Car Advice

Jaguar, Mercury top JD Power Sales Satisfaction Index

By Tim Beissmann |

Jaguar has been awarded the highest honour by JD Power and Associates in its 2009 Sales Satisfaction Index study.

The study is a comprehensive analysis of the new vehicle purchase experience with overall customer satisfaction measured against five factors: dealership facility, salesperson, paperwork/finance process, delivery process and vehicle price.

Jaguar was awarded 898 out of a possible 1000 points in the Luxury Brands segment, taking the title for the second consecutive year and performing well in the salesperson and paperwork/finance process factors.

Cadillac was next on 893 points with Lexus and Mercedes-Benz (both 877) making up a tight podium and Jaguar’s sister-company Land Rover in fifth on 872.

2011_cadillac_cts-coupe_07

Jaguar Land Rover North America President, Gary Temple, said his dealers deserved all the praise for the result.

“The top goals of this organisation are to deliver world-class quality products to our customers with a world-class dealership sales and service experience.

“These high rankings out of 37 brands in the industry coupled with recent dependability and customer service accolades show all of our efforts towards these goals are paying off,” he said.

In the Mass Market Brands segment Mercury was awarded top spot with 867 points, narrowly beating home Smart (865) and Buick and Pontiac (864).

2010-Mercury-Milan-Hybrid2

Mitsubishi was by far the lowest ranked brand on 778 – 54 points below the industry average – while Audi made up the rear in the luxury segment.

JD Power director of automotive research, Jon Osborn, said despite an improvement of 12 percent over 2008, the effects of the difficult economic climate were evident.

“In this difficult economy, dealerships are working particularly hard to close sales, but need to be attentive to customers without exerting unwanted sales pressure.

“Nearly one in four buyers in 2009 reports experiencing sales pressure from their selling dealer,” he said.

used-car-salesman

Osborn said that customer service and the buying experience were commonly overlooked by car manufacturers.

“With the billions of dollars that automakers spend designing, producing and marketing new vehicles, as well as in driving customers to showrooms, it is critical that potential buyers are not pushed out the dealer’s door because of a poor customer experience.

“Manufacturers and dealers should be concerned with the experiences of all shoppers, whether they purchase or not.

“From a buyer’s perspective, recollections of their shopping experience include not only the selling dealer, but also all of the other dealers they visited,” he said.

Of the 38 brands included in the study, 29 improved over 2008.

42-15641263

The study also found that, on average, new car buyers shop at fewer than three dealerships, and 49 percent visit only the dealer from which they purchase.

Satisfaction scores among buyers who visited only the selling dealer (848, on average) were considerably higher than those of customers who visited more than one dealer (826).

Customers who had a particularly satisfying experience at the first dealer they visited were less likely to shop at other dealers.


 
  • Peter

    As much as I love jaggy, I have to point out that this survey is peculiar to the US, and it is for the sales process. Jag is aggressively expanding in that market, where the cars are substantially less than they cost here (eg XFR approx $80K US against $220K here), and I think they are trying to get a good market for the XJ. That said, my experience of Jag Oz in sales was OK (depends on the dealer and I shopped around by fone, results pedestrian to brilliant, and I voted with my $$), and service has been excellent.

    • Baddass

      Just out of interest Pete, does the ‘handshake’ gear selector on your XF still seem fresh? Is it starting to annoy you, or seem old? I ask this because motoring journos give mixed reviews of this feature, ranging from ‘still exciting and cool’ to ‘getting boring’ and ‘a hopeless gimmick’. Your response is appreciated.

      • Peter

        Yeah, I never thought any of that was exciting. With Jag having a bad rep for electrics, I thought that all of the handshake” was just problems waiting to happen, and I’d probably have been happier without it. That said, it is pretty impressive to passengers, and it is pretty at night. I think you can turn it off, but I havent read the manual. When it comes down to it, though, the low profile of the gear selector and the absence of buttons (most functions are in the touchscreen) makes the interior uncluttered and seem a lot bigger (say) than a benz or beemer. In fact, they look pretty primative (sp?) inside compared to the Jag, and this was something I didnt expect when I bought it (I bought it on impulse because the outside looked sweet, and the ride was great – I actually didnt get to love the interior until after I had taken delivery). So now the answer to your question is that I was never excited by the rising knob, but I think it is an elegant way to keep nice simple lines in the front, so I cant imagine it any other way. It looks much better than (say) the XK interior with the traditional stick. If I was to describe it, I would say “functional”. I think anyone who says “gimmick” hasnt thought enough about the alternatives. Still thinking, eh? I bet you can hear that supercharger in your dreams…new speed measures in QLD just announced, and I’m really thinking I am better off with that slow slow V8…