Toyota planning Celica GT-Four revival?
4 Feb, 2008
31 Comments 
It is already widely known that Toyota and Subaru have been collaborating to produce a boxer-powered spiritual successor to the cult-classic AE86 rear-drive Corolla Sprinter of the 1980s. Now the rumours are extending to a resurrection of the all-wheel-drive Celica GT-Four.
Current speculation indicates the next-generation GT-Four could feature an STi-spec 224kW turbocharged boxer engine coupled with the standard AWD setup.
Accompanying the GT-Four model Celica will also be a cheaper GT model which would confirm earlier reports of an AE86 revival, featuring a naturally aspirated 2.0-litre engine and rear-wheel drive with a price target under US$20,000.
To avoid competing with the current Impreza range, both the GT and high-performance GT-Four models with be available as either a coupe or three-door hatch.
This will be the second joint effort between the brands since Toyota bought a stake in Subaru early last year, and will certainly help reinvent Toyota’s reputation as a performance car brand, something it has not been seen as since the days of the Supra.
Source: MotorAuthority
Location: Home / Subaru, Toyota / ...
Rate Post: 
(1 votes, average: 5 out of 5)
Loading ...
-
Print it:
February 4th, 2008 at 4:53 pm
Please, please, please make this car.
The AE86 was so much fun to drive, and the GT-Four was just insane. Make it happen.
(Report)
February 4th, 2008 at 5:23 pm
As long as it doesnt look like that supra shoehorn concept
(Report)
February 4th, 2008 at 5:37 pm
Build it, get it out the door ASAP, and have it a year or two old when my HSV is paid for please Toyota
(Report)
February 4th, 2008 at 5:38 pm
If Toyota going to re-introduce the Celica.. they better do it before the new Hyundai coupe is released..
Since Toyota axed the silly car; the Hyundai S Coupe and Tiburon has become one of the more popular medium sized sports coupes around and the new Genesis coupe looks to be even more so
(Report)
February 4th, 2008 at 5:39 pm
sounds like an identity crisis in the making. It wont be heart and soul (solely) Toyota
(Report)
February 4th, 2008 at 5:53 pm
Wheelnut the Tiburon is not even in the same ballpark as the Celica and on the other hand, the Genesis is in a completely different ballpark. Would be a good move by Toyota I think, enhance their image and making a killing in sales at the same time.
(Report)
February 4th, 2008 at 6:04 pm
A boxer-engined car with a Toyota badge is unthinkable, there wouldn’t be a drunk enough marketing guru in the Ginza to dream that one up. But a GT-Four revival isn’t that silly, provided that it was a better-looking effort than the earlier series of pigs.
(Report)
February 4th, 2008 at 6:07 pm
I know that…. However; my point was that the Celica was the iconic sports car of its kind yet since it’s been gone there are a number of other cars which; when the celica was available wasn’t considered to be a rival yet since than have improved in terms of design reliability and performance etc - the Hyundai is one example.
Therefore inorder to regain its cult status the new celica will have to be something special to set it apart from the rest..
as during that time some former Celica fans may have become Hyundai fans
(Report)
February 4th, 2008 at 6:22 pm
The last Celica used a Yamaha tuned engine am I right? So using a Subaru engine isn’t that far fetched
It doesn’t matter to me at the end of the day what goes in, so long its a great good cheap zippy car, i’ll buy one 
(Report)
February 4th, 2008 at 7:22 pm
Supercujo..talking bout the AE86, more Japanse car makers should introduce small affordable RWD cars/hatches. Theres the BMW 1 series, but who would want to pay that much for such an ugly car. An RWD Corrola, Mazda 3 or Pulsar perhaps (bring back the Gtir as well btw!!).
(Report)
February 4th, 2008 at 7:33 pm
I agree with Captain Mainwaring, the car would have to be unbelievably head and shoulders above competitors offerings otherwise it would be laughed out of the park for being a Subaru engine in a Toyota.
Toyota haven’t made a decent sports car in years and this one doesn’t look like it would be a sales success, just how is a salesman going to explain that Toyota is using a Subaru engine? Most buyers would just think, “may as well buy a Subaru”.
Toyota’s previous use of a Yamaha engine is a completely different proposition. Yamaha don’t sell cars and are also a highly respected engine designer, and in spite of all this Toyota didn’t exactly scream and point about the engine’s origin when the last Celica was released.
(Report)
February 4th, 2008 at 9:00 pm
TP………………………….spot on dude. I dont’t need to point out the obvious, as you summed up well.
Like I said Celica is hot and with GT4 turbo it will only get more sales.
(Report)
February 4th, 2008 at 9:44 pm
The Audi A3 1.8T uses the same engine as my Golf GT, what’s the difference? VAG owns Audi, Toyota owns a portion of Subaru, bla bla. And that’s just one of a dozen examples of crossbred cars these days.
(Report)
February 4th, 2008 at 9:45 pm
Sorry, I meant to say Golf GTI above.
(Report)
February 4th, 2008 at 10:00 pm
I would not underestimate this car until it’s built. Good on Toyota for finally deciding to build a new sports turbo 4, it’s about time. Even if they did have to go to Subaru for the motor (and possibly AWD).
While they’re at it, a new Supra please. And AE86 - or just a turbo RWD Corolla
(Report)
February 5th, 2008 at 3:26 am
This is just one of the “shelved” concept I was talking about.
I was a fan of the early 1990s GT4 as well as the AE86.
But just a tid bit, the price of $20,000 USD (under), well thats just for the U.S. The last celica sold here for around 25K US, it sold for almost around 55K in Oz.
Point is, if it does goes to production and it makes Oz (the GT RWD NA engine), roughly 110-120kW. It will cost 35k+.
And a tid bit on the Hyundai, yes the new Genesis looks good, especially thr RWD format, but a concept spec and a production spec is very different, theres going to be a lot of things not going to make production to keep it a viable sports car under the “Hyndai/genesis” name.
(Report)
February 5th, 2008 at 7:06 am
Van I think you overestimate Toyota’s influence on Subaru. I remember reading a news article a few years back in which GM had asked Subaru for permission to use their AWD technology and boxer engine in a car. Subaru freaked out saying “no” and killed that concept quick smart.
Just a few years later GM sold their entire stake in Subaru realising they weren’t gonna get a hold of Subaru’s technology. Back then GM owned 20% of Fuji Heavy Industries. Today Toyota owns only 8.7%, hardly a big enough stake to throw your weight around.
(Report)
February 5th, 2008 at 9:28 am
Jason - Perhaps there would be buyers that want Subaru performance without the boy-racer image?
This is where I’d imagine this new car would sit.
(Report)
February 5th, 2008 at 12:20 pm
PRAISE BE!!
The perfect combination! Not a fugly Subaru and Not a piss poor Toyota Motor and Drivetrain
Toyota shell design and Suby under the hood and floorplan = a match made in automative heaven!
(Report)
February 5th, 2008 at 12:32 pm
Looks promising…
(Report)
February 5th, 2008 at 3:11 pm
Current Celica looks CRAP!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
(Report)
February 5th, 2008 at 3:31 pm
^^^ There is no such thing as a current Celica…
(Report)
February 5th, 2008 at 5:16 pm
Duck,
I reckon the latest Celica (which is getting on now) looked good, ’specially up front.
Highly Unique and simple stylish lines. Previous models that looked like a shortened fat jag were a different story…
(Report)
February 5th, 2008 at 5:53 pm
Another Fuglier Celica. The only decent Celica was the TA22 and the only classic model Toyota has ever produced i.e worth restoring. Everything else they have made goes straight to the tip.
TP your’ve got your Toyota coloured glasses on again.
Toyota is better than Tiburon in your opinion you sad moron.
Did Daddy give you the keys to the Widebody last weekend.
Soylent green of the automotive world. Half arse offerings because morons like TP continue to buy whatever bland crap they dish out.
(Report)
February 5th, 2008 at 6:02 pm
Firstly real cars you twat, there are no pics on here of the new Celica, so your initial comment makes no sense… clearly just here to attack anything Toyota… certainly the AE86 pics which circulated looked very good.
Secondly you are an idiot, you would have to be braindead to think a Tiburon, FWD 140kw trash, would be better then an AWD 150kwish Celica… absolutely braindead. The Tiburon looks alrite now but its still gutless and its still a hyundai.
Lastly, yes Toyota are all bland and offer nothing… yet are the most popular vehicles in the world. You are yet another idiot here who is clueless.
Neeeeeeeeeext…
(Report)
February 5th, 2008 at 6:16 pm
Yes TP, march off the cliff with all the other Toyota loving Lemmings.
Accept whatever they offer without question.
I have known some Toyota tragics in my time but you take the cake my friend. Can you name the ugliest Toyota model of all time. No I thought not to many to choose from eh including Celica.
(Report)
February 5th, 2008 at 6:44 pm
I meant the latest Celica.
(Report)
February 5th, 2008 at 6:52 pm
The ta22 sure was sweet ride.
(Report)
February 5th, 2008 at 6:58 pm
Yeah I agree,the last Celica as pictured was fugly. I nearly bought a ta22 years ago. That was a classic they have been unable to emulate since. I reckon a new retro version in the same vain as the Mini or latest Stang would be nice if done properly.
(Report)
July 14th, 2008 at 5:08 am
I’d take a Celica over any of the damned retarded looking Hyundai’s.
(Report)
July 22nd, 2008 at 12:01 am
Always had a celica, and have been hanging out for years for a funky new model, with the same space, performance but better economy than the 2000 model. not asking too much am I?
(Report)