Toyota Rukus vs KIA Soul | Car Advice

Car Advice

Toyota Rukus vs KIA Soul

By Alborz Fallah |

Toyota Rukus vs KIA Soul

Being a product planner for a major car manufacturer is a tough gig. You need to know what your market wants and almost predict future trends in consumer demand. Some models do surprisingly well in one country and bomb completely in another. Sometimes manufacturers create cars for a market which doesn’t exist yet, in the hope of creating demand by doing so. In the case of the Toyota Rukus and Kia Soul, the verdict is still out in Australia.

Here are two cars that are relatively unique in their design, which in this day and age of car design, is rather unusual. They both look like a box on wheels and they are both meant to appeal to the younger crowd and build up brand kudos.

Late last year I spent an entire month with a Toyota Rukus and a week with a Kia Soul. So let’s find out what makes one more appealing than the other and to whom exactly.

If the manufacturers had their way, you’re supposed to buy one of these two if you wanted a ‘cool cruising car’ that could be easily modified with more bling and maybe even a paint job. Despite the best efforts of both Kia and Toyota Australia, I am yet to see a single modified Soul or Rukus.

In fact, seeing a stock standard Rukus or Soul on the road is unique in itself. Toyota managed to convince just 1,089 people to buy a Rukus last year (it went on sale in late May), well below its expectations of around 300 per month.

Meanwhile, the Koreans did even worse. Only 387 buyers signed the dotted line for a Soul in the whole of 2010. So out of the one million plus cars sold here last year, only 1,476 people went for one of these two. That represents a not-so-staggering 0.14 percent of the market.

So are we all just sheep? Do we shun cars that are a little strange looking and pick a safe bet? Or have both manufacturers really missed the mark? It’s hard to say. Both the Rukus and Soul represent great choices for certain people. The question still remains though, how many of those “certain people” live in Australia?

Engines and performance

Toyota Rukus Kia Soul
Engine 2.4L petrol 1.6 PETROL | 1.6 TURBO DIESEL 4
Maximum power 123kW @ 6000rpm 91 kW | 95 kW
Maximum torque 224Nm @ 4000rpm 156 Nm | 260 Nm
Transmission Four-speed auto Five-speed Man or four-speed auto
Acceleration 0-100km/h Not provided Not provided.

Herein lies perhaps both model’s biggest setback. Australians love to modify their cars, but it’s not all about looks. We want some ‘go’ to go with it too. The modification scene is more about fast cars than about cruisers in Australia. Does anyone remember when having a Hummer H3 was ‘cool’? Big wheels were put on and stereos were modified. That went out of fashion rather quickly (it didn’t help that Hummer went out of business either).

The Kia Soul is powered by either a 1.6L petrol (91 kW – 156 Nm) or diesel (94 Kw – 260 Nm). Both engines are available with a 5-speed manual or 4-speed automatic.

Toyota’s Rukus uses a 2.4-litre four-cylinder engine (123kW and 224Nm) mated to a 4-speed auto (no manual option). At this point, I suspect I am meant to get excited about those performance figures. But it’s rather hard.

No doubt neither of these cars are meant to be performance cars in any shape or form, but if they are supposed to appeal to the young savvy buyer who wants something unique to express his or her individuality, then perhaps both manufacturers need to realise that a 4-speed automatic really isn’t the go these days if you’re marketing a niche product.

In Kia’s case the 1.6-litre diesel is actually a rather good engine. With 260 Nm of torque, the Soul+ is a pretty nifty little thing and can get around town and on the highway with ease. The five-speed manual would be my pick but the four-speed auto still manages to do okay. KIA has updated the MY11 model’s auto-transmission by adding sportsmatic shift. Handling wise the Soul has it over the Rukus thanks to its slightly smaller size and better dynamics.

The Rukus offers reasonable acceleration despite its four-speed automatic. Although it’s based on the Corolla and RAV4 platform, it’s got the worst handling dynamics of the three (after all, it’s a box on wheels). It gets along the city well enough and doesn’t struggle too much on the occasional highway overtaking manoeuvre, but the inclusion of a six-speed auto and perhaps a V6 engine may have given the model a little more character.

Fuel consumption

Toyota Rukus Kia Soul | Petrol A | Diesel | A
Fuel tank capacity 55 litres 48 litres
Theoretical range (based on combined cycle fuel consumption) 625 km 685 | 813 km
Fuel type Unleaded (91RN) Unleaded (91RN) | Diesel
Combined cycle fuel consumption 8.8 litres/100km 7 | 5.9 litres/100km
Carbon dioxide emissions 208 g/km 167 | 155 g/km

With both vehicles using four-speed automatics, you would think that fuel economy figures wouldn’t be all that pretty. In Kia’s case though, it’s diesel engine is a standout performer and manages to return an impressive fuel economy of just 5.2L/100km for the manual or 5.9 for the automatic. To put that into perspective, it beats the Toyota Camry Hybrid (6L/100km). The petrol 1.6-litre isn’t all that bad either, returning figures of 6.5L/100km in manual form or 7L/100km for the automatic. The Soul has a kerb weight of between 1254 – 1,364kg.

The Toyota Rukus isn’t as frugal. Weighing between 1,390 – 1,420 kg it’s a little heavier, but even so, comparing the top-spec diesel automatic Soul (1,364 kg) to the lightest Rukus (1,390 kg), the Big T uses 2.7 more litres of fuel per 100km. So that makes its official figure 8.8L/100km. It’s fair to point out that the Rukus does offer more storage capacity.

A six-speed automatic (or even manual) would bring both car’s fuel economy figures down by a good 15 percent.

Exterior and dimensions

Toyota Rukus Kia Soul
Length (mm) 4260 4,105
Width (mm) 1760 1,785
Height (mm) 1645 1,610
Weight (kg) 1,390 – 1,420 1370kg

As you can see, the Soul is marginally smaller than the Rukus and its more rounded design makes it look a little more welcoming. Both of these cars require a special kind of love to appease their buyer.

Although looks are totally subjective, the Soul is the better looker as far as this reviewer is concerned. The Rukus is not lacking in the looks department, but when put next to a Soul it does tend to a look a little dated (even though it’s newer to the Australian market).

The Rukus looks more substantial on the road and if you buy it some bigger wheels and seriously dark tint (and maybe a bodykit and paintjob?), it could look rather mean. The Soul is less likely to look mean, it perhaps looks best when painted in the company colours and optioned with some nicer wheels.

There are two different Soul models now for 2011 (used to be three). The basic Soul comes with 15-inch steel wheels (great if you intend to replace them straight away), upgrade to the Soul+ and you’ll get 16-inch alloy wheels. Both variants can be optioned with 18-inch official KIA wheels, although you’d be better of getting third party 18-inch alloys fitted instead.

The Toyota Rukus is available in three variants. Build 1, 2 and 3. All three get 16-inch alloys wheels and look identical nearly from the outside.

Interior and equipment

Toyota Rukus Kia Soul
Luggage Space (rear seats up) (L) 310 340

From the inside both the Rukus and Soul offer a reasonably modern interior that is modification friendly. You can fit as many TV screens as you want but if you that’s not your style, there is plenty to be happy about already.

The base model Rukus offers six speakers, Bluetooth™ hands-free telephone and audio streaming, USB and 3.5mm audio input and a CD player. There is no Sat-nav option but you can replace the unit pretty easily as it’s not built into the dash. Bluetooth audio streaming works perfectly with an iPhone 3G/S/4 as tested.

Simply turn the car on and it will automatically sync up and begin playing the last song in your iPhone’s iPod.

The Soul fails to provide Bluetooth connectivity, phone or audio streaming. However it does come with a 6-speaker audio system that can play your iPod/iPhone (straight plug in with native support) and also take MP3 files from a USB drive. So over all, not that bad, but Bluetooth audio streaming would’ve been nice.

There is a ridiculous amount of room inside the Rukus, given its boxy shape there is so much head room infront of you that you’d think you were outside. It’s very roomy and perfect for long distance drives if that’s on the agenda.

The Soul is relatively similar but slightly smaller inside. Both models have a heap of room to carry things in. I used my Rukus test car to move a large coffee table that many weeks later would no longer fit into a big SUV. So with the rear seats folded down both cars can act like vans.

Safety

The Rukus and Soul both offer comprehensive safety packages with six-airbags and stability control across the entire range as standard features.

Warranty & servicing

Toyota Rukus Kia Soul
Vehicle warranty Three years/100,000km Five years/130,000km
Service intervals 12 months/15,000km 12 months/15,000km

Kia offers the more substantial warranty with five years or 130,000km. The Big T will give three years or 100,000km. Both cars need a service every 12 months or 15,000km.

Conclusion:

So then, who would these cars be best suited to? The Toyota Rukus and the Kia Soul are both niche cars that attract a minor audience that is relatively picky. It will be interesting to see if the next generation of these vehicles will make it to Australia given their currently low volume uptake.

They are meant to act as branding ambassador cars for the two brands. Both companies hope to attract a younger audience with these models. Kia doesn’t have too many issues given it’s already appealing to the younger crowd but Toyota on the other hand is yet to prove it’s powers of persuasion towards Gen Ys with the Rukus.

To throw a spanner in the works, the Nissan Cube, which is not officially sold in Australia is being privately imported on a more and more popular basis. That may be worth a consideration if these two don’t tick the boxes and you’re not concerned about warranty.

Nissan Australia is not planning on importing the Cube in the near future as the segment is not that feasible and it already has more successful brand ambassadors like the GT-R and 370z.

The choice between these two isn’t all that hard really. The harder choice is to actually deciding to buy either of them in the first place. They both offer ample room and a funky unique character. Both would be perfect for exterior and interior modification but lack that real potential to make it to the underground mod-scene. A little more power and a better automatic gearbox would probably fix that.

The Kia Soul is noticeably cheaper as well, starting from just $20,990. The cheapest Rukus is $27,490. Although, when you compare apples with apples, the range topping Kia Soul+ Diesel automatic is $28,690. Its equivalent in the Toyota range (although petrol) is $29,990 for the Build 2. If you want a sunroof that will add an extra $1,800 to the price.

The KIA Soul is the car for you if:

  • You have fuel efficiency and low emissions among your top priorities
  • You are not all that concerned about brand prejudice
  • You need a funky looking box on wheels
  • You can live without satellite navigation, Bluetooth support
  • You have a tighter budget
  • You’re after a diesel

The Toyota Rukus is the car for you if:

  • You want a super-practical car that has serious potential to be ‘cool’
  • You love your music and have a Bluetooth audio-streaming capable phone (e.g. iPhone)
  • You don’t mind paying a little more for the Toyota badge
  • You can live with an outdated four-speed automatic
  • Petrol is good enough
  • You drive long distances or move a lot of big things (e.g. furniture)

Further reading:


 
  • Captain Nemo

    I have yet to see a Ruckus & only seen 1 Soul and it had been converted to carry a wheelchair in the back.

    BTW minor typo on the Ruckus engine size 1339cc though it was 2.4L.

    • Ima Hogg

      I’ve seen 3 rukus’ and 1 Soul. 3 out of the toyota’s where being driven by middle aged women, the soul was a buisness car. Also the boot of the soul remindes me of a peice of bread.

      Personaly I would have the Rukus because of the looks and the 2.4l engine.

      • HmmSquare

        Saldy seen more nissan cubes on the road then both of these cars

  • jumbo

    The problem with these cars is they are just so boring. I read about a quarter of the article and got bored so I gave up.

  • Darcy Dunbar

    Yoy say “…The KIA Soul is the car for you if:…You’re after a diesel and can drive manual”

    The Soul is also available as a 4-speed auto diesel.

    • john

      Yes that is true, but the five speed manual is better but you can take the auto if you wish.

  • Hung Low

    They probably do not sell well because they are priced too high. Something risky in design as these need more of an enticement for sales.

    Soul -$17990 on road
    Rukus – $19990 on road

    May stray a few potential Corolla or Cerato buyers to have a look and take a risk!

  • Alister

    I am different obviously as i like both these cars, but would pick the Toyota. I know they arnt drivers cars by any means and they are probably the least inspiring thing to drive this side of a mack truck, but the individuality factor is quite appealing

  • Martin

    I’d choose the Soul. Diesel + anual, yes please!

    • Martin

      That’d be, Manual*

      • SC

        No, Martin I think your incorrect. It looks as if
        the word accidentally got the letter “U” placed in it.

        • Pinky

          SC thats the funniest thing i read all year!
          i think these cars appeal to a market that likes that sort of activity!

          • Martin

            Small things amuse small minds. Anal jokes really? Wasn’t aware I was back in school.

  • Andrew

    Trying to decide which of these two is more appealing is like trying to decide whether you’d rather be hanged or electrocuted… they are both just awful.

  • Anton

    I am 1 of the 387 that bought the Kia Soul. Mine is a red Soul 3, inside and out. Drives ok, but lots of looks from people on the road and lots of questions ask from strangers. Drive my cousins M3 and no one cares. It different and unique and thats the way I like it, the less Soul I see on the road the better. It not a Corrolla, and that’s the way I like it.

    • Reckless1

      Mate, you could buy anything other than a Corolla and it would not be a Corolla – or did that fact escape you?

      If I only had $20k to spend on a car, I’d rather have a 10 year old Audi S3, then I’d at least have a decent car.

      • Ivory

        Each to their own, I agree with Anton I rather stand out than be like all the rest, it’s great,… I hope no else buys them so I can be one of the very few who owns a soul! Lmao

  • Dwnzi

    Toyota is better IMO. Not feeling the other thing at all.

  • katyperry

    kia looks better,

    “They both look like a box on wheels and they are both meant to appeal to the younger crowd and build up brand kudos.” who ever from kia/toyota f*king said that is f’ed in the head.

    i didn’t study marketing but…god the sales results were going to be too obvious???

  • bangel

    When did the circus arrive , clown cars for cretins .

  • carl

    Nissan is wrong not to bring the Cube, their Tiida and the maxima basically fail in the segment and the new micra is worst than the old models. Cube should will take on well in both the small and medium segment.

  • Morpheus

    You forgot to mention …

    The KIA and Toyota are the cars for you if
    1) You have lost your “nads” in an industrial accident
    2) You have lost the will to live

    Seriously though, I remember the quote from the “Dream Team” movie a while ago – ” Volvo – it’s boxy but it’s good” – Sadly, neither is good and in this setting boxy = butt ugly… Cars from the garage of Ray Charles

  • darkone

    the kia soul is good for kids and running around town,looks like there is more room in these cars than a small hatch costing around the same as the soul,the toyota is just too overpriced for what it is,the market they are aiming at can get a second hand skyline or evo for that kind of cash

  • Nowhere

    Kia in My Opinions. Offers so much more:
    Petrol and Diesel choice
    Better fuel Economy + green
    Manual and automatic choice (and a better gearbox i think)
    Smaller size but bigger storage 340 vs 310
    Better warrenty
    Cheaper
    doesnt drive like a box

    No offence but the only reason I would buy Rukus would be because of the badge.

    If i wanted to mod the car, I would get something else.

  • http://fiat bill

    Ideal vehicles for misguided menopausal women who think they they are cool.

  • http://CarAdvice The Salesman

    Box shaped cars have never faired well in Australia, and Kia knew this. Soul was released during the Australian Tennis Open as a ‘Brand Recognition Car’
    Intended only to turn peoples heads and get them talking about Kia, its seems the mission is accomplished.
    The initial release, Kia only brought in 400 units for Australia.
    In America, Soul and Ruckus enjoy a type of cult following. Youtube ‘Kia Soul Ad’ for a bit of a laugh. These rapping hamsters won many awards for marketing in the US.
    Of course, Kia and Toyota would have liked to create a new market in Australia, obviously we are (Aussies) not quite ready for it yet.

  • Realcars

    The Soul is the pick as it is young,funky and affordable and offers room with good economy especially in the diesel. All these factors work together.

    Rukus is an attempt to cash in on this market possibly prompted by the inception of the Soul.

    Toyota at it again with their one size fits all centre speedo dash.Compromises such as this and they still ask top dollar!

    Go Kia for staying true to the mission statement!

    • Tomas79

      Funny, that the Toyota Rukus was released before the Kia Soul, toolbox!

      • http://CarAdvice The Salesman

        Soul was released before Rukus.

        • new owner

          the ruckus was originally released as the Scion Xb in Japan well before the Kia soul was ever released.

          The Kia soul did get released in Australia first

  • Realcars

    Subjectively compare a Cerato with a Corolla and again u can see Kia is trying and Toyota is resting on it’s laurels.

  • Jacob Martyn

    Another way to avoid being a sheep is to rent, instead of becoming a mortgage-slave.

  • TheDedicatedOnanist

    These “innovative” designs fail on so many levels, only appealing to people who see themselves as incredibly zany individuals.
    Both of these wheeled clothes dryers make the PT Cruiser look cutting edge.

  • Jonno Smith

    Bread-box cars are doomed to fail like MPV (Honda Odyssey, Toyota Tarago & Mitsubishi Grandis) in Australia! In the US & Japan, those Bread-box cars are highly popular with young drivers \’cos customizing them doesn\’t cost them the earth unlike here in Australia. Also in the US, the Scion Xb as they call the Ruckus there, are often modified with extreme stance like zero-offset or low offset wheels which protrude beyond wheel wells and this would be deemed illegal (both legislation and insurance-wise) in Australia. Often, a lot of things that they do in the US or even Japan to their cars are often either illegal or expensive to do here in Australia. The other issue here is that those cars (Soul & Ruckus) are priced quite out of reach for young Aussie drivers ie, &25k upwards for the Soul and a bit more for the Ruckus. Price-point for cars targeted at young drivers should be around $20k.
    The Australian car market is quite easy to define as 2 distinct markets: first, Passenger cars (hatchback & sedan)-light, small, medium and large + luxury car sub-segment (Audi, BMW, Lexus & MB); and second, SUVs, 4WDs and 2WD Crossovers + luxury SUVs sub-segment. Australians tend to be conservative by nature, outdoor & adventurous in their lifestyle and in reflects in their vehicle choices. Multi-Purpose Vehicles (7-8 seater vehicles) have failed miserably in Australia whereas they are very popular elsewhere in the world. Why? maybe Aussies see them too much as commercial van-like while 7 seater SUVs sold better due to Aussie\’s love for SUVs/4Wds. Go figure!

  • Blitzkrieg

    Thats one ugly hard,cheap blank dash in front of the driver.Why do toyota ruin thier cars like that?Probably another reason why they can’t sell any.

  • Ivory

    To all the haters out there, each to their own. It does come down to personal preference. I love both these boxy cars, definitely a head turner. Agree with Anton “different and unquie” and stands out from all the rest, just the way I like it. I already own a Pt cruiser and just ordered the Kia soul ,the newest member of my family!!

  • ruckus owner

    I’ve had a Ruckus for a bit over 3 months now, and i think it is awesome!

    I was instantly attracted to the looks of it, i really liked that it was a bit different.

    After looking around, i really didn’t like the Kia Soul (personal preference), so we decided to look at range of other cars.

    I agree that if they are aiming it at teenagers, the price is a little high, but compared to cars of similar prices, the Ruckus has more features, more head and legroom and was a lot more comfortable to drive than a lot of other cars.

    The centre dash is not an issue, it is right in a viewing sweet spot, and i really like the digital speedo.

    I ended up going for a build 3 because i wanted the sunroof, but the audio system (same as build 2) is pretty good for a factory system.

    I understand that not everyone will like the way it looks, but it is a great car, and even the people like my dad who didn’t like the looks to begin with, have said that the more they see it, the more they like the look of it.

  • Soul

    Firstly, I really liked this article, thanks for the comparison!
    I’m in the market for a new car and had been looking at the mid-range i30 with some options, until a friend recommended I consider the Soul. It’s not that I think it’s a really ‘cool’ car – if anything, it’s a little silly – but I’ve had sensible cars for long enough that the Soul makes me think it would add a bit of humour to the day.
    Also, I’m not a menopausal woman – yet… Give me 30 years.

  • Ita

    I have a Land Rover Discovery 3 Diesel. Purchased a Soul petrol last week and I am using it more than the D3. Bluetooth is fitted.

  • Ozigoo

    Great article, I am looking at present to buy a second hand one of these mainly for the space inside, there both so roomy, Im big and tall and most cars these days are so “aerodynamic” that it just feels so cramped inside. Ive looked and driven both and both have their pros and cons. The Toyota imo looks more Hotrod’ish with smooth lines where as the Kia looks more SUV’ish with its higher stance and black plastic bits. The Toyota imo looks and feels better inside with nicer design and trim and has standard bluetooth and cruze control.The Kia wins hands down on economy as Im looking at the TDI and looks like handling may even be a bit better. I have read road noise is a problem on the Kia…If the Kia had the Toyota rear end it would make my decision easier because I just hate those pillar style electrics on cars..But I do like the economy of the TDI…but I do like the style of the Toyota…..ahhhhhhh

  • James

    Exactly Same, Only difference is ones Kia and the other ones Toyota, Also one is Bigger.

  • http://profile.yahoo.com/WHH3MNMAV55WITWNZ4EXZXOOYU Joke R

    …I’d rather get a GTR.