Cadillac CTS-V Review & Road Test | Car Advice

Car Advice

Cadillac CTS-V Review & Road Test

By Mark Hacking |

Cadillac CTS-V Review

American Muscle Car in a Ralph Lauren Sports Jacket

Monticello, NY—My first encounter with the second-generation Cadillac CTS-V was a bit underwhelming. The occasion was a Car of the Year competition two years ago and the then-brand new saloon was in tough competition against the BMW M3, Jaguar XF Supercharged, Lexus IS-F, Mercedes C63 AMG and Nissan GT-R. (That was one of the great ones for new sports cars!)

During part of the evaluation, each car was thrashed around a handling circuit an airport runway. Now, make no mistake—the competition that day was fierce. But the course, with its serpentine turns, very sharp corners and relatively low speeds, did not suit the CTS-V at all. In fact, in a slalom-like section, the steering on the saloon was too slow to react; it actually felt like it was binding up as the car transitioned from extreme left to extreme right and then back again.

To make matters worse, the Cadillac was not running, as intended. Warning lights struck the instrument panel and the car’s vaunted 6.2-litre supercharged V8 felt down on power. The CTS-V is advertised as having a 0-100 km/h time of 3.9 seconds, but performance testing at the same competition revealed a saloon capable of only 4.9-second runs—a big difference. Posting such a mild performance and faced with serious competition, the Cadillac finished a lowly fifth out of the six contenders, bettering only the Jaguar in the process.

Fast forward one year and it was time for a return engagement with the CTS-V. On this occasion, it was a track session at the Monticello Motor Club in upstate New York, a private country club with the main attraction being a challenging, 20-turn ribbon of pavement. The track has an agreement with Cadillac, so a fleet of CTS-V saloons is available for club members to use.

The configuration of the full layout is incredibly challenging; there are turns of various degrees and angles and three long straight sections that are well-suited to 415-kW vehicles. It’s also worth noting that Monticello has nothing that resembles a slalom course, so it’s very much a track tailor-made for the characteristics of this particular saloon.

In this setting, the full impact of the CTS-V could be felt—its thunderous acceleration, its tremendous reserves of power, its grin-inducing ability to power slide around turns with reckless abandon. Not only does the Cadillac boast the aforementioned 415 kW of power, its gargantuan engine also cranks out 747 Nm of torque. (The engine, based on that of the Corvette C6 ZR1, employs a supercharger set to 0.6 bar of boost; this turbine is fed by air that is cooled by a water-to-air intercooler.)

Normally, this level of output in a rear-wheel drive saloon would spell trouble, but the Cadillac is very balanced and controllable, no doubt partially due to its limited-slip rear differential. Further levels of control arrive via the car’s magnetic ride control, with dampers that automatically adjust every millisecond, augmenting the handling of the independent suspension system.

The second-generation CTS-V is available with either a 6-speed manual or 6-speed automatic transmission. In testing, the automatic is faster to 100 km/h, but proved largely unrefined when it came to being in the right gear at the right time, especially when negotiating turns. In terms of sheer fun, there’s no question that the manual is the superior choice; it’s a short-throw set-up that is perfectly suited to the nature of the car and the potential of the engine.

On the topic of the steering, the flowing nature of the track served to prove that the CTS-V might not be able to handle the tight stuff, but it can certainly deal with higher-speed corners. The steering is nicely weighted and direct and offers a decent amount of feedback. The driver is further supported by leather-and-suede seats, which are contoured, but not quite ready for extreme track action. The optional Recaro sport seats are recommended.

Speaking of being ready for the track, the Cadillac comes standard with Brembo brakes and 19-inch wheels, so the braking on traction issues are pretty much under control. In cranking out many laps of the Monticello circuit, the CTS-V was remarkably consistent in both. In fact, as the laps were counted off, the saloon was easily able to support faster driving and deeper braking as I become more accustomed to the circuit layout. Very impressive.

Inside the cabin, the Cadillac offers a nice mix of the luxury with a dose of sport mixed in. Whereas its main competitors from the German manufacturers feature largely business-like cabins, the CTS-V is cushier and offers a largely successful mix of leather and technology.

The driving position is similarly decent, although the ergonomics didn’t quite fit this driver as I found the manual shifter too close and/or the pedals too far away. (Not a huge deal as this is the same impression I get from BMWs with manual transmissions as well.)

On the comfort and luxury side, the Cadillac comes standard with adaptive xenon headlamps, a 40-GB hard drive, navigation system, Bose surround-sound audio system, USB/auxiliary audio jacks and rear park assist. The options list includes the aforementioned Recaro sport seats, a wood interior trim package and panoramic sunroof.

When the former largest automobile company in the world almost succumbed to financial difficulties in late 2008, a number of emergency cost-cutting measures were identified. One such measure was to shut down the High-Performance Vehicle Operations division, which enthusiasts worried would signal an end to cars like the CTS-V.

But the Cadillac CTS-V is very much alive and well. It’s the most exciting car ever produced by Cadillac and a genuine competitor for the heavy hitters coming out of Germany. The CTS-V is also the only true modern American muscle car in saloon form. Prices for the 2010 Cadillac CTS-V begin at a shade over US$60,000.


 
  • Scuderia

    We don’t need this Cadillac, just the engine fitted to our own home grown HSV and Holden range.

    Does look the goods though, and not a bad first up effort, give GM some time and they are really going to turn the heat up on the Euro;s as they have with the Uber Vette

    • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=503133181 Brayden Cresswell

      This looks better then any current HSV which look like a mess IMO.

      The interior is better by far.

    • The Realist

      How will Government Motors achieve that?

  • Daniel

    The sat nav screen looks like an after thought…looks as though it would block your view…unless it slides back into the dash when not in use?

    • ChopstaR87

      its does slide in to the console…

  • VT363rwkw

    I can confirm this engine gearbox combo will be in a limited edition HSV by the end of 2011
    Bye Bye GTHO, ha ha ha ha
    HSV is KING!!!!!!!

    • Joker

      LOL @ VT Troll. Do you know how much boost .6 Bar is? 8.7PSI…more than the GT will be using… in otherwords..We’re not seeing anywhere near Coyote’s max potential yet.. Watch FPV go to town on the GT-HO to ensure it goes down in History like the Phase III did. HSV will probably just drop this engine straight into the “limited edition” HSV with minor, minor changes.
      The battle is just beginning ;)

      • Shak

        Actually i just read in Top Gear today that we wont be seeing a GT-HO anytime soon, and this coming from the man who headed the Miami project. He said until htey had the budget and the demand to justify a GT-HO, they did not want to rush it and sully the most hallowed badge in Australia.

        • Baddass

          What company official would confirm a project like that? By refusing to comment it raises the hype for when it is finally released. It isn’t going to be a volume seller, so details aren’t given out prematurely.

          • Shak

            Well most companies say wait and see, but this guy came out and said not anytime soon, and not after they invested such a substantial amount into the Miami project. he said it wouldnt be just a GT with a bigger engine and brakes, but a fully tailored model, and they just dont have the resources to do that now.

          • vt363rwkw

            Mate I didnt read this is a magazine i have contacts notlike you goons, I read this in blah blah blah, you guys have not contacts like me just read mags and the net, you guys are nothing.

            This drivetrain will surface in 2011, and there will be a GTHO but this thing will fry it.

            you guys above know nothing

      • Joker

        Give it s year or two. They have the building blocks, it will happen.

        • vt363rwkw

          Thats the spirit, one day you may like women again.

  • bangel

    Another piece of irrelavant auto from Government Motors .

  • JEKYL & HYDE

    give me the messed up hsv i thinks…

  • UMWHAT

    Will this ever be sold in australia? even if it is i think the price would hit C63 territory, and i’d rather have a C63 than this

    I’d would definitely get it if it cost 60 to 70k AUD though but lets face the sad reality its not gonna happen

    • Shak

      Why would you rather have the C63?

      • UMWHAT

        mainly because of the looks..i think the cts-v looks fugly from the side and rear. i also have a feeling the C63 handles better

        • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1285962287 Declan Collins

          In all American tests the C63 has got it’s proverbial ass handed to it by this car.

  • Damian

    $60k for a CTS-V… These things should be selling in droves in the US! I don’t understand why our motoring journos always crap on about how Australia has the best value for money sports sedans, when the CTS-V costs around the same as a Commodore SS-V.

    • The Realist

      You’ll also see morons on here crow about a Ford FPV ABC G6ET being the “best value” car on the planet…

      • vt363rwkw

        you love men

    • Devil’s Advocate

      Don’t forget though Damian, the SS-V you are talking about sold for around half that in the US when it had a Pontiac badge on it. Over there, the CTS-V is about $5-6k more than a BMW M3 sedan or around $2-3k more than the coupe or an C63 AMG. So our Journos are still right, our local big sedans are still some of the best value for money cars on the planet.

      • Damian

        “Don’t forget though Damian, the SS-V you are talking about sold for around half that in the US when it had a Pontiac badge on it. Over there, the CTS-V is about $5-6k more than a BMW M3 sedan or around $2-3k more than the coupe or an C63 AMG. So our Journos are still right, our local big sedans are still some of the best value for money cars on the planet.”

        Your post seems to support my line of argument moreso than what you’re contending. I already observed that the CTS-V is a bargain, and the fact that you can get a C63 or M3 for LESS than the CTS-V, serves to further illustrate that our local sedans don’t represent as much value for money as our journos purport. Furthermore, the fact that the SS-V is sold for around $30k in the States, just highlights how Australians have been bent over by the likes of Holden, even though “Holden means a great deal to Australia”, allegedly.

        • Devil’s Advocate

          I never said we weren’t “bent over” as you put it by manufacturers, I was just highlighting that in the ‘same/equal market’ the SS-V and derivatives are still much cheaper than the CTS-V etc. No matter where you compare wrt nations that sell the Commodore, it is still cheaper than just about anything else it’s size/features etc.

          I agree, my post does in fact highlight how much we are “bent over”, however it still demonstrates the value for money our big cars represent in whatever market they are sold in regardless. Even someone who ‘dislikes’ Australia as much as Jeremy Clarkson can see past it and thinks the HSV R8 (Vauxhaul VXR8) in the UK represents tremendous value for money. He has said it publically on more than one occasion and he would like nothing more than an excuse to rubbish anything “Australian” (even though it has an American engine etc etc) ;-) .

          Whilst it doesn’t explain the whole reason why cars cost so much more here, “economy of scale” compared to a HUGE market like the US and our unique ADRs go some of the way to making them more expensive.

  • greenmatt

    “(The engine, based on that of the Corvette C6 ZR1, employs a supercharger set to 0.6 bar of boost; this turbine is fed by air that is cooled by a water-to-air intercooler.)”

    The intercooler is after the supercharger, no point cooling the air before its heated.

  • ABMPSV

    Ugly car! Lots of power but that is all. Beats C63 AMG on 3 out of 4 circuit where was tested.

    • ABMPSV

      In Germany cost 74,900 Euro ($107,200 AUD), C63 AMG is 69972 Euro ($99,960 AUD)

  • Mazinger ZZZZ

    To bad the CTS Caddy didn’t make it to Australia. I saw one of these in person last year in Athens, it looked fantastic in the flesh.

    • Ricky

      Wow, you saw ONE in Greece? I saw several dozen in the US last year.

      • Rocklord

        What’s your point?… idiot.

  • John of Perth

    Mark – in reference to your comment “…(Not a huge deal as this is the same impression I get from BMWs with manual transmissions as well.)”, which BMWs did you make this generalisation on.

    I have had absolutely no issue with my E39M5 or the M3s I have driven.

    Apart from there being a real dearth of large luxury saloons with manual gearboxes/clutch pedal here in Oz.

    • Mark

      In general, I find all of the recent BMWs with manual transmissions to be this way. Of course, this comment is particular to my frame and would be applicable only to anyone with a similar leg length to torso length to arm length ratio.

  • HSV GTS

    No thx.. I will take HSV rather than Cadillac

  • Hugh Jorgan

    Looks like GM has borrowed the Subaru ugly stick.

    • Dave S

      Subaru, have a much better ugly stick.

  • lazza

    Don’t we already build much better rear drive V8′s, do we need this?! Bring in the Opel Insignia VXR! It’s German and already in the UK as the Vauxhaull Insignia VXR – so that should tick the box for any technical business case.

    Aim it squarely at the German semi-hot sedans (i.e. R36, S4, 335i) and you should have a winner. With a nice 249Kw, 400-ish Nm of torque, Nurburgring ‘approved’ and AWD 2.8l V6 turbo that should tick the boxes of the modern day thinking consumer as opposed to the cashed up bogans this american barge is targeted at…

  • Bob

    Goodness me. What an ugly piece of American junk. A cross between a Hyundai and a Ssangyong. Sorry Ssangyong.

  • Dave S

    Greaty car, massive performance. Holden. Please bring to Australia

  • SteveSV

    Is it just me or do the wheels on this car are identical to the ones on Series II VE SS-V’s???

  • freakson

    a stock standard BF XR8 with a tune, just an engine ECU tune will keep up with stock cars that make up to 380kW at the flywheel.

    i have seen a mechanically standard BF XR8 6 speed ZF with engine tune making just under 290kW and under 550Nm keep up next to the 325kW HSV and this was very confusing and amazing! what a tune can do!

  • http://www.ghestate.com GEORGE

    Thank very much for information