Mercedes-Benz E 63 AMG Review | Car Advice

Car Advice

Mercedes-Benz E 63 AMG Review

MERCEDES-BENZ E63

Pros: Sheer brutality and take-no-prisoners performance design. Wonderful atmo V8 and superlative hi-tech transmission

Cons: Not the world’s most subtle conveyance; probably too brutal for most, at least for daily driving

By John Cadogan |
Add to shortlist

Price: $140,220 to $214,920

Our Rating:  

Mercedes-Benz E63 AMG Review


Gut reaction, off the bat: This thing is a thug in a suit. You’ve seen beautiful, even graceful cars. This E Class mit AMG go-fast treatment definitely isn’t one of those. It’s the bouncer outside the nightclub, with a bull neck wider than his head. It commands respect. Makes you decide to be on your best behaviour – otherwise, you know it’s going to hurt.

You sit in. Nudge the starter button. Keyless-go, naturally. The naturally aspirated 6.2-litre AMG V8 kicks. Mental note: There’s still no defensible reason to call it a ‘63’. It displaces 6208cc. Blame the marketing department. Ditto blame for the 300 AMG logos – it’s hardly as if you’ll forget.

The start is, however, memorable – automatic throttle blip says: still a thug in a suit.

Select ‘D’. Ease into traffic. Behave. Indicate. Speed limit. Check. Get seat right. Play with dynamics settings. Whip everything around to ‘brutal’. Slide – okay, bounce – through peak hour Adelaide, which doesn’t take long.
You have to wonder, at this point if the Mercedes-Benz E 63 AMG isn’t – maybe – just a fat car with a big, highly strung engine and a lofty ($235k, thank you very much) price tag. And we all know how disappointing that can be. Can’t tell yet. Ease up into the Adelaide Hills. Put finger in ring, pull pin. Three-count. Toss grenade.

Fat-car theory explodes. Jaw on the floor time – the other versions of this car are big, fat business saloons; this thing’s an athlete. It moves like Barishnikov; punches like Ali. Manual mode: Accelerate, redline – 7200rpm – machine-gun backfire on overrun. It jams you into the next corner, scary-fast. You get there, like, yesterday. Brake, late. Turn. The seat bolster moves to oppose the lateral load. (Neat trick.) You have to pull your head upright. ESP flashes yellow. Off. Accelerate, hard. Repeat.

Steering response, feedback and – especially – brakes: magnificent. Brutal. Heavy-duty engineering plus absolute A-grade refinement and feedback.

Seven-speed dual-clutch transmission. Thumping, race car-like upshifts; brilliant downshifts. It’s all paddles – your hands never leave 9 o’clock and 3 o’clock on the wheel. Race start mode – love that. Have it wrapped and sent to my suite. Zero to 100 in 4.5 seconds, every time.

Unfair comparison time: You look at an FPV F6 or an HSV GTS – I know, they’re a third of the price – and this thing says: ‘I’m overtaking you now, on the outside. You got a problem with that?’

It takes full concentration to stay on top of this car’s game. It’s the kind of test where getting 100 per cent is the only option. There’s not even a guardrail on some of these Classic Adelaide stages. If it all comes unglued there won’t be an ‘afterwards’.

Afterwards, doing the tosser bit with a macchiato, al fresco: It’s got me monumentally stuffed how they got this car, which at 1840kg puts it just shy of the E 350 Estate and is the same weight as a Commodore, to be this agile. Because it simply does not feel heavy when you’re up it for the rent. Ditto the un-killable brakes, and heroic mid-corner grip. I’m sure the 255/35 (front) and 285/30 (rear) tyres – on forged 19-inch AMG alloys – have something to do with it. But it’s more than that. It’s extremely well set up for hard punting.

The E 63 AMG comes with all the kit, and all the cred. All the ‘… 63 AMG’ cars I’ve driven have been very special. None of them have been beautiful. They’re all thugs – this one being the most thugly of the lot. If you’re looking for a solid, if gratuitous, way to turn petrol into 386kW and 630Nm – plus water and (Who cares?) CO2 – then a car ending in ‘… 63 AMG’ certainly is a credible, satisfying place to start.

We Aussies even have a disproportionate thirst for the AMG badge, per capita. And if you get into one of those, you’re a member of an exclusive club – the performance car nut-with-money club. You can argue the toss with your rivals in M-division cars, and those into the four rings with ‘RS’ subscript – over bottles of Grange, presumably. It’s just HSV versus FPV dressed up in Boss and Prada.

Those arguments will involve specifications, undoubtedly. What’s a good car argument without the specs? The V10 BMW M5 makes ‘only’ 373kW and 520Nm. But the twin-turbo V10 Audi RS6 – line ball on price, meaning the price difference is about the same as the cost of an Hyundai i20 – is good for a mind-bending 426kW and 650Nm … albeit via forced induction.

It’s academic stuff, given the limitations imposed by the road rules. On a twisty mountain road, the fastest of the three will probably boil down to individual driving ability and enthusiasm rather than any inherent advantage by one over the others (although in the wet the Audi will almost certainly have the upper hand thanks to its AWD quattro system).

The fact is, they’re all beautiful, elite cars. It’s the thug-in-suit factor that will probably get you over the line on the big, bad Benz, however (the other pair look considerably less volatile – which is either good or bad, depending on you).

Another factor to consider here is the future – the 63 AMG engine is eventually going the way of the dodo, and it’ll be a sad day when that happens. It’s not just the performance – it’s also the magnificent sound, the backfire on over-run, the proper atmo-inducted V8 sound that all petrol-heads, no matter how wealthy, love.

Sure, the new 5.5-litre biturbo AMG engine promises 420kW and 800Nm. Nobody has a problem with those stratospheric outputs, I’m sure. It also offers significantly better fuel consumption. (Who cares? Hands up AMG buyers who claim to care about fuel consumption – fraudsters.) You just really have to wonder if it’s going to sound as tremendous. (I love atmo V8s generally, and that one in particular.)

I guess the other essential thing to consider, if you have a cool quarter million dollars burning a hole in your trust fund, is whether the whole AMG thing is really what you’re looking for. On paper, it’s certainly the ultimate E Class – most expensive, most powerful, quickest, etc. And it is excellent to punt hard. Meanwhile, however, back on earth, where you drive in traffic most days, an AMG car really isn’t so nice. They’re brutal things, even with the suspension wound right back to ‘limp’. (To do this: ESP mode, damper control and transmission settings are all just to the right of the transmission selector. The AMG button there also gives you one-button access to adopt your favourite combination quickly, without having to twiddle all three dials individually.)

What I’m getting at is: you might be in love with the idea of the AMG, but you might actually enjoy being in the E 500 more as a daily driver (it’s less the thug in the suit and the better comfortable business sedan with more than adequate dynamics). It’s worth considering, because you really don’t want to end up hating all those things I loved about the E 63 AMG – you’ll be in it for the long haul, whereas I was in one for, all up, for about a week. There are a lot of cars like that in the marketplace, especially expensive ones – the reality of owning one is markedly different to the idea. You’d have to be pretty hardcore to live with this car.

Also, I can’t tell you a thing about the sound system. Turning the audio up in a car that sounds like this would be a travesty.


 

Reader reviews of the MERCEDES-BENZ E63

<

Write a review for the MERCEDES-BENZ E63

Do you own this car? Share your opinion and add your own review below.

Add a New Review
>
  Variant Body Style Price From
MERCEDES-BENZ E63 AMG
  • 5.5L TURBO MPFI
  • 7 SP AUTO DIRECT SHIFT
  • PREMIUM UNLEADED PETROL
4D SEDAN $240,985*
MERCEDES-BENZ E63 AMG
  • 5.5L TURBO MPFI
  • 7 SP AUTO DIRECT SHIFT
  • PREMIUM UNLEADED PETROL
4D WAGON $244,500*
powered by
  VEHICLE PRICE
2012 MERCEDES-BENZ E63 AMGSPEEDSHIFT W212 MY12
  • 2,500 Kms
  • Silver
  • Sedan
  • Auto
  • Petrol
  • VIC
$243,880*
Enquire Now
2010 MERCEDES-BENZ E63 AMGSPEEDSHIFT W212
  • 33,399 Kms
  • Palladium Silver
  • Sedan
  • Auto
  • Petrol
  • VIC
$169,990*
Enquire Now
2007 MERCEDES-BENZ E63 AMG W211 MY07
  • 62,046 Kms
  • Cubanite Silver
  • Sedan
  • Auto
  • Petrol
  • QLD
$88,990*
Enquire Now
2011 MERCEDES-BENZ E63 AMGSPEEDSHIFT W212
  • 5,258 Kms
  • Tenorite Grey
  • Sedan
  • Auto
  • Petrol
  • QLD
$199,990*
Enquire Now
Showrooms > Mercedes-benz > E63

Mercedes-Benz E 63 AMG Review
Mercedes-benz
E63
This thing is a thug in a suit. You’ve seen beautiful, even graceful cars. This E Class mit AMG go-fast treatment definitely isn’t one of those.
K2S10A
http://www.caradvice.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/Mercedes-Benz-E63-AMG-Review-08-625x415.jpg

Mercedes-Benz E 63 AMG Review
This thing is a thug in a suit. You’ve seen beautiful, even graceful cars. This E Class mit AMG go-fast treatment definitely isn’t one of those.
4 stars
  • nickdl

    I love this car so much. I aspire to own a second-hand version of either this or a C63 sometime in the future. That truly is one of the best sounding engines on the planet.

    The other thing that I love about this car is that it’s not an impractical supercar and you could quite easily
    fit your family in there. Also, while it looks brutal, it looks subtle enough so that someone with a key in their hands walking past it won’t “accidentally” brush it against the paintwork.

    A second hand one of these (even previous gen) is much better value than a Grange and much, much less gauche. You must have had a great time, Alborz.

    • Hung Low

      Nickdl, this is a great car, I totally agree with you and have contemplated for an older supercharged E55 for a while but if these cars ever need a repair, be prepared to spend up like you have the $200+k to throw around for a car!
      But I have learnt by experience from having a 4 year old E39 540i in the past, great engine but a financial nightmare when things start going wrong!
      My advice is buy a used one, enjoy it, hope nothing goes wrong, and own it short term…….like a trophy wife I guess!

      • Golfschwein

        Lexus isn’t in the hunt, mate…but you know that ;)

      • Dude

        Stop trolling!

      • nickdl

        Yeah not sure how long it’ll be till I can afford one of these…

        It’ll be a real shame to see the end of the NA 6.2 V8. Sure the twin-turbo will be a lot quicker but I couldn’t care less when it will sound like my Dyson. I’ll say it again: this engine makes one of the best sounds on the planet.

      • PROJET – L

        There is a saying I subscribe to after owning a few German cars both new and second hand.

        “If you can’t afford a new German car,
        then you can’t afford an old German car.”

  • UMWHAT

    i personally like the exterior of the C63 more. It looks more compact and sportier and i especially like the 2 humps on the bonnet. interior looks better in the E63 though

  • UMWHAT

    by the way ive mentioned this many times but why in the name of the holy father hasn’t the C63 been reviewed yet? if you could get your hands on Zondas and Veyrons how hard could a Merc be to get…unl;ess it’s already been reviewed and i’m just embarrassing myself, please let me know

  • Vince

    These things seriously haul ass, having been in the older supercharged version, it was silly quick. There is a reason it’s called 63 even though it’s only a 6.2L, can’t quite remember but it has to do with German auto laws around engine capacity and rounding or something along those lines.

  • Car Fanatic

    Autobild could only get 2.7 seconds out of the E63 for 80-120 Which was pipped by the BMW M5. Whilst the E63 matched the RS6 for 0-100 and 80-120, the RS6 got to 200k’s faster and posted a quicker lap time on the Autobild test track

    • Hung Low

      Those rolling acceleration times have been equalled or bettered by the FPV F6, not trying to generally compare these cars, but for acceleration it shows the potential of the humble Ford tractor engine before a ecu flash!

      • ABMPSV

        Compare apple with apple. Ford is a different class. You put all the tech and safety stuff in Ford and lets see what you will have. Car with different acceleration and much higher price.

        • Hung Low

          Are you seriously that thick? I am just comparing the rolling acceleration of these cars as they are!
          Obviously the F6 is in a different class, your blind hatred for local cars is glaringly obvious and rational thinking is not on the cards!!

          • ABMPSV

            First I do not hate local cars! Holden and Ford does an excellent job and I do not saying in my comment. If FPV was on test I am saying that Mercedes is faster you would say I should compare it to HSV. Which way you want it?

          • Hung Low

            Give up, you do not get it and I cannot simplify it any more!

  • Hugh Jorgan

    A fine bottle of red wine and the 63 AMG is a good vintage. Cellar this one.

  • Ricky

    One comment only: 235 grand?! HAHahahahahahahahahahaha.

  • Save it for the track

    Thanks car fanatic, seems you saw my post which looks to have been removed. 80-120 for the E63 is 2.7 secs ? Given that an FG xr6t has been clocked at a ‘porsche equalling/beating’ (along the lines from the mag it was tested in) 2.5 secs, and an FPV F6 similar, hardly seems that the E63 would pass an HSV/FPV as easily as alleged (legally anyway). And I’m no big FPV/HSV fan either. Tis passing strange that a post has disappeared….
    Road safety doesn’t seem to rate a mention when it doesn’t suit…

  • Car Fanatic

    Ricky, only problem is this car isn’t 235k. Once you add LCT and on roads it’s up around 300k

    • Ricky

      Hahahaha, 235k for a piece of metal with 4 wheels. This car should be worth like 90 grand. That’s what it sells for in the US.

      • ABMPSV

        This is Australia not USA. Market over there is much bigger than here so they can sell it cheaper, shipping cost is cheaper and in US they drive on the same side as in Europe. In Australia you got LCT. Metal on 4 wheel is a matchbox this is Mercedes.

        • Ricky

          Doesn’t mean the car is worth 235k. In fact, even the US price tag of 90 grand is excessive (almost any American will tell you that). Very few people in the US would even fork out 90 grand on a car, and there are many times more wealthy people there than here. It’s just a tarted up E-Class sedan – the German equivalent of our Falcon that they use as taxis there.

      • The Oracle

        Ricky, aren’t you the bloke who was raving about your Hyundai i45 and how much better it is than a Mazda6 or Honda Accord Euro? You have disqualified yourself from commenting on the merits of other cars.

        Mate, I really don’t think you have the ability, knowledge, experience or credibilty to speak about quality cars.

        • Ricky

          Right, and you and your XF Falcon means that you’re qualified how exactly? And I know that if you don’t have one now you have at some point in the past. Anyone who has ever driven a 1980s-early 90s Australian car is unqualified to speak on ANYTHING in my opinion.

          • nickdl

            Even in the 1980s and early 90s when they were about the only affordable thing on the roads? There was not much wrong with them then and they still probably handle better than an i45 does today…

          • Hung Low

            Ever driven a 80′s – 90′s Hyundai?

        • Ricky

          Oracle – if you’ve EVER owned a pre-90s Aussie Ford or Holden, it doesn’t make you qualified to speak on the QUALITY of ANY car. And I’d be more than willing to bet you have owned one in your lifetime. In fact, even the relatively recent VT-VZ and AU-BF Falcons were rubbish. If you think my i45 is s**t, those cars are about 10 rungs below it.

          • Pizza the Hutt

            Wow, Rick(with a silent P)you certainly have a febrile imagination! You seem to think that you know what cars I have owned. Do you get these delusions often?

            Please describe for me the spec and colour of my XF Falcon and the rego number, because I’m buggered if I can remember it, you clown. While I’m not about to divulge to you what cars I currently or have previously owned, because it’s none of your business, I will say that I have NEVER OWNED a locally manufactured car from the 80′s or 90′s. You however, seem to have had a lot of experience and if you didn’t like them, then why keep on buying them?

            If you read my post again slowly, you might get the point.

            My you are touchy, Ricky.

          • The Oracle

            Ricky baby, I didn’t clear the name from the other person who uses this computer. The last post was meant to be from me, not my colleague Pizza the Hutt. (though he got a laugh from it)

            Sorry Pizza, my bad.

            Ricky baby, read it in that context. Slowly and more than once if necessary.

        • Ricky

          Well then you must be the exception, because most people posting here would have owned a rubbish Falcon or Commodore at one point, so why not pick on them instead? I myself have never.

  • Chris

    I’m in love!!!

  • Camski

    FYI, as i’ve previously said before, “63″ nomenclature is used to due to German tax laws, 1cc or more over the 6200cc means it must be rounded up to 6300cc, hence the 63 tag. This is so they can tax the owner more for emissions etc.

    As for the car, it’s still not as sharp as the C63 on the track, the exhaust is also a mild let down from the one used on the ML63, C63 and W211 M156. Maybe it’s personal taste but take my word when I say the C63 sounds more brutal hurtling down a straight at 230km/h. That said, as a daily driver, E63 wins hands down. The electronic wizardy used in the suspension is a godsend on our roads, by comparison to the C63 which has personally given me a headache on extended trips from the constant head banging against the head rest after constant thud, thud – thud from the undulation of the road.

    Gearbox, sharper, faster than the traditional auto used in the C63, but that said, the C63′s traditional ‘box is fantastic 90% of the time.

    Probably one of my only complaints about the E63 would be the clock on driver’s instrument cluster, found throughout the entire E-Class line, it’s so ugly and out of place – more so in the E63 where that space could be used for something more useful, “sports oriented” if you like, as a car with “AMG” badges should have.

    Would’ve been nice to have turned the clock into another monotone screen like the central screen, because it’s always a pain to switch the central screen to the “AMG” screen, why not have the central screen dedicated to the AMG screen and have the left (added) screen used for COMAND with access to audio, navigation etc.

    Oh and I hope they’ve added the voice command for “DVD” as well….

    • Camski

      Oh and CA, fuel consumption does matter (Re: M156 vs M157) – remembering not everyone travels in a convoy of cars with extra fuel, if you drive these 63′s hard (particularly uphill on twisty stuff) to get to your main destination somewhere far away from traffic, they drink 18L+ per hundred and in the C63, that just doesn’t leave enough fuel when your last bowser with 98 was 150km’s away.

      • Ricky

        Freeway driving is not going to use anywhere near 18L (how do you drive ‘hard’ on the freeway at 100 km/h anyway? lol). But let’s suppose your 18L quote is accurate. This means a range of 444 km from the 80L tank, which is more than enough to get you to a station that has 98, which every major town should have.

        • Camski

          Oh not so much highway, highway you can get away with about 10-12 depending on how many 110-150km/h bursts you do “overtaking” traffic ;)

          There are the odd times you misjudge how much fuel you might need (like for example entering Namadgi park with only half a tank, not knowing what to expect – national park style roads + no traffic + half a tank of fuel = just not enough :P ) or you need to drive through the twisty stuff, to get to the twisty stuff :)

          Generally 98 is widely available, but as you head out you get the odd station that doesn’t stock it which is a bit of a pain but a tank of ordinary stuff or 95 will suffice in an emergency.

      • Ricky

        PS – couldn’t you fill up a jerry can with 98 before you go? Just in case?

        • Camski

          Yeah as a backup plan that’s not a bad idea, but it’s added weight in the boot and having all that fuel sloshing around is a bit iffy haha.

        • The Oracle

          Great idea and you can sniff the fumes too.

  • Shak

    OMG we are allowed to make comments! My only Comment. Thug in a Suit with an M16 Rifle!

  • The Realist

    I’ll take a Ford FPV XYZ G6ET ABC thanks. With the money I’ll save I can buy a big home in a prestigious suburb like St Marys.

    Australia 1 – Germany 0

    Seriously, for people to even mention a 100% American Owned Ford in the comments section is ridiculous.

    • ABMPSV

      You never hear the saying “compare apple to apple”

    • Dave S

      The F6 is a great car, but not everyone wants a turbo 6.

      It seems everytime there is a review of a performance car, mostly sports sedans. Some one writes ‘oh but the F6 does this….’

      The E63 looks like a great car with a LOT of power. Awesome.

      • Chris

        “It seems everytime there is a review of a performance car, mostly sports sedans. Some one writes ‘oh but the F6 does this….”

        Agreed, I think the turbo’s great, but it doesn’t sound & obviously doesn’t feel like a v8. There’s a reason most of the worlds high performance cars & exotics have often used a v8 power plant… there’s nothing quite like the v8 engine.

    • Hung Low

      Here we have “The Realist”, a typical home grown, salt of the earth Aussie male, who wears womens style jeans, worships his hair zoolander style, goes for a manicure, wax and day spa with friends….. a hip inner city suburban socialite who enjoys a daily cafe latte or two, and loves admiring his VW Beetle Cabrio getting detailed by some western suburb degenerate from a safe distance in his paddington apartment patio. All this while cussing the rest of society that are “not realist” and who do not live off daddy’s inheritance!

      • The Realist

        Actually I consult to the resources industry and spend half my time in places like Cape Lambert and Roxby Downs… you know, the industry that actually makes money for Australia.

        What was the overall value of Aussie vehicle exports again? When can tax payer assistance end? Why do bogans keep mentioning Aussie cars with the Germans?

        • Chris

          Hung Low may have been harsh in his assumed demographic (one which I personally can’t stand). But your retort is rather offensive to all hard working people, we all play a role in keeping our economy rolling.

        • Hung Low

          So your issue Realist is the Tax payer dollars going toward local manufacturing and suppliers!
          Funny you do not mention Toyota in any of your post!
          That aside what do you propose? over 60% of yours or mine taxed income currently goes toward pensions, would you like all local manufacturing to cease and have the unemployment pension liability to go up even further?
          What if we ever see a war in the region? Do we have to solely rely on one our allies because we cannot manufacture or have the infrastructure to accommodate a war! You probably think all our military supplies will arrive via ebay to our door whilst in the middle of conflict!

          I have a tip for you, with your blinkered vision, and ADHOC outlook to life you should be consulting to the RTA or one of our failed government departments. They are looking for more clones!

          • The Realist

            You’re thicker than I thought if you think Aussie car manufacturing in any manner is the equal of high end military production.

            None of my tax will go towards pensions bud, I am a low income earner.

          • Hung Low

            No my friend, you are thicker. Believe it or not, local car manufacturing is amongst the very few large scale manufacturing operations left in this country.
            The point is, a local manufacturing industry is a resource that can be used during war, and if you notice most of the worlds superpowers still have an established and retained an auto manufacturing industry even when they have moved a bulk of their operations overseas for profitability!

  • Devil666

    Hate to be a stat-nazi, but the gearbox isn’t a dual-clutch gearbox (in the sense of two input shafts separating odd and even gears), but the Speedshift MCT, which is based on the standard 7G-tronic but with a computer controlled clutch bathed in oil replacing the torque converter.

    • The Oracle

      Yes, I agree. I was rolling through the comments to see if anyone else mentioned it first.
      I beleive the new SLS coupe has a dual clutch 7 speed, unique among MB cars.

      PS Regarding daily driving of the E63, I reckon that if you could afford one of these, you could probably afford something else as well for a daily driver. Maybe the E500 you mentioned.

      PPS I thought MB didn’t allow you to let comments be posted on your road tests.

  • MB

    Now that my C63 has been flashed I’m very happy now with the LSD and headers

    • Camski

      MB you wouldn’t happen to be in the Sydney area would you? With a ML63 as well by chance?

  • MB

    @ Camski

    No Melbourne Palladium Silver 2008 C63

    As stated just waiting for headers & hi flow cat from the states

  • Sumodog

    Nice car. It is quick ,looks good but similar in concept to any big ,heavy RWD sedan. It is not groundbreaking in any way. It is very conservative which obviously attracts conservative types.
    I do see a lot of them due to location my work place- yet to see one driven in anger. Passing anyone(let alone testosterone highly charged F6 or HSV drivers) is out of the question. Probably meant as in ” it looks like it would go around an F6 on the outside”. Image statement – reality somewhat different.

  • john

    I agree that everytime I read a review on the M5, RS6 etc. there is always a reference too the F6 or HSV etc. The thing is that for the money there are no cars anywhere in the world that get near the F6 for performance, size, comfort, value etc. But that is the key, “For the money”. People who buy E63′s, M5′s etc. are after class, prestige, brand name, image of power as well as performance. Also just because the price jumps considerably does’nt necessarily mean performance jumps accordingly. The difference between an F6 and base Falcon is bigger than the grand canyon although there is only $40k or so difference in price. The extra $170k that an E63 costs over an F6 only buys small incremental gains in any one area, however those gains are significant enough too warrant a substantially higher price which people are willing too pay. I am sure AMG has no problems at all shifting every E63 that comes too Oz and rightly so IMO!

  • Car Fanatic

    Not to slag off the FPV’s, they have great performance but I’m guessing this E63 would trounce it on most tracks around the world. It would have more poise and be a far better drive. The Fords just need to concentrate on straight-line speed as they always have and leave real drivers cars to the Japs and Europeans

  • Save It for the track

    Hey, the writer of the review was the one referencing HSV/FPV in regard to overtaking. I am simply pointing out some 80-120 (overtaking type times/speeds) times and how the more humble aussie cars are just as quick or quicker. I know that the quality and engineering of the Merc are better, and it would hose the Ford/Holden around a track.
    .
    So if mentioning HSV/FPV in comments is ridiculuous in reply/comment of such a reference in the story, what does that then make the story???

  • Shak

    Has anyone else noticed that you see alot of C63′s and E63′s driving around Sydney. You would think there wouldnt be too many people out there that could afford these cars, but i saw 6 E63′s today, and 5 C63′s. All in the space of three hours.

    • Hung Low

      Think of it as a good change from the absolute plethora of Range Rover Sports and Audi Q7′s with those stupid led headlight surrounds!

  • UMWHAT

    maybe they were the same cars

  • Roger Ramjet

    A good bang for buck comparison is the E63 vs the CTSV!
    The Cadillac is slightly quicker at almost half the price, but I would still rather the E63!

  • MB

    It the Mercedes Newsletter the MD states AMG stands for Australian Market Growth…..they are selling heaps of AMG’s here

  • doli

    this car is truly amazing and there is no doubt about that

    but why does a much cheaper , still large, still big sedan such as a G6E Turbo beat this in every roll start acceleration test, not to mention the F6 310kW?

    can somebody please explain this to me?

    and why does a stock 5.4L 6 speed ZF BF XR8 series 1 2005 keep up with this?

    • Hung Low

      Sorry mate, there is no where in hell a BA XR8 will keep up with this! It cannot even keep up with the XR6T!

  • Baaron

    i own and F6 and i had the pleasure of driving an E63 for a weekend, at 1st i was thinking this is going to be hard to justify being about worth 5 times more but everything and i mean everything about the E63 is just pure class. this thing is solid and not a fault in its build and makes you feel like god (which isn’t a good thing, maybe) and the grip! sorry FPV fan boys may just kick me outta the club but dont worry just yet, i dont have 250 large to blow and to be honest with you i probably go C63 anyways :)

  • Will

    Interestingly I actually see a lot of AMG variants now, more often in the inner south of the river, but sometimes north.

    It is a brutal machine, and I suggest a very capable inter-city commuter on the continent. I am getting old and soft, and would thus go for the standard product. I would feel terrified of putting this machine into something solid at the track…but what-ever rocks your boat…

  • LukasUtopia

    This is such a ferocious saloon, I like that it’s got drama hidden underneath the disguise but can MB put any more buttons in their cars, looks like a scientific calculator in there. Audi, BMW and do the best interiors by far, except for Bentley and Rolls Royce for super luxury saloons of course. The same goes for any car that has geeky buttons everywhere, have multipurpose buttons to simplify and improve the look of the interior.

  • Des

    I own an F6 typhoon as well,love it to bits.
    But after going for a drive in both the E63 and C63 and being very impressed by the overall fit,finish,build quality and sheer grunt of the two Benz’s, my F6 feels like a…taxi.

  • Nath746

    Dear Mercedes,

    I would quite happily go to the shops and buy one of these, or one of your other Vehicles. There is only one thing stopping me – the parking brake operation. Please remove the foot pedal and have a normal lever like everyone else. It does not detract from the luxury feel having a ‘hand’ brake. If you do not wish to put a hand operated parking brake, have a little switch as found in most land rovers.

    Sincerely,
    Nath746

  • JD

    i want one