Car Advice

Volkswagen Jetta Review & Road Test

VOLKSWAGEN JETTA

Pros: Solid build quality, economy, DSG, boot space

Cons: Waterpump squeak on test car, sports suspension a little too firm

By Karl Peskett |
Add to shortlist

Price: $20,610 to $33,960

Our Rating:  

Dated, but still a great drive

Model Tested:

  • 2010 Volkswagen Jetta 118TSI; 1.4 litre, four cylinder, twincharged petrol; seven-speed DSG; four door sedan: $33,490*

Options:

  • Metallic / Pearl Effect Paint $500.00; Media Device Interface (MDI) $300.00; Sport Package $2,500.00; Satellite Navigation RNS510 $3,000.00

CarAdvice Rating: rating11.gifrating11.gifrating11.gifrating_half.GIF

The formula is simple. Take a Volkswagen Mk V Golf, graft on an enormous boot, add some badges, change the tail-lights and voila! You have yourself a Volkswagen Jetta. Yes, we know that is what happened some time back, but with the addition of new diesel and petrol engines late last year and a new seven-speed DSG, Volkswagen has extended the life of its small-medium size sedan.

Let’s be frank: The 2011 Jetta will be welcome with open arms. We’ve seen the styling of the current model for quite a while and despite looking nice in isolation, when compared with the Mk VI Golf it looks positively outdated. So, is it an old car trying to be new? Or does it genuinely have some merit?

Sales figures tell us that the Jetta’s interest is waning slightly. Last year from January to June, 962 Jettas were sold. This year, in the same time period, 843 were purchased. Interestingly, the more expensive Passat outsold the Jetta, by a comfortable margin, despite being in the same VFACTS category. We decided to spend a week in the 118TSI to see what’s what.

Our test car came with the $2500 Sport Package, which adds front fog lights, 17-inch five-spoke alloys, dark tinted rear and side windows and a 15mm lower ride height with stiffer suspension – effectively what the MkV Golf GTI had. It takes a standard Jetta and makes it look a little more mean, a little aggressive, which is what it really needs. Although the styling is inoffensive, it can be a little bland. Plenty of chrome on the front end helps things. The boot also looks like it was always meant to be there, being a natural extension of the C-pillar.

The Passat-style tail-lights round out the rear, with a curious omission of a Golf-derived badge-activated boot release – it’s a standard touch-pad on the underside of the boot lid. But what a boot it reveals. It’s wide, flat and low. You can easily fit a pram in – even a big one which doesn’t collapse completely flat – which you would expect with 527 litres of capacity. Putting it into perspective, that’s more than the Toyota Aurion and Holden Commodore, and only eight litres less than a Falcon.

Inside, there’s plenty of space up front, the shapely front seats a familiar sight from the Golf. No getting around it, they’re excellent. The back seats also offer enough room, and in this particular car, seemed to be a little softer than in previous, more board-like iterations.

The dash is pure Mk V Golf, too, which means if compared with the stylish and classy Mk VI Golf, it’s again looking a little tired. However on its own, it’s nice to look at, very functional and practical, too. With a huge glovebox, plenty of drink spaces and decent sized door bins, there’s plenty of storage space.

The driving controls are all well placed, and ergonomically, there’s little to fault with the whole cabin. Driver interaction is a little muted, with not a lot of steering feel, but plenty of weight, and braking isn’t too snatchy or wooden either.

The suspension is probably a little too firm for this sort of car – if it’s sports you’re after, buy a Golf GTI – as it tends to make the ride fairly uncomfortable with its short, sharp vertical pitching. That said, it follows the road faithfully, with little crash, and gives the Jetta heaps of grip.

The new seven-speed DSG shifts more smoothly than the previous generation six-speed, with slightly softer changes. On full throttle this is most noticable, with shifts not being as rapid, however for everyday driving it’s a much better compromise. It also doesn’t delay as much when engaging from a standstill, meaning less hairy moments pulling into traffic.

The 118TSI uses Volkswagen’s 1.4-litre twincharged engine, which combines a supercharger for boosting torque instantly at low revs, with a turbocharger for upping the power at higher revs. The result is a small-capacity engine with big-capacity numbers. 118kW at 5800rpm gives the 118TSI a very spritely feel, especially when it’s wound up, however it’s the 240Nm coming in at a diesel-like 1500rpm that keeps the show rolling.

It’s an extremely tractable engine, pulling from low revs without hesitation, and it builds power parabolically, increasing its pull as the revs rise. The official 0-100km/h time is 8.5 seconds, however it feels a bit quicker when on the move. Fuel consumption is reflective of its small capacity, with ADR testing returning a 6.6 litre/100km use.

On test this week with almost exclusive city and suburban streets, we eeked out 7.5L/100km. Not a bad result for a petrol car, and normal driving. It’s also the lowest emitting CO2 car in its class at 153g/km, so if its a petrol car you want, but want to keep your emissions low, then it’s an excellent choice.

It wasn’t all sweetness and light, though. A few times in traffic, we had cause to back off and then reapply throttle to keep our distance and then accelerate as everyone else around us did. Each time we did this, a high-pitched chirp appeared, almost like a very loud squeak. Most noticable when sitting around 70km/h and in fifth gear, it came from the engine bay. It was also consistent – the same conditions caused it to happen again and again.

We wound down the window and the sound was much louder, so it wasn’t just happening in the cabin. It would also happen on sharp acceleration immediately after the DSG shifted up. Having spoken to the Volkswagen service agent when we dropped off the car, we were told that it does happen on this particular motor, and that a revised waterpump was the fix. We’re just hoping that a revised waterpump will be standard fitment on later built Jettas.

If it is, then there’s little to complain about. Sure, the styling is a little old, and the interior may be starting to age but it’s still a pleasant drive. It offers heaps of space – most noticably the boot – and feels solidly screwed together. Throw in excellent economy, decent power and a smart DSG which is closer to an automatic than ever before, and you’ve got a pretty decent package.

Mind you, if you want to hold out for another half a year at least, the newly styled 2011 Volkswagen Jetta will be here. It’s already out in America, and based on the new Golf, its styling is modern and clean-cut. Based on American pricing, it’s also cheaper, too. Whether Australia follows suit with costs is anyone’s guess. We won’t be holding our breath…

Ratings:

CarAdvice Overall Rating:rating11.gifrating11.gifrating11.gifrating_half.GIF
How does it Drive: rating11.gifrating11.gifrating11.gifrating_half.GIF
How does it Look:rating11.gifrating11.gifrating11.gifrating_half.GIF
How does it Go: rating11.gifrating11.gifrating11.gifrating11.gif

Road Test the Rivals:


    *Pricing is a guide as recommended to us by the manufacturer and does not include dealer delivery, on-road or statutory charges.


     

    Reader reviews of the VOLKSWAGEN JETTA

    <

    Write a review for the VOLKSWAGEN JETTA

    Do you own this car? Share your opinion and add your own review below.

    Add a New Review
    >

    The competition

    • Golfschwein

      I’m amazed that VW Australia let a fleet vehicle out to a motoring journo with this problem. The chirping’s well documented elsewhere and should be subject to a recall, in my opinion.

    • Jazrod

      The chirping was a common problem with the GT-Sport TSi Golfs (effectively the same engine), and also early MkVI 118TSi’s – I don’t remember fully what the ordeal was, but I know the problem is fixable.

    • Nick K

      While VW is at it they should fit water pumps with metal impellers not the plastic stuff which goes wrong too early and too often.

    • Micky

      Requiring 98 RON in a car of that price is ridiculous. No wonder the US model still uses the old 2.5L I5 engine – nobody there would pay for ultra premium fuel in a compact car. And $300 for a USB interface? LOL. Speaking of the US model, it’s far better looking than ours with it’s dark tinted red tail-lights, compared with our silly oval white ones. They look more like headlights than tail-lights!

      • Golfschwein

        That’s the price you pay for technology, Micky. Compare its power, torque, economy and transmission specification with the just-released Corolla Sports, and you’ll see what I mean.

      • NotTheStig

        LOL…

        The tailights you refer to are LED in Australia but standard bulbs in the US.

        Those in the US love to upgrade to the LED ones…

        • http://img530.imageshack.us/img530/2316/usjettas.jpg Micky

          Did not know the US weren’t LED, but they still look better. Ours are massive white ovals and they just look silly and ugly.

    • http://img530.imageshack.us/img530/2316/usjettas.jpg Micky

      Click on my name to see how much better the US Jetta tail-lights look compared with ours. I took this photo while over there, there were 3 Jettas parked next to each other (shows you how popular they are). These cars are completely factory, aside from the tinted windows.

      • Golfschwein

        Yeah, not bad. I hope that’s not your junked banana smoothie in the background!

        • http://img530.imageshack.us/img530/2316/usjettas.jpg Micky

          Nah, it was a school parking lot. Spoiled rich brats… getting new Jettas at 16, hehe.

    • Able

      I thoroughly disagree on the taillamps. The Australian model (with LEDs) is so much cooler than the US model. And also, the indicators are orange here but red in the US (which is a massive design fault in most cars that are sold in the US). Very silly

      And saying this about a car I don’t like very much…but it’s better than the new one!

    • nickdl

      Why did you bother testing this when the new model’s due in six months?

      • Bob

        Because Vw Aus has some Jetta’s still to sell!

      • NotTheStig

        Certainly won’t make it here within 6 months – more like 12…

    • David

      Probably an excellent car but……

      Like the Golf, I have this reservation about these blown tiny engines. Sure they may perform like a big 4 or a small 6, but they’re not. They’re small engines being forced to do a heck of a lot of work, and I wonder at the longevity.

      For that money you could get, say, a Mazda 3 with a 2.5L engine with 8.6 v 7.5 fuel consumption. There are others of course.

    • ridley

      if they put the twin scroll on a 1.8 liter they would have a FANTASTIC powerhouse

    • Jabba the Hut

      I actually prefer the stying of this compared to its replacement. The new one is smart enough to look at but it has also become a little more conservative and borrows too much from its Audi cousin.

      I am a big fan of these cars for the way they drive but I wouldn’t own one due to the reliability issues that keep resurfacing with VW.

    • Simon

      Another VW review……
      CA, we’re still missing the A3, A4, A5, A6, A8 and Q5 reviews. I think this speaks volumes of the VW – CA relationship.

      The Jetta will sell much better when the new model arrives. This model has a dopey looking front end. I suspect it’s all to do with those sleepy headlights.
      The waterpump problem should have long been put to bed.

      • http://www.caradvice.com.au Karl Peskett

        Simon/Cameron/Whatever your current name of choice is:

        CarAdvice has approached Audi on numerous occasions requesting press cars. Each time, Audi has declined to supply them.

        • Simon

          It’s Simon – thanks for asking, thanks also for a reply.
          Care to shed any light as to why?

          • http://www.caradvice.com.au Karl Peskett

            We’re as baffled as you are. There are plenty of Audi owners/fans who read the site.

            In the meantime, we’ll be reviewing all the vehicles we can get.

            • Simon

              Indeed. On paper I was considering an A4 Quattro 3.0 Diesel or possibly a Q5 with the same engine.
              There are not many Australian reviews of these cars, What I have found suggest their dynamics are somewhat numb.
              While there is no substitute for test driving a car for yourself, I’m unlikely to bother putting either on the shortlist without some more independent reviews.
              Here’s hoping the Audi execs take note and realize my views are likely representative of a larger group.

    • Hung Low

      This model is living proof of how rubbish a German car can be!
      One of a few brands/models subjected to the LEMON LAWS in the U.S!
      The badge posers will still love it regardless!

      • Simon

        Ahhhh Hung, your comments as always are bound to polarize.

        • Hung Low

          Do not shoot the messenger Simon! Google the words Jetta and Lemon law together and behold the polarizing truth!
          Also ask any worthy mechanic of what they think of VW products!

          • Boney Maroney

            ps: i expect my above post, and prob this one too to be deleted like a few of my others regarding my ongoing poor experience with my VW golf with this engine

          • Boney Maroney

            yep, my post deleted. CA Cowards = VW payroll cronies.
            HL, I wish had had seen this before buying my golf 118tsi bucket of bolts. watercooled website shows the new waterpump has fixed squat!

    • anthony

      The Jetta had been a huge worldwide hit for VW,with almost 1o million being sold,and 700 000 units last year alone.
      The current Jetta is excellent,but the new one will have to be,facing lots of competitionm,such as the current Honda Accord Euros.

    • Richard

      Just a couple of points (because I am Engineer I think in this format):

      - David, the 1.4ltr engine is amazing. It pulls like a diesel in the low-end. The genius is that you don’t have to rev it hard in day to day driving. It will last!

      - The engine needs at least 2000K to wear in. We have never experienced a “chirp” – however FuelEcon was not so great to begin with. For the first 1000K, the engine also had a lag around 1000-1500. Thankfully, now that it has “worn-in” this has disappeared.

      - The features are exceptionally wife pleasing. Forward and rear park sensors, automatic headlights and wipers, bluetooth for the mobile and MDI (both optional). We have been really happy with the overall “integration” (especially the MDI with an IPOD) – something which was not available in the competition.

      - The suspension is good – but not great on speed humps. We previously owned a Focus (excellent btw) which would eat speed humps for breakfast. The Jetta suspension is good overall, but it really doesn’t appreciate the short antipodean speed bump.

      - We bought a Jetta in April and have been stoked. My only (minor) complaint is that I don’t like the steering wheel material. If we could have waited a year (for the new model) we probably would have. Regardless of this, the current model Jetta is equal to or better than the competition.