Great Wall X240 receives four stars ANCAP | CarAdvice

Car Advice

Great Wall X240 receives four stars ANCAP

GREAT WALL MOTORS X240
By Garreth Miers |
FIND DEALS

Since Great Wall made its appearance in the Australian Car Market in 2009, the car maker has been praised for its low priced range while being criticized for its lack of focus on safety.

Initial models released onto our roads failed to have such basic safety features as ABS brakes and even Airbags. ANCAP test results reflected this with initial models failing to achieve over a two star safety rating (five stars being maximum).

These poor results are simply not heard of in a time where basic hatchbacks are rating four stars and above, leaving customers faced with a range of ‘Great’ price vehicles with not so ‘Great’ safety standards.

Nonetheless buyers can now have more confidence walking into their local Great Wall dealer with the announcement of an impressive four star safety rating for their latest Great Wall X240 SUV.

These results are a testament to the X240’s safety features which include Front Airbags, ABS and EBD. With other standard equipment including an 8 speaker stereo, Leather seats, Auto climate control and Alloy wheels, the X240 is a well rounded package.

And the price? Just $23,990 (Yes, I had to double check this too!)

Great Wall’s competitive pricing now matched with its new focus on safety could see the Chinese car maker become a real emerging force on the Australian Car Market in 2010.

The results put the X240 on the same safety rating as the Toyota Camry Hybrid!


 

  • smokin’r32

    We’ll see how these things fair in 5 years time, you get what you pay for.

    • david

      Yeh… ask toyota owners! bwahaha

    • Minnow

      Can you say the same thing about the communist russia Lada niva? They’re still driving around 20years after being sold here.

      • Tim

        Lada Niva, best SUV in the world. So reliable and the things I have seen them do, amazing car.

    • tekkyy

      eh…too expensive

      Chinese SUV needs to offer the similar equipment as Korean SUV while being cheaper in order to penetrate the market

      in the same manner the Korean SUV did

      Korean SUV Captiva, Sorento, ix35 are ~$25-$27k
      Japanese SUV Forester, RAV4 and CX7 are ~$33k

      so I think X240 needs to add airbags, and match Korean SUV equipment, and drop to $23k to sell

      • alex

        Tekky please check your figures or tell us all where you are buying your $25-27k Sorrento’s(on-road $39,990) or Captiva’s (drive-away $35,990) from cos i’d love one…

        • Forrest

          Yes please tekkyy, I’ve been eyeing an ix35 or sportage that’s selling for 35k so I’d love to buy one for 25k… do tell us where you’re buying your cars from…. pretty please!

      • Rob

        Tekkyy where you get your info?

        I work for a Hyundai/Mitsibishi/Toyota dealer and I dont think we get them for that price!!!

        If you get the base model you may get close to those prices but add all the gov charges,dealer charges and rego.

        $25391 drive away with all the bells No other manufacturer can beat that. Sure they may have more air bags.

        You also need to get to North Qld where 4wds are the normal car, GWs are everywhere!

        • Bazza

          Jumping on the “Tekkyy check your info” band wagon as well here -> Tekkyy did you actually read the article? The bit where it says the X240 is UNDER $25K and has a 4 star Ancap rating? A CX7under $33K? Um…………….

  • Valet Dabess

    wow! what an improvement. last time i saw a great wall it was rated at 1 star safety

    • S Lally

      Its a shame that GWM did not do their research a bit better and had a vehicle that was up to scratch from the start before launching it onto the market in the west. ANCAP tests, airbags, quality etc should have been standard considerations in 2009/10. They have set them selves up for ridicule and critisism right from the start. However, I have heard that they are very quick to respond to feedback from their Aussie reps. In a blink of an eye they will have Toyota / Ford / Holden and Mitsubishi fumbling for excuses.

      • http://www.facebook.com/powerclan Danny Power

        How do you think Toyota got where they are now? They had teams of engineers following around the Landcruisers for the snowy scheme

        • Ocka

          Danny, this seems to be an urban myth. The Snowy Mountains Authority’s vehicle of choice for transport to and around the dam construction sites was the Land Rover. They bought a very large fleet of them. For a contemporary report, refer Wheels Magazine April 1958. The commissioner, Sir William Hudson is quoted, “Without Land Rovers we would never have been able to keep to schedule.”
          When construction work was finished (the roads had been put in) the authority replaced the Land Rovers with Landcruisers.

  • s

    they need to make it five star in order to sale it well here

    • cfc

      It’s been selling well while people thought it would only get about two stars.

      • Bazza

        There are still people buying older vehicles with less of rating “s”. I don’t know of anyone who really checks the ANCAP rating anyway.

        For those of you who don’t know about the history of the airbag, they were only invented due to the lack of seat belts being used in the US. That is all.

        German cars only started coming out with Airbags AFTER cars made in the US did.

  • Baddass

    I honestly am surprised. I didn’t think this had 4 stars in it.

    • ABMPSV

      Me too and there is no crash test result on Euro NCAP or ANCAP website. Where is 4 star comes from??????

      • Dean

        The crash test was conducted sometime last week. It was already reported by another newspaper. The website has not been updated yet.

        • Dennis

          There is C-NCAP test video on youtube. But it’s not called the X240 in china.

  • matt

    It did not qualify for the pole test, it has no side airbags and scored the same as the Camry Hybrid with ESP and 6 airbags so i do question the validity of these tests now, is it too easy to get a 4 now.

    • Fred

      When Great Wall Utes scored 2 in the crash test, nobody was questioning the validity of the result. Now when a GW car scored 4 stars, someone suddenly jump out and start questioning the validity of these test results. For some people, whatever against their perception and prejudice is questionable.

      Don’t need to be shocked. I am sure Great Wall has learned the lesson from previous results and improved their cars. Also, don’t forget ANCAP is an independent organization, not influenced by car manufacturers.

    • AB

      Yeh I read last week the test is now being questioned on its scoring method as the Great Wall scored the same as the Camry Hybrid when it has been argued that it clearly isnt as safe and the test results are misleading consumers

      • tekkyy

        in the end lets not get too excited now
        four star rating spans from ~25 to 32.49 out of 37

  • XR6TGOD

    My old duck brought one of these 3 months ago, at first i thought what the hell have you done. I was very worried about the inital saftey results and expressed concern to her about it. In the flesh its really not a bad looking car and the interior isn’t too bad either, it comes with just about everything you need and i don’t think there is an options list. The big problem with it is the engine and tranny, a small 2.4 pumping out about 103Kw and bugger all torque and the thing is nearly 2 tonnes, takes a week to get to 100km/h and you have to really give it to her to get it going, fuel consumption would be interesting. The gear box is rubbish, clunky and ruff. I guess you get what you pay for. I see Great Wall as what Hyundai was 20 years ago when they released the first Excel onto the aussie market. In time they will get better, but at the mo no one can beat them on price and to Joe Average motorist out there that is what it is really about.

    • jaythree

      I’ve heard of chickens crossing the road, but ducks driving???
      Anyway, i’ll have another serious think about these when they have an auto option. (suit my wonky left foot)
      I’ll still buy me a 3-4 year old Territory i reckon.

  • Shak

    Why is it so hard to belive that the Chinese cant acheive this result. They can engineer some quality electric cars, they have DSG boxes, they already use Xenons and LED’s on some of thier cars, and above all they are cheap. The average buyer buys with their wallet at the end of the day. They will forgo some safety for a bit of kit or a sving of a few grand.

    • idlebrain

      It’s hard to believe because this car beat Toyota, Honda and many other cars which people thought well positioned in the safety factor.

      Go and check the safety result of RAV,CRV and Xtrail etc… they all have 4 stars with the Curtain,side air-bag and ESC but this car even don’t have these things.

      Especially, if you look at the Mitsubishi Outlander, it has two different results. one got 4 stars and the other got 5 stars. The only different thing is the side and curtain airbag. And you will be able to find more examples like this from other cars that one star difference because of this air-bag.

      So, is this mean if they add ESC and more air-bags, they will be able to get 5 stars? The company got 2 stars just few months ago came back as the leader in the car safety by getting 4 stars even without today’s standard safety features…?

      But as anything can happen in the real world, it would be nice to see this test on youtube like other crash test on US or Europe.

      • Kenn

        ANCAP 5 Star rating is dependent on the side impact pole test. The pole test is carried out only on cars with curtain & side airbags. The curtain & side air bags are an optional item on the base model 5 seat outlander, while the 7 seat Outlander has curtain & side airbags as standard fitment. Structural strength of both 5 seat & 7 seat Outlander are identical. I recently bought a 5 seat Outlander with the optional curtain &side air bags (similar safety level as the 7 seat model).
        The Camry Hybrid has curtain & side airbags, but the body’s structural strength might be the reason for the 4 start rating.

  • ricflair

    LOOK OUT HYUNDAI GREAT WALL IS COMING, GREAT VALUE AND THIS WILL KNOCK OFF THE KOREANS THEN TOYOTA.
    NUMBER 1 IN TEN YEARS IN OZ.MARK MY WORDS
    IF I HAD MONEY I WOULD BUY ONE.
    GREAT CAR IN THE FLESH AND 33% CHEAPER.
    WHEN CAN CA DO A REVIEW

    • The Oracle

      There is no need to yell. Take off the caps lock and perhaps a bit of punctuation would be a good idea, too.

      • vid_ghost

        GREAT WALL, Do not sell cars in Automatic… this is the number 1 thing they must fix befor people start buying cars from them in bulk

        • Dennis

          I think they will be once they start selling the Diesel version here. Apparently either running a Isuzu or Mitsu donk. They are already for sale in China, i’ve had a browse of their site…

    • The Oracle’s Master!

      I might be wrong but I feel they will take a long time to sell in numbers regardless of price. Whenever we Aussies joke about the quality of something we usually jokingly say “made in China”.

      Vanity is alive and well here in Oz like nowhere on earth and that is why it will take quite some time to get momentum in Chinese cars. Want proof? Look no further than Hyundai. It has taken them 20 years to get to where they are now and people still prefer (god knows why) the Corolla over the much better i30.

      I would pay and extra 5-10 grand for a reputable SUV over one of these any day of the week. Even a few more K for a Dualis is much better spent in my opinion.

    • James Cortez

      Number 1 in ten years? You’re dreaming. May be in 20 – 25 if they progress rapidly!

  • sammo

    This car does not deserve 4 stars.
    The Toyota Camry Hybrid ALSO was given 4 stars and it has EPS, six airbags, ABS…
    none of which is available on this piece of junk!
    Where is the logic??

    • vti07

      According to the article, it does have ABS….

    • toxic_horse

      I guess you know more than the peple who have driven and crash tested this car.

      As soon as they power up this engine a bit or bring out a turbo diesel these will sell like hotcakes.
      I am starting to see the utes everywhere already. My friend was looking at 2wd Jap utes which all have a 3 year warranty. But he picked up the 4×4 GWM for the same price with 5 year warranty at the same price.

      • alex

        5 year warranty. Where does it state that, exactly?

    • Fred

      Not need to be so emotional, mate. Having ESP (not EPS), six airbags and ABS does NOT necessarily guarantee a five-star rating. As ANCAP chairman Lauchlan McIntosh mentioned before, a crash test also includes testing the structure of a car, the way that the car body is designed.

      • Bazza

        To add to what Fred has said -> All of Great walls vehicles sold in Australia are based on Isuzu platforms. Isuzu have NOT really had a good score with safety even in there own vehicles in the past.

        The Holden Rodeo (TF) is a good example as it never reached a 2 star rating before 2000. That didn’t stop this model having sales rates only second to the Hilux.

  • SSV

    How the hell could one of those Chinese death traps get a 4 star rating? Anyone who puts themselves or their family in one of those Chinese cars is an idiot. Why do you think they are so cheap? Its a disgrace on our Government to even let them into this country.
    They are cheap for a reason and the sooner people realise this the safer our roads will be. The Chinese should stick to making their wonderful food…..

    • Kenn

      SSV
      They are cheap due to two main factors lower manufacturing costs in China & economy of scale (they build millions of cars unlike the Holden Commodore). The fact is the Chinese cars are improving rapidly including safety features. The Chinese cars r lot more reliable than Commodores.

    • gt6

      Dear SSV,

      Based on the suggestion that Chinese manufacturing is all completely substandard, I feel for you having to walk around your house wrapped in bubble wrap while you wait for your TV, your electric razor, your electric carving knife, your computer that you wrote this trash on, to self destruct and have you call 000 on your chinese made mobile phone. Better hope the nails that hold your house together aren’t chinese made either, you may need to put your chinese made Hard Hat on too!!
      Enjoy your blinkered vision of the world.

      • Jay

        SSV, the GWM ute is the rodeo shell and has Mitsubishi running gear, all old technology which has been out for a long time already and hasn’t got that many problems.
        Also another good fact for you if you think the Chinese vehicles are cheap and nasty, reflect back to the 2007 Holden Barina, had only a 2 star safety rating and was actually worse then the GW produces.
        Think of it as Great Wall are going to make companies like Toyota realise we are not going to be paying for there over priced vehicles anymore.

    • Forrest

      Dude, get a grip… some of your beloved Holdens are also poorly disguised cheap knockoffs. The Cruze is a Daewoo, the Barina is a Daewoo. What’s your point? ANCAP is an independent body who conduct tests on thousands of cars, are you saying their tests are wrong?? and by implication, that you’re right?? Stop sprouting your prejudiced nonsense here and talk motoring please.

    • James Cortez

      Listen SSV: I bought a chinese cell phone in which I can put two SIM cards and after 2 years nothing has gone wrong. don’t underestimate them. The same applies to their cars. Now the great wall is c**p. Who knows in 15 years? The same comments were made on Hyundai, KIA 15 years ago.

  • Handsome_Al

    Why can’t Great Wall get 4 star?? The Car has airbags, ABS, EBD, etc and most of all the best safety factor is Speed.. and this car has a really slow Speed compared to Camry.. So why on earth this car can’t get 4 star??

    • matt

      hahahahahabha

  • Paul

    4 Star is the maximum for a car without ESC these days if it had that it would have been 5 star!!!! Amazing VALUE! I bought one and love it best thing I have ever done! anyone who knocks them should drive one for a while then comment!

    • cfc

      Have you managed to get it to 100 yet???

      • safe again

        cfc. u know what comes befor 100 dont u , [99] so chang hand. ha ha ha.

    • http://gmail.com Tammy Laursen

      thinking of buying gw ute can you recommend it as a good car or not

  • ohreally

    they should report the crash ratings.
    not the overall scores

  • jordan

    wow differently be looking at this!!

    • jordan

      can’t spell hahahaha

  • http://carAdvice The Salesman

    We do nothing but complain. German and Jap cars are too expensive. Koreans are better than they were but not as good as Germans or Japs.
    GWM are offering a cheap car with good enough features at a brilliant price and four star safety rating. And what do we do? That’s right COMPLAIN!!!!
    We are even lucky we get the choice we do across all brands. Australia barely gets to one million cars per year. Hardly an attractive market to any potential newcomers. I welcome this new competition from GWM.

  • SSV

    I cant believe people would buy a Chinese car. I have driven them and all i can say is that they are really really bad. The quality of the materials the gutless engine and woeful gearbox driveline brakes that are very ordinary and the handling steering is a joke.

    • Kenn

      SSV
      U r typical ignorant Holden fan. U have not even got close to a GW SUV. Interior & features are exceptionally good for $23k car. Reliability also is far batter then the Crummydores & Craptivas. The engine is bit underpowered, but the 4 cylinder Holden Craptiva engine has similar power & torque figures. I would rather buy GW SUV over a under powered 4 cyl Craptiva.

    • James Cortez

      SSV,

      you are a typical Holden moron. Scrap off your prejudice. The Chinese have shown the outside world that they can send satellite, build warplanes and on the way to buiding an aircraft carrier. 26 years ago when I started working in the oilfiled literally everything was made in USA or Canada. Now caterpillar prime mover, valve, heavy equipment is made in china under license from USA.

      Wake up and your holden products will be falling further behind.

      • matt

        your name suggests you own a holden… yet you use the word woeful? Are you proud that english bogan jeremy clarkson likes your car? My general opinion is all these light commercials are garbage… no one should put their family in one. Appart from the engines… what is the great big deal between this and say a navara or hilux? Not much, they are all rough as guts cars that belong on a farm or mine. Please people go to the jumbuck page and whinge about a 1 star vehicle that will probly be used around town alot more.

  • Moey

    Piece of junk is what it is

  • vti07

    Anyone got spammed (check your inbox) after commenting in this article (there is a tag line from this article) ? Or is it just my computer?

    • LessQQ

      lol you actually used your real email addy?

  • Handsome_Al

    This car is great, but I guess it’s gonna be difficult to change people perception here in Oz.. I think GreatWall should try to capture the market of India, South East Asia, and Africa first. These markets are easier to convert based on Value wise than Oz.. Or they can perhaps build Holden cars under licence.. If we can wear Bonds made in China, why not Commodore made in China??

  • SSV

    James…….i hate anything made by GM. SSV is my initials. Jokes on you……haha!! I actually drive the best luxury performance vehicle in the the country…….an FG G6E Turbo.
    Best car ever made here. Comfort performance handling fuel economy style reliability fantastic interior exceptional value for money…..there is nothing that comes close to it from any maker. The best part is the driveline……that silky I6 Turbo and ZF auto is the closest thing to perfection you will find.

    And before you start saying .oh a Ford wanker……this is the first Ford I have owned. I have had many makes of car over the years as i like to try different cars …..this FG is way way way better than anything I have driven or owned. People who havent driven one of these are really missing out. OH, my other car is a 2000 BMW 318Ti……another great car.

    • toxic_horse

      “there is nothing that comes close to it from any maker”

      thats a pretty big call. And how can you compare a sports sedan with a SUV that costs half the price.

    • cfc

      SSV, absolutely agree with everything you say on the G6E Turbo. In saying that I wouldn’t mind an E63 AMG or an XFR but for the money you are absolutely right, nothing comes close.

      Just try to keep your comment on a news article related to it!!

  • smitty_nsw

    I test drove one today and I was very surprised at the power, after reading some reports I thought I would be driving all day to get back to the car yard, This is a true value for money vehicle I was rapt!!

  • Fish

    Taking one out for a test drive tomorrow, I’m keen to see how it goes after having read countless comments about it

    • Fish

      Test drove one today. I dont know what everyone is on about, “it will take you 100000 seconds to get to 100km/h” “slow off the mark”, rubbish, what do you think we are all driving on a race track??? It is steady off the mark, which is what you want from a regular car, we dont need formula one vehicles on our roads thank you. Ive seen enough accidents in my time and i know speed and hooning has a lot to do with it. About towing, it was never ment to be a heavy towing vehicle, if u want to tow your 22′er go a monster, tho this will easily tow a full trailer or small camper or tinny. Got my approval. Apart from the power, drive was comfortable, climate control is nice, fairly silent drive, got up to 110km/h well and holds it nicely. Looks are great, im thinking black colour, chrome nudge bar, chrome side steps, some roof racks and front tinted windows, will be a beut.

  • stavros

    Test drove one in mandurah…..Very nice ,Bit underpowered for my liking…but value for money its tops…Ive never had a 4wd before but this may just do it for me…loved the leather smell!!!haha…Busselton sand tracks…here we come!!!

  • Henry

    anyway, i think it is better than second hand

  • http://caradvice.com.au dave

    hey love the x240.The 2.4ltr donk can be easily sorted with a small after market turbo charger. what do u think, anyone tried it.

    • matt

      dont know why these pompus inbreeds would mark you down on a GOOD question like that. I have seen turbo kits on the net for mitsu’s 2.4. Personally seen one on a 97 magna 2.4. Power registered at 151kw on the front wheels. Went Alot better. So it can be done but a quick google i cant find it anymore. Good luck if ever you get it sorted mate.

      • Bazza

        There was rumour that Great Wall has already fitted one to a Non-Aus Marketed SUV.

        You’ll need to ensure the cooling system can handle it especially since the engine is only COPY of a Mitsubishi engine not actually imported from Japan.

  • http://howsafeisyourcar brian

    I am currently driving a 1994 Commodore (Executive).
    I doubt that it even has a crash test rating but that does’nt stop me from driving it. I am going to book a test drive tomorrow and be reasonably confident that if I buy one then I have an immediate safety improvement with dual front air bags.I also get a CD player(cool).Apart from that, on paper they have similar features ie air con, power steering, remote central locking and power mirrors. The Commodore has cruise control which I have never used and 4 wheel disc brakes.I think I can probably get used to having basic rear brakes and a 4cyl donk (if I try very hard).I would expect better fuel economy as well.
    It all gets down to price and for what I need in a vehicle I think the GW will do very well.

    • Bazza

      Brian the 1994 commodore is actually based on a car made by a German car company called OPEL. The European counterpart would rate at least 3-4 in the Euro equivalent of the ANCAP back then.

  • HappyWallOwner

    Have had one for 2 months and am quite happy. Black with tinted windows and electric sunroof looks a treat. New it wasn’t gonna be super fast but it does the job nice enough. Comes with a lot of extras that you would have to pay for with other makes. For the price it’s a no brainer.
    As for the safety rating, this is a very solid unit, no plastic gaurds on this baby, doors are strong and the bonnet is one heavy piece of steel, when you test one open and close the bonnet to get an idea of how solid it is. Time will tell as with anything but I know these motors can go for ever, have had Mitsubishi’s before.

    • NotTheStig

      LOL. If you think a car having a heavy bonnet makes a car safe, it isn’t any wonder you bought one of these low quality outdated clunkers.

      No, I am not against Chinese products, it is just the Chinese engineering that is the issue…

      • Bazza

        Wow NotTheStig, head up your own butt much? Actually a heavy metal sound from the bonnet is actually a good sign and metal thickness is actually part of the European safety testing to see how weather proof the car can be.

        Been to Ikea? Seen that demo of the chair pressure thingy that tests a chairs strength by how times pushes down on it? The same thing is done with car doors in Europe. There is an advert on TV for a car that actually shows this!

        It also means the hinges are strong, the side panels are bolted on sturdily and the bonnet itself sits tight and doesn’t rattle.

  • Jabba the Hut

    I sat in one at a recent outdoor expo here in Cairns. Very basic was what first sprang to mind. Then when I sat in it the driving position reminded me of back in the days of a HQ holden bench seat. Flat, low and awkward. The plastics are ordinary, the dash design is antique and drab. The panel gaps outside were uneven and wide and the chrome accents look cheap.

    At the end of the day though, the price will get most people past the above. Just not me.

  • AAA

    It’s not good. It’s greeeeeeeeat :)

  • Biggies

    There are incredible amount of bluggers in this country. When Greatwall motors first enter Aus market, peolpe complaint about its safety and so on. And now X240 achieved a 4 star rating and once again these red necks come out complaining and saying ANCAP is wrong??? ANCAP IS AUSTRALIA’S MOST AUTHORITATIVE NEW CAR TESTING BODY, IF YOU IGNORANT RED NECKS DONT BELIEVE IN ANCAP THEN WHO DO YOU BELIEVE!!! Go and buy an over price car you ignorant red neck idiots. While I will buy a X240 and save heaps.

  • woofythor

    I took one for a test drive last week, I honestly couldn’t fault it, handles the road well, 4wd works fine, stable, smooth, body was strong with no faults, nothing seemed out of place, the only thing I could possibly say is that the gearbox is a bit rigid, it isnt goin to break any speed records but why does it have too, speed limits never change? And yes an aftermarket turbo would rectify this. It seems to easy for people to be so negative and slander this line just because it comes from china, have a look inside any car and tell there isn’t some part of the vehicle that doesn’t. I am going buy 1, the old line u get what you pay for is complete rubbish, its more to the fact that u always pay for what u get and get ripped off most off the time-like a holden(yes I do drive one)

  • Az

    I took one home for half the day, only fault is lack of auto diesel… But it was quiet, I liked the noise from the engine, very comfy driving position oh but no cruise :-( . But I’m considering one…. Drove nicer than my 2001 pathfinder v6

  • sailor

    GREAT WALL MOTORS SUCKS!!!! i bought a brand new sailor pickup and its costing me a fortune emotionally and financially to maintain…and the company refuses to assume any responsibility….the vehicle is already rusting, makes all kinds of sounds and the electronic display on the rear view mirror is not working…BE WARNED!!!

    • india

      go buy a mahindra.

      • Suzukimad

        Mahindra fell out of the the Australian market with a resounding thud in the 80′s with their diesel Jeep.
        These cars had through rust (holes right through the panels) inside 12 months.
        Poor build quality and even worse steel used left us with piles of rust where the cars should have been.
        The new cars that have hit the market look like somthing that has fallen out of a car crusher…
        I drive a Maruti built suzuki alto every day and have no issues with that car but a Mahindra don’t make me Laugh!!

  • Louie

    Without anyone driving such a vehicle, it’s quite unfair that anyone should criticise the make, the model and the manufacturer…especially where the car is derived from! I have recently purchased the car, and I must say that it’s probab;y one of the most suited and smoothest vehicles I have ever driven. I bought another locally made vehicle some time ago (brand new) and I must say that the Great Wall vehicle overrides the other new car I purchased.

  • Henry

    This Car is based on the Isuzu Axiom so that’s why oh yeah the axiom was sold in the USA and got Acceptable and the top is good so its like four stars over there but the thing is the axiom was sold in 2002 so its an old car now!!!!!

  • Mark of Kal

    just wondering, am going to go and look at these in the next few months when I’m ready to buy, but do they come with cruise control or not? tried searching but having no luck. cheers for any answers guys:)

  • Suzukimad

    No they dont come with cruise, I just went over 1 and its an option like bluetooth or a towbar!

  • Eric

    Looked a 2010 X240 with 12.000k’s on the clock.

    POS

    Had RUST bubbles in the bonnet.
    No Power
    leather seats looked 200,000k’s old

    Eric

  • Laura Itov

    ANCAP safety rating is only 1 aspect of the car, but like early versions of Hyundai & Toyota, their small Mitsub engines to run, oversized ambition, fuel economy, the price is not as cheap as one thinks, people know how much it costs them to fix cars, so cheap & nasty cars are not a catch.

  • tim

    I have driven the new 2011 X240 and found it adequate. Sure no big powered motor in it, but it will do what I want. My wife to get to work, pick up the kids from school; or work while be in a “little comfort”. Leather seats, Reverse camera, DVD player, air con, electric driver’s seat the lists seems to go on and on. I don’t recall many in this market having a reverse camera??? How would you rate this feature? By the way we can take it off road for a weekend if we choose too. Adding the 3 yr 100000k with road side service. SOUNDS GREAT TO ME!

  • Jimbo

    Put simply… it X240 is the best value new car in Australia. Love the 2011 update. Even more features, but they forgot to give engine a bit of tweek??? 120 kW would be good for 2.4L motor now days. I guess I’m going to wait for up and coming turbo-diesel.

  • Dean may

    Good luck, we’ll see how they fare once out of the warranty period, don’t fool yourselves that ” everything is made in china anyway ” , there is a big difference between something that us made in China under licence and strict supervision and something they make themselves, but what would I know, I only had the misfortune of seeing it 1st hand for 4 years. If you knew anything about the Chinese you would know that above all else cost cutting comes first, and that includes safety

  • http://caradvise Macca

    Funny, I saw my first (because it was parked in front of me)X240 today and decided to read reviews, I started when they were 1st released which went more to the neg side..main bits were ancap rating, no side airbags (whatever) and underpowered, but reading an upto date review they jumped a massive 2 & a bit stars…thats impressive for such a short time…the looks of the X240 are more on the pos-side which did get my attention (hence why Im here today) if GWC reacted so fast to the ancap just think what it would be like when they bring out a turbo diesel or V6 and auto, just like when an unknown car company like Hyundi came on the scene “WHERE ARE THEY NOW”…..I was impressed by what I saw today and only hope GWC iron out whats wrong (as they seem to be doing)But still very impressive for what you get for your Dollar!

  • jamie

    I would like to hear from people who have actually bought one and would like to hear their opinion on the vehicle. If you haven’t driven one or owned one how can anyone make a call on how good it is or its performance. Typical of the internet, let any clown voice their opinion.

  • Ssangyong is better

    Why on earth anyone would buy one of these cheap and nasty Great Wall things I will never know. If you want a cheap car with borrowed technology and quality that you can trust, try a Ssangyong Kyron – I just tried both the GW x200d and the Ssangyong and I bought the Kyron without a second thought for the Great Wall.

    For only $3k more than the new diesel x200 you can get a cheap, well made 4wd with a Mercedes designed engine (made by Ssangyong under license) You won’t find yourself missing out on safety features either – it comes with ABS, EBD and twin airbags like the Great Wall, but crucially you also get Hill Descent Dontrol, Electronic Stability Control, Anti Rollover Protection as well as traction control Side airbags are available too, which I ordered in mine.

    It also manages to have a respectable towing ability of 2300kg compared to the measly 1700kg of the Great Wall.

    In the words of the Ssangyong dealer, who happens to be a multi-franchise that sells Great Wall as well, the Great Walls are ‘horrible things’