Car Advice

HSV E2 Senator Review & Road Test

HSV SENATOR

Pros: Engine note; straight line acceleration; sedate styling

Cons: Sluggish gearbox; no interior styling changes

By Paul Maric |
Add to shortlist

Price: $44,640 to $68,400

Our Rating:  

Understated, yet seductively powerful

Model Tested:

  • 2010 HSV Senator Signature Series; 6.2-litre V8 LS3; six-sped automatic – $82.990*

Options:

  • Bi-modal exhaust

CarAdvice Rating: rating11.gifrating11.gifrating11.gifrating11.gif

Let’s be honest. When the first images of HSV’s new E2 were leaked onto the internet and posted here at CarAdvice, I thought it was the end for the Aussie performance workshop. Most of you guys agreed too, with comments varying in intensity.

It’s with little doubt that I approached this road test cautiously. I didn’t want to judge a book by its cover without giving the new HSV range a decent test.

The first thing I can say (in all honesty) is that the E2 range looks at least twenty thousand times better in person. While the ridiculous bonnet scoops of the GTS, Clubsport and Maloo don’t do it for me, the Senator’s sedate, yet aggressive styling strikes the right chord.

At the front end of the Senator, a Honda Accord Euro esque grille has been employed to draw attention, in addition to lashings of chrome and a dual strip of LED lights. The body kit has also been lowered to give the Senator a sweeping feel.

A more aggressive rear end has rounded off the Senator, giving it the mean looks it deserves, without the outrageous design elements of its more sporty siblings. The E2 Senator also features new wheels and performance options, jump starting the HSV range both visually and behind the wheel.

Inside the cabin, it’s hard to spot any changes. The same sporty leather/suede seats are used to carry passengers and differentiate the range from its Holden cousins.

All changes come in the form of technical advancements. Our Senator was fitted with bi-modal exhaust pipes – classed as a SV Enhanced Options. The bi-modal exhaust opens a set of butterfly flaps (one on each exhaust outlet) as exhaust pressure builds. The flaps open at around 3500rpm and give the Senator a thumping feel that is enough to tickle the fancy of any V8 diehard.

Even without the bi-modal exhaust, it’s obvious that HSV has beefed up the idle exhaust note. After the 6.2-litre V8 fires to life, the throbbing idle can be heard from blocks away. Inside the cabin, it’s loud enough to put a smile on your face but not loud enough to give you a headache.

Behind the wheel, visibility is much the same as a run of the mill Commodore. Visibility around the A-pillar is very average; it’s not hard to lose motorcyclists and bicycles in the A-pillar blind spot. Rear visibility is great, on the other hand.

Front and rear leg room is superb, clearly the main boasting point of this executive-express. Five adults will comfortably fit in the Senator, with the only issue coming down to ground clearance. With a full complement of adults on board, the Senator catches everything from speed humps to gutters, certainly unhelpful to both your ego and the undercarriage.

It’s behind the wheel that the Senator really starts making sense. Mash the throttle from a standing start – or pretty much in any gear – and hold tight as the force of all 317kW and 551Nm of torque is unleashed on your body. The loud V8 works up a sweat racing to the 6000 cut-out and starts becoming very sonorous from around 3500rpm courtesy of the bi-modal exhaust.

If you’ve ever heard an Audi RS 4 at full flight with the bi-modal exhaust active, it sounds very similar to the Senator. The engine note is very mechanical and deep, throbbing through the entire cabin.

Fitted with Magnetic Ride Control (MRC), the system is based on the magneto-rheological principle. Small iron particles (when in a magnetic flux) align themselves in the direction of the magnetic flux. An electromagnetic coil is integrated into each of the four damper pistons, so that when it is energised the magnetic flux runs crossways to the admission ports of the damper piston.

From there, if the piston moves, flow resistance is created by the aligned iron particles in the flowing suspension fluid. The more energy that is applied (and hence greater magnetic field), the more resistance applied to the damping power. The system can then adjust each individual suspension component automatically variable upon road conditions.

The driver can also select between two driving modes, Luxury and Performance. Both modes obviously vary firmness to accommodate for a luxury ride or a sporty ride.

The system works well, but is overly firm in Performance mode. When pushing through a corner, the car can sometimes skip over bumps in the road due to the suspension being far too firm. Over regular road surfaces in Luxury mode, the suspension is great and soaks up bumps with ease.

Under the bonnet, HSV’s 6.2-litre LS3 lives on. Producing 317kW and 551Nm of torque, the mammoth V8 officially consumes a combined 13.9L/100km with the six-speed automatic. The figure was close to the average consumption recorded by us at 14.3L/100km.

Pushing the Senator hard is often an easy task but extra attention needs to be paid to sudden direction changes and too much throttle out of corners. Unlike its FPV rivals, the HSV range is fitted with adequate 275mm wide rubber. Powering out of a corner is met with plenty of grip, giving the extra confidence required to keep the throttle buried out of a corner, but on occasions the rear end can skip if bumps are encountered mid-corner.

Along with the added firmness of the Performance suspension mode during rough corners, the steering rack exhibits considerable rattle if you find abrasions and bumps mid-corner.

Steering accuracy is impressive, but I felt the steering could have a bit more weight and the wheel itself could easily be reduced in size, it sometimes feels like you’re steering a bus opposed to a sports car.

As you could expect, the massive AP Racing 365mm slotted, four-piston front brakes and 350mm slotted, four-piston rear brakes bite with intensity. The brakes held up well during performance testing and are testament to the level of engineering that has been put into the HSV E2 series.

During regular driving, the six-speed automatic gearbox is okay. It shifts smoothly and keeps the whole package in check. It’s only when you begin pushing the big HSV that the gearbox begins showing its true colours. The often confused gearbox has a mind of its own and won’t kick down gears unless you bury the throttle.

The Sports mode is the only option left for people looking for sharper responses and an exciting driving experience. In addition to the Sports mode, the gearbox can be manually shifted using the tiptronic mode.

Unfortunately the only day left for us to conduct performance testing was a 36 degrees Celcius scorcher. The first three runs returned results between 6.5-seconds and 6.8-seconds over the 0-100km/h dash.

The slow times were all due to the gearbox refusing to change between second gear and third gear at any great pace. There was a half second lapse between the cogs swapping, which obviously slowed everything down.

After waiting for the weather to cool down, the car went for three more runs. This time, the fastest time posted was 5.37-seconds for the 0-100km/h dash. The gearbox behaved on the cooler runs, but was still short of HSV’s claimed 4.9-second 0-100km/h time, which has been impossible for any journalist to obtain.

The HSV Senator Signature is available in manual and automatic, priced from $82,990. The automatic gearbox is a no cost option.

The new HSV E2 series of vehicles is a big step up for HSV in terms of technology and design. While the Senator might be a bit expensive for some, it is a desirable package that gives you all the straight line thrills of more expensive European vehicles at half the price.

In terms of bang for your buck, it’s hard to look past the Senator if you’re after sedate looks and a heck of a lot of performance. You just have to find a way to fund its fuel addiction.

VBOX supplied courtesy of Applied Measurement

*Pricing is a guide as recommended to us by the manufacturer.

Ratings:

CarAdvice Overall Rating: rating11.gifrating11.gifrating11.gifrating11.gif
How does it Drive: rating11.gifrating11.gifrating11.gifrating_half.GIF
How does it Look: rating11.gifrating11.gifrating11.gifrating11.gif
How does it Go: rating11.gifrating11.gifrating11.gifrating11.gif



     

    Reader reviews of the HSV SENATOR

    <

    Write a review for the HSV SENATOR

    Do you own this car? Share your opinion and add your own review below.

    Add a New Review
    >

    The competition

    • Steve-Poyza

      I think its fairly ugly.

      • Philthy

        Agreed. There’s something Great Wall about the front end. The old one looked much better.

      • Kiwi 1

        The interior looks to have come from the same old parts bin as the push-rod engine.
        When will GM find some R&D funds to develop a modern engine to match all its competition?
        Oh, that’s right, they are still nearly bankrupt!!

      • Crossy

        I know someone with one of these and I agree with the tester that the car looks way, way better in the flesh.
        Personally, I think it’s the pick of the HSV range.

        • Karl

          I saw one of these the other day on ballarat rd in melbourne.
          Looks MUCH better in the flesh.

      • Simon

        The LED lights, the rear tail lights and bumper all look aftermarket.

    • Gordo

      My E1 R8 wil be staying in the garage for a few years given the looks of the E2 and the trade in price I was offered. But unless I go to the blue boys, the Senator will be my pick. Still can’t quite digest the rear end, but the front is a lot more cohesive than the new GTS/R8.

    • billy

      Did Holden steal Honda legend’s for the front grill?
      I think out of that whole car that would have been the last thing i would want them to steal.
      But i will say the rear on the car looks good….

      • Andronicus

        Looks very much like it I agree.
        I dont mind it but it just seems to be lacking something. Class maybe.

        but then again who buys a holden if your looking for a touch of class.

      • nick

        Couldn’t agree more about the front…
        Couldn’t agree less about the rear…

    • dan

      I like the looks of it…inside and out!

    • NickBoghaan

      I’m almost lost for words to describe how grotesque the rear looks with that starwars storm trooper face. The front’s me too LED lights are way too large.

      It’s a bit like cheap furniture being “blinged” up to claim Euro style credibility… but so much was lost in translation.

      Sorry, still no cigars. But, the target audience probably won’t mind as they can’t see beyond the badge and the agricultural straight line speed being everything.

      • The Oracle’s Teacher

        I’m not fussed on the styling. I think your storm trooper comment is spot on. But hey they may have an extra market now in star wars fans?

        Please go to further length though to explain your “agricultural straight speed comment”. If you are suggesting this car can’t handled the curves you are way, way ,way off the mark. Whilst I believe the entire Commodore range needs a new model upgrade (as does Falcon), this particular vehicle has exceptional handling and you comment to suggest otherwise reaks of anti-holden sentiment rather than actual knowledge.

        Even the most ardent Ford fans with an ounce of decency would acknowledge this fact.

        • Deco

          I beleive there was a test where a GTS, with the same MRC as the Senator went around a track as quick as a M3 :D !

          • David

            I saw that too. The M3′s tyres were almost shot.

            The basic VE shape has been butchered with the E2. Every model looks ghastly compared to the E1 and the donor Holdens.

        • Jp

          I agree on the handling, I disagree with the suggestion that we need new Falcons and Commodores. Commodore has only been out for 4 years, and comprised of a brand new, ground up chassis. Falcon has only been around for 2 years, and while 2/3rds of the chassis is carried over, the 1/3rd they changed kept the old bird fighting hard. Even the most ardent Holden fan has to admit that the Falcon chassis is a good thing (as is the Commodores – finally). Both cars are quite new, and while the Holden may look dated, it is only in need of an update, not a whole new model. The Ford is much newer, and fresher looking (only the idiots over at Drivel and Carsguide claim it looks too much like the BF – Toby Hagon, I’m looking at you here) with a much better powertrain to the Holden. Could use a small upgrade 2 years since launch, with tweaks mostly to the dynamics to keep up with the Holdens very impressive handling.

      • brent

        Spot on about the cheap furniture being tarted up. Looks like something a young hoon has done home made.

        I’ve always been on the Holden side of the Holden/Ford argument but this just looks tacky. I’d much rather a Calais

      • topdog

        I wonder too if thay could have fitted larger led front lights.This thing is shocking.And the interior is soooooooo plain plain not what you would exspect from nearly 100k car

    • Robin Graves

      Looks a hell of a lot better than the GTS with the grills and scoops tacked on everywhere for the Bogans, but the LED’s still look glued on afterwards. That dashboard looks about as low-rent as it gets! Straight out of a Daewoo catalogue?

      • topdog

        The fuuny thing is these hsv guys use to take the piss out of all those rice burners for all there plastic add ons and fake this and that .Well how the tide has changed this thing has more plastic add ons and fake bits every were its such a try hard its embarasing

    • Shak

      Has to be the best looker, and all round package in the E2 range.

      • Deco

        The Senator is always the pick of the HSV range.

        Though, I’ probably buy the GTS for the optional 6-piston brakes.

        The Senator really needs that as an option.

        • Shak

          I think you can option them on the Senator.

      • Road Warrior

        IMO I think the Grange is the best looker of the lot.

        Pity its going to be canned.

    • Andrew M

      For me the styling of the senator looks far less balanced than the GTS.

      At least when the GTS went a flarey, it was consistantly all over. With this senator they have flared up the bottom which makes the top half look bland/dated.
      Its kind of like wearing a plain bonds T-shirt with disco pants.

      I rather the look of the previous Senator and the E2 GTS over this.
      I also reckon you have to be careful of your colour choice with the E2 range. Some Ive seen look shocking in some colours.

      The E2′s in white actually look decent.

      Same for the FPV’s, the racoon eyes look odd in some colours, but surprisingly in the right paint they look quite good

    • Deco

      On the topic of the brakes. Paul are the standara brakes on the Senator competant?

    • Millatime

      “…still short of HSV’s claimed 4.9-second 0-100km/h time, which has been impossible for any journalist to obtain.” No surprises there that HSV under Walkinshaw have been caught out lying AGAIN!

      • Shak

        Its not lies. TG acheived 5.0 flat with a GTS, so its getting pretty. Close HSV probably claim with hardly any fuel on board, and a jockey driving the car.

        • Get real

          Err Shak, TG is a light entertainment program, not a hard core motoring journalistic type program. And that’s what people enjoy about it, it’s what makes it good.
          BUT, if you haven’t worked out by now that it’s all very carefully scripted and orchestrated, you are very niaive!
          Bottomline is TG make things up – you do yourself no credability at all quoting anything from TG as being serious motoring information!

          • Bent 8 Brigade

            So are you saying that TG in fact didn’t achieve 5 flat?

      • topdog

        Yes no tester has ever managed to get any of the claims hsv always quote. No suprise realy

        • Simon

          Maybe the problem is the HSV engineers do their runs downhill!

    • HyundaiSmoke

      A GM executive during the LA Auto Show was talking to John Mc Elroy on Autoline Detroit about the future of the Company, and he stated that “GMs goal is to sell every car we sell gobally in every country.” He also hinted of seling Holdens and Vauxhalls in America badged as Holdens and Vauxhalls.

      • Baddass

        Keep dreaming mate, there is no way Holden or Vauxhall will be sold in America. GM already sells a few Opel/Vauxhalls badged as Saturns.

        It is a welcome change to see you post something that doesn’t somehow involve Hyundai. Keep it up.

        • Tom22

          You’re obviously knowledgeable, considering Saturn was recently shut down..

          Lutz said he wants Holden as a Chevrolet. I can see it happening.

    • Lynchy

      I don’t mind the look of this, in context of the entire E2 range, everyone has their own opinion in terms of exterior styling, it’s the spice of life, the interior is still the weakest link (although it is circ 2006 so it’s doing okay) a long with the auto. I think the VF will address the interior definately, the auto will receive some work and their will be moderate exterior changes, big question is, when is VF slated for release? Overall though I think this is my favourite HSV at the moment.

      Decos correct on the handling and dynamics, the GTS has lapped as fast an M3 around a circuit in Australia (can’t remember which one), I’m not saying it’s the match of the M3 overall by any stretch, but it’s at least half the price and bang for buck along with the F6 it’s hard to beat. The big aussie performance cars have come a long way in the past decade, they may not be the precision scalpels like the Germans but their no longer the tanks of yester year.

    • The Realist

      A second hand BMW 335i for me thanks. Or an E39 M5.

      • GGG

        Exactly what I ended up doing….petrol saving along is a godsend

        • The Oracle’s Teacher

          Wait until your German fails, and it won’t be long. You’ll need a bank loan to pay for it .Never mind the fuel savings.

          • ABMPSV

            Yes you need a bank loan to pay for this car!! the 2010 Australia’s Best Cars HSV and FPV got from 10 only 1 for Running and repair cost. Audi TT got 8, Porsche Boxter 5, BMW 520d got 7…etc

          • The Realist

            The 335i failing ahead of the HSV Omega? Love to see that.

            BTW in the rare instance it does fail and you’ve got a good relationship they may loan you an M3.

            What would HSV do? Loan you Holden R8 built with left over parts destined for the USA?

            • GGG

              I’d rather trust the germans…..but, just in case, 4 year extended factory warranty for $3k. At which time the HSV will sell for barina money…

    • atomic22

      i love those wheels!

    • GGG

      If only they could get their hands on a ZF auto gearbox…..like FPV, Jag etc

      • Shak

        I’ve been saying this for so long, why not just get the ZF and charge $2500 for it. They charge $2000 for their average one, so charge 2500 for the ZF and still make money as nearly everyone will take it.

        • Andrew M

          Actually Shak, with the senator, Auto is a no cost option.

          Are you now going to give me a speil on how they jack up the manuals price to cover it????

          I wasnt ignoring your comment on another post on that subject by the way, I did try and reply a couple of times, but got sick of the moderator blocking it for some weird reason

          • Shak

            Oh really, i thought it was a cost option. Ok i’ll budge on this one, but im standing true on my previous comment. Either way, get the ZF and charge $2500 for it. People will buy it.

            • Andrew M

              Well just to summerise what I said regarding the F6′s no cost auto option, Ill point out that the F6 manual box isnt the same as the lesser specced Falcon manual boxes.

              The F6 picks up launch control and extra synchros for starters which could justify the manual box being closer in price to the Auto, So I wouldnt jump to concluding that FPV just jack up the manual price to hide it

            • Jp

              Sorry, this is actually a reply to Andrew M. Sorry mate, the F6 does actually get the same “lesser specced Falcon manual”. This “lesser specced” box is actually a Tremec TR6060, rated for in excess of 600Nm, has 3 synchro’s on every gear and is simply put, the best manual fitted to a Falcon or Commodore, one of the best ever made. It has short gates, slick shifts, bugger all lock-outs or kick-outs, ridiculous durability (try 520 drag starts in one with 2 flat shifts per start without a single problem)… its a frankly fantastic gearbox, and I’m glad both Ford and Holden use it now, because the T56 was rubbish.

      • The Realist

        Nope, HSV will stick with their “world class” automatic transmission.

        • Swank!!!

          People need to stop putting so much emphasis on what they are reading in car mags etc, regarding the gear boxes in the Ford & Holden. How many of you actually think you would still have an opinion if the motor journalists weren’t pumping your ears full of trivial automotive insight? In the real world much (not all) of this scrutinizing is barley worth the paper it’s written on. I have been driving Falcons & Commodores back to back on a regular basis for many years as part of my service to rental car companies. The auto box in the ford is superior to the GM box but it isn’t worth any further discussion.

    • Neutral

      The rear is a complete mess. The old design looks much better!

    • Vince

      U.G.L.Y you aint got no alibi! Try again HSV, this time ask peoples opinions before releasing abominations.

    • t

      Finally a VE i can like… well almost

      hideous rear bar has to be a joke? hondas legend grille kinda looks ok on it, finally a VE with the grille sitting at the level it should be at anyway!

      but those LEDs are so sooo tacky. id expect to see them on a ssangyong chairman, or a pretend luxury car. i lol when i see them coming down the road.

      The wheels are nice, but the interior is kinda, well…. plain??? looks like its from a vectra.

    • ABMPSV

      You are wrong. Honda Civic windscreen cost more than Mercedes and percentage wise European cars cheaper to repair.

      • t

        from a windscreen shop both screens cost the same.

        hth

    • ABMPSV

      Very expensive car!! A 1 year old Audi A6 Triptronic quattro is $3,000 cheaper, same size, better quality. HSV got more kW 317 v 213 but can I use it? No! HSV got more NM 550NM at 4000rpm, Audi 420NM from 2500 to 4850 which is better in city driving. Fuel economy is way out HSV 20.4 Audi 13.3!! If you do not like Audi go for 2007 Mercedes E350 still under $80,000

    • Neo

      Inside looks alot like a V Spec SS but this one has Proper Gauge’s. unlike the SSV its has a cheap looking Digital readout that you cant dim. i cant understand why peaople would pay so much for somthing so ugly that has a bad Auto.

      as ABMPSV above says there is much better for the price

    • BlingBling

      Yes, styling is very subjective, this is just my view only. At the conceptual sketch, the VE outline’s simplicity has a handsome and bold side to it, which works. Such a shame that taking the conceptual design to physical, a few too many stubbies got in the way. In the HSV’s range’s current execution, the tarted up furniture has turn it from a AFI award nominee to a C Grade movie that is so bad, it’s good.

      Watch the resale drop in the used yards… just like the C grade movies, it will be in the weekly rental section in no time. The “Transformer” brigade will be happy about that, but I just think that it’s VE Design potential gone down the drain, which is a huge shame for local design.

    • Save it for the track

      AS far as I’m concerned and from my years of driving Falcon’s and Commodores HARD in real life situations, a BF Falcon xr6t craps all over a VE SS, let alone an FG Falcon being a further improvement upon that. Extrapolating then up to FPV v HSV, I can’t see HSV being better than FPV. The sheer torque curve and useability of that torque with 80% available from around 1500rpm to just over the peak torque rev point, combined with the ZF gearbox that craps all over the comparatively pitible Holden automatic effort. Even though the weights of the C’dores and Falc’s are fairly similar, the Falcon’s seem to handle and turn in better, and with the ZF gearbox being far more effective, a well driven Falcon will leave a well driven Commodore for dead over a twisty, stop start route. I can only imagine the same for FPV v HSV, with the same basic chassis and gearboxes underpinning the overpriced offerings from both Marques. I should make it clear that I have never been on one particular side of the Holden v Ford debate, with both Falc’s and C’dores being very underwhelming and overrated in my eyes. That being said, back in VY, VZ days, I preferred VY, VZ against BA Falcon (with the old 4 speed auto), but once the 6 speed ZF came in, it transformed the Falc’s (again xr6t and not the nose heavy XR8′s). Things might be different with manual gearboxes, but as far as I’m concerned whilst the Falcon suspension is working combined with the ZF six speed, the Falcon (or equivalent FPV) is the car to have for those that don’t really care about ‘looking different’ or ‘standing out’. I’d go an xr6t or g6et optioned up a bit, and have a vehicle to crap all over any HSV, on a decent back road or in stop start conditions, until the suspension failed of course….. If I had 80k to spend on a car I wouldn’t even be looking at tarted up Falcodores….

      • Deco

        ANd you would be wrong.

        No FPV can touch a GTS or Senator with the MRC suspension.

        • Joker

          Not to be argumentative, but I’d like you to back that up with facts.
          Say, the entire FPV Range Vs. HSV manual and auto….Come back to me when you have.

          • Shak

            I really dont think you can provide factual evidence of which car handles better. Its all up to personal preference.

            • Joker

              You’re right Shak,

              It is personal preference :)
              Deco was talking like MRC+HSV= FPV beater.
              Blind statements that are spoken like fact need clarification IMO ;)

      • t

        ford drivers buy fords because THEY LIKE THEM

        holden drivers buy holdens because EVERYONE ELSE LIKES THEM

        :)

        • Deco

          Nah Joker nothing to do with allegiences.

          GTS goes quicker around a track its been proven. Unfortuneatly my collection of car mags are 600km away =[.

          I’ll see what I can find though.

      • Swank!!!

        Look up Edmunds inside line & check out the times they’ve recorded of the Pontiac G8 GT. Slalom 65.7 mph, Skid pad 0.85 (lateral g) these results are almost on par with smaller & lighter performance cars e.g. WRX, VW R32 etc. Undeniably brilliant results for a car based on a $30,000 platform that can also carry 4 adults in absolute comfort. There’s nothing negative about the VE Commodore in performance guise.

    • isamike

      Im a fan of rear wheel drive vehicles no matter what the make, in saying that, the latest creation from HSV would have to be the worst looking vehicle they have put together, lose the Christmas lights from the front bar, bonnet scoops and rear end vents, actually, go back to the previous models styling. FPV has it right in their styling of the falcons, nothing outlandish (I even like the “racoon eyes”) and sack the teenager that decided that the HSV needed more holes in the body work.

    • Adam

      The headnote says, “understated, yet seductively powerful”.

      This thing is about as understated as a Metallica concert and the whole package is heavily dated to boot.

    • Rowman

      What an UGLY car. It sound like a good car but just so ugly. So far as Holdens being sold overseas with Chevy badges is a recipe for disaster. Its part of the reason GM are now state owned. Plenty of people have been talking about the Falcon maybe be becoming part of a true global, high volume platform negativly. If you look at what FoMoCo has achived globaly in the last two years I think Mulally and Ford know a bit more about making a coin than GM recycled washed up executives. Playing around with low volume market specific vehicles will lead to one place and GM knows all about it.

    • ohreally

      Rear bumper is definitely a Star Wars reference

      “These are not the droids you are looking for!”

    • GTR

      This car is the bogans mercedes!

    • Rocket

      When will Holden put the cruise on the steering wheel, put the lights on the stalk and relocate the boot release from the glovebox to the dash? The only good thing about this car is the sound of the engine. An Omega lowered with a nce set of rims looks better than this contrived work of LEGO.

      • Jack

        those changes are absolutely stupid

      • Kiwi Senator

        Cruise on the steering wheel – who cares, it’s perfectly reachable where it is. Lights on the stalk – I just set the lights to Auto and never touch the switch for months – doesn’t matter where it is.
        The boot release is in the glovebox for security – lock the glovebox and a break-in can’t access the boot.
        An Omega lowered with a nice set of rims – WANNABEE !!!!! Yuk.
        Ever driven a Senator ? Then you’d understand the difference.
        Gotta say the front LED’s aren’t flash – but then I’ve got an E1.

    • The Associate

      “…Honda Accord Euro esque grille has been employed to draw attention…”
      Yeah right, attention of the wrong sort!

      If you’re buying an HSV I wouldn’t like it to be compared to a Honda whatsoever!!!
      This car has the worst styling of the E2 range yet this review seems to praise it!

    • RdS

      well written review. covered some good areas. :)

    • SWANK!!!

      Why does HSV always stuff up the first face-lift of a new range? It always ages the car very badly with time.

      • Jack

        VX looked better than VT, and its aged pretty well, alot better than the VT with a fresher face

    • Stumpy

      I don’t like either car that much but the front of this thing looks very similar to the E class even down to the fairy lights.

    • Shak

      It seems that anyone posting anything resembling a good post about HSV gets a thumbs down from everyone, where have all the fanboys gone?

      • The Realist

        They’re at McDonalds enjoying some fine dining.

      • Jack

        Yeah, try getting through these thick ones why dont ya Shak, retarded lot.

        Saw a black GTS the other day, and no joke, did it look the part or what. They look amazing, especially with the LED’s. Literally everyone was looking.

        • Byron

          I know. I was coming back from Brisbane & one was behind me. I nearly crashed the car cause it looked heaps mad! Loved the front end & the back end didn’t look as bad as people make it out to be. Check one out in real life before you judge. Go HSV

    • HS-Pee

      Jack: ” Literally everyone was looking ”

      Yeah that’s not even actually possible. LITERALLY EVERYONE was looking? Every single person that exists was looking? You checked every person individually to see exactly what they were doing? Even the guy driving the GTS was outside the car looking at the GTS with LEDs? lol Learn what literally actually means before using it to describe your beloved HSVs.

      FAIL!

      • deco

        Wow you are a troll.

      • Jack

        Yes, martians from your anus landed and had a look.

        Who are you? My english teacher?

        Bloody tool.

    • Will

      The zeitgeist into which this machine was born was outdated in the ’70′s. To those that are conned, enjoy your second mortgage and annual insurance premium. Otherwise, like Lutz, let it die.

    • Byron

      Rather the front look of the E2 Senator than the E1. E1 grille looked arkward, but E1 has a great back end, but the E2 back end is not heaps good, nor is it heaps bad. Better than a FPV Falcon. All thats needed is an interior update, when VF arrives. I’d buy a HSV over a FPV anyday. Go HSV

    • Brian

      The E2 Senator still has this crazy unforgiving low front bumper which you will break on just about every gutter, car park wheel stop and even road kill although I notice the bumper is in 2 parts now which will cost less to fix.
      I sold my E1 because it was too nerve racking to drive it anywhere as it would cost thousands to fix. I broke it 4 times even though I was very carefull. Never by another one until they fix this and update the interior.