Car Advice

Subaru Liberty Review & Road Test

SUBARU LIBERTY

Pros: Price, fuel efficiency, all-wheel-drive grip

Cons: No rear parking sensors standard

By Paul Maric |
Add to shortlist

Price: $20,880 to $34,440

Our Rating:  

Luckily the new Liberty is nothing like the old one.

Model Tested:

  • 2010 Subaru Liberty 2.5i; 2.5-litre, four-cylinder, petrol; CVT; sedan – $33,990*

Options:

  • Automatic transmission $2500

CarAdvice Rating: rating11.gifrating11.gifrating11.gifrating11.gif

I’ll be the first to admit I didn’t really like the previous generation Subaru Liberty. It was slow and there was bugger all rear leg room, not to mention the design, which was confused at the best of times.

It’s no wonder I came into this road test somewhat pessimistic about the new Subaru Liberty, especially considering I was in the base model with no options ticked (aside from the automatic gearbox).

Let’s be frank, we all shuddered slightly when images of the new Liberty were leaked on the ‘net prior to the vehicle’s release. Awkward headlights and a boring rear seemed to be the best Subaru could conjure.



But, when you approach the new Liberty in person, you instantly begin eating your hat. The design is actually really attractive, as are the proportions and stance. The sweeping headlights, sporty body kit and defined grille give the Liberty a sporty edge you wouldn’t expect from a car competing with the Camry, Mazda6 and Mondeo.

Open the driver’s door and jump into the cabin to find an alarming amount of leg and head room – just what has the Liberty become?

Rear seat passengers now have Commodore-esque leg room in comparison to the outgoing Liberty, in addition to a comfortable amount of head and shoulder room, especially for taller adults.

The dark interior is offset by light coloured beige plastics that grace the doors, dashboard and centre console area. The most engaging part of the cabin is the steering wheel, which is comfortable to grab hold of and small enough to man-handle the car when required. The steering wheel is also fitted with paddle shifters that move with the steering wheel and allow up to six instant ratio changes.

Interior build quality and feel of materials is a big step up from some of the other Subaru products. The plastic materials don’t feel as nasty as the outgoing Liberty and give the car an up market feel.

As the entry level model, the 2.5i is packed with features. The $33,990 price tag places it lineball against the Mazda6 Classic, Camry Sportivo and Mondeo Zetec. Standard features include: Fog lights, dual zone climate control, six-disc CD-player, 17-inch alloy wheels, trip computer, electric windows, electric mirrors, hydraulic emergency brake, cruise control, steering wheel audio controls, privacy glass, six-speaker sound system and auxiliary audio jack.

In addition to all-wheel-drive being standard across the entire Subaru range, the Liberty comes with: Electronic Stability Control (ESC), ABS brakes, BA, EBD, dual front passenger SRS airbags, dual front passenger side airbags, dual full length passenger curtain airbags, driver knee airbag, three child anchor points, engine immobiliser and datadot security.

The characteristic Subaru boxer engine rumble can be felt and heard immediately from startup. The 2.5-litre flat four-cylinder engine produces 123kW and 229Nm of torque. While this might not sound like much, our test vehicle was fitted with a Continually Variable Transmission (CVT) that allows the driver to extract the most out of the engine.

The infinitely variable gear ratios mean more time is spent in peak power and torque zones. The near instant bursts of power result in effortless overtaking and get-up-and-go from the traffic lights. The most appealing part of the boxer engine configuration is the engine note. It’s unlike any of its other four-cylinder competitors and leaves you with a smile after each stab of the throttle.

Subaru is renowned for its Symmetrical All-Wheel Drive system, featured throughout its entire range. While the Liberty’s suspension setup caters more toward comfort than handling, the all-wheel-drive system removes the uncertainty its competitors possess with a front-wheel-drive setup.

You will seldom run into an occasion where you have overpowered the Subaru and grip is compromised, even in the wet – where something like the Camry can sometimes begin to get stressed when a touch of the throttle is added to a tight corner. The Symmetrical All-Wheel Drive system works seamlessly with the driver’s commands and is at its best under throttle out of a corner.

The 476 litre cargo capacity and 1500kg braked towing capacity make the Subaru Liberty a realistic option for family buyers. After spending more than 1200km behind the wheel, both alone and with a car load of passengers, the Liberty remained confident even during maneuvers such as overtakes and cornering.

The combined ADR fuel consumption figure is 8.9L/100km. On test, I managed to get the figure down to 7.5L/100km with a skew toward highway driving. It’s great to see fuel efficiency doesn’t come at the cost of power or driving comfort.

I never thought I’d hear myself saying this but I would highly recommend the Subaru Liberty. In fact, I would recommend it over the local and European competition. It drives better than the Mondeo, Mazda6 and Camry, but still manages to feel adequately powerful and luxurious, all for under $40,000.

The Subaru Liberty has transformed from its former self and is now an attractive proposition for those who want a family car the size of a Falcon or Commodore, but don’t want the fuel use to match.

Ratings:

CarAdvice Overall Rating: rating11.gifrating11.gifrating11.gifrating11.gif
How does it Drive: rating11.gifrating11.gifrating11.gifrating_half.GIF
How does it Look: rating11.gifrating11.gifrating11.gifrating11.gif
How does it Go: rating11.gifrating11.gifrating11.gifrating11.gif



 

Reader reviews of the SUBARU LIBERTY

<

By: DaveH

Rating:  

I have two Liberties, one station wagon and the other a sedan. Both have been flawless with a growing family, hand... Read more

Write a review for the SUBARU LIBERTY

Do you own this car? Share your opinion and add your own review below.

Add a New Review

By: Mr Gaspo

Rating:  

Overall a decent car. Its main virtues are in its handling and AWD grip. I also think it looks better than the c... Read more

By: Krosbow

Rating:  

The 2005 Subaru Liberty GT is an interesting and sometimes understated car, combining the best of the Japanese aut... Read more

By: Gary Radley

Rating:  

The new 2012 model gets 10 way driver power seats, leather throughout, rear view camera, new 4.3" USB media center... Read more

By: Sin Yaw (Tom), Lim

Rating:  

I like the car overall and good value for money. Read more

>

The competition

  • Nick K

    I guess styling is subjective, I’m not so upbeat on this car’s looks inside and out, however it is not offensive either. The previous model had soft touch plastics on the dash and doors, very upmarket, this one makes to with hard plastics everywhere… a backward step. Another issue with Libertys is their very thin sheet metal, it’s more like tinfoil really… dents much too easily and the bumpers are also flimsy. The car also lacks split-fold rear seats and Subaru’s service intervals and requirements are straight out of the 1980s… maybe they should be suppling leg warmers and Wham albums with the car? These are the negatives for me, the rest of the car, its AWD and engine gearbox is impressive. I’d say worth considering as a base model and definitely a worthy car to consider.

  • Krish

    Sorry Paul, but one of your comments I completely disagree with, “Interior build quality and feel of materials is a big step up from some of the other Subaru products. The plastic materials don’t feel as nasty as the outgoing Liberty and give the car an up market feel.” The interior of the new liberty is well put together, but the materials being used are hard plastic and quite frankly, feel cheap! You cannot compare the interior of the previous gen liberty with the new gen! The previous gen used QUALITY materials and was put together extremely well. Also the jury is out on the looks too, in my eyes it looks like a Holden Epica! May not be such a bad thing for some people, but personally, I hate it! Having driven the current shape GT, the engine and CVT are a step up, less lag and more linear torque, but thats where it ends! Sales may tell a different story, but the new Liberty could have been MUCH better.

    • gre

      I also thought the first few Liberty’s I saw were Epica’s from the front

      • Mitchell Oke

        Agreed, the front screams Epica to me, much preferred the previous styling. Sure it may have been understated and not been the roomiest thing around, but it was classy and smooth, things the new design very much lacks.

        • http://www.caradvice.com.au OSU811

          Krish the only fault with your statement is (! Having driven the current shape GT, the engine and CVT are a step up, less lag and more linear torque, but thats where it ends! ) AS the GT and 3.6 Models run a conventional 5 Speed AUTO!!!!
          which makes me doubt that you have actually driven one!! as you would be able to feel the difference!!

  • Mark

    Looks like a result of a drunken one night stand between a maxima and a cruze.

    And is head to head with Camry/Aurion for plastic fantastic on the inside.

    I know people will disagree because its a premium brand, but in my opinion your better off spending $36k on a G6 or Commodore International.

    Yuck!!!

  • Kris

    I find the new Liberty and Outback to be far less attractive than the previous variant.The front end is ugly and the rear end has been designed to suit the Americans which is just downright boring. The interior might be more modern but the plastics are hardly worth raving about. They’re hard and feel cheap to be frank. I’d take a Mazda 6 or Mondeo ahead of the Liberty…It’s just a very ugly car now that happens to stick to the road well.

    • Devil666

      Amen.

    • Rob

      I agree with Kris and many of the other online comments: the old Liberty had a nice clean look to it. The new Liberty does look slightly better in the flesh having seen many of them on the road. But the old model wins.

  • Tim

    WTH are you smoking? The old Liberty was heaps better than this.

  • Speedbird

    As an owner of an 06 3.0R, I have to disagree with the comments about the interior quality of the old car. It looks and feels classier, and loved the way how the dash is slightly angled to the driver. And space in the back? Come on the Liberty was never meant to be a Commodore/Falcon and as a mid sized car it was perfect. I for one will not be trading up any time soon.

    • Devil’s Advocate

      Whilst the previous version was, as you said, never meant to compete against a Commodore/Falcon, it still had a very cramped rear seat even when compared to the Mazda 6/Accord Euro. Not to mention the tiny boot when compared to the other medium cars in it’s segment. I know of a few cars in the class below that had more leg room and boot space. Don’t get me wrong, they were a very nice car that was well built, but they were far from roomy for a car of it’s size.

  • davie

    I’m not sure what you mean about the old model having bad interior plastics?

    The old model has nice soft touch plastics and an angled dash.

    ARe you sure you dont mean the imprezas yukky interior?

  • o

    I agree in the flesh it looks completley different

  • Andrew

    You have to be kidding about your comments of the old Liberty such as “…not to mention the design, which was confused at the best of times.” The previous generation of Liberty’s are solid and well designed.

    Everyone is of course entitled to your own opinion but the one above is a little out there. Of course I could be wrong and there will be heaps of comments after this agreeing with you that the new generation is better than previous.

    The front is alright on the new one, but the back is horrible.

    • Tom21

      I agree, particularly towards the end of the model run, those black GT liberties were very impressive looking vehicles

  • Riker

    One look at the previous generation Liberty in comparison to the new model immediately reveals the previous gen car to be superior in exterior, interior design & definitely superior on interior feel & materials. What hellish thoughts were Subaru thinking when they designed this new car…….

  • Aleks

    I stopped reading this article, when the author wrote, that the interior plastic look and feel better then previous liberty’s, because I knew right then, that this guy has no clue what his talking about. Looks are subjective, but touch and feel aren’t. The previous liberty was so highly talked about the motoring press, how it would give bmw and mercedes a run for their money on the interior. I have seen the new interior, it looks and feels 20x worse then the previous liberty.

  • Callous Aussie

    I can’t get over how much they have botched the styling. now it looks just like any other mid sized ugly car. Namely Camry /Epica and the like. I owned a 98 outback and it was brilliant. I have little doubt about this car’s dynamics however when are manufacturers going to start understanding that no matter how good the car drives ,vanity dominates people’s purchasing habits. If it is ugly it will get sidestepped.

    The Mazda 6 has poor ride around town and loads of tyre roar yet they sell heaps of them. Why? Because it looks fantastic. Come on Subaru, you are capable of better. This isn’t the first vehicle in your range that has suffered a backward step in interior styling either. it seems that if a car is going to the USA as a target vehicle it must be ruined in the process. Only the Forester is worthy of a Subaru badge at the moment.

  • Confused person

    Apart from the styling, I can’t believe suburu put a CVT in the new liberty. It may improve the fuel efficiency slightly but the pain it brings…

    I think the general consensus about the new liberty seems to be completely opposite to the review.

    It seems this feels to me more like a “paid” review rather than any…..

  • subeylover

    A Liberty with a space saver spare? – it just ain’t a real Subey. I’ll stick with my beautifully proportioned and extremely well bolted together high quality 2005 3.0R thanks. This review is just bogus. Watch the resale values of the 4th gen Liberty soar!

    • Wheelnut

      A number of Subies have space savers and have had for some time.. even my 02 Impreza RS.. which I believe is one of; if not the best looking Impreza[s] to date

      I personally don’t see the point space savers – as the space the spare is stored in has got to be the same size as a full size wheel.. and you can’t really use the space to store anything else..

      They should call them “Cost Savers” as all they do is save the car companies $50-80 per car

  • Fasthonda

    It does look better in the flesh and I’m sure it’s driving dynamics are very good.
    A couple of people have touched on a valid point.It seems that this car is indeed Americanized.The land where stylish design is thrown out the window!
    Be prepared as more car companies start designing their cars to cater for the American market.
    At present there are a number of car companies that have “design” studios in California.The worst thing about these studios are when the Americans have a hand in designing a car the result is usually repugnant to the rest of the world! However,they believe that they have done an absolutely fantastic,can’t be beaten design,wonderful design that the WHOLE world will surely love.

  • darren

    Have a look at the Liberty in the Pearl white, the front lights blend in beautifully. I bet the people knocking it havent taken one for a drive. I bought one in Oct and love it, heaps of positive comments. While I loved the previous Liberty, this one is very different and drives a lot better.

    • Speedbird

      Also having driven the new car back to back with the old, it simply does not drive as well. The new car has gone soft. More roll through the corners, less feel through the steering. It just doesn’t feel like a Liberty.

      My current one has been my third, having owned a late Bilstein Special, a 2002 Heritage, and now the 3.0R. All have felt like a progression on the previous, however the new car….well dare I say it….has gone all american on us.

    • David

      Nice car agree with your comments, Cant believe some comments to buy a ford or holden over a Subaru…..resale value and quality say it all…..Subaru for me!

  • Tom21

    the fuel usage isnt low enough to justify its lack of power compared to its v6 rivals

    • Callous Aussie

      …and they are all wheel drive too? Regardless of its ugly looks I’d take this car over a Camry any day and over all the medium 4′s when the roads are covered in water.

      I used to own one and wet weather grip was incredible.

  • spellbound

    Ever time i see a the new model as i have a dealer 1k from home i cringe , eat my hat its an abomination .

    The wagon looks like a smaller honda odessy , yep a people mover , a box

    I had a 2004 liberty 3.0r wagon , loved the drive , yes a bit glitzy inside ,style + , juice chewer, but a great handling car , they lost me with this .

    The more i look at it the more i feel sorry for the people who forked out for this .

    Observation of whos buying them , over 50′s would make up the bulk.

  • qwerty

    I own an 08′ Liberty Heritage Wagon.

    Things I dislike about the new car:
    Badly proportioned styling. Too tall and narrow. The old car was about the classiest looking wagon on the market at any price.
    Interior quality. The hard plastics are a major let down on the new car as is the general theme. The old model was much more driver focused and the McIntosh spec’d cars had beautifully weighted machined alloy controls for volume and climate control and gave the interior a real point of difference. New car has small plastic imitations.
    Why still no fold down seats in the sedan!!! Also, you’d struggle to get an average sized suitcase through the boot opening.
    Where’s the massive moon roof gone on the wagons? Now its about the size of a letter box.
    I have not driven the new model. and I’m sure it drives beautifully… BUT
    I could never own one because some clever bunny at Subaru decided to only offer the 2.5 sports model as a CVT auto!!! WHAT THE!!!

    • http://www.caradvice.com.au OSU811

      I totally agree, not offering the 2.5i in a manual with the sports suspension and bigger wheels is a damn shame!!! and will surely loose them sales, but in saying that the new 6 speed is a little clunky and not as sporty or short shifting as the previous 5 speed, which would put me of buying one anyway!!!

  • gt6

    I have read enough about this vehicle elsewhere to agree this is a better drive but not a better looker. End of the day would still consider one of these against a Camry/Epica whitegoods on wheels deal.
    My actual gripe is with the infomercial style reporting here. Don’t think there was enough criticism (if any at all)when every car produced has something that drags it down in people’s opinion.
    Would have been better as a TV ad if this is the writing style offered here.

    • NotTheStig

      I think that you are very close with the informercial comment.

      This review sounds like one of those Australian car shows where they were scared to offend anyone and made no bad comments at all. Look at what the negatives are “no rear parking sensors standard” – Mmmm…

      May as well read the brochure IMHO !

  • http://www.caradvice.com.au OSU811

    Paul styling is always a personal opinion thing!, the new shape is growing on me, but to say the old model was awkward looking is a joke!, it is one of the smoothest, classiest and stylish medium cars ever made! imo, with the right wheels on it (sti 18′s) it looked aggresive sporty but still classy, the interior plastics were of a much higher quality, having a soft luxury finished dash and quality controls, yes the new dash is nice but is of a cheaper harder plastic constuction, yes the new model has more room but it depends on if you really needed more room, my 07 wagon has more than enough room for us and our two kids!!, fuel economy is about the same as i get out of my 2.5i in that kind of driving (admittedly mine is a manual), and the old model feels more sporty and focused to drive, but the new model does still handle very well in the sports models with the 18′s and bilstiens and still rides very comfortable!! so yes there is some improvements but there is also some backward steps, (but I agree it is still the pick in the med cars in that price range)

  • http://www.caradvice.com.au OSU811

    also of note is the new one has done away with the frameless windows which i have always loved about subaru’s, and has lost some of its boxer engine burble in the chase of more refinement, plus the biggest loss is the new 6 speed manual has a long and clunky change compared to prev 5sp manual, and on top of that no sti 6speed in the gt or 6cyl models anymore!!!!

  • Al

    I agree with most of the comments here that it looks horrible and like an Epica. The interior looks crap as well, even the stereo looks dodge.
    I don’t think this is a critical review, more like a sales pitch. I expected better.
    The review doesn’t mention lack of diesel which is available in the gorgeous Mazda 6.

  • Baji

    Im going to have to agree with the general concensus here. I really struggle to see how the new Liberty has a better interior than the outgoing model. I had a look in both the new Liberty and outback and was severely dissapointed in how much of a step backwards the interior has become. The outgoing model probably had the best quality and best looking interior of the midsize cars, it just oozed quality and class. The new one although doesn’t look to bad is is fairly well put together, it just feels cheap. Hard plastics everywhere. Kinda feels like an ice-cream container.

    The exterior of the new model is growing on me, but i still think the old shape was one of the nicer and classier looking sedans around.

  • Yonny

    Can’t say I’ve looked at the new model closely – but I did own an MY04 Liberty and in my opinion it was one of the sweetest looking cars I’ve ever seen (you know, excluding exotica like the Aston Martin DB9). There wasn’t a single angle at which it didn’t look anything other than stunning and well-proportioned. Of course, this is just my opinion!

    Mind you, when I did first see one of the new Libertys on the road, it took me a minute to realise what it was – I thought Sonata/Epica/Cruze!

  • Steven

    Time to visit your optometrist, Mr Maric. The new Liberty is arguably the most awkward, contrived, ugly new car on the road. I loved (and owned) all previous generations of Liberty – all were clean and stylish for their day. The new one, however, is simply hideous. I suspect it was designed for the US market. I don’t care if it drives like a Ferrari, there’s no way I’m buying a car THAT ugly. Subaru have lost me as a customer.

  • Sam 300TD

    Um yeah, no. This review read like a parody or something…. “Confident even through corners”…um its a Subaru, duh. However, styling is subjective and me, its ugly inside and out.

  • bbcd

    The crowd has spoken and I agree. I’ve owned a Gen 3 RX sedan and a 08 Gen 4 Heritage wagon previously and with the stuffups Subaru were making with the ‘mainstreaming’ for the Impreza and Forester I went out and bought an MY09 3.0RB wagon secure in the knowledge I’d be getting the last of the good ones.

    Yes styling is subjective, but when you start saying things like “The design is actually really attractive, as are the proportions and stance.” and ” The plastic materials don’t feel as nasty as the outgoing Liberty and give the car an up market feel” no-one can take anything that is written subsequently seriously.

    I’ve had a good look over the new model, and I’m sure it drives great, but Camry/Epica bland – no thanks. Bye Bye Subaru.

  • Juan

    I would question car advice’s intention by making comments like “design, which was confused at the best of times.”

    I know subaru likes to rely on viral marketing, are we on to something here ??

  • Tony

    CVT transmissions are a joke. It is used when the manufacturer wants to save a little cash and can’t afford to develop a 6 speed transmission. When I see a CVT in a spec sheet it strikes me as “penny pinching whitegood”. I have owned 2 liberties and while the 4 speed auto can’t continue I will never buy a CVT.
    Toyota is destroying this company ! (as expected)

    • tommo617

      Tony,

      have a drive of the new model with the CVT. I have recently purchased a new outback (my third subaru) and the CVT is a whole world better than the old 4 speed. CVTs are being embraced by european car manufacturers (the belts for the Subaru are made in europe by the people that do them for Audi…) and save more fuel in comparison to a standard torque convertor automatic transmission.

  • brent

    Agree with most of the above comments – I owned a 2006 3.0R specB and after much research I was convinced it was the best value for money in that 50k price point. Although we’re talking an inferior spec here it’s pretty clear they’ve buggered the design and compromised on quality.

    Not sure if it’s my eyes but either the depth on those photos is off the planet or we have a passenger side for fat people and a drivers side for skinny people. I’ll assume it’s the photography :)

    Brent

  • RDKO

    Very disappointing review, it definitely read like an infomercial. It is the start of the year and people are trying to get back into the swing of things, but this review is definitely not the quality motoring journalism that we expect from Caradvice (I have been a avid reader to 2+ years). I was hanging out for this review from CA to help me make a final decision on whether to purchase the new model or not.

    I have been in two minds about this car since launch in Japan, there was a period when I was ready to plonk down my cash for the GT wagon. I was ready to let go of my beloved 07 3.0R Spec.B for a shiny new GT. The thing that stopped me from making that jump was when I asked myself would I stop to admire the new GT like I would every time I see my 3.0R? Yes every morning before I get in to my car to go to work I say to myself that is one awesome car and I have been saying that for the last 2.5 years. Every time I see one of those new liberty’s on the road or in the car yard I don’t feel anything except disappointment.

    I have made over 6 trips to several Subaru dealership to see the liberty in the metal and have been on many test drives to help me possibly fall in love with it (I call them car dates). Yes the new model is more refined but it has lost it’s soul, no longer does it feel like a car but more of a product concocted to generate massive profits, come on what the hell is all that plastic doing in a supposed “premium” brand. I guess that is what you expect when you get in bed with Toyota.

    I am so disappointed in the way Subaru has steered their heritage to the ground and started making cost cutting products. Yes I am a Subaru Fanboy but I will be handing in my fan boy badge very soon.

    Long live the frameless windows!

  • NotTheStig

    I forgot to mention before that I think the styling is a step backwards in many ways although it does look more modern in other aspects. The interior is however more a disappointment. I feel the mishmash of styles and nasty materials just remind me of a Camry – perhaps that is the part ownership of Toyota showing through ?

  • macario de guzman

    You said that you will recommend the Liberty over the european competition. By european competition, did you mean Renault/Citroen or BMW/Mercedes ? Because if Liberty is almost as good as BMW (3 series) or Mercedes (C class) then i’ll opt for Liberty for reliability and value.

  • Jake02

    The MY00 Liberty, of which I owned, was the one of the best cars I’ve ever owned. It failed at nothing and the MY03-09 Liberty is in exactly the same boat. The MY10 Liberty, however, has suffered from Toyota’s ownership of Subaru. All the individuality is gone and it’s sooo ugly! So it does all the boring things well, enough to attract the people who want a car for A to B, but for Subey enthusiasts it’s absolutely disappointing.

    After seeing the Impreza and Forester, I saw this coming last July and bought another brand of car. I know a few other Subaru drivers doing exactly the same thing. Shame really how profit got into their heads…

  • Rocket

    I always admired the Subaru Libertys for there understated style (like BMW 3 series) and quality build but this new model looks Korean and the wagon is especially ugly. How can a company turn such a good looking car into something Dame Edna would drive.

  • blitzkrieg

    The gen 4 models look fantastic inside and out,that’s why i bought a wagon,as well
    as the quality, space,and solid feel overall.I can honestly say i’ll never update
    to this utter mish mash of epica/camry uglyness,laughable 4WD wheel arches and dangerous hand brake placement(in an emergency much easier to pull a lever than taking eyes off road to locate a small button on the dash).

    This liberty is Subarus AU Falcon ’98-’02, an abomination.Ford learned their lesson
    and gave us the striking BA Falcon,perhaps subaru can also learn their lesson!

    I can only hope that the CEO of subaru Aust reads peoples comments on sites like this and wakes up and does something about it.

  • Tony

    i would not count myself as someone who is completely hung up on the way a car looks… i like the look of the toyota aurion, the 2011 hyundai sonata and even the new accord euro isn’t too bad… and i don’t mind the uglier skodas either… or even the US crap like the Lincoln MKT/MKS…

    but i draw the line here… this car may have a V12 that does 28mpg and a ZF 6 spd auto but I just cannot live with a car this ugly.

    Imagine having to wake up everyday to look at this in your garage before you drive it to work!

    It has the worse of Korean Daewoo, Olivier Boulay Mitsubishi and the Nissan/Renault Vel Satis design language.

    Hell, I even find some of Chris Bangle’s worst indulgences more attractive than this!

    Revolting, horrible design. I cannot think of enough expletives and negative adjectives. Deplorable.

    The AU Falcon is better looking than this! And the old Liberty B4s are so beautiful. I used to like Subarus but they are making me hate them.

    • http://www.caradvice.com.au OSU811

      I wouldnt go that far Tony, yes its not as sleek or as well proportioned or as sporty looking as the previous model, but it isnt totally ugly either, yes the back end and boot design is boxy and boring, but the rest of the car is ok, its just that the previous model had all its proportions and lines so right, that it makes this one look awkward and big and a liitle ugly at the rear end!, but it wouldnt stop me owning one just on looks!

      • Tony

        everyone has their aesthetic ideal and their threshold for what is ugly… no-one is right or wrong

        however let’s compare to a few cars in the same class… I actually don’t mind the old Mitsubishi 380… in fact I find it leaps and bounds over this car… there is actually no aesthethic aspect where this car beats a 380

        Ok you might say the 380 is old. Fine. Compare to the Suzuki Kizashi or perhaps the new Kia Cadenza. Both are staggeringly better looking than the Liberty. To have a Kia beat a Subaru in looks? Unbelieveable.

        Ok lets break down what I don’t like about this car. It tries that thing where the headlights go half way up the bonnet. It sorta doesn’t work too well on small cars and it certainly does not work on big cars.

        It has fake arch blisters in conjunction with the whole design that makes the wheels look tiny. Why do that? It has 17″ rims. Why does it look like it has 14″ rims? If I’m paying the premium for 17″ tyres, make it look like I’m getting my moneys’ worth.

        It has an excessively tall beltline for no apparent reason that makes it even worse.

        The C pillar smacks of Nissan Maxima which in itself is not a pretty car anyway. To that end, the tail lights and boot treatment is something out of Daewoo’s book.

        The interior base design looks ok, as does the dash cluster. Except for the Toyota Camry like sprayed silver plastic. That does it no favours. I know they are trying to get away from basic black. This doesn’t work.

        There is nothing complementary in this design. At all.

        You will notice the TV ads for this tends to shoot in the dark and from very specific angles. There is a reason for this. They aren’t stupid.

  • Scott

    I generally enjoy reading Caradvice reviews but this is genuinely one of the worst i’ve read..

    You say the last incarnation of the Liberty was slow? What do you consider slow for a mid-size 4cylinder family car? They were quicker than all but the Euro in most quantitative reviews that I’ve ever read. You also question the old cars styling? As can be seen by the myriad of responses above, you haven’t the agreement of many people at all on that front. Further, if you look back to the release of the last iteration you will find very few criticisms of the styling whatsoever. It was a classy sporty looking mid size car. You can argue that styling is subjective, true as that is, your opinion finds you in the minority. I wont even reiterate the points made by everyone else with regards the interior finish..

    The new car is no doubt a good car but it is most definitely a flawed car. Liberties have been highly regarded for many years now and in my book this one falls short. It looks almost korean styled, there are decent angles and ugly angles but overall it just looks too big, rides too high and looks awkward with little of the sporty classy essence of the previous models.

    It’s manual box is no longer direct link but rather a cable link removing the direct feel of the old model. Further, to not offer the STI box in their top ‘sports’ model and instead offer this cable operated taller geared box is a real shame.

    You say the old model was slow but don’t say the same of the new model yet it’s power and torque is within cooee and its weight is significantly higher.. The new model is slowER than the old one in the 4 cylinder. The 6 cylinder auto maybe be quicker with a 20percent larger motor but that’s not the car you’re driving.

    I do agree with you on the legroom, the new model does definitely improve that and its new auto (cvt) box would be a big step forward but the old auto box wasn’t a great thing. The thing is the car is becoming a ‘large’ car rather than a ‘medium’ car and when a brand like Subaru brings out a new Liberty (it’s prestige car) that can only boast more room and an improvement in one gearbox in the range it’s incredibly disappointing.

    The old model looked good (in the opinion of the majority-as seen above), it handled beautifully, rode well, involved you in the drive and did it all whilst being one of the safest cars ever tested and using precious little fuel. The new model looks like it was penned by hyundai, rides well at the expense of handling (when compared directly with the spec it supercedes), scores lower in Ancap testing, removes the option of their sportiest box for their top sports model …

    A good car in isolaton but not a good replacement for a car like the last Liberty.

  • blitzkrieg

    Why is the handbrake on the dashboard?

  • nick

    If only they had kept making the last Liberty with the same amount of rear legroom as the new one. We have a MY00 Liberty which is fantastic but it’s getting too small. Loved the last generation but there was no improvement on legroom. However despite the new model being big enough I could never bring myself to buy one. This really is a step back for Subaru. It’s ugly in sedan form and even uglier in wagon form. The interior looks like it should be in a Camry or 380. Such a dissapointment.

    It’s now official that every new Subaru is either ugly or boring to look at (just like Toyota) and they all have cheap, plasticky interiors (just like Toyota). Congratulations Toyota on ruining what used to be a fantastic make of car.

    One thing that Subaru has always prided itself on is the number of repeat-buyers. It has always been different but in a good way. That number is likely to drop significantly now because they don’t do a lot different to other manufacturers apart from AWD which is becoming more common in other cars. People can just buy a similar, better-looking car instead.

  • Sam

    Thanks..

    A4 Quattro for me!

  • Greg Goupis

    We have an 09 Heritage , I am now glad we bought one before this model was released.
    I agree with most , the new ones look terrible , what was wrong with the previous shape , look at the AUDI A4 and how they have progressively modernised and updated the same shape of the years , all they needed to do was provide alittle more rear leg room.
    Interior has a modern but cheap look about it.
    I love the dynamics of Subarus , hope they get it right before we need to update again.
    We saw plenty of ugly cars in the USA recently .
    Americans will love the new Liberty.

  • robbo

    18/3 – Liberty sales are up 90%, so all those comments that say Subaru will lose sales, sounds like the only losing was you. Well done Subaru, a great selling Liberty.

    • nick

      Is that in Australia or America?

  • maurice

    Read with interest all the comments on the new Liberty.My first one was a 91 LX and moved up to a late 02 RX gen 3
    recently having been so impressed by the model when it appeared.Can’t say I feel the same about the body shape of the next model that came along or the new one either but if they handle as well as my RX, Subaru have made winning cars.Try driving a 99 Hyundai Lantra as a comparison for example !

  • http://n/a Jumbo

    Why do these cars have such low towing? 1500 braked towing? needs more, my 2007 Xtrail (2.5 CVT Auto) has 2000braked towing