Car Advice

Nissan Patrol Review & Road Test

NISSAN PATROL

Pros: Off-road capabilities; spacious & practical cabin; generous ground clearance

Cons: No ESC; steering feel; lack of torque; four-speed automatic; fuel economy

By Matt Brogan |
Add to shortlist

Price: $32,940 to $51,600

Our Rating:  

Tough enough for the rough stuff

Model Tested:

  • 2009 Nissan GU Patrol Ti; 3.0-litre, four-cylinder, turbo-diesel; four-speed automatic; wagon – $71,690*

Options:

  • Metallic Paint $495 (Fitted)

CarAdvice Rating: rating11.gifrating11.gifrating11.gif

Words by Matt Brogan Pics by Brendan Nish

Seven days and 1,100 kilometres of gruelling off-road excursions, leisurely highway cruising, plus the mid-week urban assault course, have seen Patrol prove that, while it’s tough enough for the rough stuff, its on-road manners are akin to that of a rugby player at a five-star hotel.

Nissan_Patrol_Ti_112

The Patrol Ti on test this week may have been the duck’s guts ten years ago, but compared to its modern day rivals now feels rather agricultural, truck-like and unrefined, which considering its price tag and dated options list, can discourage even the most die-hard of Nissan fan.

On the up side Patrol Ti includes a six CD tuner with cassette; remote central locking, power windows and mirrors, electric tilt/slide sunroof, adjustable steering column (tilt only), powered leather trimmed seats, semi-automatic climate control air-conditioning, satellite navigation and a stainless steel bullbar. On the down side it misses out on an auxiliary audio interface, Bluetooth connectivity, full-function trip computer and second-row centre headrest.

Nissan_Patrol_Ti_114

Other than that, the cockpit is straight forward with simple instrumentation, big switches and a commanding view of the road, certain to keep things simple when you’re off tackling the great outdoors.

The electrically operated leather seats are reasonably supportive, easy to wipe down and are adjustable in all the usual directions.

Nissan_Patrol_Ti_113

But perhaps in showing its age, some of the Patrol Ti’s functinoality is, by today’s standards, rather compromised. The reversing camera takes too long to engage (31 seconds) and is angled too low to be of any real use – except perhaps for hitching the boat; the remote-control satellite navigation system is painful to negotiate and terribly slow to load; and the trip computer offers distance and time information only, omitting the truly useful information that is fuel consumption.

Which brings us to the big one: the Patrol’s insatiable thirst for fuel.

Nissan_Patrol_Ti_115

Powered by a lethargic 3.0-litre, four-cylinder turbo-diesel engine, the Patrol simply isn’t up to task when compared to its more modern rivals. Developing 118kW of power at 3,600rpm and 354Nm of torque from 2,000rpm, the Patrol’s diesel offering is mated to a decidedly lazy four-speed automatic transmission, a combination that sees the full-size 4×4 suffer considerable turbo lag from rest, asthmatic open road performance and glacial overtaking – not to mention fuel economy returns this week of 15.6L/100km.

It’s a shame really, and when you look at the rivals figures – Toyota LandCruiser 195kW/650Nm, Land Rover Discovery 180kW/600Nm, Mitsubishi Pajero 147kW/441Nm, Volkswagen Touareg 176kW/550Nm – justifying the asking price of Patrol is a hard ask. Until that is you head off-road.

Nissan_Patrol_Ti_106

Once off the beaten track the Patrol really starts to make sense with it’s robust torsion beam, coil-sprung suspension and live axle goodness easily tackling the tougher aspects of off-road driving.

This is not a half-baked soft-roader, it’s the last of the real 4x4s boasting approach and departure angles more than adequate for most situations, an ample 210mm ground clearance and generous amount of suspension travel that proved this week ideal for climbing.

Nissan_Patrol_Ti_102

There’s virtually nothing we could throw at Patrol that would discourage its course – mud, ruts and moguls were all conquered with surprising ease. Large hills were ironed flat in low-range with Patrol proving just how much can still be achieved without electronic assistance – that said switchable ESC might have been a nice idea.

Perhaps the most reassuring aspect of Patrol’s off-road prowess is that it never broke a sweat, or even come close to feeling like it would – no matter where we took it.

Nissan_Patrol_Ti_109

With flexible seating arrangements, Patrol offers two folding pews in the rear cargo area to offer a total six-passenger capacity. The third-row seats do impinge a little on cargo capacity but can be removed should you so desire.

The middle row seats can fold flat, be slid fore or aft and also offer 50:50 split fold versatility for carrying those cumbersome loads. The cargo area is accessed by a vertically split tailgate that offers the choice of one narrow door or both. The spare wheel is mounted on the tailgate for easy access off-road, or simply when the boot is full of cargo and kids. It does however limit vision slightly when reversing.

Nissan_Patrol_Ti_107

Despite its off-road toughness Patrol is still a bit of a mixed bad on-road and around town. It’s slower than it should be, is heavy on fuel and offers light steering feel with a complete lack of tactility on-centre. But if you’re looking for a tough, dedicated and simple machine off-road then from just $51,630*, Patrol might just tick all the boxes. Three-out-of-five.

Nissan_Patrol_Ti_108

Ratings:

CarAdvice Overall Rating: rating11.gifrating11.gifrating11.gif
How does it Drive: rating11.gifrating11.gifrating11.gif
How does it Look: rating11.gifrating11.gifrating11.gif
How does it Go: rating11.gifrating11.gifrating_half.GIF

*Pricing is a guide as recommended to us by the manufacturer.



     

    Reader reviews of the NISSAN PATROL

    <

    Write a review for the NISSAN PATROL

    Do you own this car? Share your opinion and add your own review below.

    Add a New Review
    >

    The competition

    • Carl

      Pathetic power, torque and fuel consumption figures out of that engine!!!!!! NOT good enough Nissan!

    • Hung Low

      There is a new model due so I do not know why this model was reviewed as it has not changed much in a decade.
      But it still provides a better value option than a 200 series as a tow car or serious off roader. This 3.0 diesel is one of the worst engines from Nissan and I wonder why they persisted with it for so long, but the new 6 cyl diesel will out torque the 200 series V8 and will be one to wait for. Pity the new Patrol will follow the trend of the 200 series in terms of design which I hate!

      • SC

        Overlander did a giant tow test a few years ago and this thing sucked.
        They towed a 2 tonne large twin axle caravan and the patrol took an eternity
        to get to 100 kph, I don’t think I would rush out and buy one of these as a
        tow car.

    • Simon

      The couple of patrol owners I know have been plagued by expensive repairs.
      In my mind there is real risk in buying one of these and owning it outside warranty. Couple that with inadequate performance and ridiculous fuel consumption the question really begs to be asked.
      WHY?

    • Ford KIng

      0-100 in 14.9 seconds – thats rediculous coupled with its fuel economy! Needs to be completly overhauled!

    • JEKYL & HYDE

      when the 2.9ltr v6 comes (don’t hold your breath but,short of australia and anywhere a wars on,the patrol doesn’t go,so r&d is short) it WILL be a great thing.its just not high on nissan’s list…

    • thetruth

      long time reader first time commentator,

      not sure why this is being reviewed as its a very old car and not a new release. However for those how know a mates mates dog uncles brother that one knew a guy whos sister went out with a bloke that owned a 3.0l patrol that blew up, i have owned two 3.0l patrols. One GU2 and a GU3. The first one did well over 300,000ks with multiple long touring off road trips to remote places of the country. The only problem it had was dirty fuel it picked up at a servo in kings way melbourne. It was completely standard but was unstoppable off road. The second one again did over 300,000ks spent most of its life towing a 2.5t boat through soft sand and never ever missed a beat. My sister has the exact same car as in this review. She lives in the Kimberly north of broome and gives her cars a hiding. Hers is nearly at 200,000ks and has had no problems either.

      The motors that had the problems were the first generation 3.0l motors that in some cases did blow i think it was an oil sump issue and nissan buried their head in the sand and im sure it cost them a lot of money.

      rant over

      • Dlr1

        yeah, early 3 litres had issues with oil sump capacity and oil pressure, later ones had issues with rings and undue wear on the cylinder bores. It may have only affected maybe 10% of vehicles with 90% reliable for 300+ Kms, but it was and still is an expensive fix.

      • bob webb

        you must be the only bloke in Australia who has got 300k`s from a 3ltr. time bomb, and as for stating this motor must of cost Nissan a fortune, how WRONG you are. Nissan wiped its hands of this time bomb, leaving hundreds of OWNERS MANY THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS OUT OF POCKET. Incidently, do you still have a 3ltr. Nissan Patrol?.

    • Jeremy

      Nothing wrong with the performance figures. You’d get worse from the 4.2 diesel, which is a far superior motor for hardcore off-road stuff. Of more concern are the overboosting issues with the 3.0 intercooled TD. Interestingly, the same 3.0 litre diesel in the Navara without the intercooler doesn’t seem to suffer the same tendancy to turn grenade.

      • The Real Car Fanatic

        Besides, who buys a serious 4×4 for it’s 0-100 sprint time?

      • Dlr1

        Navaras explode too!

    • Daniel

      They’re still selling (and people are still buying) this thing?!

      • LN

        Not really, the sales for the patrol have dropped massively in 08 and 09 but I think a dealership up in far north queensland sell at least 300 of these Patrols a year.

        We get a lot of used 4.2L diesal engine patrol and as soon as they are stocked in the used car lot, they get swooped straight away.

    • AAA

      The Renault’s 3.0 Turbo Diesel engine in the Patrol is unreliable. Why do they have to use a Renault engine? If I wanted an unrealible Renault, I would have bought a Renault.

    • Jeremy

      It’s the last of the real hardcore 4wd’s with separate chassis (for body lifts, if not airbag equipped), low range transfer case and solid axles front and rear.
      The Patrol’s competition in that regard consists of the Land Rover Defender, Toyota Landcruiser 79 series, Suzuki Jimny and Jeep Wrangler.

    • Brett

      I know this is the Patrol review but I am looking at buying a ’09 or 2010 Pathfinder and Car advice haven’t got a review on it and I’m looking for some feedback on them. It will probably be between the Pathfinder and the Mitsubishi Challenger, any feedback would be appreciated.

    • damien

      my 5.4L ba RTV ute makes 175rwkW, and will outperform this piece of crap that makes just 70rwkw when in 2 wheel drive mode.

      not to mention that fact that i have just over 470Nm to play with. and my car costs $10000 now days.

    • Troy

      I owned a GU II Patrol wagon for 2 years, got up to 280,000kms on the clock and sold it (cause i was getting a patrol ute for work). im loyal to the patrol and nothing can beat them off road!!! and isn’t that what you buy them for??? who cares how fast it gets to 100km/h
      it will sit on it all day long on a highway. I’ll be sad to see the GU patrol go, as it really is the LAST OF THE REAL 4WD!!! Im a diesel mechanic by trade and all i can say to you about these 3lt motors blowing up is…LACK OF SERVICING!!!

    • James

      Thats overpriced but if have lots of money a couple kids and a big dog you should get one.

    • Terry

      My 3.0 2004 patrol has done almost 200,000 and most of this was done towing a 21 ft caravan. My last patrol was a 4.2 GQ but the 3.0 out performs it.
      It is still running very well.

    • krishna suresh

      See my dad just bought the ew nissan patrol 488 petrol which is way better and plus ours is way way higher than the nissan patrol over there. this 3.0L is bad i mean BAD peolle who buy a patrol pleaaaaaaaaaassssssssssssseeeeeeeeeeeeee buy a petrol 4.8L Ti
      this car 4.8L is very good trust me. :)

    • Dillen

      This 4WD wagon is good-looking — in my opinion — but glad I’m doing my homework before actually going out and buying it when I’m careful on how I should spend my money! I really do find the Patrol wagon a lot more better looking than the cab chassis one, though but will want to consider getting it second-hand. Then again, who knows what I decide in the end!
      Thanks for the review! :)

    • oliveiros

      I ve got a nissan patrol gtr 3.0 and i am inlove ,t cold my chiaLd but when i will be a litel ugly old i think i wild like to buy LAND CRUSIER

    • Bob!

      Looks folks, the 3.0ltr is fine and suitably powerful for intended use…its only Landcruiser drivers that need big 4.2+ V8′s, and thats cos they cant drive well…they also look naf.
      Id steer clear of a GUI,II,III but post that (this is a GU6/7 review), they’re fine if they’ve been looked after

    • SW

      My Nissan Patrol 3.0 litre turbo diesel 2006 DX just blew up after doing only 152 000 KM!!!!! Whoever recommends a 3.o litre diesel patrol…… I hardly towed a thing – no more than 750kg in a single axle trailor at any one time and I looked after it like a baby. I argued with Toyota drivers when they called their Landcruiser tow vehicles for Patrols. Guess what …just had a Cruiser tow my Nissan!!! How can this keep happening to Nissan what’s going on??? I was warned and I ignored the warnings.

      Now I have to consider my options of converting to a 4.2 litre engine if it is doeable. The chevy option is not on the table for me. I went for the 3.0l because it was supposed to be economical. If you have any feedback or advice I would appreciate it. I am devestated – I always wanted a Patrol and now I have a huge bill I can’t afford to contend with.

    • SC

      Both, accelerating with the weight on, 80-100 etc.
      I guess its nice to know you can overtake easily whilst towing,
      pulling out on to a freeway or from an intersection, when faced
      with an uphill stretch with a van on ,this thing struggled.
      Not doubting that this thing has a strong chassis but so does a
      Kenworth.

    • SC

      I think it was done in 2006,google it, but I guess you answered your
      own question that the patrol is 10 years old and theyr’e still
      flogging them. Just think that its time Nissan did something
      with this, updated it cause there is still a loyal fanbase.