Car Advice

American manufacturers sell at a loss

By Alborz Fallah |

Most of us believe vehicle manufacturers are making a killing with billions in profits, this is might be true of banks, but not so much for car companies, at least not American ones. When you factor in the huge cost of research & development, marketing, labour, material and warranty support, vehicle manufacturing doesn’t really sound like a good business to be in.

It all depends on the manufacturer’s ability to build profitable cars worth buying. In the last few years, American manufacturers have managed to lose so much money that some have come close to, or have gone broke.

While Ford is busy selling off its assets, Chrysler was performing so poorly that Daimler decided to cut loose. The Detroit free press recently released a report outlining just how badly the Americans have been performing in the States.

In 2006, Chrysler managed a loss of more than $1,100 USD for every vehicle it sold in North America, compared to a profit of $144 USD per vehicle in 2005. So what’s next? Apart from the new owners, 13,000 jobs will be cut over three years to reduce labour costs, and the company has promised to invest $3 billion USD to produce more fuel efficient cars, an issue at the very core of Chrysler’s demise.

The big three American manufacturers, GM, Ford and Chrysler lost an average of $1,073 USD per vehicle in North America. In comparison, the top three Japanese manufacturers competing in the same market (Toyota, Honda and Nissan) made a profit of $1,593 USD per vehicle. Ford America managed to lose $12.6 billion USD dollars in 2006 (no wonder they are selling Jaguar, Land Rover and Volvo).

Ford Australia lost over $40 million in 2006, while GM Holden lost over $146 million.

Source: Detroit Free Press


 
  • Myke

    I don’t see how a car company can sell a car at that great of a loss and not see the negative consequences down the road.

  • 280zx

    So on these ” Losses” are we taking into account the amount of money spent on the development of the Orion and the VE ?? What was that around a billion i think just for the VE alone….

  • http://AustralianCarAdvice Dingo

    And what about Toyota’s expenses that they have had to cover in recent years aswell which includes the extensive modernisation of Altona (WHEELS November 2006 pages 56-60)which has also enabled them to increase production from 110 000 to 140 000 vehicles per year. Then there are the re-equipment expenses associated of manufacturing the new Camry (and Aurion), developmental expenses of the Aurion and the establsihment and commssioning of the new R&D complex.

    No-doubt introducing the TRD to Australia hasn’t come cheap with the extensive engineering of the TRD Aurion and Hilux that has been taking place in association with Pro-drive, Harrop Engineering and the Orbital Company and lets no forget the administration, training and retooling expenses associated with introducing so many new models to our shores.

    You see 280ZX – Toyota has had a damn lot of expenses to cover aswell not just Holden or Ford yet have been able to be profitable.

  • Steve

    When I hear things like how much manufacturers spend on designing a new car, I wonder why it can blow out to a billion dollars.

    Is it just that the cost of producing a car is now more expensive then ever? Or is it bad management/choices?

    Steve

  • Andrew. M

    Dingo, pull your toyotas nose out of it. 280ZX said nothing about toyota nor did he bad mouth them. he was asking a question about the figures represented.

    280ZX,
    yes mate these are net figures they display meaning the ones showed do consider the development costs. so you are right to assume that 1billion has come off holdens turnover and the orions development costs would be reflected. id alos guess there would be some more orion development costs to be reflected in their next statement aswell.

    and lets not forget that fords US figures should reflect the performances of Landrover and Jag so it would be interesting to see how Jag and Landrover affect fords balance sheet

  • Adam

    Dingo…
    are you PAUL in disguise!!??

    Ok, American manufacturers are losing money only in America, due to many factors…which some are…

    Legacy costs…they have to cover retirees for the rest of their lives…even when they stop working for the company, no national healthcare system there.

    They have unions, so can’t just sack workers and have contracts they must honour with the unions…

    The Asian manufacturers don’t suffer at least these problems…

    In AUS and in many parts of the world aprt from NA, Ford, GM and Crysler don’t suffer these issues..

  • jbot

    Lol Dingo and Paul do seem very similar!!

  • 280zx

    Yeah same here Steve i cant understand why it costs so much but apparently its made from scratch etc etc but it is still alot of dosh for one car?? Thanks for the heads up Andrew and as for you Dingo well i wont waste my breath unlike your good self!

  • http://AustralianCarAdvice Dingo

    I’m also the Chief of Toyota.

    280sx – about time… long time coming but good to see.