Ferrari California Review | CarAdvice

Car Advice

Ferrari California Review

FERRARI CALIFORNIA

Pros: 

Cons: 

By Mark Hacking |
FIND DEALS

Price: $297,660 to $342,100

Our Rating:  

Perhaps I’ve got an overly developed sense of self, but I like to think that my opinions of various cars might occasionally serve a purpose. Not in the case of the 2009 Ferrari California.

Words Mark Hacking, San Diego, California

Reason being, this car, the fourth platform in the current Ferrari lineup, recently hit dealer showrooms around the world, but it’s already been sold out for the next two years.

_MG_1068

The story is the same every time a new Ferrari is introduced. So: road tests and critical reviews have no bearing whatsoever on how the California will be perceived by the motoring public or how successful it will be in the marketplace.

Given the fact that this 2+2 was guaranteed to be a sales success regardless of how well it drove, it’s a minor miracle that the California is as good as it is.

_MG_1104

And it is good—very, very good. In fact, because Ferrari labels the California a Gran Turismo and not a sports car, I was genuinely surprised at its level of performance.

But let’s step back a bit.

_MG_1193

During the manufacturer presentation, I learned that the California is the first Ferrari with a foldable hardtop, a dual-clutch transmission and a mid/front-mounted 8-cylinder engine.

I also gathered that this latest Ferrari is, as mentioned, positioned as a true Gran Turismo, albeit a more affordable car than the 612 Scaglietti.

_MG_1207

From this introduction, I expected the California to be a fairly laid-back ride—you know, the kind of machine older fat cats drive because the F430 or 599 Fiorano are too extreme, was I wrong.

_MG_1583

Although the California is powered by ‘only’ a V8, it’s a 4.3-litre V8 engine complete with direct fuel injection and variable valve timing.

_MG_0933

Mounted towards the middle of the car for better weight distribution, the engine develops 343kW of power and 484Nm of torque. It possesses an 8000rpm redline and howls like a caged animal when driven through tunnels, just magic.

All versions available for our drive from Los Angeles to San Diego were fitted with Ferrari’s seven-speed, dual-clutch, automated transmission. A six-speed manual is also available, but there’s no reason in the world to opt for it because this dual-clutch gearbox is, I believe, the very best in the business.

_MG_1514

The shifts are so fast, it’s almost frightening, you expect some kind of hesitation between gears, you get none.

If this is Ferrari’s take on a “lowly” Gran Turismo, it’s no wonder they have become such a legend among car aficionados.

_MG_1319

The manufacturer estimates that the run from 0-100 km/h takes less than four seconds; there’s no reason on earth to believe this is false bravado. The California is ridiculously quick.

On the drive south, the Ferrari proved hugely entertaining. Of course, the engine and transmission represented a potent one-two punch.

_MG_1588

The standard carbon ceramic brakes were not tested to their limits, but they did serve to remind us that this car is very true to the Ferrari performance heritage.

_MG_0980

Of course, the aluminum foldable hardtop provided ample opportunity to soak up the hot west-coast sun.

The interior of the California alone suggests this thing means business.

_MG_1867

Awash in stunning tan leather, the car also boasts some dynamite touches: namely, the badge on the right side of the dash declaring Ferrari as the Formula One Constructors Champion from 2008, the instrument panel with its bright yellow tachometer and the F1-inspired, flat-bottom steering wheel.

_MG_0955

On said steering wheel are two key switches: the large red engine start button and the smaller red manettino control switch that adjusts the transmission response, stability control, traction control and suspension settings (when the car is equipped with the optional active dampers). The wheel is, simply, flat-out cool.

_MG_0949

The interior of the California is, otherwise, very clean and simple in terms of design. The centre console houses a fairly rudimentary navigation system (which is apparently a Chrysler design), the climate control switches, the buttons to operate the launch control, select reverse or pick automatic shifting, and switches to operate the power top and windows.

The ‘back seat’ comes with the choice of either a shelf with leather tie-down straps for luggage or a pseudo-seat with very little legroom, for luggage!

_MG_0945

While the Ferrari California is wildly impressive, I’d be remiss in my duties as a car reviewer if I didn’t mention a few criticisms – despite the fact that they’re surely irrelevant.

The steering proved too light to the touch and the seats didn’t offer sufficient side support during aggressive cornering. These are the only aspects of the car that did not encourage sporty driving, and even they weren’t enough to dampen spirits too much.

_MG_2107

Having said all that, with more direct steering and racier seats, the California would be close to perfect.

Some critics have offered that the car is not the prettiest design to emerge from Maranello, but that’s an argument for another day.

_MG_2225

One thing is true: it’s distinctive. Another thing: all those people on the waiting list probably don’t care what the design critics think, either.

In the final analysis, the 2009 Ferrari California is an incredible piece of machinery.

_MG_2078

It possesses the sheer style of a true Gran Turismo blended with the performance capabilities of a genuine supercar – an intoxicating blend no matter how you slice it.

2009 Ferrari California: Specifications

Base price $472,000
Vehicle type: Front/mid-engine rear-wheel-drive 2+2 convertible/coupe
Engine: 4.3-litre V8
Power/torque: 343kW/484Nm
Transmissions: six-speed manual or seven-speed dual-clutch
Fuel consumption: 13.1 L/100km (combined)
Zero-100 km/h: < 4.0 seconds
Top speed: 310km/h


 

Owner reviews of the FERRARI CALIFORNIA

Write a review for the FERRARI CALIFORNIA

Do you own this car? Share your opinion and add your own review below.
Add a New Review

  • Frank

    For the price of a nice 3 bedroom, 2 bath home – I’ll take it!

    • Dave

      What suburb is the house?

  • Dude

    Iv always thought this thing was butt ugly, and i think iv just figured out why…. the main projector lamps are set to far forward in the head lamps, this causes it to have a googly eyed appearance that effects all recent ferraris. They should be set further back and deeper in the head lamp housing. Funny how minor details can affect the whole look.

  • Alex

    I have grown to like the way it looks, but I still think the folding hard top did swell the backside too much. I’m sure the drive makes up for it though. I’m not quite sure if I trust Ferrari’s reliability when it comes to the roof though. After all, this is technology that even BMW and Mercedes has had trouble with so if Ferrari got it completely right on the first try, I would be amazed.

  • whatefa

    It’s a Ferrari styled by Mazda.

    Another grinning gummy car.

    No thanks.

  • http://Caradvice.com.au Baddass

    Hmm, styling has grown on me, but that huge boot is still so wrong!

  • Carfanatic

    This is one totally wrong Ferrari, what were they thinking?

  • josh

    Not even one shot showing what it looks like with the trick folding-roof up? really?

    • Sgt.Sweetchuck

      They are in California! only rains 4 days a year.
      No need for roofs

  • Martin

    Well I think it looks fantastic… And I am really not a Ferrari person.

  • Tom

    I also think it looks brilliant, yeah the rear is a little large but so is Beyonce’s and noone complains.

  • crouchy

    What a great car. My only concern is that everyone lost it at Lexus for doing the double deck exhaust but no-one has mentioned it on this… Just proves how many Lexus haters there are out there…

    The rear is a little bit busy. Could be a lot cleaner but a beautiful car overall.

    • Martin

      Good point about the double stack exhaust. Although, I bet Ferrari have made all four pipes actually real and not only two.

  • zahmad

    Love it! Only gripe is that stacked exhaust.

  • Astonalicious

    Wait, a six-speed manual is available? That’s the first I’ve heard of it.

  • Alan

    ANTI-SPAM word: Maserati
    I can’t help but wonder if this car should’ve being badged as a Maserati, funny that is the anti-spam word for me.

    Anyways, the styling is still butt ugly for me, and i have seen it in real life and on the road a few times. I can’t imagine this being used everyday as a GT car either, especially like mentioned above, i wonder about the reliability of an italian made roof as complicated as this. I think i’ll have to agree with JC on times UK that MB SL is a better choice.

  • Kevin Walsh

    Own an SL55AMG. Drove the new SL63AMG, Audi R8 and now two days driving Ferrari California. The Ferrari is the best car that I have ever driven, comfortable, noisy beyond believe. Will never reach its potential in Australia on our roads.

    • http://Koenigsegg Kevin Walsh

      Noisy with the roof down. Conversations are easy above the noise with roof up.
      Seven speed double clutch gears easy to use driving manually.

  • Dany

    You know what is so funny … every one who cant afford a Ferrari, not even a California, say’s that is ugly, IT IS A GREAT CAR and you know what? you can use it on a day by day basis, more than that after 25.000 Km the roof still works, and more to come, on a mountain road … like the ones on the Alps no the jerky straight roads in US, it is fantastic, the engine is perfect, the steering response is great the car is a very very good one great fun to drive, does not give you that wide impression of a supercar … And for the guy who said that they are in California and they dont need a roof … well budy you need a roof if you know how to drive a Ferrari, but I guess you dont need one if you are driving a lazy ass prehistoric aged american convertible … A … 5.0L V8 who cant go past 60 MPH.
    Come on people … get a life.

    Oh and for the writer you are right … there are some who say that this is a ugly car … and you are right the ones who afford it dont care what others are saying, they buy it and enjoy it.