Car Advice

New GM benefits from US$16 billion tax loophole – report

By Matt Brogan |

According to a report published in The Wall Street Journal yesterday, the ‘new’ General Motors could benefit from a massive US$16 billion tax loophole once it emerges from bankruptcy court.

‘New’ GM will be able to claim the tax benefit stemming from operating losses tied to Motors Liquidation Company, better known as the ‘old’ GM.

Known as “tax-loss carry forward”, the strategy is usually safeguarded against in bankruptcy court – preventing entities from buying bankrupt companies only to benefit from the tax loophole – but GM’s “363″ sale allowed the company to benefit from the old company’s losses on a technicality.

“The result seems to retain the cake while eating it,” said Duke law professor Jeffrey Coyne. “They get to sell quickly and without the many procedural protections because this is not a plan. They get to keep the (net operating losses) using a provision that requires the transfer to happen as part of a plan.”

As the bankruptcy sale happened so quickly, GM will likely avoid paying federal taxes for years to come and although some might argue that the US government’s majority ownership of GM makes it a moot point, there are still others set to gain from the tax loophole.

The UAW’s retirement fund now owns 17.5 per cent of GM and will also be exempt from paying taxes for the next several years.

On the other side of the coin, companies like Ford that didn’t take a government handout will be at a disadvantage, paying billions in taxes that GM will avoid.

With: The Wall Street Journal


 
  • AB

    I find it ironic that the companies that had foresight, better management plans and stronger product lines are the ones that will suffer.

    Why dont they all declare bankruptcy and follow suit

  • Lukaas

    GM’s lawyer’s research and planning skills should be copied down to their product planning and development departments.

  • Alex

    Oh why won’t they just go away? Even now they’ve gone through the whole bankruptcy thing, does anybody actually want them or the cars they build?

  • Big Oil

    Alex, judging from the large number of positive posts here (and over at the Drive blogs too) regarding Holden’s Commodore announcement yesterday, the answer seems to be yes, people want them around and yes they want their products (although with Holden it’s hard to distinguish that from blind Australian parochialism sometimes).

  • Shak

    Alex your telling me you dont want the ZR1 and the CTS-V.If you dont want one of them then somethings wrong with you.

  • Lukaas

    Shak,

    People not into sports cars with massive V10 engines dont want those cars.

    Something wrong with them?

  • Andrew M

    Isnt the world a funny place.

    Surely with that sort of coin at risk of being fleeced from the tax payers with out an agreement, once the media sprays it around, people will call for action from Derrick

  • Capri-XR2

    good to see GM is looking after their bonuses and how not to pay the public money back, the public money that saved GM in the first place.

  • jon

    Mmmmm GM are such a deceitful company, they built years of crap and now the innocent tax payers are having to foot the bill. The same thing happens in this country and to be honest its ridiculous, I mean if a company can`t stand on its own two feet than why should it be constantly supplemented by us to survive. Well according to the Productivity Commission that ends in 2015 so bring it on, we will soon see how long they survive and also with tariffs reduced to 5% next year I think it will make things harder for them in the mean time.

  • Alex

    Big Oil, I was thinking more in terms of GM’s American operations. After all, we have been told numerous times that Holden is safe even if GM goes down. I don’t know how that can be, but they have said so.

    Shak, actually I don’t really care about those cars. I think they’re great cars and I like them very much but at the end of the day, neither are ground breaking and the only real reason why everybody is so enamored with them is because finally GM managed to release a sports/super car without making a hash of it.
    I know they are so much cheaper, but it’s not as if a Corvette is better than a 911 or a CTS-V better than an M5. They are excellent cars I’m sure, but they don’t bring anything new to the arena other than a bargain price.

  • Jester

    Wow- great news, not. As if anyone with an IQ greater than 80 will buy another sub-quality, dinosaur GM product. Their cars are a joke, and the only reason they still exist is all the government assistances. If they were a proper business they would have gone under 20years ago.

  • Tom

    It is ridiculous that a Government can punish a company like Ford for not going bankrupt and requiring bailout money, by giving their competition a massive unfair advantage. Think of how many platforms GM should be able to engineer with $16 billion. Its a massive slap in the face to all manufacturers operating in the US who did the right thing and survived with their own means. I’m reasonably happy GM survived, just for the damage their bankruptcy would have done to Ford, but how can companies compete in a non-free market, which is what the US Government has created.

  • Jack

    Seems to be the way of the world. Make mistakes and fail and pay the price. Make huge mistakes and get a free ride. The sad bit is those who astutely plan, save and remain profitable are not rewarded with great loopholes. A system that encourages dependency and rewards profligacy and poor planning?

    There has been a great cost to GM and its bondholders and shareholders. The company has now lost its independence and its stakeholders have received next to nothing in the dollar for the saved money they invested, and now see their investment Government run and around 17% owned by the UAW, of all organisations.

    Madness.

    I wonder what Mullaly said when he heard of this? His action to secure funding before the GFC arguably saved Ford from a similar fate, and in hindsight was impeccably timed.

    Indeed, I wonder what Henry Ford would think? He paid back his initial investors quickly and owned FoMoCo privately; it was not even listed. He owned every level of the supply and production of his cars; he was able to pay double the wages going to employees in Detroit, and built to such a massive scale and speed that a Model T could be made in 26 seconds – crates with components were built to exact sizes and then became the floors of the T! Planned to perfection, built to massive scale, complete individual control of ownership; in the days before currency inflation he was able to make the cars cheaper for the consumer year after year in an exceptional example of productivity gains actually benefiting all people! Just try to imagine it today…

    He had total control, the complete opposite of the total dependency we see in New GM. Where did Free Market Capitalism go?