Car Advice

GM posts US$6b loss; burns US$10b cash

By David Twomey |

General Motors Corporation in the United States has said it burned through US$10.2 billion in cash and posted a net loss of US$6 billion in the first quarter of 2009.

The massive loss came as the company relied on a government bailout to ride out a sharp decline in global sales that overwhelmed its cost-cutting efforts.

Revenue dropped by almost half to US$22.4 billion as the company cut production by a staggering 900,000 vehicles and worked to run down costly inventories in the United States and Europe.

The results showed the extreme pressure on GM with just four weeks remaining for the embattled carmaker to win deals to slash debt and operating costs with its major union and creditors to avoid bankruptcy.

“Results were awful, as expected, however, GM’s cash burn was even worse than we were expecting,” Kip Penniman of KDP Investment Advisors said in a note for clients, according to Reuters Newsagency.

Body Shop

GM Chief Financial Officer Ray Young said there was evidence consumers were scared away from the company’s cars and trucks because of concern the carmaker was headed for bankruptcy.

GM cut US$3.1 billion in operating costs in the first quarter, including just over US$1 billion in North America, but the latest push in a four-year campaign to cut costs failed to keep pace with the plunge in sales.

“You could not offset the revenue implosion that we experienced here,” Mr Young told reporters following release of the quarterly results on Thursday.

GM Shreveport Assembly Plant

GM’s North American operations, where it plans to cut 21,000 factory jobs and close more than 2600 dealerships, posted a loss before interest cost and taxes of US$2.5 billion.

Henry Brown Buick-Pontiac-GMC Dealership Grand Opening

European operations, which Italy’s Fiat SpA has proposed taking over, posted a loss on the same basis of US$1.2 billion as vehicle sales in the region dropped 29 per cent.

GM still hopes to complete a debt restructuring out of court but is readying plans for what it expects would be a quick bankruptcy if that proves necessary, Mr Young said.

2007 Saturn Outlook at Lansing Delta Township Facility

He said GM expects to draw on the experience of Chrysler LLC, which filed for bankruptcy last week under the supervision of President Obama’s government.

“We are very, very cognisant of this issue of revenue perishability and how consumers react to the threat of bankruptcy,” MR Young said.

Mr Young said GM would make a decision at the end of May on whether an offer to extinguish US$24 billion in bond debt in exchange for new shares had garnered enough support for the company to avoid a bankruptcy filing.

GM’s global market share fell to 11.2 per cent in the first quarter, down from 12.4 per cent a year earlier and it posted a first-quarter net loss of US$6 billion, almost double the loss of US$3.3 billion a year earlier.

Wilmington Plant Adds Third Shift

The company has lost US$88 billion since its turnaround efforts began in 2005 under former Chief Executive Rick Wagoner.

The losses are expected to mount in the current quarter when GM shuts down US manufacturing plants for up to nine weeks in an effort to run down inventory and lessen its exposure to bankrupt former subsidiary Delphi Corporation.

GM is facing a government-imposed June 1 deadline to reach agreements to overhaul its operations and cut more than US$40 billion in debt.

It currently has a US$15.4 billion in emergency loans from the US Treasury and expects that to rise to US$18 billion by the end of the month.

General Assembly-Lansing Grand River Plant

The first quarter was marked by GM’s failure to win backing for a turnaround plan that the US government autos task force concluded was too slow-moving to succeed.

President Obama’s government ousted Mr Wagoner as GM CEO at the end of the quarter, replacing him with Fritz Henderson.

GM really needs to win concessions from the United Auto Workers union to make headway on in restructuring and is continuing talks on what the UAW will accept in return for about US$10 billion the union is owed for a trust fund for retiree healthcare.

A New 2005 Pontiac G6 Assembled At GM's Orion Plant

The current proposal is that it accepts GM shares, which would give the union a 39 per cent stake in the restructured company.

Under the restructuring plan GM detailed last month, the government would own a majority stake, effectively nationalising the 100-year-old Detroit-based carmaker.


 
  • adam (aka mada)

    Wow.
    I think quick bankruptcy will be GM’s fate.

    Ford is doing very well in comparison.

  • Tom

    Just for comparison for Q109:
    Ford: $1.4 billion loss
    Toyota: projecting a $3.7 billion loss (results come out today I think)
    Chrysler: unknown, bankrupt, but it lost over $18 billion last year as a rough guide to its quarterly losses in this environment.
    Honda Automotive: $US3 million loss
    VW Group: $AU448 million profit
    Daimler: $AU2.53 billion loss
    BMW: $AU97.2 million loss
    Mitsubishi: $AU806 million loss
    Fiat Group: $AU757 million loss
    Ferrari: $AU100 million profit (recession my a*se!)
    Audi: $AU640 million profit.
    Skoda: $AU49.3 million profit.

    A large chunk of Daimlers loss was their write-off of their 20% stake in Chrysler. Overall, everyone down, except VW.

  • lazybones

    I think bankruptcy is their only option, they have been avoiding the B word in poor effort not to scare customers away and make the problem worse. Thats why Obama offered warranty on all GM products if they did go to C11. I found some news reports about GM’s bankruptcy options dated in 2005!!! This is nothing new, they appear to have been in the sh*t for years. So now its inevitable.

    The question is, will Rudd bail out Holden so they can build the cruize?

  • BJ

    What an appalling mess; how can GM possibly avoid Chapter 11 now?

  • Alex II

    $88 Billion loss since 2005 is just staggering, this means that even during boom times GM was not viable. The US Government is in a no win situation no matter which way you look at it, they will just have to keep pouring money into a black hole.

    I am a Ford man myself, so I don’t want anyone taking this the wrong way. I suspect the only reason Ford isn’t facing a similar fate to GM and Chrylser is they organised loans before the GFC, this could have been sheer luck or really good management, I guess we’ll never know.

  • Dick Justice

    If GM started making decent cars perhaps they wouldn’t be in this situation.. I say screw them, let them fold like a brittish nanny

  • topdog

    Wow here we go again thay need few billion more just to see off the month,There heading towards over 100 billion in loses the way things are going no one is ever going to see this money ever paid back ,The goverment needs to end it all quickly thay wont even have enough money to help them if thay keep going the way thay are, in the end it will be all wasted

  • Limited Slip

    OUCH !! it just keeps getting worse as I said it would months ago. GM is now not worth saving as the taxpayer has wasted enough money keeping GM alive……..how mch more is going to be wasted? This is money that WILL NEVER BE PAID BACK and next quarter another 10b then another 10b………and so it goes. Please put GM out of their misery as they have had enough time and money wasted on them……….enough is enough.

  • AAA

    Looks like it’s a bottomless money pit. May be the best thing to do is to just put that company to sleep.

  • Limited Slip

    AAA money black hole……

  • Tom

    I was slightly wrong about the Toyota numbers, for the quarter they lost $US7.7 billion, on a sales drop of 21%. If you are going to make your first loss in 59 years, might as well make it a big one.

  • john

    Chrysler had too go into Chapter 11 because they failed too meet their obligations by the 60 day deadline imposed by the President. Had they sealed their deals they would have receive more “Free Money” from the government. It is funny how they call this money a “Loan”. No one is going too see this money again, it is nothing more than a free gift too the Auto industry. Also chrysler has not gone bankrupt. They have filed for Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Protection which means they can trade as a solvent company while they work out restructuring with their creditors, employees and the court. If they fail, they then go Chapter 13 which is Bankrupt. As for GM, if I was them, I would continue to go down this same path, while the government is willing too hand out free money. Once the money dries up (if it ever does), then file for Chapter 11!

  • Frontman

    john Says:
    May 9th, 2009 at 9:53 am
    Agree wholeheartedly, the other funny thing is, whilst we are being told how much the US senate is dishing out to GM & Chrysler, we aren’t privy to the ongoing contracts and State funded handouts still hapening in the Southern factories. Especially given that the two biggest recipients are also posting losses.

  • Limited Slip

    GM has said if it survives it wants to have just 4 brands…….Holden isnt one of them

  • Wheelnut

    Limited Slip – The 4 brands you refer to are primarily for the US Market – Chevrolet Buick Cadillac and GMC.. GM would still want to maintain a prescence in Australia.

    The reason they kept the Holden name when they took over ownership of the companies was because of the history heritage popularity and familairity of the name in Australia [same applies to Opel in Europe]

    In GMs initial statement as to what they intend to do as part of their restructuring plans etc they said that they plan to keep Chevrolet Buick Pontiac Opel and Holden – and get rid of Saab Saturn and Hummer

    Then a couple of weeks ago when they made the announcement that they were getting rid of the Pontiac brand they didn’t say that there were any other changes to their original plans.

    So if GM were going to dump Holden don’t you think that they would have made a similar announcemnt to the one they made in relgards to the desicion to dump Pontiac

    I mean the reason that GM kept the Holden name when they took over ownership of Holden was because of the history heritage popularity and familiarity of the Holden Name in Australia.. They wanted to have and maintain a recognised presence in the Austral Pacific region and the same applies to Opel

    Plus given that it looks as though Fiat are intent on buying Opel.. I wouldn’t be surpised if GM decide to transfer procudtion of the Insignia the Corsa or the Astra to Holden and other GM plants around the world whiclst they still hold the rights to the design and tooling etc.

    Thats not to say that whrn Fiat buy Ople they wont be able to build the Insignia or Corsa its just that it will look virtually identical to the ones built by Holden or Daewoo

  • Limited Slip

    GM cant afford to keep Holden as they keep losing money.

    GM WON’T survive anyway so no point in denying it……..

  • Lukaas

    funny that the luxury brands has not taken much hit, considering their “demographic” are not affected at all..

    Honda and other exceptions surprisingly on a profit, but maybe due to new models? Not sure.

  • Maneesh

    Ford should sue the Federal Government of USA for giving an unfair handout to GM. Ford have been doing the right thing and making cars that people actually want to buy. GM kept making cars that people no longer wanted to buy. GM was No 1, and Ford obviously wants to be No 1, but cant because the government is propping up a dinosaur.

    Totally unfair!

  • Duck

    Seriously I don’t know much about this stuff……………but I’d like to know…………

    Why has Chrysler done financially worse then General Motors?
    And why has Ford done better then General Motors?