blog counter
2007 Cost Of Ownership Survey : Car Advice | News Blog

2007 Cost Of Ownership Survey

May 29, 2007 by Alborz Fallah  




The 2007 RACV Cost Of Ownership Survey has been published and the results are a little surprising. The cars are judged on many factors such as cost of financing the vehicle, operating costs including scheduled services, registration, insurance, fuel, tyres, etc.

Cars were broken down into 10 categories.

  1. Light cars
  2. Small cars
  3. Medium cars
  4. Large cars
  5. People movers
  6. Diesel & hybrid cars
  7. LPG
  8. Compact SUV
  9. Medium SUV
  10. Large SUV

Click on each category to see the winners and losers.

Share this article:
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • MySpace
  • del.icio.us
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Digg

Pages: Page 1 Page 2 Page 3 Page 4 Page 5




Related Articles:

Kia Carnival most affordable people-mover
The RACV has also released its results for the lowest cost people-mover to own and operate, with the Kia Carnival

Toyota Aurion tops large car survey
The Toyota Aurion AT-X has bested its rivals to be named the least expensive Australian-built large car to run, according

2008 Honda Accord Hybird?
Honda and Toyota are the leaders in Hybrid technology with the rest of the world now playing catch up. The

KIA tops US Green Index Survey
KIA has topped the Smart Green Index for the large car segment in the US with its Amanti (also known

Cheapest car to own and maintain
I don't know how many emails I get with these questions every single day: Which car is the least expensive car

Comments

7 Responses to “2007 Cost Of Ownership Survey”
  1. Dingo says:

    ACTUALLY DRIVE – i do have a message to submit and i would appreciate a return offer.

    Regarding the medium SUV comparison… why wasn’t the Kluger used instead of the Prado. I recognise the Prado is not not exactly a ‘medium’ hauler nor ‘large’ but agianst the Nissan Pathfinder and the Captiva or even the Ford Territory, it is not exactly within thier league either with it’s ‘FULL’ of road abilities. A far more appropriate choice would have been the Kluger in this instance so i beg the question…. why the Prado (with greater off-road abilities then the comparo)then the Kluger (of which is more comparable) ??

  2. Nick says:

    The 380 is great, would never go back to Holdens. I think they should have included more cars in categories like Light. Where was the colt for example? It has the most economical 1.5litre petrol engine in Aus.

  3. Diana says:

    The RACV uses the highest volume selling vehicles in their survey and as a result the Kluger missed ot this year.

  4. peter alex says:

    In your comparison of diesal and hybrid running costs i was quite suprised to see the standard honda civic cheaper to run. I s this a general trend?

    I was thinking of buying a mazda 6 sports in the diesel version assuming i would save some money instead of the standard model.

    If it is going to cost so much i may be better off sticking to a large family sedan which is what i have had all my life.
    I am confused!!

  5. new buyer says:

    i agree with dingo …
    why was the Toyota Prado used in the med SUV catagory ????? the Klugar would have been the natural choice to put up against the other rivales…

    Drive .. can you give us a answer why the Prado was used insted of the Toyota Klugar ????

  6. tredinertok says:

    Hi

    Very interesting information! Thanks!

    Bye

  7. RoFlmaTiC says:

    I would also like to add that the major reason for the korean brands seemingly being less affected by the world recession is because their currency is rapidly depreciating. Thus if they sell the same number of cars in America for example, this will instantly convert into higher profits for them because of the exchange rate.

    On the other hand the Japanese yen has skyrocketed (see: www . x-rates.com/d/USD/JPY/graph120.html for example) and thus the drop of sales in USA is amplified.

Speak Your Mind

Tell us what you're thinking...
and oh, if you want a pic to show with your comment, go get a gravatar!

*
To prove you're a person (not a spam script), type the security word shown in the picture. Click on the picture to hear an audio file of the word.
Click to hear an audio file of the anti-spam word