blog counter
European Imports Not Safe? : Car Advice | News Blog

European Imports Not Safe?

May 23, 2007 by Alborz Fallah  




Yesterday I was writing about the Volvo Crash Test Laboratory in Sweden and arguing that Volvo and other European manufacturers are spending a great deal of time and resources developing safer cars.

However word from Motoring journalist and safety advocate Clive Matthew Wilson suggest the importers of European cars had “completely lost the plot in the past decade”. A big claim indeed, but what does he mean exactly?

They are more concerned with style over substance, stripping out safety features to keep costs down helps the manufacturers sell more cars as it makes them cheaper, but the end result is that ordinary people die,” Mr Mr Wilson said

Imported cars are being stripped of their safety features? How could Australians be so blind to not notice? Mr Wilson says that importers of European cars (e.g. Ateco) are bringing cars to Australia with the lowest possible specifications and selling the cars with limited safety features (base models).

In doing so, importers are able to charge a fortune for higher end models that have the safety features that give them their credibility. Even though the safety features on the high end variants here are standard on the base models in Europe.

Furthermore, Mr Wilson points out that many Australians are being fooled by the European New Car Assessment Program (ENCAP) which despite being highly reputable, does not apply to Australia imported vehicles due to specification differences (for the worse).

What also worries me is Australians are reading international crash test reports where the safety features were included.” he said.

One of Mr Wilson’s main targets has been curtain airbags which tend to get stripped out of imported vehicles to cut costs. He also argues that our neighbours in New Zealand don’t share our problems.

Given the relaxed import laws in NZ, Japanese & Korean cars are available at a much cheaper rate, hence European importers have to compete.

“In New Zealand, importers are competing with second-hand Japanese imports with all the safety features. In Australia they do not have the same competition. It’s a cozy arrangement between the car companies to leave safety devices off to cut costs.” he said.

Of course you couldn’t talk about unsafe cars without bringing up the Holden Barina, and Mr Wilson comes out firing.

The (Holden) Barina has ABS standard in New Zealand, but in Australia it does not come with ABS, but costs about the same price,” he said.

Why would Holden ship the Barina (which received a 2 star safety rating – you can watch the video here), without ABS standard? It all comes down to money.

As for the European cars, we will have to investigate this claim a little further, expect a lot more on this issue in the next few weeks.

Share this article:
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • MySpace
  • del.icio.us
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Digg



Related Articles:

Ford Attacks Holden over Korean cars
Holden has so far escaped media outrage over importing cheap Korean cars, with the company's small, medium and SUV vehicles

Holden Astra is officially finished
GM Holden has confirmed to CarAdvice something that’s been fairly obvious for a while; the Holden Astra imported from Opel

Where does my car come from?
CarsGuide has put up a good article regarding where cars in Australia come from. Although I don't tend to point

Holden suspends Astra imports
GM Holden has taken the unprecedented step of suspending imports of its second best selling car the Opel-made Astra, sighting

Dick Johnson Road Safety Ambassador – Not So Safe
Update: we have been informed the photo is more than 12 months old. Firstly, let us just say, Dick Johnson is

Comments

5 Responses to “European Imports Not Safe?”
  1. Steve says:

    It’s sad if this is correct. And it is even more sad that I have held this nagging belief (hunch) for quite some time myself.

    I also wonder how some cheap little Peugeot and other small Euro cars come here with massive price tags due to the fact that they are no different to the standard Mazda 2’s and such, yet come with all the toys and safety features. Thus jacking up the price because competing models don’t come with the toys as standard.

    pipsqeek

  2. Amanda says:

    Cheap bastards!
    Safety should be their priority. So they’re ripping us of and endangering our lives?

  3. Lost out there... says:

    Well, one carmaker comes to mind when talking safety – Volvo.

    Why is it then that they make DTSC (or ESP) optional (at $2190.00 thank you very much !) on the majority of their models such as the C30, S40, V50, S60, V70 and XC70.

    The top of the line (AWD/Turbo) C30, S40 and V50 have it but the mainstream models don’t ! It is standard on the C70 and S80 only…

    Our VW Jetta has ESP standard. It is a joke that Volvo portrays the safety image when they leave off ESP don’t you think ?

  4. Myke says:

    It’s hard to believe it would cost so much to produce safe cars considering most luxury cars arent built in Europe anymore and therefore no high export costs.

    Other car companies are able to produce safety and reasonable pricing with their cars, ‘european’ cars are no exception.

  5. ukcar says:

    Not sure that NZ gets second hand cars from Korea, as cars in Korea are left hand drive. Sure, Korean cars may be sold in right hand drive in Japan, but so too are European cars, many of which end up in NZ.

Speak Your Mind

Tell us what you're thinking...
and oh, if you want a pic to show with your comment, go get a gravatar!

*
To prove you're a person (not a spam script), type the security word shown in the picture. Click on the picture to hear an audio file of the word.
Click to hear an audio file of the anti-spam word