Car Advice

Subaru Safe & Reliable

By Alborz Fallah |

You might or might not have noticed that I am a Subaru fan boy. I have dropped little hints here and there in support of Subaru mainly due to the fact that a WRX will be in my garage before the end of the year (don’t worry you will hear all about my adventures in finding one) but no matter how hard I try, no one seems to bad mouth Subarus! Its always “Oh its soo reliable” or “its been so good” (please do tell me otherwise if you have had bad experiences). However Subaru reliability has so far been just a word of mouth from lucky Subaru owners to other ‘to-be Subaru owners’ but now there is proof!

A survey in Germany has found Subarus are the least likely vehicles to break down. Subaru placed top, ahead of Mini, Mazda, Toyota, Honda and Mitsubishi in Germany’s ADAC AutoMarxX survey, in which long-term quality was the key focus. In 2005 Subaru drivers had the lowest number of breakdowns among all brands, with an average figure of 7.12 per 1000 vehicles.

Not bad! Given that it was in Germany and Subaru is going up against the likes of BMW, Audi, Mercedes and the like! Says a lot about the Japanese brand that reinvented it self with the All Wheel Drive (AWD) Impreza and Liberty. So what about safety? Well, apart from the AWD system (more information about Subaru AWD at the end of the article), seems like the ring-shaped reinforcements around the passenger cabin of Subarus has proven it self in real life test crashes:

According to witnesses, Shona’s Impreza was hit with such force it spun full circle, was rammed into the concrete central reservation then rolled three and-a-half times, ending up on its roof. Police and Ambulance officers were amazed when they opened the driver’s door to hear Shona urging: “I can’t undo the seatbelt upside down. Can you let me out?

Subaru Impreza Crash PictureI’d like to see that happen to a Toyota Yaris (or echo) or the new Holden Barina with its 2 star safety rating, I reckon the Barina would have exploded on the spot!

More on Subaru’s AWD Systems:

Continuous AWD: Subaru manual transmissions use Continuous AWD, normally 50/50 front-to-back power split and use a mechanical viscous centre differential to to vary the power split when there is a loss of traction.

Variable Torque Distribution AWD (VTD). Introduced in 2001, VTD transfers powers front to back electronically. The power split is 45/55 front/rear and the rear bias is designed for a nicer, more luxury car feel as opposed to the front bias of the Active AWD system. Usually 45/55 front to back split but that varies according to wheel slippage. In 2003 VTD AWD came into use for the Outback, Liberty GT with Sport Shift automatic transmission and Impreza WRX with automatic transmission.


 
  • http://spaces.msn.com/gokufigoneojin/ amanda

    my brothers subaru isn’t reliable :)

  • ebony

    My partner and I are currently looking to buy a used Subaru Forester 2.5L manual no older than 2003. I want to be as best informed of the pros and cons of buying this particular car, and wonder if you might be able to help with this process. After having driven one yesterday at Docklands, I am sold on the performance, comfort, and all round features of the car from what I can tell. Though I wonder of running costs and maintenance costs of the vehicle in respect of 100,000 km service, general service, tyres, etc. I would greatly appreciate your advice and guidance regarding the Subaru Forester 2.5 manual, and the above questions. We are certainly looking to buy a used forester with low km’s, manual, and no older than 2002/3 before the end of financial year. I have done some internet based research and spoken to others who have owned Subaru’s however I would like your opinion also.
    Thank you kindly, ebony

  • Paul

    Not sure about reliablity… first time Ive seen it top a survey, in other ones it was Mazda – Honda – Toyota top 3. And from the stories I hear albeit about older WRXs, they dont seen overly reliable… in their defence its because tools have thrashed them, but thrashing or no thrashing that figure should be represented.

    As for safety, that example wasnt safety… like it contributed but it was pure LUCK. Ive heard of stories where people with cars that when they were built the word crumple zone, abs or airbag werent even invented get out of crazy situations… alot of the time its just a fluke.

  • Nick

    My Subaru Liberty 2.0R has not impressed in terms of quality and reliability. The issues have been:
    1. ECU being sesntive to petrol quality and retarding of timing, this involved a revised version of the ECU software being loaded and running on 98 octane.

    2. Assorted squeeks and rattles in the cabin (Subaru only warrents this stuff for 12 months!)

    3. Battery is marginal resulting in not being able to start in cold weather sometimes. I had to replace the battery with a one with a higer CCA after wasting my time with Subaru.

    4. Very think sheet metal that dents far too easily.

    5. Expensive and very frequent servicing (mine must use fully synethic oil every 6 months!) 4 cyl Engine uses timing belt (not a chain) and diff oils need changing, etc.

    6. Boxer engine and AWD means poor fuel consumption around town even for a 2 litre 4, when I factor in the cost of 98 octane fuel and the service costs my AU Falcon is very cheap to run in comparison even in terms of direct fuel costs.

    All in all my Subaru has been a big dissapointment, the only saving grace was its purchase price ($34K) I can live with the issues and the fact it has good safety and handling. If I had paid 40K to 50K for a more upscale one I would be very angry. Bottom line is that I would not buy another one.

  • Tom

    So far I’ve had no issues at all with my MY05 Liberty 2.5i Luxury, so I’m surprised you’ve had so many problems nick. I admit that the boxer engine isn’t particularly efficient, I usually clock around 10L/100 K in the city, and around 7L/100km on the highway. Also how come Nick you are running 98 octane in your car, was that to fix the ECU issues? Mine runs pretty much the same whether i give it 91, 95 or 98, no noticable shift in fuel efficiency or power output. Still, I can see why your annoyed with subaru, the dealership should look into those problems and fix them, and subaru servicing is expensive, but subaru excellent resale makes it worth while I reckon.

  • Nick

    Tom,

    The 2.5L is designed to run on 91 octane fuel, not so the 2.0 in the 2.0R, the 2.0 needs a minimum of 95RON. The current 2.5 has more power but also needs a minimum of 95RON. Subaru have flashed the ECU with a software revsion and insist as per the service bulletin that I run 98RON fuel and fully synthetic Subaru oil to avoid retared timing in the future. Once the timing is retarted by the ECU the car is undriveable its that bad.

    I’m glad you have had a better experience with yours.

    My theory on the frequent servicing is that Subaru is under-capitalised and is making do with a decade plus old drive train, hence the service needs. I also believe that the joint venture between Inchcape and Subaru means that Inchcape wants a good income stream for its dealers, so 12.5K or 6 months stays,when a 12 month 15K interval would be fine. This is also evidenced by the ‘mean’ warranty that only warrants ratttles for 12 months and does not offer roadside assist… Nick Senior’s operation is greedy.

  • Gavin

    Hi

    I have owned my 03 RX liberty 2.5 for 5 months now. I had a Vectra 2.5 QUAD CAM 24valve v6 for that a sold it after a year because it spent more time going wrong and in the shop that it did working(4k on repairs), I reckon too much tech.My Subaru on the other hand has been super reliable. In the 5 months that i have owned it I have done 12000km’s. It is booked it for its 1st service(112500) with me monday and Subaru Doncaster.

    I will admit the fuel consumption is not great my v6 vectra was better, im happy if i get just less that 10L\100km city driving which I mostly do.About 6\7 on highway. Who cares about old technology. It works and its reliable. The car also handles better that any car I’ve ever driven, bar my mates MY02WRX, which out powered obviously. Prefer the Liberty for luxury and ride quality.

    Well on a last note i could never knock a Subi, not at the moment.

  • http://www.solveit-uk.com Carl

    I imported a WRX 1996 model last year and on the last day of 2007 i crashed it (was a wet and crap tyre thing at some speed) thing is i was on a dual carriage way left lane, slid to the right lane, banged against central reservation for 150yrds, started spinning, went through a turning gap in the central reservation hitting the posts on both sides of the opening (still spinning) across onto the other side of the carriageway, over the pavement, down and embankment and smashed into a golf course fence. 450 yards from start to finish.
    My Point…. both me and my mrs when it stopped looked at each other said r u ok then said “that was like a crazy fair ground ride” we got out without a bump, scratch or ache. so you work out safety. but then again i suppose the struts bars on front and back along with it being a wrx model may of helped but i’ve already found a few others im interested in from Japan again.

    http://www.solveit-uk.com/imports/subaru-v-limited/crashed_scooby.jpg

  • Sheila

    Very safe car, according to my experience. I owned an ’05 Impreza 2.5RS and last year, some guy ran a red light and T-boned me on the passenger side at an estimated 60mph on a 25mph zone! My car got turned around 180 degrees and got pushed to the sidewalk. To make a long story short, my passenger and I walked away without a scratch. Even the attending officers and fire crew were amazed. The only problem we ran into was the passenger side door was stuck shut and had to be removed to let my passenger out.

    When everything was settled w/ the insurance company, I went out and bought another Subaru (an ’08 model).

  • perry

    Hi,
    We have a Myo2 Liberty Heritage. My daughter has the same, my sister has the wagon (which was mum & dads) & my niece has an Impreza. So reliable, may not be the most feul efficient or pwerful, but compared to the Holden Astra we had, super cheap on servicing. My sisters car has 250,000kms on the clock has been around Australia & from the Gold Coast to Perth. Never missed a beat & still running strong. Handling is fantastic in all conditions. Great to pull up next to those UTES at the lights in the wet & watch them slip & slide when the Subi just leaves them. Yeah they catch up but your doing the limit & they have to be speeding. I’ve had a lot of cars over the years, Honda, Toyota, Mitsubishi, holdens & the Subi would rate the best. The Mitsubishi Callenger was the most comfortable & cheapest of all for servicing but way too plastic.

  • Wheelnut

    I own a White MY02 Subaru Impreza 2.5 Litre Automatic RS Sedan [which I believe is the best looking model to date] and so far I have had approximately 90;000 absolute trouble free kilometres with my “non-turbo” WRX.

    I have however; made a few enhancements such as adding a K&N performance air filter etc which has increased the power to almost the same as a rex.

    Mind you reliability of a car depends on how you treat it.. if you regularly maintain and service it you should expect it to start every time and perform as usual – yet if you neglect it and thrash the c–p out of it in traffic light drags for example well then; of course you’re going to have problems.

  • Wheelnut

    Tom – I also average 10L/100Km city and 7L/100Km on the highway.. and when you consider that my subie weighs 1400kg I think that the 2.5 litre boxer does a pretty good job at getting all that weight moving

    Part of that reason I believe is due to the fact that a couple of years ago I switched over and I now use premium in my car and have noticed that I am [or I appear to be] getting more k’s out of each tank as the car runs smoother – although that depends upon how you drive it and what speeds you cruise at etc

  • Alain

    Hello

    l di-egree regarding subaru reliability,wrong subaru has never ever been ablable to address Head Gasket issues pretty much since they built cars.And when it comes to replace head gasket is an expensive exerice,since the engine has to be out .l have one forester first subaru and last one never again.Remember Subaru has always been small on the market.Tribeca is a piece of S… on wheels.

    cheers alain from australia

  • Websters Dictionary

    Such fine words from an obviously well educated person.
    now if only I could understand those words.

  • FrugalOne

    Subaru are a good product, but at the end of the day they are NO BETTER than any other of the Japper made product, all be owned by BigT [tm.F-0] soon enough.

    Pity the brand has been butchered by the doof-doof types, and mostly fugly looking things are/nt they?

    Cheers

    F-0

  • zi

    I have a liberty 97 AWD. Bought it 8months ago. The car is fantastic, never let me down and it has 195,000kms on the clock. Everything has been awesome.

    This morning i left it for a major service at subaru and my bill is $2500 :O woww, now this is a shock

    I didn’t buy german to that i could afford maintainance at a dealership but it seems like Subaru’s part are as expensive as Beemers.

    $1300 Major service
    $700 New radiator
    $500 front brakes and rotors

    I’m never buying a second hand car ever again.

  • matt

    This makes me sad :( i just recently wrecked my 04 subaru wrx. I miss that thing so damn much!

  • Brett

    I just got a wrx 99 and the motor and gearbox through in the towel after 700kms but i like the car and have just put another motor in and im in the process of getting the box done i would jut like to know how many hours labour can a mechanic charge to remove the box split the box replace the centre diff and bearings at the rear of the box put it all back togeather and put box back into the car i have paid for all the parts

    Thanks
    Brett

  • Tauhid

    I just buy Subaru 2010 liberty 2.5i crv and don’t know how much realiable the car will be. Because I run every week 700 mile. Can any one give me advice. Thanks.

  • Steven Bloxham

    subaru’s reliable? You bet…
    I only buy used Subarus that need their head gaskets replaced. I get them for a song and they seem to last forever. My 1st head gasket job was a bear but after that I can do the whole job in 3-4 hrs. It is one of the easiest h-g jobs in the world. Regardless of what a shop says, a h-g job on a Subi is a pieceof cake!
    Everything is right on top (the alternator, the a/c compressor, the starter, the cam and crank sensors, the map and the maf sensors. Everything is simple to work on and if you live within an hr of a good u-pull-it type of wrecking yard they are awfully cheap to keep on the road.
    Tweeking them tohave more power isnt the best idea, in my opinion if you want a fast one just get a wrx or an sti or a stock tubo 4 cyl. Actually I’m going to try a simple nitrus injection system in my95 Legacy and my Forester just for fun. I know Kia and Ford are working on a similar ethanol injection system as suggested by MIT and Dr. Heywood’s team. This is about the only mod that is logical.
    In stock form the Subaru is hyper reliable and the few failures that do occur are well known and ez to fix.
    And cheap too. Shops differ, but they have a reason to differ.
    I live in the mountains of California where we had over 600 inches of snow this last season. Our old Legacy (95)and our 01 Forester do better than a Jeep. its quite humorous to drag a big heavy Ford or Chevy pickup out of the snow. With my little Forester I’ve made a monkey out of a lot of big SUV owners. It’s pretty funny.
    MPG is in the low 20′s, nothing to write home about but the low cost of repairs more than makes up for it.
    Plus: the Legacy and Outback are American made with American made parts. Higher % USA content than even the Ford or Chevy trucks. Want American made? Then Subaru is the way to go.
    Reliable? Yep, but learn to fix them yourself (and how to read a $65 OBD2 reader) or find an honest repair shop. (good luck with that one!)
    AWD in Subi’sis something else and the automatic transmission is tough as nails. It will eventually fail but you will be at 200k miles when this happens.
    Even my SVX (bought a garage kept one for 1900 dollars and its quite a car, better mpg than the 4 cylinder ones I own believeit or not) and even the svx uses the same transmission. Automatics may cost 1mpg but the ‘feel”and reliability make up forit.
    if I want a smooth quiet road cruiser you can’t beat an older Lexus LS400 or the Subaru SVX that we just picked up a few months ago, they are both cheap, reliable and smooth as silk, but for all around general purpose use, the regular old (any 95 to 2003 are just fine if you are careful to avoid the dohc 2.5 engine … …still a good engine but much harder to do a h-g job on) awd Subaru’s just can’t be beat.

  • AndyM

    Hello i have beee reading all the great comments here on Subarus, and am seriously thinking of purchasing a Subaru Forester My04 – my06 model for around the $14 to 17k mark for an XT Luxury. I realise i need to keep an eye on the oil colour, the regular service history, and underneath to see if its gone, off road, but what else should i be looking for. If i am getting one around the 110k to 130k kilometress mark should i need to be looking for timing belt replacement etc?

    I also noticed a major service was $2500 from one pundit above. Question is what are major service marks and are they all that expensive. (40k, 100k 150k etc, and what do they do at each one.?) and if you don’t do 5000k every 6 months do i still have to the oil regardless?

    all tips i’d be greatful.

    ta Andy