Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution X Review | CarAdvice

Car Advice

Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution X Review

MITSUBISHI LANCER

Pros: Astonishing handling and grip; straight-line acceleration; TC-SST dual-clutch transmission;Recaro seats.

Cons: Noisy engine at high revs; poor fuel economy, bone-shattering ride; lousy interior.

By Anthony Crawford |
FIND DEALS

Price: $56,990 to $65,990

Our Rating:  

It might be the most user-friendly Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution ever built and quite possibly the last of the famous rally-bred, street-legal lineage, but the Evolution X still goes like a scalded cat and does corners at impossible speeds.

The Evo – as it is more widely known – gained legendary status in the 1990s when Finnish rally driver Tommy Makinen won four World Rally Championships in a special WRC edition of the Evo. They even built a special edition Lancer Evolution in honour of the driver – the Tommi Makinen Edition, also known as the Evo VI.

The current-generation Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution X first graced Australian shores in 2008, a year after it captivated the crowds at its unveiling in Japan.

Physically, there have been no discernable changes to the current Evo over the ensuing years, apart from new side air dams introduced on the 2010 model year.

A few minor tech updates and interior revisions across the 2011/2012 editions were about the extent of it.

And so it’s no great surprise that Mitsubishi has maintained the same formula for the 2013 Evo update, with no mechanical or exterior revisions.

What they have done is add value with a substantial price cut across the Evolution range of up to $8900, along with a new audio system featuring a standard fit 6.1-inch screen with Bluetooth connectivity and a rear camera.

The range-topping MR edition we tested receives Mitsubishi’s new Multimedia Communication System with a 7-inch touchscreen, voice-activated Bluetooth and satellite navigation with 3D mapping.

Our Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution X MR is essentially a speced-up version of the Evo X and gains additional gear such as Brembo two-piece front brakes, front and rear Bilstein shocks with Eibach springs, HID headlamps with adaptive front lighting, 18-inch BBS forged alloy wheels, heated leather front seats and a Rockford Fosgate audio system with nine speakers including a boot-mounted subwoofer of some size.

That might seem like a fair bit of kit over and above the standard inventory on board the Evolution – inventory that includes full Recaro bucket seats, automatic climate control, power door mirrors with electric fold and auto-on headlamps and rain-sensing wipers. But the Mitsubishi Evo’s interior is otherwise a collection of hard-touch plastics with the odd chrome-look highlight.

It’s certainly not what you’d expect to find in a four-door sedan priced at $65,990 before on road costs. However, it is still significantly better than its Evo IX predecessor when it comes to interior trim and standard kit.

Traditionally, though, Evo buyers have been less concerned about the look and feel of the cockpit than with what lies under the bonnet.

All Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution X models are armed with the same inter-cooled and turbocharged 2.0-litre MIVEC petrol engine, generating 217kW of power and 366Nm of torque. Neither number matches the respective outputs of the Evo’s most famous rival, the Subaru WRX STI (221kW/407Nm) but you won’t be left complaining about a lack of speed.

While it has a particular talent for impossibly quick corning speeds, the Evo is anything but slow in a straight-line dash. Mitsubishi claims 5.4 seconds for the 0-100km/h sprint with the six-speed manual, while the MR edition with its mandatory six-speed twin-clutch transmission needs 5.6 seconds.

Mind you, that’s still several tenths quicker than the recently released Renault Megane RS265 and faster even than the Audi S3 Sportback.

Compared with the hardcore and less compromising Mitsubishi Evolution IX, the Evo X is infinitely more liveable as a daily driver, particularly if you choose the MR edition with the TC-SST transmission.

Slip the shifter into Drive and the Evo X is happy enough ambling around busy car parks or performing the stop/start shuffle in the peak hour crawl. In this mode the engine is lazy and the throttle response is almost dull.

But once you get some clear road ahead in the Evo, you’ll feel a profound urge to engage either Sport or even the S-Sport drive mode for that instant Jekyll and Hyde behavioural shift in the Evo X’s on-road demeanour.

Sport is where you’ll want to be for any road conditions that don’t include bumper-to-bumper or slow-moving traffic. In this mode even left in automatic, throttle response is snappier and the shift points are higher up the rev range. The gear changes are also noticeably quicker.

Step on the throttle with some extra purpose and the Evo turns manic. Push forward on the rocker switch again to S-Sport and this is where the Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution X really comes into its own – throttle response is appreciably quicker and the engine starts shrieking as the rev counter hits the 7000rpm redline.

It’s a god awful sound from inside the cockpit, but you’ll soon forget about that when you’re slicing up the tarmac with all the precision of a hot-shot neurosurgeon.

It’s a drive mode that’s best left for occasional track day outings or the moment you stumble on a deserted section of twisty road and the enthusiast in you takes over.

Right foot planted firmly on the floor and the Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution X is doing what it was bred to do – carving through S-bends quicker than a thoroughbred Italian exotic is capable of.

Even at this fast and furious stage, it’s still fine to leave the dual clutch transmission in auto mode as the rev counter winds out to near 7000rpm on full-throttle before shifting up. However, most drivers will naturally engage the superb magnesium paddle shifters for that extra driver engagement, especially when braking hard into corners from fifth down to second.

There’s not a lot of turbo lag either, zero if you the keep the revs dancing around 3500rpm where the Evo’s torque peaks.

But it’s not only the straight-line pace that’s frenetic and seemingly quicker than factory claims, it’s the fact that through many of the turns you barely have to lift off – let alone brake.

When you do need to haul up in double quick time, the 350mm Brembo brakes up front can wipe off speed remarkably quickly.

The only problem is that there’s precious little feel or progression in the brake pedal, more like you’re pushing against a concrete block.

Part of the Evo magic can be found in the super-quick steering ratio needing just 2.1 turns from lock to lock. There’s minimal wrist effort required, except if you’re trying to perform a three-point turn, as the turning circle is atrocious.

The Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution X is also armed with an arsenal of chassis aids that allow the car to carry such astonishing pace through corners. At the heart of these systems is Mitsubishi’s S-AWC (Super All Wheel Control), which effectively harnesses the workings of four independent wheels including an active centre differential with three modes (gravel, tarmac and snow), Active Stability Control, and Super Active Yaw Control that apportions torque between the rear wheels.

These combine with the Evo’s full-time four-wheel-drive system to provide a level of handling that simply re-writes the laws of physics as we know it – rain, hail or shine.

It might go the clappers and handle on rails, but just don’t expect anything that resembles a decent ride – this is bone-shattering stuff.

The superbly moulded Recaro seats do their best to offer some relief, but the Evo has a unique ability to seek out every crack and minor blemish in the road and let you know about it.

It’s not so bad on the larger speed humps, but the standard suburban road provides nothing less than go-kart levels of ride comfort.

The Evo’s fuel economy is similarly merciless. The best combined fuel consumption reading we could get over the week-long test was 14.2L/100km – rising to 16.4L/100km during a more enthusiastic session. The end result is multiple trips to the 98 RON petrol bowser to replenish the trifling 55-litre tank.

Evo owners must truly be a dedicated bunch. They put up with an ordinary interior (except the Recaros), kidney-bruising ride, poor fuel economy and an asking price that’s significantly more expensive than a Volkswagen Golf R and Volkswagen Scirocco R, or Renault Megane RS265 – all outstanding performance cars.

They do so because the Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution X is still one of the world’s most capable sedans and downright untouchable in the twisty bits.

There is still no word from Mitsubishi on the next iteration of the Mitsubushi Lancer Evo – although reports suggest that it will be a hybrid.

Owner reviews of the MITSUBISHI LANCER Add a New Review

WE RECOMMEND YOU ALSO CONSIDER...

  • RecursiveLoop

    Owned one of these before trading in last year for a more “family-friendly” car….I still miss it everyday. It’s untouchable in the twisties by anything less than $150k.

    • Adrian

      Oh don’t know about that I would Say the Renaultsport Clio or Megane would do better on twisty roads.

      • Garrywhopper

        Yes, would say, but you don’t know

        • Seano

          Owned one as well as a few clios the evo x is untouchable in the twisties !! On the race track here in qld the clios win go figure that haha

      • Damian

         That’s assuming they don’t fall apart beforehand…

        • Adrian

          I can assure you my RS200 clio has not once let me down once. Your comment just points out your lack of knowledge.

          • Zaccy16

            Yeah they are great cars the rs200, thinking of buying a used one

  • Zaccy16

    Great handling but getting abit dated

  • Kampfer

    $65,990 before on road costs?! That’s same as the up-coming BMW M135i which is quicker 1-100 (5.1s manual/4.9s auto). Shame about the BMW’s look…

    • Wile E Coyote

       I prefer the BMW looks to down market Japenese with clip ons e.g. EVO and WRX

      • hehe

        Wile – the potential buyers of Evos don’t care about looks – it’s all about what’s underneath 

        • Wile E Coyote

          Clearly

        • Dominique Vøn Hütch

          I’ve always thought it looked menacing and aggressive, but generally good looking as well.

    • F1orce

      The BMW has 6-cylenders. This has 4!

  • JamesB

    A Japanese test saw the SST accelerate quicker than the manual. There’s no point adding $5,000 for a slower gearbox, and it’s not meant to be an auto.

    Apart from the handling, it’s hard to argue the Evo over other cars of the same price, such as the Lexus IS350 and BMW 135i. They’re much better made inside. With the exception of 4WD, they’re also just as quick and very capable, and more importantly, way nicer for everyday use.

    The Evo’s fuel economy is also mysteriously atrocious, even with its performance credentials. I can’t blame the 4WD system as an Audi Quattro of similar size, weight and power can do much better in that area. What’s causing it then?

    • Zaccy16

      Yeah the evo is still a great car but getting on these days compared to rivals

      • PSY

        Agree.  A top contender these days needs to blend all aspects together, not good enough to have a back breaking ride and absolutely $hit fuel economy and interior for a performance car in 2012.

        Only Evo fanbois need apply.

        • JamesB

          I understand it doesn’t have direct injection and stop-start, but with modern technology and aerodynamics, it should still be more economical than it is.

          • RecursiveLoop

            The car runs very rich stock. Mitsubishi knows that most people who buy the Evo will most likely modify the car to some degree and they make it run rich to reduce the number of blown engines. Also more fuel running through the engine has a cooling effect which is good for most Evos that will end up on the race track. This is why you can get gains by a simple drop in panel filter which leans out the fuel air ratio.

            Bottom line, if you are even a little concerned about fuel economy, this is not the car for you.

          • Hehe

            Agreed – and that’s exactly the market the Evo marketing team is targeting. 

            It’s an unforgivable car – people normally buy Evos as the toy car for track and modification – not as the primary car in the house!

    • Dominique Vøn Hütch

      The Turbo sucks like you can only imagine…apparently some chip tuning, intercooler and exhaust modification can lower the avg fuel by a couple of litres.

    • JooberJCW

      You need to also take account that a chunk of evo buyers, will look to modify these cars, for track or personal purposes.
      The IS350 is the least tunable, 135i, parts too expensive. whilst japanese cars always offer bang for buck with all their go fast bits.

      Definately agree though off the shelf and keeping it that way, an evo is definately not up there for the complete package.

  • PSY

    Oh, and a sub in the boot… seriously?  L O L.

    • Brayden_cresswell

      90% of new cars have a sub in the boot…

  • F1

    The Golf R is a pure hairdresser car in comparison with this..

    And the GTI caters perfectly for 16yrs old girls

    • Guest

      What a moronic comment. Going off that logic, I wonder what target market the Micra caters for? 

      • Golfschwein

        I agree it’s absolutely silly. As someone who likes the Golf R (you mean you can tell?), I respect these totally. And I can do that without resorting to lame ownership stereotypes. There’s a Evo, WRX and Golf R for everybody.

        • Legnab

          Some of us prefer nicer interiors and we like to keep our spines in tact , evo is  a great car , but times have changed hence the price drop .

        • JooberJCW

          Funnily enough the Evo and Wrx Sti have the same target market, just like FPV and HSV. its like your a fan of this badge or the other.

  • PB

    Weight of this car kills its fuel economy. Its extremely heavy for a car of its proportions. Poor interior quality really lets it down. Tiny boot space doesn’t help. I wouldn’t say it’s a great handler. People confuse handling with grip. This car has phenomenal grip and makes talent-less drivers look and feel good. A Renault Megane RS265 will run rings around this car both on twisties and track with a decent driver in both cars. The EVO is just way too heavy. Take a look at the showroom class at TAS Targa, the Mazda 3 MPS constantly beats all “showroom” EVO’s even though they run in the 4WD category. If the EVO was such a great handler it should dominate in stock form but it doesn’t.

    This car feels a little lost. Not practical enough to be a real sedan for the family man. Looks to boy-racers yet costs so much. Isn’t really attractive enough to be a sports car. Not faster enough in a straight line to be an XR6 Turbo or Commodore SS. And for a 2.0L Turbo drinks fuel like it’s going out of style. So what is it? I think it’s lost it’s way and has no direct links to WRC any more. As I said earlier it has phenomenal computer controlled playstation type of grip but I can get that from playing a video game. It’s just not the car that it once was, raw, fast, light and crazy fast.

    Nowadays there are much better options for a lit less money Than a Lancer EVO.

    • moulton2speed

      I have done 2 trips to QLD from southern NSW in Evo X and frequently got less than 10 litres/100 km. Certainly not at silly speeds. The 55 litre tank is a pain though , an obvios attempt to reduce weight. I’ve done 44k km since ownership, no problems. Tyres lasted 30k km and biggest expense so far. Love it

    • Roo

      “Mazda 3 MPS constantly beats all “showroom” EVO’s…” No, not really.  Multiple Australian rally champion Simon Evans constantly betters part-time and casual Evo drivers. No surprise there.  Does that mean the MPS is better than an Evo? Course not, unless you’re talking about running costs and insurance premiums… Imagine if Evans did drive a “showroom” Evo?!

  • Robin_Graves

    This is the only Mitsubishi I would love to own.  At least they handle some decent mods without killing the engine (or killing the stock engine in the case of the VeeDuds)

    • Andrew

      Dude you don’t know what your are talking about, killing the vw engine. They are probably the hottest tuner car at the moment. Have a look at the latest motor mag and the apr tuned golf r with dsg. My Golf gti with the newer ea888 and k04 turbo dsg would destroy the evo and still cheaper. I smash everything in straight line and with my other footwork mods have clocked 1:08 at Wakefield park. No probs after 60 thou kms with mods and my mum can even borrow the car. In saying that respect to evo but needs some jdm mods first before its maad but entry price at bit too high for what it is. Whatever happened to the little colt ralliart, that would have been a good little run about.

      • Robin_Graves

        Maybe you should apply for a job at VeeDud seeing as they need to detune the GTI to stop it from ventilating pistons yet you seem to be able to fix that issue.  You also seem to be pretty handy seeing as you make a FWD car out accelerate an AWD car in a straight line. Well done.

        • Johnson

          My old Ford Festiva once beat an old RAV4 off the lights. Ergo FWD beats AWD.

          Wonderful contribution to the discussion as always Robin.

    • Legnab

      Yes you prefer lots of cheap plastic interiors , would blow you old tech G6E into the weeds ., keep dreaming grave robber you will find a replacement for your devalued falcoon , maybe the i20 would suit you .

      • Robin_Graves

        Whats wrong bunghole, VeeDud broken down again?  I dont need to replace my Falcon, its got many years of trouble free motoring ahead of it, unlike your timebomb on wheels.  Whats worth more than a VeeDud out of warranty with a blown engine or DSG that costs more to fix than the cars worth?  A bus ticket, or maybe one of your Demtel frypans.

        • Legnab

          YER but your old teck falccon is worthless at least i will get good retained value 60% plus , yours sub 38% .

          Still waiting for this mythalogical explosion , your like a broken record , no listeners .

          MATE its time to dump the old G6E falcoon pensioner special , worthless in todays downsized wolrd of economical lightweight performance cars .

          • Robin_Graves

            No listeners because all you deluded VeeDud fanbois stick your fingers in your ears and go “tralalalalalala’ 

            Go and hijack a thread on another website, talk about me being a broken record – we are talking about a Lancer here not my Falcon and not your p00fmobile.  And before you act like a 2 year old and go ‘oh but you started it’ I was talking about one of the many merits of an EVO over the competition, they have enough headroom to handle some fairly decent mods without going kaboom, unlike your 5 year old stage 10 habibi special tune GTI. They had to be ‘detuned’ to try and last the warranty period in Australia due to the ‘heat’ – talk about fragile euro trash.

          • Legnab

            The prophet whose knowledge beyond a falcoon is zero , and no one is interested in your trollollo comments .

          • Hung Low

            Bungle, explain why a 3yo FG XR8 is worth similar money to a R36 Passat that cost 20k more from new than the XR8???

          • Jober As A Sudge

            I think you two should get a room instead of venting your love of each other on this website!

  • Matt

    I don’t see why everyone complains about fuel economy and a stiff ride, the evo is built as a track car. The road going version of this is called the lancer ralliart, look it up if you haven’t heard of it…
    If the evo was cheaper, had a softer ride and better fuel economy, the ralliart would be obsolete because that’s the point of it, whereas the point of an evo is when someone wants to go ridiculously fast in a stock car.
    My personal opinion is that if you want luxury, don’t go for the evo, because that’s not what it aims to achieve, although if you want the quickest car and best driving experience, the evo is the way to go for sub six figures.

    • Sumpguard

      Agree wholeheartedly.  I  wouldn’t own it due to a neck injury but damn I wish I could.

  • UMWHAT

    I don’t like how the 2013 model made the air vents the same colour as the car. The black vents looked better

    • RecursiveLoop

      The GSR gets the black vents. The MR spec gets the colour coded vents.

  • grumpy

    I heard its only got a small fuel tank,so a short range with the fuel.saw that on an old top gear show.Dont think I would buy one,friend of mine had an earlier model and had nothing but reliability problems,such as he ended up replacing the engine and still had issues after that.

    • Matt

      it says in the article 55L fuel tank, that will get you about 400km with normal driving. And how can you judge a new Mitsubishi by an old one? They have the largest warranty in Australia now with 10yrs on the powertrain, how can they be anything but reliable?

      • RecursiveLoop

        The Evo X is very reliable. It’s essentially a road-going rally car, so everything is over-engineered. Some people are putting down a large amount of power on the stock engine. FYI the stock engine comes with forged internals. I tracked mine quite a bit, tuned it, brought it to the skid pan, weekly runs up the mountain and it never skipped a beat. Of course, the more you mod it, the more risk you run of doing damage. But isn’t that half the fun? :-)

      • grumpy

        read the fine print,pretty sure its only a drive train warranty for 150,000km or 10 years whichever comes first.yes i have owned a mitsubishi,it was an australian built magna and it was so unreliable I would never go near they’re product or anything with a mitsubishi based engine again.I dont know how they could get something so atrocious on the market.

        • RecursiveLoop

          Don’t think you can compare a Magna to an Evo. Tons of Evo owners have been putting a lot of power down reliably with the 4G63 and 4B11 engines. It’s like saying you won’t try Windows 7 because MS-DOS was bad.

          • grumpy

            whatever, wont ever buy one of theyre cars,wont take the risk.I am not the only one who thinks most of the mitsubishi product range is junk,known other owners who wont touch them again.not just magna either.

  • Lot6 Mahoney

    Hows your hyudai i30 sports now???

  • Lot6 Mahoney

    Hows your hyudai i30 sports now???

  • James Cortez

    Listen its now the Euro cars that rule! European produce diesel engines which the Jap can’t even hope to emulate. Kia may come close but they are second to the euro nonetheless. The Europeans produce low pressure, high pressure turbos which the Jap has no answer. Honda used to carry the japaneese flag but is now left behind by the Bimmer, let alone the Porsche. WIth the exception of Hybrid, Japs no longer produces exciting mass production cars (you can’t treat the porky GTR as mass produced car)

    Likewise this EVO. Bye Bye. Megane, VW R leave you behind. Good luck catching up – if you can -

    • JamesB

      It will, once your beloved Euro car is on a RACV/NRMA tow truck!

      • James Cortez

        I don’t need no tow truck airhead. Euro cars nowadays are reliable. Who sells teh most cars to China?? VW yes you bet not the japs, let alone AUSSIE bulit cars.

        • Hung Low

          I think there are many other historical reasons why the Chinese would not prefer to buy Japanese brands and Euro cars are still behind for reliability and long term running cost. Too much EURO loving down at your end to write off the EVO as Japans no answer. Perhaps explain where were all the Golf Gti’s and Megane’s at the grueling Bathurst 12hr production races?

          • JooberJCW

            Exactly.

          • James Cortez

            I don;t watch Bathurst race. You’re still lost by not answering why the chinese prefers Volkswagen! What luxury cars do the rich Arabs and Chinese prefer??? BMW 7 series and Mercedes S class. Golf GTi is an all round performance cars. Go to England / Germany, do you see more EVO than GTi?? NO!!

            That tells you something.

          • Zaccy16

            I know what cars the chinese cars want, Cars with Lots of legroom!

          • James Cortez

            I don;t watch Bathurst race. You’re still lost by not answering why the chinese prefers Volkswagen! What luxury cars do the rich Arabs and Chinese prefer??? BMW 7 series and Mercedes S class. Golf GTi is an all round performance cars. Go to England / Germany, do you see more EVO than GTi?? NO!!

            That tells you something.

        • Birty_B

          The Chinese Hate the Japanese. VW have massive production in China and there own car industry is well behind the rest of the world. Hardly a fair comparison between vehicles. 

          • James Cortez

            Hey it has nothing to do with ahte. Common sense, rationale prevail. Tehy know VW cars in general are better to drive than Japs. That’s why. Think, think man!

          • JamesB

            I honestly don’t call cars with nannying driver aids which can’t be turned off better to drive. Your beloved Golf will always have them on, and the Evo will drive rings around it.

          • Birty_B

            If common sense and rationale prevailed then there would be no such thing a prestige car, or a supercar. Who could rationally pay a million dollars for a 4 door sedan with the fuel economy of a small bus or a two seater that will reach the maximum legal speed limit in 3 seconds without the ability to see what is behind you or drive over a speed bump at more then 2 1/2 KMH. Ofcourse people buy vehicles with emotion. 

    • JooberJCW

      Im pretty sure if Toyota wants to emulate they can, people can be poached or contracted to change structure and strategy, money can buy you this, you may realise that the japanese may not want to follow the euro’s? Perhaps they are running a different business strategy altogether? 

      You may also realise in Asian markets Japanese makes and models supremely outsells the euro counterparts. Also to note,hot tropical climates can affect turbo’s and increase reliability issues due to heat? and given SE Asia is a prime market, avoiding turbo helps solve reliability issues there, and hence may well be why Japanese makers avoid going the turbo route.

      If you look at the top 10 sales for last year, its pretty close, and remember with the tsunami, perhaps Toyota should have topped the list.

      • James Cortez

        See my reply to Hung Low. Arab countries are way hotter than many asian countries and there’s a lot of Euro cars there. Temperature above 120 F  in the summer  is not uncommon. If the Euro cars break under that heat then you won’t see too many of them. The fact that they are a lot of BMW, MERC, PORSCHE ought to tell you somethig about Euro realibility,

        Japaneese is falling further and further behind below their european competitors.EVO included!

        • Jober As A Sudge

          There are more Euro cars in the Arab countries purely because of the prestige of owning a BMW, Merc, Porsche etc. It has absolutely nothing to do which country produces a better car

        • F1

          You idiot there’s way way more Japanese cars in the GCC nations which have some of the most brutal conditions..

          Lexus outsells Mercedes, BMW & Audi in GCC

          • James Cortez

            You are an idiot> the mainstream Japs are purchased by the labor / low to low medium income earner. Middle calss and rich arabs / sheikh prefer Euro dumb ass.

          • JamesB

            Only one logical explanation to James Cortez stand, he will be fired by his VW employer if he badmouths the car. If you can’t beat Jap reliability, trashtalk it.

  • Frank

    You know what’s nice (and funny) about all the comments made here and everywhere against the Evo’s Interior, it’s $hit fuel economy, it’s hard ride and its ageing look, is that they’ll be less and less appreciated, until one day in the future most of those short sighted people that commented against it will look back and probably say “What a beast the Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution X was, and what a legend!” And by then most of the Evo X’s would have all but disappeared and only a few good examples would be left, and most of the guys that condemned it would kill to own a piece of automotive history / Motorsport legend.

    In saying that IS350′s, 135i’s, XR6 Turbo’s, and SS’s will be cheap and plentiful; anyone?

    • Wile E Coyote

      Hey Frank…. you’re  dreamin
      It’s like the Mini Cooper S 
      By the time it becomes a legend in history who will really want one and who will really care.

      • Hung Low

        Any cars that appreciate in value have just enough people who care and want one!

        • Wile E Coyote

          This won’t appreciate.
          What some boy racer car that’s been thrashed within an inch of its life.
          And if it hasn’t been thrashed no-one would believe it.
          Dream on.

      • JooberJCW

        Different, if you look at the grey imports, old skylines, evo’s, are still in demand, especially by the younger demographic, cheap to buy and cheap to modify.

        • Hung Low

          Supply still outstrips demand though.

    • Wile E Coyote

      Hey Frank…. you’re  dreamin
      It’s like the Mini Cooper S 
      By the time it becomes a legend in history who will really want one and who will really care.

  • Chilli

    I owned one from 2008 and sold it in 2010 under the impression the new Evo XI was going to arrive in 2011 or 2012. Yet it still hasn’t changed shape…

    Hopefully the new STi shape looks half decent when it arrives in the next year or two

    • JamesB

      So you sold your car thinking it will have a replacement?

  • Byzon_3

    I love my Evo X its great. 
    Now I will comment on this as I own a X and have previously came from a  bmw 335, so I can give a valid option. 335 is great daily driver,but too pricey for everything, its not a capable sport car when push come to shove it doesn’t cut it. 
    Yes looks good but ive turned away from euros brand like bmw/audi as a majority of people who own them are a bunch of muppets. They have an attitude of my bmw/audi is better than yours. Ow look i wear a suit.
    While brands like evo/sti the owners all respect each other, kinda like how the motorcycle community are all very friendly.

  • Evoxftw

    Ordered my new evo x,comes in August,mitsubishi tunes these cars to run rich from factory,a re tune will see you get more out of the tank,nothing handles any Better than this in the price range,golf r,Renault 265 and scirocco r are all good cars but it all comes down to preference.

  • Evoxftw

    Ordered my new evo x,comes in August,mitsubishi tunes these cars to run rich from factory,a re tune will see you get more out of the tank,nothing handles any Better than this in the price range,golf r,Renault 265 and scirocco r are all good cars but it all comes down to preference.