BMW 335i Review | CarAdvice

Car Advice

BMW 335i Review

BMW 3

Pros: Impressive all-round performance with exceptional poise and balance; superb ride and handling, style, comfort, engine and transmission, iDrive and technology.

Cons: Lack of decent engine note inside cabin; run flat tyres; price is higher than most competitors.

By Anthony Crawford |
FIND DEALS

Price: $91,400 to $108,100

Our Rating:  

Now in its sixth generation, the BMW 3 Series is still the luxury German brand’s bread-and-butter model in Australia, and at $91,400 (before on-road costs), the BMW 335i remains the flagship in the premium mid-size line-up, at least, for now. BMW aims to release the more powerful ActiveHybrid 3 towards the end of 2012, which will succeed the 335i as the BMW 3 Series range-topper.

Prior to its release in February, there were more than a few BMW fans concerned over the new F30-designated 335i’s growth spurt since the previous E90 version.

But BMW pulled off an impressive feat – despite increasing the length and width of the new model, it reduced the overall weight by 30kg to 1520kg and even managed to introduce a more generous roll call of standard kit.

Its performance has improved too. The new BMW 335i sedan is capable of sprinting from 0-100km/h in just 5.5 seconds – shaving three-tenths off the previous model’s time.

Fuel consumption and CO2 emissions have also fallen, despite identical engine outputs of 225kW and 400Nm from the carried-over 3.0-litre turbocharged six-cylinder powerplant.

BMW claims a combined fuel consumption of 7.2 litres per 100km (down from 9.6) for the 335i sedan and CO2 emissions of just 169g/km (down from 231).

The BMW 3 Series has, for the most part over the past 29 years, set the benchmark for compact sports sedans ever since it first joined the BMW line-up in 1983 as a second-generation model.

For as many years, the 3 Series sedan has had the wood over its rivals in the performance arena with its balance, poise and the connection it makes with those lucky enough to be behind the wheel of the high performance models.

But these days, the BMW 335i flagship faces increasing competition, from the likes of the Audi A4 3.0-litre TSFI quattro, Mercedes-Benz 3.0-litre C300 and the Lexus IS350 all vying for the top spot in this high-profile, performance-based niche segment.

Equal threat can be found lurking in BMW’s own stable with the superbly balanced, but less powerful, BMW 328i. It shares the same 250km/h top speed with the 335i, but is slightly slower off the blocks, needing 5.9 seconds to complete the 0-100km/h sprint.

There’s also a significant premium to pay for the extra grunt delivered by the range-topping 335i over its 328i sibling – $27,300 before on road costs are added.

But there’s a lot more to the top-of-the-line BMW 335i than a few tenths of a second in the acceleration stakes.

For starters, it’s well stocked with more premium-grade standard features including 18-inch light alloy wheels, larger 80mm dual exhaust tips, a Harman Kardon 16-speaker sound system, Bluetooth connectivity with voice control and album cover display, an 8.8-inch high-resolution screen with Navigation System Professional and internet functionality through the iDrive controller.

As well as the five 3 Series sedan variants available in Australia, buyers can also choose between three optional ‘Line’ packages: Modern, Sport and Luxury. These finishes are priced from $1000 to $4900 depending on the variant.

There’s still a bewildering array of options on offer for the 3 Series, as the three specification lines convey more of a style package than a traditional options pack.

To complicate matters further, there’s also an M Sport Package available for all 3 Series sedan variants except the 318d. Key features include M Sport suspension, M leather steering wheel, BMW sports seats and many other performance-oriented goodies.

We tested the BMW 335i Sport Line, which includes highlights such as a double-spoke version of the 18-inch alloy wheels, ambience lighting, exclusive high-gloss black trim both inside and out, ‘BMW Sport’ doorsills finishers, black chrome exhaust tips, and several contrasting upholstery options including Dakota black leather with red highlights.

The cabin of 335i Sport Line is a nice place to be. The fit and finish is first class from top to bottom with a collection of quality look and feel surfaces married to an uncluttered centre stack and instrument cluster.

While we love the contrasting twin stitch on the upholstery and steering wheel, we’re not fans of the plastic red strip that spans the dashboard – a little too kitsch for this reviewer.

All the important things we have come to expect from a BMW sports sedan are represented here in the 335i, additional to the fact there’s also room enough for four adults and their luggage.

It starts with some of the most comfortable and supportive sports seats in the business. They simply lock you in to the perfect driving position as well as any non-harnessed pews could ever hope to do.

The three-spoke leather steering wheel is special too. It’s thick, but not too thick, and its leather wrap is specially grooved for extra feel and tactility for those hard charging moments (and there’ll be plenty of those).

Hit the well-hidden starter button (on the left-hand side of the steering wheel) and the 3.0-litre TwinPower Turbo engine plays a smooth, up-tempo tune with an underlying growl as back up.

There’s no dual-clutch transmission for the 335i, but what there is instead is a very refined, quick-shifting eight-speed automatic gearbox that does a fine job imitating the haste of a dual-clutch unit.

Our BMW 335i was also fitted with the optional Adaptive M suspension, providing some additional firepower with the Sport plus setting.

In this mode, when hard on the throttle, expect the BMW 335i four-door family sedan to instantly morph into a highly aggressive performance car with lightening-fast throttle response and shift times and a lot less nannying from the dynamic stability control system.

Less thrilling – and at the other end of the dynamic scale – is the Eco Pro setting. It sits below Comfort and Sport modes, and effectively optimises throttle response and the automatic transmission with the goal of achieving the lowest possible fuel consumption.

It’s not the most exhilarating of drive modes and, frankly, is best left for long stints on the freeway. Comfort mode is ideal in light to moderate traffic conditions, but switching to the more aggressive Sport setting is advisable the moment you get clear road.

There’s a decent exhaust note from the BMW 335i at mid-range, but it gets a little too metallic and raucous above 5000rpm. The engine is actually best heard from outside the car, as not a lot of the good stuff is channelled into the cockpit.

The all-electric steering is a delight in this setting. It tightens up on the straight-ahead and is quick to respond to rapid changes of direction. There’s loads of feedback and a real connection between the tyres (despite being run flats) and the steering wheel.

The chassis balance and suspension geometry of the BMW 335i is outstanding. The adaptive M suspension minimises body roll on turn in (it’s minimal), backed-up by the 10mm drop in ride height that’s also part of the package.

There’s plenty of grip all round, although you can feel the extra weight of the 3.0-litre six over the front end compared with the 2.0-litre 328i, which feels more agile in the twisty bits.

Ride control is equally superb. The BMW 335i manages multiple different road surfaces with such expertise that the car never feels unsettled regardless of the pace. Even with Sport Plus selected, the suspension irons out all but the most severe potholes.

In Comfort mode the ride only improves further and with greater pliancy and a less urgent throttle response.

For six generations BMW has been carefully evolving and honing every facet of the 3 Series and has again pulled it off with a more capable and stylish version than its predecessor.

The F30 BMW 335i is an exceptional car. Superbly balanced with predictable handling, and best of all it goes hard. It’s a true sleeper that doubles as the perfect executive sedan for the weekend enthusiast.

Owner reviews of the BMW 3 Add a New Review

WE RECOMMEND YOU ALSO CONSIDER...

  • JooberJCW

    Wow 7.2/100km consumption by a 3ltr turbo puts my parents 1.8ltr new elantra to shame and twice the power.

    Nice german tech.

    • Guest

      Yeah it is also 5 times the price of the Hyundai. What is your point?

      • Galaxy

        Yeah that’s right. Save your money, buy a 328 and for the $27,800 saving, buy a top of the line Elantra as well…. EVERYBODY’s HAPPY!!!

      • JooberJCW

        My point is that the engine tech difference. With what your saying why isn’t the 2 x more expensive Porche carrera with its 6cyl doing heaps much better numbers than this engine.

        • Silver Streak

          It kind of is :P The new Porsche engines are fantastic!

    • Monk

      A 1.8L Elantra puts itself to shame

    • john

       My $40000 SS Commodore puts out twice as much power (almost 420kw)

      • john

         And on LPG @ 60c a litre, $9 per 100km

      • john

         And on LPG @ 60c a litre, $9 per 100km

      • Phil

        Yet the brakes are half the size.

        • john

           355mm Brembos! Does the new 335i have 710mm brakes?

          • Phil

            Standard disc size is 321mm for Crummer V8 and a woeful 298mm for V6s NOT 355mm  – both with a rather large wheel hub centre reducing the actual brake area.
            No the BMW wouldn’t have a brake diameter twice that of the Crummer, but relative to the weight/power of the car, the disc area probably wouldn’t be too far off double that of a Crummer (remember that the surface area of a disc increases exponetially relative to increases in diameter though I doubt Crummer owners excel at maths).

          • john

             Mine are 355 Brembos and are standard on SSV redline. My daily is an E92 M3, so I have the best of both worlds, and my SS outbrakes my M3, thats a fact. My other victims at Eastern creek include a C63 and a Lexus ISF. No bad for an unopened crummer

          • Sydlocal

             So a $40,000 SS that in reality would have cost much more considering all of the modifications to a raft of components over what comes standard out of the factory? How many thousands of dollars has been spent on all of these modifications, including the LPG? It sounds like and I’m sure it is a great car and I am glad you like it, but you can’t really compare the two considering your car sounds quite far removed from what comes out of the factory. Otherwise we may as well start comparing it to a V8 Supercar, now that wouldn’t be fair.

          • john

            Total cost for mods under 5k

          • Sydlocal

             Thanks for the clarification John.

      • Phil

        Yet the brakes are half the size.

      • F1

        Yeah that much power at the crank, pitty that much power doesn’t really translate into the real world performance we’d expect, where cars with half that power can beat your sh*tbox

        • Pro346

          Sounds like f1 is a little jealous…

      • http://www.facebook.com/people/Karl-Sass/100000921334936 Karl Sass

        I’m a Commodore fan but that’s a silly comparison, especially a highly modified one.

      • http://www.facebook.com/people/Karl-Sass/100000921334936 Karl Sass

        I’m a Commodore fan but that’s a silly comparison, especially a highly modified one.

      • http://www.facebook.com/people/Karl-Sass/100000921334936 Karl Sass

        I’m a Commodore fan but that’s a silly comparison, especially a highly modified one.

      • Redbaron

        and you’re $40000 SS Commodore looks and handles like a taxi.

        • http://twitter.com/stevenpoyser stevie

          good call

          • http://www.facebook.com/emil.koutanov Emil Koutanov

              You can pick up a used rexy in a decent shape for 10K. It’ll run rings around the SS…
            … in a straight
            … in the twisties
            … in the dry
            … in the wet
            If I had an SS, I’d stay quiet.

          • john

             mmmmm search utube for ss v wrx at Wakefield. If I had a WRX id stay quiet

          • JooberJCW

            A stock SS vs stock WRX, then true a WRX will do the above, 

            once we start talking about modified cars, theres no end, you modify your car to as much you wallet sees fit and the line of whats pound for pound better than the other becomes vague

      • Sydlocal

         So it should with an engine at least twice the capacity. Is that $40,000 before or after extra money was spent on the modifications required to increase the power that much over the standard car? Take the amount you spent on modifications to your SS and spend the same on this and the difference would be no where near as much in “paper numbers”. I won’t even mention what that BMW would do to your SS on a real road with a few bends! All you are doing is comparing a modified car to a stock standard car and turning this into an appendage swinging contest.
        Seeing as we are allowed to compare apples with oranges with a ‘mine is bigger than yours’ mentality, I bet my stock standard, $17,900 133kw 4cyl would eat your ‘almost 420kw’ modified SS alive in a straight line drag…

        • john

           Lets find out. BTW, my victims at Eastern include E92 M3, C63 AMG and a Lexus ISF. Getting big power out of L98 isnt expensive, under 5k. My daily is an E92 M3 too BTW

          • Sydlocal

            Well my stock standard 4cyl can do a quarter mile in around 10 seconds flat if you get a good launch on standard street rubber. Some have even broken into the 9s with a good operator. However I would get slaughtered on the corners and under braking though! ;-) TIC

          • Pro346

            Yeah on what planet?

          • Mr Irony

            I think that Sydlocal is talking about a bike.

      • SPEED!

        Any idiot who compares a Commodore to a BMW (or Audi/Mercedes) has clearly never driven a BMW. You can go on all you like about how you get more power per dollar, but you lack the refinement, pure driving pleasure and posing value of the Germans. Don’t Lie, If you had the money to afford one, you would.

        • john

          Don’t get me wrong, I love my M3 and its a great car, but jumping into the SS just puts a bigger smile on my face every time I drive it. 

    • john

       My $40000 SS Commodore puts out twice as much power (almost 420kw)

    • F1

      There no nice tech.

      All it means if you drive with premium fuel, ECO mode on, with stop/start on and drive like a nanny then you might achieve 8L/100Km and that’s BMW’s claimed fuel economy which should be taken with a grain of salt..

      • JooberJCW

        Agree, its just a claim 

        Likewise with my parents elantra’s claim of 7.1 by Hyundai, we average at best 8.5 or so and never get to that magic 7.1 claim Hyundai makes.

        • Oh-oh_i’ll-cop-it-now

          How did a mention of a freakin crappy Elantra end in a 335i thread?  Who would admit to having one or even worse, ‘my parents’ Elantra?  Man the girls must flock to you… :)

          • JooberJCW

            lol, you missed the point, its not about the car its about the tech of the engine, and how something produces twice the power twice the  litres can claim to produce the same ltr/100km.

            and yes its my parents as they don’t really give a hoot about badge. my car is my avatar

      • Phil

        It’s the ADR figure, same test all new cars do. It’s not some figure that BMW plucked out of a hat.

        • peddy.d

          drive the elantra efficiently and you’ll get good figures. I know cause I have one. And mate those official fuel consumption figures are bogus everyone knows that

          • Legnab

            Sure and hundi got pinged in the US for blatant over optomistic fuel consumption , i would trust BMW , hundi no .

          • http://www.facebook.com/people/Karl-Sass/100000921334936 Karl Sass

            It’s not about trusting anyone, they’re OFFICIAL figures, no choice in the matter.

      • Phil

        It’s the ADR figure, same test all new cars do. It’s not some figure that BMW plucked out of a hat.

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=737660467 Kit Ho

    What a fantastic front end, even better looking in person. Love the curves of the bonnet. 

    • Legnab

      Yes this new look is growing on me , the front is very good .

  • TJ

    The old coupe’s looked great on the road.  Will BMW be introducing a coupe variant of the 335i?

    • Dominique Vøn Hütch

      Yes it will be the 4 series moit – thought we’d all heard of that by now.

      • TJ

        Ah right that makes sense.  Didn’t realize the 4 series was going that way.

  • Shak

    I’ve been seeing quite a few of these one the roads now, and i have to say i keep mistaking them for a 5er. I’m not sure if that’s a good or bad thing (depends which one you paid for, the 5er or the 3).

    • KRS

      Exactly what I thought when I saw one!! The extra length makes it look like the next 5.

    • pixxxels

      Me too I must say. I like the look of the new 3′er, but it is just too big and long!

  • nugsdad

    Obviously a great car …………. but is it really worth >$100k ????

  • Ja

    41K in the USA

    • Oh-oh_i’ll-cop-it-now

      Well go buy one there then.

      • Mr Irony

        On US Wages too.

  • Phil

    Front end looks great, but the rear end looks a bit weird, like it’s been rear-ended or something.

  • Troop

    Looks too simple and plain (esp. the interior)

  • Troop

    Looks too simple and plain (esp. the interior)

  • Ymh9890

    I can’t imagine this top of the line model still has fish-net backseat pockets as a “standard”, and it is made in South Africa too.

    • BMWDave

      Thankfully, yes, South Africa, where MILLIONS of BMWs have been made since the early 1970s. Like my 1992 E36, my 1998 E46, my current E90, which still feels like new and my just about to be shipped from Durban, F30. I wouldn’t have it any other way. Best performing factory of the BMW group.

  • Ymh9890

    I can’t imagine this top of the line model still has fish-net backseat pockets as a “standard”, and it is made in South Africa too.

  • F1

    You can get a Lexus IS350 $68k driveway fully loaded except sunroof.. 

    • JooberJCW

      Carsales say $80,800 for 2012 Sports Luxury.

      The only gripe I have for the Lexus is that your buying a body and interior unchanged much since 2005. As a luxury car buyer you want the latest tech and look, in and out.

      • F1

        Yeah but the 7 yrs old Lexus interior is much better then that ^

        Look and is better..

        • JooberJCW

          Don’t agree, 

          The trend in dash design is becoming more shape defined, which the new GS250 is more attuned to. The Lexus of 2005 is of yesteryears when people looking at new luxury cars they will easily spot whats old old quite easily.

          Though its more personal taste but given all luxury car makers are moving to this sort of design, they are the experts to know what is better.

          • Blueberry

            JCW… you my be right that the IS interior is an older design but once you sit in it it still feels expensive (bar the horrible digital clock). Yeh the sat nav could improve and the dash is the old slab design but it feels well put together and all the component work beautifully. The leather on the seats is also superb. I didnt feel short changed sitting in the Lexus after sitting in the C-Class. To put into context I personally believe the C-Class interior is the benchmark. 

  • Zaccy16

    Love the twincharger 6cyl engine!one of the all time greats, hard choose between this, the c class, a4 and is350!

  • Tom

    You claim that the price is higher than most competitors, but then list its competitors as the Merc C300 and the Audi A4 3.0, and the Lexus. I will cop the Lexus, but it is considerably more powerful and faster than both the Merc and Audi. To get similar performance, you are looking at an Audi S4, which is considerably more expensive. 

  • Tom

    You claim that the price is higher than most competitors, but then list its competitors as the Merc C300 and the Audi A4 3.0, and the Lexus. I will cop the Lexus, but it is considerably more powerful and faster than both the Merc and Audi. To get similar performance, you are looking at an Audi S4, which is considerably more expensive. 

  • Tom

    You claim that the price is higher than most competitors, but then list its competitors as the Merc C300 and the Audi A4 3.0, and the Lexus. I will cop the Lexus, but it is considerably more powerful and faster than both the Merc and Audi. To get similar performance, you are looking at an Audi S4, which is considerably more expensive. 

  • F1

    I don’t think anyone will be getting 7.2L/100Km with this..

    And what they don’t say is that the 7.2/100 is achieved with stop/start enabled..

    9.6 to 7.2 is a steep drop, not one you achieve with shaving 30kg off the weight..

    Plus those numbers are what BMW claims, they’re not official..

    • Phil

      It is official, thats the “Australian Design Rules” figure.

    • BMWDave

      Actually, they are official, just not easily attainable in city/country mix – unless lots of country.

  • Sms

    Germans don’t know how to design stylish exhuast tips..”

    Themntips looks terrible

    Same with the new 7 series the exhuast tips look like an aftermarket job compared to Lexus LS tips

    • JooberJCW

      lol

      and the ISF exhaust tips are any better?

      • Phil

         The Lexus IS F of 2007 is of yesteryears when people looking at new luxury cars they will easily spot whats old old quite easily. BMW are the experts to know what is better. (sic)

  • john

    IMO this car looks absolutely hideous, however I just read a News Alert that Stevie Wonder loves the look of this car so what would I know!

    • Wile E Coyote

      I don’t think its funny to use someones disability to support your view

      • http://twitter.com/supercujo supercujo

        Well, your disability stops you from seeing the humour in what he said. You’re both about even I’d say.

  • Rod

    Truthfully, IMO, the interior design of this car is no better than the local 3.  I am sure it is well screwed together, but it is really bland, hardly inspiring.

    • Zaccy16

      I think the interior looks classy and is full of technology

  • Wile E Coyote

    I don’t think its funny to use someones disability to support your view.

  • AutoMoto

    The dash and centre console look kind of cheap and plasticky.

  • Damian

    You can’t beat the IS350 when it comes to bang for your buck.  The F-Sport is obviously the best package, but the Prestige is exceptional value.  The BMW 335i is probably the better car overall, but doesn’t make a very compelling case for itself when it comes to value for money.

  • Twala

    looks like an ordinary 320i to me, Audi S4 looks better as it comes with S-line package, why cant BMW have M-sport as a standards on 335s?

  • Nozferatu

    I just don’t understand the draw of these cars.  I’ve driven so many of them here and there and frankly I cannot see why this is considered such a special car.  There are so many 3 series Beemers sitting at dealer lots after 3 year leases…they all look tired, used, and outdated.

    These cars are like handbags…you buy one and throw it out a while later.  Their dynamics is nothing special, they feel sterile and bland inside, they drive well enough but nothing outstanding…typical, dull, boring German cars.  Not very efficient either…heavy, use fuel like crazy, and are very poor in terms of emissions (well at least Benz and Audi…Benz takes the prize as being possibly one of the worst polluting brands on the market…very pathetic).

    I’ll stick to better cars and lower prices thanks.

    • Zaccy16

      Where are you living Nozferatu? new Mercs are very good on fuel and emmissions 

      • Nozferatu

        I’m in the States…the EPA has two scores for vehicles here..SMOG and GHG….most Mercs score very low on both scores…all out of 10 being best.  

    • Wile E Coyote

      Like what?

      • Nozferatu

        My tastes are different…I like smaller vehicles that offer more fun and character than almost any of these fat, heavy German cars.  To me an 500 Abarth is far more value for money than a Beemer is.  Different class I know…but that’s what I mean.  
        Beemers and cars in this class are simply not worth the money and their performance isn’t astounding other than straight-line.  Many cars on B-roads will easily put these cars to shame at half the cost.  A Clio Cup will humiliate the 335i on any twisty road.

        Fun/$$$ ratio of these cars are low IMO.  And they are dry as hell.  But in fairness to BMW, that’s a German car issue…they just build dry, rather characterless cars.

        For this reason I simply cannot understand why anyone would by a car like this other than to say “YEAH I MADE IT AND YOU DIDN’T.”  It has more to do with ego than car.

        • Phil

          If your so worried about the “use fuel like crazy” and “very poor in terms of emmisions” why would you want a Abarth or Clio?
          This BMW uses a fair bit less fuel than a Clio Cup and puts out almost %25 FEWER emmisions and despite the micro size of the Abarth, this “heavy” BMW is within %10 of the consumption/emmisions of the Abarth.
          For it’s size, the Clio Cup is absolutely shocking for economy/emmisions – 8.2L100km and 192grams Co2 - for a 1200kg 4 cylinder car that is appalling and quite a bit worse than this ‘big’ BMW.

          • Nozferatu

            For one, in the real world, all that can be thrown out the window.  I have a friend who owns a 335i and he’s lucky to achieve 18MPG US combined….which is rubbish.  

            I own a 500 Sport…I get 41.2 MPG combined…which blows the doors off the 33 MPG of official results.  An Abarth will lag behind about 3-4 MPG and the proof is in the actual results most owners get from the forums you can look over.

            That aside, it doesn’t really change the view I have of these big, heavy, inefficient cars.  In the real world they suck fuel like there’s no tomorrow.

          • Wile E Coyote

            Abarth better than 335i… you are kidding…fuel consumption debate is a joke
            I know if had to drive one of them across Australia which one I would choose and I don’t care how many B roads there are.

          • G1010

            You are a joke i own a very powerful 335 coupe tuned 450bhp and i get 12lt per 100kl in the city which is 19.6 mpg and 6.5lt per 100kl which is 36.75 highway at 110klh
            in full manual mode
            Your cars would be lucky if you found one in Australia nobody would buy one

          • Nozferatu

            Yeah and you forgot to mention that your gallon is 1.2 times larger than a US gallon…so you’re getting 16 MPG and 30 MPG on the motorway.  Let us know what your overall is…I’d venture to say you barely break 21 MPG if that…..driving like a granny.

            Just as a metric, at 110KPH, I’m getting 64 MPG on average…that’s 76 MPG in your fuel size.Who cares about the Australian market…both those cars are award winners everywhere else so it’s your loss.  There’s a reason why they win these awards as well.  Small light cars are plenty fun and more than quick enough for everyday driving.  

          • Mr Irony

            Do you like sardines?

  • James Cortez

    91 K??? you get a C63 AMG + VW GTi in North AMerica (States + Canada)

    • Albois

      I’m a mechanical engineer in Sydney amd I get paid 130k per annum….how much does an engineer earn in the good ol USA….60, maybe 70k ?. Horses for courses my friend.

      • James Cortez

        May be? try 100K and if you are in the oil business it’s close to 200K . lower tax. Much cheaper house prices and you know what I mean. Just don’t deny it. it is expensive cause you guys are willing to be ripped off! Good luck owning one anyway.

        • matt

          ok lets bring it down a level…. $32 an hour on sundays in the hospitality industry in oz…. whats america $6… then hound like an animal for “tips”even if the service is craphouse

          • James Cortez

            nothing to do with wages airhead. this is a forum for car enthusiasts, 

          • Mr Irony

            Well, you started it. And taxes are higher in US. In some states there are local payroll of up to 5% on top of the Federal taxes. Ouch!

            And less annual leave in US.

            I could go on.

  • James Cortez

    91 K??? you get a C63 AMG + VW GTi in North AMerica (States + Canada)

  • http://twitter.com/klowik klowik

     This facelifted BMW just looks outdated comparing to Audi or Merc equivalent. I wonder how good the sales is on this high end model.

  • James

    In my opinion the interior just isn’t good enough for such an expensive car. If I had that much money I would honestly go for the mercedes or audi. Even volkswagen has nicer interiors. But I guess people buy it for performance not for how good the interior looks.

  • http://twitter.com/supercujo supercujo

    Seems overpriced.

    • Crummydore

       Check what the Govt’s cut is… take that off and it doesn’t look too bad.

      • http://twitter.com/supercujo supercujo

        But can I buy it for that? Didn’t think so.

        • Legnab

          Cant afford it then buy a toyota .

  • Wile E Coyote

    Most of the arguments about rip off prices of luxury Euro cars in Oz I think is due to a combination of government taxes , shipping costs and  car company price stabilisation policies.
    The first thing Rudd did when Labor got in was increase the LCT.
    BMW must also be keeping prices up to hold the used market because the Oz $ has strengthened
    considerably.The fact this delivers a much higher margin is nice for them as well.
    Imagine if imports were say 25% cheaper due to the $
    Imagine what that would do to the local makers
    So if you are prepared to pay for a luxury Euro fair enough and those that cannot and whinge about the price let them eat cake

    • Zaccy16

      Damn Rudd the dud!

  • James

    I don’t understand how something can “first” join a line-up as a second generation model….

    The BMW 3 Series has, for the most part over the past 29 years, set the benchmark for compact sports sedans ever since it first joined the BMW line-up in 1983 as a second-generation model. 

  • JamesB

    The engine is a carry-over from the E90. It’s only a few tenths quicker than the 328i, but that is more balanced because of the lighter engine, and more efficient as well. Audi’s supercharged 3.0 also beats it in performance, so BMW ought to step up their game. I also hate the gloss black side-view mirrors in the Sport models.

    • Wile E Coyote

      The judges at the 2012 International engine of the year awarded the BMW 3.0 turbo over the Audi supercharged 3.0