Lexus RX270 Review | CarAdvice

Car Advice

Lexus RX270 Review

LEXUS RX270

Pros: Refined engine; smooth auto; quiet cabin; improved handling; comfortable seats; extensive list of standard features; value for money

Cons: Ride quality not as good as other RX models; slower and thirstier than comparable X3 and Q5; no F Sport trim option

By Anthony Crawford |
FIND DEALS

Price: $69,900

Our Rating:  

Lexus is hoping the launch of the new Lexus RX270 will help deliver the dramatic sales boost it needs to capture a greater slice of the of the market from its German rivals in the booming SUV segment.

Lexus kicked off the new RX range this week with the launch of the RX270, slated to go head-to-head with the Audi Q5, BMW X3 and Range Rover Evoque.

The RX270’s key draw will be that it offers more space and standard equipment at the equivalent price point of $69,900 (before on-road costs).

When you look at Lexus’s year-to-date sales figures to May, it becomes desperately clear why the Japanese carmaker needs this shot in the arm.

Lexus’s sales of 2,592 are well short of Audi (5585), BMW (6877) and Mercedes-Benz (8474). Even Land Rover, which doesn’t sell sedans, has sold significantly more vehicles than Lexus this year.

SUVs continue to contribute strongly to new car purchases – since 2007, luxury SUVs have overtaken luxury sedans as the vehicle of choice due mostly to the additional space and inherent practicality they offer over their four-door counterparts.

Lexus has positioned the new RX270 in the medium SUV class, which has seen almost 50 per cent growth in 2012, with no signs of slowing.

So while the Lexus RX essentially straddles the medium and large SUV segments, with the RX270 Lexus believes they are offering a large SUV at a medium SUV price.

The key points of difference between the RX270 and new-look RX350 and RX450h models is the smaller engine displacement and the fact that the RX270 trades all-wheel-drive for a front-wheel-drive set up.

Instead of the 3.5-litre V6 engine used in the Lexus RX350 and Lexus RX450h, the Lexus RX270 makes do with a smaller 2.7-litre four-cylinder petrol powerplant generating 138kW of power and 252Nm of torque.

While output is well down in comparison with its more powerful RX siblings, the RX270’s on-road performance is considerably better than expected despite its 0-100km/h-sprint time of 11 seconds.

That’s a direct result of the 135kg weight advantage the RX270 enjoys over the 2.085 tonne RX350 through the adoption of a smaller engine set up.

Even though Lexus is billing the RX270 as a city-suited all-purpose vehicle – more likely to spend the bulk of its time travelling to and from shopping malls, schools and sporting venues – our 200 kilometre launch drive this week proved it was far more versatile than that description.

The 2.7-litre engine is one of the smoothest-revving four-cylinders this reviewer has driven to date. And typical of all Lexus vehicles, you’ll have trouble hearing the engine spin at idle – turn the air-conditioning off and you may be able to hear a slight hum.

Equally svelte is the six-speed automatic transmission with sequential shift. It’s not a particularly quick shifting unit, but the exceptionally smooth gearshifts are perhaps even more valued given its luxury status.

Despite being the least heavy variant in the RX line up (1950kg), the RX270 is still a large vehicle by anyone’s standards, so decent progress from a standing start requires moderate to heavy throttle input.

Surprisingly though, there’s none of that annoyingly harsh engine buzz so common with four-cylinder powerplants during full throttle starts.

There’s no sign of torque steer either – another less than desirable characteristic of front-wheel-drive vehicles in this segment.

Highway travel on board the Lexus RX270 is also a breeze. There’s plenty of mid-range punch from the four-cylinder engine once the rev counter nudges 4000rpm, making high-speed overtaking on highways an entirely safe proposition.

Throttle response on the RX270 is very good considering the vehicle’s weight and engine size, with quick and precise responses to throttle inputs.

It’s a similar story in the handling and ride department. Lexus has improved the entire RX-line chassis by some margin over the previous iteration by adding 12 additional spot welds to each side of the RX body for extra rigidity.

That improvement is immediately noticeable from the very first time you turn in. Body roll has virtually been eliminated from the RX models, including the heavier RX450h.

Like its more powerful stable mates, the RX270 feels significantly more composed than previous RX models. There’s a certain planted-ness about the revised line-up that was sorely missing from its predecessors.

The revised chassis has also meant a major improvement in the steering response and feel. The level of communication through the steering wheel is greatly enhanced and is now closer than ever before to the benchmark German marques in this regard.

However, ride quality between the RX models varies significantly. There have been huge improvements to the suspension on the RX350 and RX450h models, particularly with the new RX F Sport variants.

It’s their ability to iron out the harshest road surfaces and potholes while at the same time remaining beautifully composed that impresses this reviewer most.

Sadly, the same cannot be said of the ride quality aboard the new RX270.

While the front-wheel-drive chassis still feels dynamically enhanced, the model’s unique suspension calibration fails to properly absorb impacts from bumps on poorly maintained road surfaces as effectively as its more powerful RX siblings.

Aesthetically, it’s a different story.

The RX270 shares the same new-look Lexus corporate identity complete with spindle grille and the more aggressive front bumper that finally adds a more distinctive personality to the brand.

It’s accentuated on the F-Sport models, but the grille outline is common to all variants.

Naturally, the RX270 loses some luxury kit compared to the pricier RX models, but with latest design Lexus interior from the recently released GS model, you would need a keen eye to notice such differences given the extensive inventory of standard kit on board this vehicle.

Standard features across the entire Lexus RX model range include an 8-inch screen with satellite-navigation with traffic alert; leather interior; eight-way power seats; power rear tailgate; 12-speaker audio system; reversing camera with guide assist (no front or rear sensors); smart entry and smart start; Bluetooth phone and music streaming with voice command; daytime running lamps; steering wheel easy access, digital audio (DAB+); second-generation Lexus remote-touch; metallic paint and 18-inch alloy wheels.

Lexus has always made exceptionally comfortable vehicles and the new RX270 is no exception.

The leather seats with contrasting stitching are nothing less than sumptuous and provide a superbly comfortable cushion with ample side bolstering that should suit a wide range of body shapes.

The newly-designed sports steering wheel is beautifully tactile and covered in that same supple leather as the seats. It’s also slightly padded, adding even more feel during turn in.

The dash, courtesy of the new generation Lexus GS model, is a huge improvement on the previous iteration RX, but it still falls short of its German rivals – but not by much.

Meanwhile, the second-generation Lexus remote touch system moves closer to the intuitive functionality of BMW’s iDrive system, some may even find it easier to use.

Safety is another aspect well catered for on the RX270, and indeed, across the entire Lexus range.

Ten airbags, including side airbags on the rear outer seats, are standard – as are active front seat head restraints.

Additional safety features include Lexus vehicle stability control and traction control; hill-start assist control; anti-lock braking; electronic brake-force distribution and brake assist;

The RX270 has a combined fuel-consumption of 9.7-litres per 100 kilometres. That’s better than the RX350 at 10.8L/100km, but well short of the RX450h’s combined consumption of 6.3L/100km.

The addition of the new Lexus RX270 means the entry price into a new Lexus RX has fallen by $12,000 compared with the previous entry point.

The RX270 is a compelling package, but whether it’s enough to persuade buyers away from the established German brands or the popular Range Rover Evoque, remains to be seen.

CarAdvice will also post a review of the RX350 and RX450h models this week.


 

Owner reviews of the LEXUS RX270

Write a review for the LEXUS RX270

Do you own this car? Share your opinion and add your own review below.
Add a New Review

  • MisterZed

    Just a small correction – the RX350 does not weigh 2.85 tonnes, it weighs 2.085 tonnes.  Big difference. 

    • Robbo

      It’s just ridiculous. Can you proof read your articles for once Anthony?! Stupid little mistake in every one of your reviews.

  • Bgfs

    All Toyota/Lexus engines are smooth..

    Even the Corolla engine.. Much smoother then all of its rivals…

    • Silver Streak

      Say what?!

  • Irpowah

    This SUV is better then the silly, awkward, bland and pointless German SUVs

    Besides Lexus created this segment of cars themselves in 199X

    And the Germans followed

    • GK

      Lexus didn’t create Land Rover did they? Fact is the Germans actually followed Land Rover – specifically Range Rover. BMW owned LR from 1994 to 2000 before deciding to sell to Ford and build their own range with their own brand.  

    • bd

      Big difference btwn the Germans (well, BMW and MB) creating RWD CUVs based on the same platforms as their compact and midsize offerings and Toyota creating the FWD RX on the same platform that underpins the Camry.

  • F1

    The Lexus RX is very popular in North America..

    The Lexus RX alone sold 10,647

    To put it in perspective, the entire Audi brand managed to sell 11,503 vehicles

    • bd

      It’s the go-to soccer-mom-mobile for upwardly mobile set.

      More interior room, soft ride and less expensive than the sportier Germans.

      Basically the same type of person who would purchase an ES instead of 3 or 5 Series.

  • Legnab

    NO torque steer” , thats an impossibility there is minimal torque .

    • Smart US

       there is very little torque in first place so maybe no torque steer at all

      • third time lucky

        The minimal torque makes it hard for their to be torque steer.

    • Yuppie1

      Actually you’d be surprised? ;)

  • Daniel

    Sorry, I like Lexus a lot, but $69,990 for a front wheel drive four cylinder SUV based on the Toyota Kluger? For $10,000 less, definitely yes, but that is a bit too much money for what it is. People say that you don’t need big engines and four wheel drive for the school run and I agree completely, but that doesn’t mean it needs to cost so much.

    • D4D

      This car is design to become the Poor mans’ Merc….it start to make sense if you think in this way…

      • blkpantha

        lol a poor mans Mercedes lol at that one I guess the poor men will be the smarter men because he’s getting something that will last for years and not only that but way better quality MB quality doesn’t even come close to Lexus and the world knows it the only reason why MB seems bigger than Lexus is MB history they have a long history. but at this day in age Lexus Overall is way better than MB

  • Philthy

    252 Nm of torque for a two tonne truck… I imagine progress in this would be very leisurely once loaded up with people and luggage.

  • Tell It As It Is

    They should have priced it at $59,990 or lower.

    • F1MotoGP

      I would go for Toyota Grande 2WD 7 seater cost $60,990.

      • F1MotoGP

        missed  Kluger

  • Tell It As It Is

    I think FPV first came out with this grille design.

    • bd

      Try Holden.

  • Schn

    I still think they should’ve made a completely new medium sized SUV. I’m sure it’s still a good car, a few typical Lexus features, but it’s going to be hard to compete.

  • Aus_poppa

    This is precisely aimed at the Lexus target market. Except for dedicated skiers, I suspect that a great percentage of the Lexus SUVs never need to use their 4WD capabilities, just like their BMW or Audi counterparts. So for the school run or equivalent a 2WD 4 cylinder product which is nicely trimmed and beautifully put together, as the RX range is, will tick all the necessary boxes.

  • enthusiast88

    I don’t understand this comment “The dash, courtesy of the new generation Lexus GS model, is a huge improvement on the previous iteration RX”.
    The dash is the same as last years RX, came out long before the new GS, and is nothing like the new GS dash.

    • stevo

      Agreed that claim is misleading.  The clock is a dead giveaway that it is clearly not courtesy of the new generation GS model!.

  • Sco

    Would have rathered some “real world” fuel consumption figures… rather than a marketing puff piece.

  • save it for the track

    I highly doubt any of these will ever get anywhere near the ADR combined figure. No doubt in the city environment most will be used, they’ll be getting in the mid to high teens.

  • http://twitter.com/klowik klowik

    They can’t sell in Australia  because it costs $60k upward here ,not about half the price in US. People here can afford $60k and up for an SUV would rather spend it on the German brands.

  • Jax

    Please help me out here…which is uglier, the interior or exterior ?
    Line ball I reckon.

    • Doctor

      Yeah, that grille is horrible – and it seems to be the new TUTmobile face.

  • Mikez

    I’m driving one of these at the moment, and although I agree with most of the reporters comments I COMPLETELY disagree with comments about the engine. It is loud, and most certainly has that “typical harsh engine buzz!” Torque steer is also very evident.

    Putting a small engine in what is still a large heavy 2wd car means I haven’t been able to get the fuel consumption below 13L/100km

    Overall I think Lexus have cheapened a good car with this version. However the cheaper price means it will be popular, but you may as well buy a V6 kluger!

  • http://twitter.com/klowik klowik

    They should put a diesel engine or a turbo petrol in for such a heavy vehicle. The RX270 is going to struggle a lot when going uphill.

  • Kwark

    Not to mention whoever buys one the same as the pictures above.  That interior shot is horrendous.  The dashboard looks like some 1970s throw back to a time when there was NO style.  Its sort of Picasso abstract to me.  And the baby s%&t brown leather.  OMFG.

    Sack the stylists as this car is disgusting.  So what if the Americans like it.  They have shown time an again how style and substance is not important (look at the previous taurus – Cue vomit here – amongst others).

    Please Lexus, get away from the Toyota Platforms.  Build your own stuff from the ground up, and get some credibility for your product.  Toyota’s design department have followed HSVs lead into overstyled charicatures of their previous ‘good looking models (ie, the obese Prado we have now with the unstyled 70s dashboard).

    Get the guy behind the 86 to come over to Lexus, distance yourself from Toyota (ie. get the stampings and platforms away from your cars) and get in the game.  People think you are a joke.
    While it may work for VW/AUDI, it DOESN’T WORK FOR YOU… 

  • Realcars

    ha,ha chipped 2.7 four out of the Hilux workmate and Camry platform. Oh what a ripoff!

    • Bsrse

      You’re an idiot!

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Karl-Sass/100000921334936 Karl Sass

    For that money you’d be better off in a Territory Titanium RWD.

  • Andre

    What a stupid idiotic car… For that price?!?
    No torque…
    11secs to 100? You can’t get in front of anything. And then that ridiculous boot “space”…

    Look at the alternatives in this price bracket an you wonder how they sell any at all…

  • Guest

    Why didn’t Lexus produce the Lf-xh? I can’t stand the current RX design, for it’s bland and drab….

  • latw

    Very bad looking front end

    • ww

      the grill, the headlights look nice, but that grill, its hard to look at.