Volvo V40 Review | CarAdvice

Car Advice

Volvo V40 Review

VOLVO V40

Pros: Contemporary exterior design; cleverly designed and well executed cabin; good range of engines – and five-cylinder petrol oozes charisma

Cons: Restricted rear headroom; more expensive than German rivals in Europe; pedestrian airbag seems more gimmick than social responsibility

By Damion Smy |
FIND DEALS

Price: $34,990 to $49,990

Our Rating:  

The new Volvo V40 means the Swedish car maker finally has a five-door hatch to rival the Audi A3 Sportback, BMW 1 Series and Volkswagen Golf.

While selling alongside the three-door C30, the Volvo V40 replaces the s40 compact sedan and twin V50 wagon in one swoop with a sporting design, as the V, according to Volvo, stands for ‘Versatile’.

On the outside, the Volvo V40 is instantly recognisable as a Volvo yet is cleverly executed with up-to-the-minute styling. It looks sporty, with a rising waistline that ends in an upward kick that echoes the classic Volvo P1800 sportscar, while the rear follows on from the C30 and 1980s 440 with its glass hatch.

 

There’s an optional glass roof that’s tinted black, giving the car a low stance, while the B-pillars and glass surrounds are also blacked-out for a sporty look. We’re testing the Volvo V40 in Europe ahead of its Australian release in either late 2012 or early 2013.

There are three trim lines for UK models, starting with the ES, SE and SE Lux. All offer a smart cabin that has taken a major step up from the S40.

There’s still super comfortable seats wrapped in either a mix of cloth and some clever new materials, or there’s leather on the SE Lux.

 

Either way, the front seats are well sculpted with a sports looks and reasonable side support, while the cloth seats are the same design with contrasting stitching. There’s plenty of room for a six-footer and more storage pockets – including the floating centre console – while there’s some clever stuff in the back.

On top of moulded-in cupholders near the doors, lower the armrest and there’s a set of pop-out cupholders, too, which neatly tuck away when not in use. The rear seats are also sculpted, while they’ve been moved inward to offer greater elbowroom. It also means rear passengers aren’t staring at the seatbacks in front of them.

Still, rear headroom is compromised slightly, meaning anyone more than six-feet tall won’t fit, even with the excellent glass roof optioned.

 

That sheds light, however, on the excellent surface finishes and textured dash, which sees a five-inch display and three-spoke leather wrap wheel. It has audio and cruise buttons on the wheel, while there’s a traditional park brake handle instead of the space-saving push-button electric versions in some rivals.

Option the sat-nav and you’ll get a seven-inch screen as part of the package. The Volvo V40’s driving position is low down with good all-round vision. The new digital dash is brilliant, with crystal clear colour graphics that outclass many pricier vehicles.

 

The display works with the three performance modes, which alter the throttle response and the weighting of the V40’s electric steering. The default ‘Elegance’ mode offers decent weighting a good turn-in, and there are good grip levels and decent body control from the front-wheel-drive hatch.

It’s not as sharp as the rear-wheel-drive BMW 1 Series, for example, even in the ‘Sport’ mode, which tightens up the steering feel and changes the dash display to include an integrated speedo/tachometer shrouded in traditional red mist.

‘Eco’ mode offers the most efficient of these, choosing the most economical gears to make the most of the start/stop and regenerative braking.

 

The ride on European roads is class leading, so there are high hopes for a cosseted, compliant ride even on Australia’s bumpier surfaces. That’s backed by a highly refined cabin and engines, which are improved versions of those found in the C30, S40 and V50.

The most efficient of the range is the D2, which is also expected to be the big seller. The entry-level Volvo V40 has official European cycle figures of 3.6L/100km courtesy of its 84kW 1.6-litre four-cylinder turbodiesel.

There’s also a 110kW D3 and a 130kW D4, the most potent diesel also coming with a healthy 400Nm of torque. Petrol engines comprise a 110kW four-cylinder T3, a 132kW T4, and the range-topping T5 is powered by a 187kW 2.5-litre turbocharged five-cylinder as seen in the C30 T5 hatch.

 

By far the most impressive combination from a driver’s perspective is the D4 that is well mated to the six-speed automatic and makes good use of its slabs of torque. It’s an excellent blend of economy and performance, and it has quite a rorty exhaust not when you’re pushing.

It’s a better pick than the T4 auto (the T5 debuts in Europe in November), which is ill-geared and not as effective or enjoyable point to point. Take the rare manual option if you’re after a punchy petrol-powered V40.

Of course, the D2 is the choice when shopping by numbers, and is a smooth but uneventful drive. In Europe, the Volvo V40 starts at around $3000 more than an entry-level Audi A3 and BMW 1-Series, but it would be a surprise if the Swedish hatch didn’t start below $40,000 in Australia.

 

A performance variant to rival the upcoming Mercedes-Benz A45 AMG and BMW M135i variants is expected to debut at the Paris show in September, badged as an R-Design. It’s expected to be powered by a more powerful version of the turbocharged five-cylinder found in the V40 T5 and C30 T5 and be priced at about $75,000.

The Volvo V40 is a worthy rival to the BMW 1 Series and should keep the forthcoming Audi A3 and Mercedes-Benz A-Class honest. It combines a well-made, spacious cabin with an excellent ride, good practicality, spades of character and an enjoyable drive.

It’s not as sporty or involving as a BMW, but some will prefer its styling and it offers a range of unique features and equipment that will sway if for some. 2013 is shaping up as a great battle for premium hatchbacks.


 

Owner reviews of the VOLVO V40

Write a review for the VOLVO V40

Do you own this car? Share your opinion and add your own review below.
Add a New Review

  • SM

    and I thought that my V60 was a nice looking wagon, this is stunning and that choice of engines is nothing short of amazing. Having said that, I was under the impression that the 2.5 5cylinder had been put out to pasture…

    Might have to see if I can widen the garage and get 3 cars across :)  

  • Ivan Sherwood

    Thank you CarAdvice! Waiting for a review on this particular car on this website seemed almost an eternity to the point I felt as if no Australian motoring journalist actually went for the launch. But more to the point, if there’s one thing Volvo can do apart from make safe cars, is they believe their own hype way too much. Stefan Jacoby clearly stated the V40 would be class leading in driver dynamics against its competitors but then backed down somewhat during the Geneva Motor show to say it would be almost equal to its rivals. From this review alone it seems the V40 will get nowhere near the BMW in driving dynamics once again, what a surprise not!. Volvo should just sell their cars on their strengths such as comfort and safety, and not on other makers strength. This way those who want to buy a Volvo will do so based on what the brand stands for. And its definitely not BMW-style cornering or handling.

    • Lbrinsmead

      Agreed

    • Phunken

      Love Volvo and the V40, but welcome Volvo more involving dynamic talent. Safety is not only a domain Volvo can brag about anymore as nearly all cars offer 5 star ancap which is seen as a norm not a luxury.

  • Schn

    That speedometer looks awesome. The colours seem to really work well together. I don’t know, but the glass roof seems like it might be really expensive to repair. Imagine driving with it in a hail storm.  

    • Phunken

      Its the same strengthen glass as the windscreen so if you got insurance than nothing to fear about… after saying that dented metal would be expensive to repair as well.

  • Henry Toussaint

    I like the back of it, it’s very Unique, and the boarderless rear-view mirror another Unique feature! 

  • Lbrinsmead

    Wow 3.6 litres, this or the not-so-soulful Prius…hmmm, I’d take the Volvo.

  • Andrew

    Glad to hear the ride is nice & compliant – possibly an advantage over the 1 series & GTI. Like the sound of the 130kW D4 or 187kW T5, they could be a fun drive. Oz pricing will be very interesting…..

  • Legnab

    Well done looks very cool , is it still spun off the focus platform or is i their own , good to see the grunty T5 still available .

  • Nicevovo

    there’s never been a volvo that would have made it on my shopping list before but I’d have a look at this car if I was in the market

  • SG

    Not a big issue, but an actual lever hand brake these days seems kind of old fashioned….not a big issue really, but it does seem a little out of place in what is otherwise a very nice and slick interior.

    Volvo are churning out some very nice cars.

  • Mike

    I don’t get the comment “pedestrian airbag seems more gimmick than social responsibility”. What is the basis for this judgment? It is simply too soon to tell how effective the pedestrian airbag is, but the idea is brilliant, and Volvo should be commended for trying it out. 

  • Daniel

    It’s nice, but it’s also quite boring I think. I was a big fan of the C30, but this seems a lot less modern and interesting to me. The other thing that the C30 somehow managed was that it was genuinely cool. To me, though this is a good car, it’s just another premium hatchback and I’d probably rather have a more interesting A3 or 1 Series. And just to clarify, I am aware that isn’t really the natural successor to the C30, but it basically replacing it for now so…

  • Smart US

    it looks like Kia ceed mixed with i30… pricing is already high… would be surprising when they ditch this “we are so luxo” mentality…

  • tonyW

    We will certainly be having a close look at this when it arrives next year as a possible replacement for our 2009 C30 T5. The pick of the engines will certainly be the improved T5 but at an estimated cost of $75,000 – forget about it. The current C30/S40 T5s are a little less than $50,000 and for an extra $1,500 you can get the Polestar tuning on those T5s to get them up the power/torque of this T5. Also a bit disappointed they are not going to offer AWD that used to be available on the S40/V50 (and still is in Europe).

  • http://twitter.com/WiillWalker Will Walker

    Volvo are really heading in the right direction under the chinese. Thankfully they have let them do what they know and not playing around with the formula. Only sad the Dynaudio systems are no longer available.

  • Rightindicators

    Nice design language. Pity there won’t be a sedan version which replaces the s40.