Volvo XC90 Review | CarAdvice

Car Advice

Volvo XC90 Review

VOLVO XC90

Pros: Unrivalled value for money in the Luxury SUV segment; brilliant interior space architecture; superbly comfortable seats; integrated child booster seat; easy to drive; quality audio system

Cons: Exterior and interior design getting long in the tooth; turbo lag from standstill; diesel engine not a class leader for power and efficiency; no keyless entry; cumbersome sat-nav system

By Anthony Crawford |
FIND DEALS

Price: $69,990 to $74,490

Our Rating:  

For nearly a decade the Volvo XC90 has been a first-generation vehicle pitted against a series of sleek newer-generation rivals, but the big Swede remains a popular and worthy choice when it comes to seven-seat luxury SUVs.

In fact, the Volvo XC90 has been the best-selling luxury seven-seater in Australia for the last five years running and is currently the brand’s second largest volume seller behind the XC60.

Clearly it’s a vehicle that’s got a lot going for it, despite its unusually long life cycle – which has been on the road since 2003 and won’t be replaced until 2014.

Its winning formula is unlikely to be down to the XC90’s styling, which could be seen as a bit tired next to its smaller, but more contemporary, sibling, the XC60.

So why is Volvo still striking gold with this grand dame against such stiff competition as the Audi Q7, BMW X5 and just-launched Mercedes-Benz ML-Class?

Few other luxury SUV manufacturers can match the Volvo XC90 for its value for money proposition.

With a starting price of $69,990 (before on-road costs are added) for the entry-level R-Design 3.2-litre petrol model, the XC90 undercuts the competition by at least $10,000, and in some cases by $20,000 as with the Audi Q7 quattro 3.0-litre TDI that sells for $90,500 (before on-road costs).

There’s also no doubt that Volvo’s reputation for vehicle safety innovation continues to resonate with parents.

Those innovations include full-length inflatable curtain airbags (1998), driver and front passenger seat airbags (1994), side impact protection system (SIPS – 1991), whiplash protection system (WHIPS – 1998), and roll stability control (2002).

Our test vehicle is the Volvo XC90 D5 R-Design – a five-cylinder turbo diesel with a sports-tuned chassis and a host of other R-Design features including quad-exhaust tips, leather trim, sports leather steering wheel, gearknob and floor mats.

It sells for $72,900 (before on road costs are added) and is the most popular variant in the XC90 line-up so far in 2012.

The R-Design alloy wheels and bodykit might give the XC90 some design flair, but features that have become a mandatory these days on anything billed as a luxury vehicle – such as LED daytime running lights inside the headlamp assembly – are noticeably absent from this Volvo XC90 package (they are instead part of the lower foglights) and partly betray the model’s true age.

What’s not missing from the Volvo XC90 is space. There’s an impressive 615 litres of cargo capacity behind the second-row seats. Fold them forward and that expands to a full load capacity of 1837 litres.

It’s by no means the class benchmark, but with clever seat architecture we’d be surprised if you ran out of space in the XC90.

All seats (including the third row and front passenger seat) fold dead flat, allowing for extra-long items such as ladders and 9-foot Malibu surfboards to be carried on board.

The superbly supple and ergonomically designed stitched leather seats even extend to the third-row pews, which are able to comfortably support children and adults up to 160cm tall.

We especially like Volvo’s trademark child booster seat that’s been integrated into the second-row’s middle seat and conveniently slides forward to be closer to the front driver and passenger seats. It simply pops up via an easy-to-use lever and is able to support children anywhere from 15 to 36 kilograms.

Meanwhile, the second row outer seats also slide forward and back, thereby opening up rear legroom to near limousine levels, if the third row seats aren’t in use.

Rounding up Volvo’s smart design is the split tailgate that doubles as a load-bearing bench if needed.

Unfortunately, while there are enough proper metal accents and soft touch plastics throughout the XC90’s cockpit to pass the basic luxury test, it still falls short of its main rivals.

The satellite-navigation system is accessed via a screen that rises awkwardly out of the dashboard and isn’t particularly high-resolution, either. We also found its functionality to be less intuitive than systems from Audi, BMW, Mercedes-Benz and Land Rover – so overall Volvo’s offering looks more like an afterthought rather than a fully integrated unit.

There’s no such criticism of Volvo’s premium sound system, with 12 speakers and Bluetooth audio streaming. It produces a strong sound with exceptional clarity.

The thick-rimmed R-Design sports leather steering wheel is also another quality item on board the Volvo XC90, but on the same note there’s no keyless entry or push-button start on this vehicle.

The large-size quad exhaust pipes are more for show than outright go, but the XC90 D5 isn’t exactly short on torque. The 2.4-litre turbo diesel generates 147kW of power and 420Nm of torque and moves this 2125kg SUV from 0-100km/h in 10.3 seconds. Top speed is 205km/h.

There’s noticeable turbo lag from idle, followed by a rush of boost from 1900-2800rpm where peak torque occurs. It’s not the most refined diesel engine in the segment, either, with plenty of clatter down low, but moderate acceleration produces plenty of punch along with a thoroughly sporty growl for an engine note.

And even though 50 per cent of the vehicle’s drive is sent to the rear wheels during heavy acceleration, there’s also some tendency for mild torque steer.

The D5 engine is mated to a smooth-shifting six-speed automatic transmission that can be used as a sequential manual, though there’s little point to it given the slower-than-usual shifts – up and down the ratio range.

Where the Volvo XC90 scores high is in its general driveability. Despite its considerable size, the XC90 never feels like you’re driving a large, seven-seat SUV – except of course if you need to turn around in a tight space. Its 13.1-meter turning circle is atrocious.

The electro-hydraulic, speed-sensitive steering is light enough for easy parking manoeuvres and weights up nicely as speed increases. It also produces a surprisingly quick steering response along with some communication through the steering wheel thanks to additional R-Design tuning.

The R-Design chassis also benefits from firmer shock absorbers, stiffer anti-roll bars and 19-inch alloy wheels, so there’s less body roll on turn in than you might expect from this luxury SUV.

The drawback is that the ride is less cushioned over poorly maintained asphalt and larger potholes can produce a harsh reaction through the cabin.

Fuel economy from the Euro 5-compliant D5 engine isn’t too bad, though, with CarAdvice achieving an average fuel consumption over the seven-day test period of 8.5L/100km (as shown on the average fuel consumption readout). The XC90’s relatively low weight also helps keep CO2 emissions in check, with just 233 grams per kilometre.

It’s a decent result, but pales when you consider BMW’s more powerful X5 3.0 diesel generates 180kw/540Nm from 1750-3000rpm and has a combined fuel consumption of 7.4 litres/100km, yet emits just 195g/km of CO2.

Apart from the extensive inventory of safety systems mentioned earlier in the review, the XC90 comes with a raft of additional safety features including active bending lights that are motorised headlamps that turn up to 15 degrees to illuminate the road when cornering at night.

There’s also roll stability control that uses a gyroscopic sensor that registers the XC90’s lean angle and rollover risk. In the event of a potential roll, the system will either cut power to the engine or brake one or more wheels in order to reduce the risk.

However, while the Volvo XC90 misses out on the car maker’s innovative City Safety and adaptive cruise control active safety systems from the XC60, you can expect those features and more to appear on the XC90 replacement in 2014.

It would seem that after nearly a decade in the market, Volvo finally needs to play catch-up in terms of design flair, interior finish and overall economy if the XC90 is to maintain its lofty sales figures.

Yet with a value-for-money proposition few can match, the current Volvo XC90 continues to keep the Swedish brand in the large luxury SUV mix.

 

Owner reviews of the VOLVO XC90

Write a review for the VOLVO XC90

Do you own this car? Share your opinion and add your own review below.
Add a New Review

  • Shak

    I still think its a relatively competitive car, especially considering how old it is. I think the design is also pretty good considering that its rivals are much newer, but arguably don’t look as good. Hopefully the updated model in 2014 will build on the remarkable success of the XC90.

    • Schn

      Agree, it has stood the test of time and is still a good car. 

  • Jax

    So how is the fitting of driver & passenger airbags an innovation for Volvo in 1994 when Porsche had them both as standard equipment for their 944 Turbo in 1987 ?

    • Phil

      Normall, parts of Anthony Crawford’s review, like this airbag claim, sound like they’ve come straight from the manufactuers brochure, but in this case, the claim isn’t even remotely correct.
      Volvo was offering twin airbags in 1992 from the debut of the 850i. Ford was also offering twin airbags that year  in the USA Taurus.
      Mercedes had twin airbags from 1987 [closely followed by BMW].

  • mo

    Drove the turbo six (T6) version of this car many times. It was incredibly spacious, stable and could comfortably shift seven adults (!!). The XC90 would have been a great car if it wasn’t for the high running costs, expensive tyres, heavy fuel consumption (14.5L/100km) and lack of audio inputs. The other killer in this model was the unreliability of the GM 4spd transmission – it didn’t affect us but there are many reports of failures, often several per car. This all affected residual values giving a disappointing resale. 

  • Daniel

    I like the XC90. They made a really good car that still holds up all these years later. It has an intensely logical interior, an exterior that doesn’t make you feel like giving up on life (like most MPVs) and it’s also largely unpretentious. It even still looks good. I hope the next one looks like that concept drawing, it looks great!

  • Own 2 7 seaters!

    As a current owner of an XC90 2.5T Petrol 5sp Auto since 2005 as my wife’s family limo, she just loves the 7 seat capacity without the difficult width of a Landcruiser/Q7/GL/Grand Carnival etc.

    The article is spot on, my only real gripe is also the large turning circle (seems to affect all Volvo/Ford products with this 2.5T Petrol engine/trans). Otherwise is a great value car, very well built, even if its missing some of the latest gadgets which you don’t really need.

    Even the standard audio is easily the best standard system I have ever heard.

    Pity we had very poor service from our local Volvo dealer here in the Perth northern suburbs…never went back after that. I’d highly recommend the car however.

    FWIW our 4 kids all reckon our OTHER much cheaper 7/8 seater is the much better car…much more room, cloth seats, 3rd row opening windows, better 2/3rd row Airconditioning, sliding doors. At around half the price, the Kia Grand Carnival is the one we all jump in when we go out together, or go on holidays.

  • Bobby_j

    While it is a great car; safe, comfortable, fuel efficient, nice ride, a quick search reveals both the petrol and diesel models have gearbox issues. Due diligence is a must.

    • http://www.facebook.com/nicola.loder Nicola Loder

      thanks for great info you guys….if i got a state road test would they be able to pick up gearbox issues?

      • haydlew

        Thats who did my mechanical test. They provided a good report and a verbal as well. They guy that looked at my xc90 found that the gearbox issue wasnt noticeable until about 30 minutes of driving. Something I didnt notice when I test drove it. I was then able to put the condition on the dealer to fix before I considered purchase.

  • sam

    hi, i want to buy a volvo 2005 2.9L turbo petrol never had one before are they a good suv for family and are they powerful in towing a boat 5.3m aluminum behind the volvo xc90 on long trips like 3 hours on holiday time please some advice can anyone help

    • haydlew

      I would avoid the 2.9 T6 form the pages and pages of complaints I read while researching the xc90, basically the gearbox is unable to handle the torque of the engine. Towing I would imagine only enhance the issue. I bought a xc90 d5 4 weeks ago. Drives really great, perfect for the kids. I made sure the gearbox and valve body was tested before purchase…..proved to be a great decision & saved myself $2800. I have not towed with it, but Im sure it would tow very well. Unfortunately ..D5′s are dearer than the T6. All the best with your purchase.

  • Nicola Loder

    i have just brought a Toyota Prado Landcruiser 2005 Turbo Diesel and its so big and clumsy I want to sell it and get a CX90 which was what i was looking at before i got talked out of that and into the Prado. 

    My concerns are reliability and cost as i can only afford a second hand one.

    Do they require a lot of work? What about the gear box? ( I thought that was only an issue prior to 2005?) Will it cost me a lot over the next 7 years?

    thanks 
    Nicola