Infiniti FX37 & FX50 Review | CarAdvice

Car Advice

Infiniti FX37 & FX50 Review

INFINITI FX

Pros: Uniqueness, driving dynamics, 3.7-litre V6 engine, ride comfort, steering feel

Cons: Interior similarities to Nissan range, lazy transmission when coupled to FX50

By Alborz Fallah
FIND DEALS

Price: $84,040 to $96,580

Our Rating:  

The Infiniti FX range is set to revitalise the luxury suv segment with a distinct new flavour and enormous attitude. The Japanese luxury brand is relying on the FX SUV to make up more than 80 percent of its initial sales volume as it sets to launch in Australia in August.

The Japanese-built SUV is not intended to appeal to all; in fact, the whole point of the FX’s existence is that it won’t have mass appeal. Infiniti couldn’t possibly compete head-on with its significantly more established competitors if it had no real point of difference.

As a result, the exterior styling is polarizing at best. It’s pretty obvious the Infiniti FX was designed from the ground up to be different, not simply for the sake of being different but be different with good reason. The front-end styling is bold and shameless, it exudes a ‘look-at-me’ attitude that demands attention and so far as we could tell during our drive through Queenstown in New Zealand, it certainly gets it. Unfortunately there are no LED day time running lamps, which would’ve really finished of its front styling, but alas it’s still a looker if you’re into ultra modern car design.

The rear and side-on view is very much the same in that it constantly seeks attention. Despite its SUV status the Infiniti FX appears low and sporty with an edgy character appeal. To give you an idea of how Infiniti is going to approach its model lineup, the absolute cheapest model FX will start with 20-inch wheels, simply because Infiniti is all about making a statement and anything smaller wouldn’t have done the job.

The FX launch range will consist of the FX37, FX30d and FX50, with all variants being produced in the same Nissan/Infiniti plant that builds the Nissan 370Z and GT-R. All three make use of a seven-speed automatic gearbox (a derivative of which is also found in the 370Z and Pathfinder/Navara). The FX37 goes one step further and shares its engine with the 370Z, being powered by a 3.7-litre V6 that pumps out a healthy 235kW of power and 360Nm of torque. The Renault-resourced 3.0-litre turbodiesel in the FX30d is similar to that found in the Pathfinder Ti500 and as such has 175kW of power and a massive 550Nm of torque. The one that’s sure to cause the biggest hoo-ha is the 5.0-litre V8 powered FX50 range-topper, which is good for 287kW of power and 500Nm of torque.

We had the opportunity to review and drive the two petrol variants during our introductory drive in New Zealand. On the surface you may think the Infiniti FX37’s codeshare with the 370z is a negative, but given the performance credential of that V6 engine, the FX37 is an absolute cracker to drive. Perhaps the only downside is that it happens to share some characteristics of the rough-sounding Z engine, lots of noise, but not much good noise.

The important thing to realize is that the FX doesn’t drive like an SUV. In fact, it actually feels more competent than the company’s M sedan. It’s similar in its driving behaviour to the BMW X6, in that you can simply point and steer and it will go as directed, even around the hairiest of corners. The electronically controlled AWD system is generally pushing power to the rear wheels when cruising but can move it to all around when required. This inherent rear-wheel drive bias is a huge advantage as the FX genuinely feels like a driver’s car.

Our two Infiniti FX test cars were UK spec with no localized tuning or modification, but still managed to impress us with their driving dynamics. Steering feel is very BMW in its preciseness and gives adequate feedback when pushed to the limit. Ride comfort over rough surfaces was also impressive, given the sporty nature of the car. It’s not hard but it’s not floaty and soft either. There’s the option to select Sport mode, which hardens up the suspension and for those that must have it all, there’s the option for rear-steering (1-degree turn) that noticeably changes the driving feel around corners by fascilitating a more precise turn-in feel at speed. The excellent levels of grip are no doubt a result of the large (21-inch on the FX50) wheels and sporty tyres but the roadnoise generated by the Dunlops was more than we were expecting.

Infiniti claims the FX50 does the dash from 0-100km/h in an impressive 5.8 seconds. Given the power of the V8 and the seven-speed automatic transmission, it’s a good claim, but behind the wheel it doesn’t feel like a 5.8 second car. In-gear acceleration is hindered by the transmission, which seems to take a good second from the time you floor it to when it actually decides to drop down a gear or two and gun it. It’s the same story from take-off, we performed several 0-100km/h dashes on a flat road and the best we could achieve in the FX50 was 6.8 seconds (approximate).

On the contrary, the Infiniti FX37 feels faster both in-gear and on take-off than its bigger V8 brother. Officially it’s a second slower from 0-100km/h than the FX50 but during our approximate tests on the same roads, it was easily managing the dash in seven seconds flat, just 0.2 of a second slower than the V8. For most, it’s not necessarily the 0-100km/h times that are important, but the in-gear acceleration for overtaking and the ability to quickly extract all the engines’ power and torque. In that regard, the FX37 wins again. It seems to be in the right gear at all times and on the odd occasion that it’s not, it manages to find it much quicker than the FX50.

On the handling side, the lighter weight of the V6 didn’t seem to make all that much difference compared to the FX50, both are highly capable and sporty SUVs that feel natural around tight bends.

So it’s pretty clear that the Infiniti FX range is not your typical SUV. On one hand it’s new, bold, aggressive, sporty, dynamic and oozes uniqueness. On the other, it’s certainly capable of being a family car that is perfectly suited for tips to the shopping centre or dropping the kids to school (but it may scare the other children away). With pricing for the FX range still a secret guarded in Apple-like security, it’s hard to know how it will position itself against the Germans and to a lesser extent, Lexus. If we suppose that it’s in a similar price bracket as its major rivals and that it’s after-sales service isn’t spectacularly better, then is it as good? Or is just Nissan with a different badge?

From the outside, it certainly has the goods and is certain to appeal to those that want to be noticed. In performance terms, it’s also on par or better than its German rivals (excusing the excessive road-noise) in how it drives and feels, so it all comes down to the interior.

Step inside an Infiniti FX and you’ll quickly notice the Nissan tie-up. Be it the centre instrument cluster with the circular controls that drive the satellite navigation and audio systems, the dual-zone air conditioning controls, the feel of the soft-touch plastic on the doors and dashboard or even the start/stop button that resides to the left of the steering wheel. It’s all very reminiscent of a Nissan. So much so that even the actual smart key is simply taken from Nissan’s parts bin with an Infiniti badge added on.

Of course, there’s more technology than you’re likely to find in a Nissan. The FX range has lane change departure systems that warn you if you’re leaving your lane without indicating, smart cruise control that can follow the car infront and the there’s even a collision warning system that monitors and warns the driver in case the vehicle up front suddenly decelerates.

The cabin ambience it self is quite good and there’s ample room for four large adults front and rear with a fifth possible if required. There’s heaps of leg and headroom for all passengers as well, which is a bonus given the curved roofline would suggest otherwise. So it’s not to say the interior is of poor quality, far from it, only that it’s not what we believed the brand is trying to portray and that it’s not up to BMW, Mercedes-Benz, Audi and Lexus standards.

Infiniti has an opportunity to start its Australian life with a clean slate and avoid being negatively associated with its parent company, an issue that has plagued Lexus’ brand image for the last 20 years (even though the current generation of Lexus vehicles are far removed from that scenario). However, given the interior trim and treatment of the FX, it appears to be falling in the same trap. Its saviour is its exterior styling, which has absolutely no Nissan DNA in it.

The explanation for the interior similarities comes down to the FX’s lifecycle, which is now half way through. The next-generation of FX and G coupe, convertible and sedans are expected to offer significantly different interiors that are as unique to Infiniti as its exterior styling. The first signs of this are seen in the M sedan range (also launching in August), which has a noticeably more upmarket and unique interior than the FX.

With the German luxury brands and Lexus having been around for decades, Infiniti is heading to Australia to offer something new and perhaps to a new type of buyer as well. How close it will be priced to its direct rivals remains to be seen but either way, Infiniti’s success relies heavily on buyers’ dissatisfaction with the existing offerings, be that a result of conservative stigma or after-sales service. At the same time it needs to create an aspirational lineup that has a certain kind of appeal, one that can pull luxury car buyers away from the expected norm.

The Infiniti FX ticks all those boxes in regards to how it looks and how it drives, but it’s let down by its interior. We suspect that may not be a big issue as competitive pricing and Infiniti Australia’s expected plans for its after sales service may negate the downsides.

Owner reviews of the INFINITI FX Add a New Review

  • Kme

    The Lexus V8 makes 311kW & 505Nm

    • Phil

      Do you really think the Lexus IS-F – a small sports sedan is a relevant comparison to this large 4WD Infinit?

      The BMW V8 puts out 408KW and you’ll find it in the X5 which will actually compete with this Infinit.

      • Kme

        Yeah because their V8 is twin turbo..

        What does BMW’s normal V8 make?

        • Phil

          309KW from 4.0 litres.

          That entire 1.0 extra in Lexus’ 5.0 V8 only makes a extra 2KWs………..

      • Kme

        Like any other German car, they have good paper performance but unfortunately in reality they’re sub- par and overpriced

        For example BMW need a car with “400kW” to compete with a Lexus with “300kW” .. Either BMW lies or they don’t know how to transfer power from the crank to the Tarmac efficiently..

        • Phil

          All wrong.

          The BMW that competes with the 311KW 5.0 V8 Lexus is the 309KW 4.0 V8 BMW and if you read any comparison on the M3 vs IS-F – of which there are plenty, you’ll find the M3 always comes out on top. in both acceleration times and overall standings.

          In the Luxury 4WD class, Lexus’ best offering for performance is the RX450h or RX350 which only offer ~204KW and 0-100 times of 7.9/8.0 secs.
          Lexus has no comparison to the 408KW BMW X5 nor the 270KW X5 Diesel offering.

          My point is [1] this is a luxury 4WD category where Lexus has no performance offering and [2] Lexus’ 5.0 V8 is not some massive achievement that needs random attention in a non related article.

          • Joe

            Caradvice did a review on both ISF and M3. ISF 4.6 0-100 M3 4.9.
            Also RX450 has 220kw, don’t know where you got 204. Your right though,  Lexus don’t have a performance SUV. IS the M3 a better all round car than an ISF, yeah it is but not by much. Also it should be better with the price difference.

            By the way, the c63 is my number 1

          • alabaster

            Agreed, for a first attempt at a performance sedan, the ISF isn’t too shabby.

          • Carlos

            in the same test 0-400m M3 12.7. ISF 13.0 s.
            & in overtaking times it’s all M3…

          • Carlos

            in the same test 0-400m M3 12.7. ISF 13.0 s.
            & in overtaking times it’s all M3…

          • Polo

            True, the Lexus V8 gets enough attention in it’s own right.

        • Tomasz

          Kme, get off the drugs mate…I hope that’s your excuse for being so confused & arrogant.

          • Khgjghghgkjgkj

            Honestly, I’m not even sure if Kme is serious…or real…*cue gasp*

  • MichaelLock

    I just can’t get past the front end treatment, especially the grille. It’s not ugly, just out of place.

    • Sumpguard

        I think it’s ugly!

  • shak

    That steering wheel has way too much similarity to the Nissan wheel. On another note, the car itself looks pretty well equipped to shake up the school run scene. Most soccer mums just want the flashiest car with the best design, and this sure ticks those boxes.

  • carl

    this car has chubby cheeks

  • Guest

    I thought the interior of the RX350 was bad, but this is even worse!

  • Ryan

    ill pay 65k MAX for this car. interior design is appaling for a “luxury” brand

    • Saltypigeon

       well, at least it doesn’t have the horrible patches and angles like the RX

    • Kampfer

      Just go for the Nissan Murano Ti.

      • D987

         That interior sure is disappointing, I’d get a Murano over this for this.

      • D987

         That interior sure is disappointing, I’d get a Murano over this for this.

  • save it for the track

    Well, I just hate how the steering wheel is so round, just like every other car…..  Seriously…. In some markets Nissan models are badges as infiniti. Just like older lexus/toyota models we didn’t officially get, but were avaialble o/s soarer/sc400 etc. There’s nothing wrong with a Nissan (okay tiida excepted), they simply dropped the ball with their range in Australia.

    • Homer

      Except for those one’s they dropped when still soft out of the mould and the bottom is flat! Ha ha

  • Smart US

    i agreed to disagree – Infinity has  mass appeal in the markets where it is PRICED RIGHT!!! the design has been around for ages – so “polarizing design” is what??? journalism of 5yo??? who paid you to be biased???

    • Phil

      Every product has mass appeal when it’s priced right. For example, I’d happily buy one of these Infiniti’s if it were priced at 50c.

      • Smart US

        dear Phil – i meant that They introducing Infinity as something “New” i know these cars from EU long time… and i like them… however in comparison what they offer and what they challenge eg. in USA sitting $10k under BMW per model how can you justify in OZ being $10 over brand new tech BMW??? Oz seems to be market that can be swindled easier than yanks 

    • nickdl

      I don’t think you understand the meaning of the word ‘polarising’. It essentially means you’ll either love the design or hate it. Whether the design has been around for a while or not makes no difference. I for one think the FX is a great looking vehicle, and I’m not particularly bothered by the interior, it’s certainly better than the woodgrain in the Lexus RX.

  • bungel

    I didn’t realise we were getting an update to the Murano? And they’ve removed the Nissan badges on this update as well…. 

    • aware

      This isn’t an update to the Murano….

  • Craig

    I kind of love the look of this.

  • Showtime

    I saw quite a few of these in LA about 18 months ago. Like Alborz said this car does turn heads (in a good way) and the pictures don’t do it justice. The FX37 would need to be priced below the Evoque for it to sell well.

  • ABCDEFG

    Get the Land Cruiser 200 with the new gen 4.6 V8 from Lexus.

  • Altezza

    After looking the interior of FX, it is appalling for a luxury SUV. Let alone the Infiniti, this car is more like a Nissan. The interior seems to be different quality than the luxurious US version. I doubt that Infiniti will win against Lexus. The Lexus Australia itself was right, that they have once said they are ready to face Infiniti once launched in Australia. They have nothing to scare about.

  • Schn

    In my opinion, this car just isn’t a contender in this segment. Sure, if I remember correctly Nissan wanted to offer something different, but this just isn’t the ‘different’ you would be want to be offering. I like the exterior from some angles, but the interior just isn’t fitting for such a segment, it’s far too ‘Nissan’ like and also, the gloss finish, doesn’t exude the sense of quality you’d usually see on other luxury cars. If you stick a Nissan Badge on it though, replace the Murano with this, then you might have a winning formula though. 

  • LN

     This is just an updated Nissan Murano. Not worth the 80-90k you are going to pay for this.

    The FX37 should cost no more than $40k.

    • Smart US

      and it indeed cost $40k in normal markets where ppl think before they part way w their hard earned money

    • LN Joker

      $40K, you are kidding right? So it should be $10K less than a ST Murano for more engine, better dynamics (RWD Bias) and similar features. $40K buys YOU a Captiva so run along.

  • Guest

    The interior could be mistaken for a Great Wall!

    • Hung Low

      I think its the rubbish photo quality and the lack of contrasting colours in this car. The author claims that the interior is too much like Nissan, but the truth is that this model has been out for a while and most of the newer model Nissans like Murano and Maxima have inherited Infiniti switch gear and layouts on the interior and compared to other mainstream brands, its the Nissan interior switch gear and trims that are very good in comparison.

      • http://www.caradvice.com.au/ Alborz Fallah

        That’s besides the point. If the new Aurion had the same interior as the new Lexus GS, It would still be a downer for the GS owners who are forking out significantly more $.

        • Hung Low

          Bentleys used parts of Audi interiors as does Lambo. Basic VW products have used Audi switch gear. Toyota has shared some interior components with Lexus, Ford, GM etc all do it. Why is this any different? This is far from being Infiniti’s best interior, but saying that, the aforementioned Nissans do not have bad interiors to start with in comparison to Subaru, Mazda etc!
          I think the Infiniti sedans do it better but if the FX are priced correctly, i.e under Lexus, this should not be a real issue.

          • http://www.caradvice.com.au/ Alborz Fallah

            I dont believe it will be priced that much lower. And you’re right about Lambo/Bentley/Audi interiors, they do share parts and they get criticised accordingly. 

      • http://www.caradvice.com.au/ Alborz Fallah

        That’s besides the point. If the new Aurion had the same interior as the new Lexus GS, It would still be a downer for the GS owners who are forking out significantly more $.

      • http://www.caradvice.com.au/ Alborz Fallah

        That’s besides the point. If the new Aurion had the same interior as the new Lexus GS, It would still be a downer for the GS owners who are forking out significantly more $.

  • ME

    I haer what you’re saying about the interior… Could you imagine forking out close to $300,000 on a luxury car to find it had the same switch gear as a VW Polo! It would never happen!

    Oh…. wait a minute!

  • LJSearles

    Contrary to the comment regarding the key being the same as the Nissan, which it is, but it was Infiniti that had it first, and it then trickled down into Nissan Vehicles. At least here in the US.

    • http://www.caradvice.com.au/ Alborz Fallah

      Thanks for pointing that out, in AUS we had the key as a Nissan first given the lack of Infiniti in the market before. 

    • http://www.caradvice.com.au/ Alborz Fallah

      Thanks for pointing that out, in AUS we had the key as a Nissan first given the lack of Infiniti in the market before. 

    • http://www.caradvice.com.au/ Alborz Fallah

      Thanks for pointing that out, in AUS we had the key as a Nissan first given the lack of Infiniti in the market before. 

  • mrxandthexfactor

    BMW>Audi/MB>Lexus/Volvo/Jaguar>…>Infiniti in terms of…well…everything. IMO. Give it up already Nissan. Even Lexus is moving away from the ‘jumped-up Toyota’ image. Their build quality, refinement, design are becoming better and better. Infinitis are just ugly Nissans with melted grilles, dimented sheet metal and copy-Audi elements. 
    ^ My thoughts, feel free to disagree with me. These things are subjective. (and, please don’t criticise me for being a Lexus fan.) mrx

    • Peterm

      funnily enough, I think the opposite.  I see a lot of infinitis in Japan, they are overwhelmingly better looking than the Lexus to me, the Lexus 4WD looks to me like an old camry on stilts.  That said, I’ve never driven an infiniti and never been inclined to drive a Lexus (although I’ve been driven around in a few) so I dont really have a basis to compare save for exterior.  People who own the Lexus seem to like them.  That said, the infiniti was being priced up close to Jag XF territory in the UK, why would you bother with it at that price?

      • mrxandthexfactor

        Lexus do look boring, admittedly, and understated. New GS design is a clear example. Infiniti designs are unique but they just don’t appeal to me. In my opinion, they look disproportional. But I respect your opinion. Looks are always subjective. As designers say, designs are usually a love/hate thing. 
        And, Jags over Infiniti any day!

      • mrxandthexfactor

        Lexus do look boring, admittedly, and understated. New GS design is a clear example. Infiniti designs are unique but they just don’t appeal to me. In my opinion, they look disproportional. But I respect your opinion. Looks are always subjective. As designers say, designs are usually a love/hate thing. 
        And, Jags over Infiniti any day!

    • Bones

      Exterior looks much better than the Lexus suv, especially side profile….but Lexus interior better.

  • Tom

    What’s the deal with the discoloration of the photos, like they weren’t exposed properly?

    • http://www.caradvice.com.au/ Alborz Fallah

      Unfortunately they are the ones supplied to us by Infiniti AU. We are also unsure as to why they are like that. 

    • http://www.caradvice.com.au/ Alborz Fallah

      Unfortunately they are the ones supplied to us by Infiniti AU. We are also unsure as to why they are like that. 

    • http://www.caradvice.com.au/ Alborz Fallah

      Unfortunately they are the ones supplied to us by Infiniti AU. We are also unsure as to why they are like that. 

  • save it for the track

    So, do we all think then that the WA dealer trying to sell grey import Ex37, FX37, and Fx50′s from 79,990 up to about 105k for mostly 2010 models is having a lend of themselves??? They are even trying to flog a G37 for almost 63k.

  • http://www.ecarport.com.au/ carport Sydney

    Interesting page indeed! Cool

  • Mr Frobisher

    If this is going to be an $80K plus proposition, then I think Mercedes Benz is going to sell a lot of M Class wagons!  Infiniti must be a value priced premium brand in Oz to take on Lexus and the Germans.  Over time they can look at pricing in some premium.  Infinity will struggle I’m afraid, there are established options (arguably better options at that) for similar money.

  • Nada

    Too much too much… bye bye.