Mitsubishi Lancer: ES Sportback Review | CarAdvice

Car Advice

Mitsubishi Lancer: ES Sportback Review

MITSUBISHI LANCER

Pros: Versatile cargo capacity; base spec audio system; Buletooth voice system; good safety spec.

Cons: Noisy engine when mated to the CVT transmission; steering, handling and general composure through bends; too many hard plastics inside.

By Anthony Crawford |
FIND DEALS

Price: $21,690 to $44,490

Our Rating:  

Mitsubishi has been building cars for a lot longer than you might have guessed. Since 1917, in fact, when the then-known Mitsubishi Shipbuiding Company contradicted its name by building the Model A – a hand-built, seven-seater sedan based on the Fiat Tipo 3.

The Japanese manufacturer sold only 22 Model As owing to the model’s relatively expensive price tag compared with mass-produced vehicles out of Europe and the US, though it certainly hasn’t experienced the same issue with its Mitsubishi Lancer small car.

The Mitsubishi Lancer has also been around for quite a while, as a mainstay of Mitsubishi’s global sales. Our Sportback test car is a member of the ninth-generation Lancer family that dates back to 1973.

The Mitsubishi Lancer has certainly hit the heights globally in the past, thanks to multiple World Rally Championship (WRC) titles with the high-performance, all-wheel-drive Evolution models (a badge that continues today), though here we’re testing a more humble Sportback ES model that props up the Lancer range.

The Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback was the realisation of the ‘Concept Sportback’ first shown at the 2005 Frankfurt motor show and later released as a series production version in 2007. It essentially replaced the Lancer Wagon from that moment on, with the hatchback providing the alternative to the sedan.

While the final Sportback production version never quite captured the standout styling of the concept car, especially at the rear end, it does however hold its own among some stylish competition from the likes of Ford, Mazda, Kia and Hyundai.

The Lancer sedan is just 15 millimetres shorter than the Sportback and has a larger boot capacity with the rear seats up, but as with most hatchback’s the Sportback has the practicality advantage when you don’t need to accommodate rear passengers.

Fold the seats flat, which can be cleverly done via remote latches from the rear of the cargo area, and stowage capacity weighs heavily in favour of the Sportback. There’s a tonne of load space and plenty of room for extra long items such as prams, ladders and several surfboards.

There are also plenty of useful storage spaces, especially around the centre console that came in handy as phones, wallets, and sunnies can be easily accessed without needing to fish around in the centre bin.
Backseat legroom is reasonable, too, though the Sportback’s ‘fastback’ styling reduces headroom by 27mm compared to the sedan.

Although the ES is the entry-level Sportback, our test car was equipped with the optional ‘convenience pack’, which adds electro-chromatic mirror with reverse camera, reverse sensors, Bluetooth phone and music streaming, leather-wrapped steering wheel and front map lamps. For the grand total of $960, we think this is an option box worth ticking.

Mitsubishi has also sweetened the offering for the 2012 model, adding electric power steering, new design wheel covers, rear spoiler, chrome plated door inner door handles, dark sliver interior trim, new design seat fabric and soft touch door trim with leather insert.

While those additions to the interior are certainly a marked improvement over previous-generation Lancers, the Sportback interior can only be regarded as acceptable when compared with a number of rivals in the small car segment.

The Lancer’s instruments and switchgear are well laid out and easy to read, but soft-touch materials on the dash, or anywhere else except a small part of the door trim, is non-existent.

There are a few interesting metallic-look accents around the cabin, such as the dark silver insert across the width of the dash and door trim, but that’s about it; the remainder is a mix of various hard plastics.
A tilt-only steering wheel isn’t ideal, either, to find the perfect driving position, though at least the seats are comfortable and cosseting.

Bluetooth connectivity with music streaming is also standard, and one of the easier car-pairing set-ups: simply tap the phone symbol on the steering wheel, mutter a few voice commands, and then, presto, you’re good to go.

Higher-grade Lancers gain the premium Rockford Fosgate audio system, while our base model ES only comes with a non-descript four-speaker system. That’s no reason for folks to despair, though, even audiophiles; this entry-level unit actually produces an exceptional sound (via Bluetooth streaming) that would see us call the public relations team at Mitsubishi just to check that it wasn’t in fact the higher-end unit.

Under the bonnet is Mitsubishi’s 2.0-litre MIVEC engine, which puts out a fairly ordinary 110kW of power and 197Nm of torque on regular unleaded fuel. In this guise it’s nothing special, with an even less inspiring engine note that is decidedly metallic in sound.

Much of the blame for this rests with the optional continuously variable transmission in our test car (standard equipment in the ES variant is a five-speed manual transmission). While there’s no desperate shortage of engine torque, the noise and commotion between 3000 and 4000rpm is best described as a symphony of a blender on ice-crushing mode and a petrol engine remote control car with its throttle wide open.

There’s little to get excited about on the road. Electric power steering systems can be tuned to produce accurate and quick response steering, but this is not one of those. There’s too much weight in the steering at low speeds and it feels numb and lifeless on turn in at any speed.

The Lancer Sportback doesn’t feel that composed negotiating bends. Despite the ES model weighing only 1355kg, the car produces enough weight transfer for this to feel like a heavier vehicle that it actually is.

Mitsubishi has got plenty right with safety, though. Active and passive safety systems are well catered for on the Sportback, with no less than seven airbags, including driver’s knee airbag, as standard kit. There’s also a 5-star ANCAP safety rating.

If you can manage a manual transmission, then it’s also quite well priced at $21,690, for a car of these proportions. Otherwise the Lancer Sportback ES’s best attributes are its spacious cabin and versatile cargo space.

Mitsubishi also provides Australia’s best new car warranty with 10 years or 160,000 kms on the powertrain, 5 years or 130,000 kms as the new car warranty and 5 years on corrosion, which in itself is a strong selling point.

There’s certainly plenty on Mitsubishi’s ‘Need to do’ list if it is to make the 10th-generation Lancer a more competitive rival for the growing list of commendable small cars on offer.

Owner reviews of the MITSUBISHI LANCER Add a New Review

WE RECOMMEND YOU ALSO CONSIDER...

  • Dathomster

    Bring on the hard plastics in this kind of car I reckon… dog claws, small children and daily beach trips with the family seem to have taken far harder toll on newer vehicles with soft touch everything!

    I never normally comment on the looks of a vehicle as it’s such a subjective thing and I really don’t  feel people need to have my opinion shared with them, but by heck I’ve always found the back end on this uglier than just about anything else on the road.

    • Golfschwein

      Your comparison of hard and soft plastics is interesting. My Golf’s passenger side interior door grip copped a hammering (indignantly denied, naturally, and one doesn’t take it further) from my partner’s fingernails. The driver’s side, with up to ten times the exposure, had a fraction of the damage of the left, but then, I am fussy with my surfaces. And I clip my nails.

      • Noddy

        Yeah you should tell your partner to cut his fingernails.

        • Golfschwein

          I will. Who is Kiseop and why do you have the hots for him?

          • Noddy

            I too ask who is Kiseop? Why did you ask?

        • Scatman

          Thats pretty funny Noddy

      • Guest

        We are grey nomads and travel with our cat – hard plastic is good when his claws need clipping. Soft plastic would have pin holes everywhere! 

  • Frank

    Drove a Lancer sedan for a week on the Sunshine Coast early last year. A comfortable, compliant and versatile vehicle for the money (even for a rental with 45000kms). CVT is about the only complaint I have; makes the car’s performance a little lack-luster at times. A conventional 5 Speed Auto with manual mode or Mitsubishi’s TC-SST box would have been a better set-up even in the naturally aspirated Lancers.

  • Kampfer

    How can Mitsubishi make the great looking Concept Sportback into an ugly duck is beyond me…

    • Aazz

      Yea, sure is ugly. If you dropped it on 19″s/20″s like the concept, it may be a different story.

    • Lucii Pooky

      Same way GM did with the Cruze Hatch (Go look at Holdens drawings and then the current car)

    • Kd

      Because instead of using different rear doors like the concept they wanted to save money and used the sedans doors, totally ruining the design in the progress

  • Frank

    What makes ugly cars great is that there aren’t many on the road. If you’re after something different rather than the typical blade-of-grass on the roads, I say ugly is individual.

    • Noddy

      But no one wants to drive the ugly car. That’s why there aren’t many on the road.

      • Frank

        I want to drive the ugly car. I don’t want to look like I’m driving what the other 97% of  road user’s are driving. Exactly my point!

        • nickdl

          Or you could drive a beautiful car of which there aren’t many on the road, like some Citroëns and Alfas.

          • Frank

            Point taken nickdl, but I can’t afford a beautiful car so I’ll have to stick with the ugly rather than a common.

  • Phil

    A awful, awful car. Terrible to drive and such a nasty interior.
     
    The example I drove (18 month old with 22K on it) had a copious amount of freeplay in the steering. The CVT was slow off the line and there was a bad flaw if you kept flooring it for more than few seconds after it reached peak power revs – instead of holding the revs there indefinitely the revs would slowly rise after a few seconds of full throttle and it would then sit on the rev limiter. Very irritating.

    It’s not even good as cheap basic transport given Mitsubishi’s constant poor results in consumer surveys.

    • John

       Show me any Australian consumer surveys that back up your assertion Mitsubishi rates poorly.

      That’s right, you can’t. Dont bother pointing to J D Power either – the American market is substantially different to the Oz market. The Lancer, for example, sold in America is made in America, and has quite a poor reputation mainly related to build quality and componentry failure. The Oz market Lancer is built in Japan and is built to a quite reasonable standard.

      • MisterZed

        Er, what?!  The Lancer has *never* been built in the USA.  It’s always been imported from Japan, which makes it a rare exception in that market.  The only Mitsubishis to be built in the USA are the Galant and Endeavour SUVs, and the re-badged Dodge Ram (Mitsubishi Raider).

        • John

           I had thought MMNA imported the Lancer CKD and assembled it at their Illinois plant, using imported and locally sourced parts, and I distinctly remember seeing evidence of this – that of course I cannot find any more.

          Apologies if I’m wrong. Assuming you’re right though, and their Lancers and ours come from the same factory, then why do ours appear to be better built? Anecdotal evidence suggests the Lancer is a well-regarded small car with no major faults.

          Of course, those Mitsu cars that are actually built by MMNA do indeed have a poor reputation – perhaps that reputation rubs off on the Lancer in North America.

          • MisterZed

            The only CKD kits I’ve ever heard of in the US are pickup trucks and small vans, so as to avoid the 25% “chicken tax” import duty.  I have rarely heard of any passenger car being assembled there from CKD.  I believe the Lancer is fully imported, but if you can prove otherwise let me know.

  • gt86.com.au

    the sportback looks cool (HOT).. but the standard lancer just looks soo dated japanese.. they really are behind the ball game..

  • somebody who knows nothing

    Very ordinary car when compared to the opposition. Especially as most buyers in that price bracket are after as much fruit as they can get for their dollar. Also the Driveline is below par when compared to even the Cruize.
    Mitusbishi really need to lift their game, nothing they have is new. Nothing they have competes with the main stream market place.

    • Sydlocal

      …yep, the 1.8L engine in the mainstream/lower end Cruze is above par compared to the MIVEC in the Lancer…..  ;-)

      • DAVIDZ

        +1

        Don’t encourage the fools/trolls

  • Adam

    Not sure why there are so many complaints about the CVT noise in these Lancers.

    I find that the engine has more than enough torque for it to keep up with traffic without ever getting above 3000rpm… and when used in manual mode it actually sounds pretty good above 4000rpm if you want to go hard… and at this point the MIVEC engine really does hammer.

    Harsh review in my opinion, given the car is 5 years old now.

  • Amlohac

    Having the displeasure of driving one of these, its just aweful. Aweful to the point it actually felt unsafe on the road. The steering feels totally dead, and actually feels like it was lifted from a car 15 years ago. Its in desperate need of a total re-build.

    • Able

      Spelling awful with an e makes me think the opposite – that I should be full of awe towards to Lancer.

      Fail to you my friend!

      • AUS.CARS

        +1

        POST OF THE WEEK!

      • BackOff

        This isn’t a spelling bee, note the opinion, not the language, i’m sure you have better things to do than make comments like that.

  • Favrence

    When is the lancer going to be updated?

    • DAVIDZ

      why would they, sells  so well and THE SEGMENT LEADER

  • Able

    Possibly the best value car on the road, especially as a VR or VRX, Mitsubishi has very well deserved to sell the amount of Lancers they have – I see them everywhere!

    But Mitsubishi Aus should be thinking diesel…

    • somebody who knows nothing

      You see a lot of them because it has been with us for so long…. Could possibly be the best value car on the road, BUT simply isn’t! Similar pricing to 3 Neo, Focus Ambiete, Corolla Ascent all better drives with the benefit of newer dianamics and better fuel consumption. Also those three, plus the Koreans have a more honest advertising campaign when it comes to warranty statements… Whats with the 5/10 warranty?
      Its a three year warranty that will be validated and extended IF you continue to get it serviced through Mitsubishi Service centers… Also their Claimed 5yr Roadside assistance is actually a 12 month programme renewing only when you get your car serviced.. (I am well aware that this is the exact same setup Ford have, however Ford calls it for what it is…

      • Able

        Sure the Focus and 3 drive better (than most cars actually, let alone the Lancer) but a Corolla? No way in hell… 

      • Sydlocal

         Plus another thing to remember is that the 10 year powertrain warranty is non-transferable ie only applies to the first owner.

        • Anonymous

          That was all expained to me at the dealership before buying. Mitsubishi isn’t doing anything underhanded, it’s a reward for loyal customers.

          I love how someone is attacking them for only honouring a massive warranty and roadside assistance if you service your car. I mean, shock horror. It’s more than made up with their current fixed-price servicing.

        • Amlohac

          What? Really? What is the point in that? Are they saying that because the car has changed owners this puts undue stress on the drivetrain? Like its depressed its been sold or something? Thats just …odd.

          • Mick

            No, they are saying they look after ‘their’ customer.  It is not in the interests of mitsubishi to provide a long term warranty to contribute to profits of 2nd hand car dealers or auctioneers.  It is an incentive to buy directly from them and that is what we call good business.   

      • Bjccox

        brad c      5 yr roadside does exist in australia i have used it after 2 yrs not a problem

  • http://twitter.com/jackkl Jack

    I really love the look of this car, especially in the VRX trim. I think it has aged well, but perhaps getting a bit long in the tooth.

    The interior design though is atrocious, easily one of the worst in the small car category.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_6ZQHML4W2NGIYK4AFA47WMEPKI timmyt

    What is the current cycle for car models? All these comments about its aged looks amuse me given the car has been out for what? 4 years? I still think the sedan still looks quite attractive, despite myself personally opting for a mazda 3

    • Amlohac

      Dont know about it “looking” aged. But it certainly drives like it has. A 4 year old car shouldnt feel 15 years old.

  • AUS.CARS

    Oldwe C/A test by Alborz claimed [and i agree] this is THE best car in the segment

  • Jeff

    I have a 2010 Lancer GTS Sportback and I really like it. Its US specced with a 2.4 engine and the CVT, 18″ alloys and lower body cladding this one doesn’t have.  I get a lot of compliments and admiring looks – its far from ugly.  Its better looking than the Ford Focus hatch imo.  Got it for several thousand less than a Focus, Cruze or Madza 3 – Mitsubishi dealers are much more willing to discount since they sell so few.

    • Amlohac

      Why do they sell so few though?

      You find the CVT a bit annoying to drive?

  • Anonymous

    I bought an ES last week (sedan and manual version). You’re right, the stereo (especially over Bluetooth) is far better than I expected. If I could do it again I might have gotten the Sportsback instead… but it’s a tough call.

    I did test drive a Mazda 3 Neo first and while it was nice and quiet I didn’t ilke the position of the gear shifter, and it doesn’t have the same pickup or fuel economy as the Mitsubishi; also the Lancer had more options included, for cheaper, a longer warranty, and low fixed-price servicing.

    Say what you want about the interior, it’s no big deal. Seriously. Whatever your thoughts on the end product, every new car shopper should at least be giving one a test drive.

    • Jeff

      I had no thought in my head about trying a Lancer Sportback.  I test drove a Corolla, Mazda3, Honda Civic, Chevy Cruze and Volkswagen Golf.  They were all fine, but as I dove around the “auto mall” in my city I saw the Mitsu dealer and thoutht “what the hell, I’ll pull in and see what they have”.  The Sportback looked good and drove about as well as the others (a tiny bit more road noise from the 18″ wheels and low profile tires), had a good warranty, loaded with options and was a lot less money.  Its hard to pass up a $4,000 rebate and discount vs. the others.  I don’t trade my cars in often – I’ll probably keep it for 6-8 years so the depreciation and non-transferable warranty is no problem.

  • W2r

    This car being so popular in Australia shows that Australia has bad tastes, reason is because literally every other compact is better then this one..

    Cruze
    Elentra
    Civic
    Corolla
    Etc

  • Antmindel

    I like the sedans shape,but HATE HATE HATE the body of the hatch,so ugly…

  • Johnny Rocket

    I’ve owned a 2008 ES Sedan since new and it is rock-solid. These are an excellent value proposition and in 2008 it was easily the best equipped and cheapest base model when compared to the Mazda 3 and Toyota Corolla. 
    The CVT is noisier than most engine/transmissions I’ve driven and whilst it’s never left wanting for power, it’s not sporty. As a reliable daily driver that’s cheap to run, it has been faultless. I’d definitely reconsider a Mitsubishi, particularly as a second family car. 

  • Robbo

    I owned a MY10 VR-X and after a year I couldn’t wait to flick it (and I did).  What I thought would be a great car ended up being cheap rubbish.  Not just on opinion, but these facts:  steering was terrible with slight tyre wear, massive tram lining on the smoothest roads (yes, I had Pedders wheel alignment, and at only 15000km replaced all four tyres with quality brand that I’ve good times with before, in 1000km the problem came back).  The boot leaked badly, I went through four sunvisors both sides still they fell down, the paint was wafer thin with more chips and scratches I’ve ever had on any car (and i’m really fussy about cleaning etc myself), the power delivery was rubbish with most standard Lancers being just as quick, the road noise was massively bad on course chip you couldn’t talk to the passenger without shouting, the engine was noisy even at low revs and the leather interior marked so easily that after that one year the driver’s seat was rubbing through (I’m not that big and very careful).  We have no kids and treated the like it was our last.  Yes, good points were great sounding audio, good tech features, good a/c, good brakes, clever rain sensor that worked properly and best of all, no rattles at all (hard plastics pay off).  I’ve since driven other equivilants and a i30 or a Corolla as much as readers will bag them were a better car to drive.

    Do yourself a favour and stay away from the Lancer, it’s packed with big warranty and features to take your mind of all the above nasties, unless those things don’t worry you.  There are better choices for the money asked, and this is coming from someone who’s worked with the motor industry for years and and is very logical about vehicles (middle aged, not a rev head).

    Thanks for reading :)

    • Amlohac

      You’re right. A big warranty is nice, but having a car off the road all the time if it falls appart isnt much fun at all. Even if it doesnt cost you a thing to fix.

    • DAVIDZ

      get off the drugs brother and back to your great-wall

  • Tarquin, Hair Artiste

    Too bad the Sportback does not look like the concept car.  The production car is a bit dumpy looking.  Overall the car is starting to looked dated and is not that fuel efficient, however, it seems like a decent choice.  My only major concern is the longevity of the CVT auto.

  • DAVIDZ

    >>>>>My only major concern is the longevity of the CVT auto.

    Which part of 10YEAR/160,000 POWERTRAIN WARRANTY are you having trouble with understanding?

    NEXT!

    • Doblekara

      hi david, since you love the lancer i just wanna get your opinion on this. i’m looking at buying a used lancer, my budget is $18000 max and i found 2 from car dealers:

      1. 2008 (MY08) VR-X sedan with 43,000 kms at $16,990 + stat charges
      2. 2010 (MY10) ES Activ (it’s an ES with extras) with 15,000 kms at $17,990 + stat charges

      which one would you go for? i haven’t really driven or seen them in person yet but they both look good in the photos (both are blue as well)

      anyone here can chime in as well, cheers!

  • Steven A

    Robbo, its funny but we havent had any problems with our VR-X Lancer at all, are you sure you were driving a Mitsubishi Lancer and not a Holden?. Your claimed experience certainly isnt shared by anyone else contributing comments here.

  • Johnc

    @DAVIDZ But Mitsubishi told me for the power train warranty to remain active for 10 years, you have to get it serviced by the dealerships only. Seems pretty useless for those who prefer not to use dealerships after the standard warranty ends. 

  • S_rees52

    I’ve had one for 5 years and love it, had a minor transmission fault when new, and the car radio failed once. Been great since. My car fair motors along. I drive V8 Commodores and Turbo fords but I still love the way it goes

  • New User

    My girlfriend just picked up a brand new manual ES Sportback with Safety pack (reverse camera and sensors, extra airbags and touch screen sound system) for $16990 drive away.
    Brilliant little car for what it is. I own a current shape 3 MPS, and for the price she paid the equivalent Cruze or 3 doesn’t compare. Anyone that is saying it’s terrible is comparing it to cars that it shouldn’t be compared too. 

  • Btx6006

    Well I had a 2012 Sportsback with CVT for 3 years / 51,000km.
    Its gets 12km/L around town, has heaps of cargo space, hasn’t missed a beat, still has the original tyres (about 5000km left on them), has towed a 8 x 5 ft trailer loaded with a motorbike 5000kms and the capped servicing is relatively cheap. Still have 2 years left on warranty and has proven to be the ideal car for me. Sure it could do with some more power but the fuel economy comes at a price. I would swap the CVT for a manual if I lived elsewhere but I live in Brisbane which is very hilly and full of stop and start traffic.