Kia Rio 3-door Hatch, Sedan Review | CarAdvice

Car Advice

Kia Rio 3-door Hatch, Sedan Review

KIA RIO

Pros: Local suspension tune; six-speed manual; sharp styling and clean sedan; warranty; SLS value

Cons: Four-speed auto; slow 1.4-litre models; road noise; scratchy cabin surfaces; hatch's rear visibility

By Tim Beissmann
FIND DEALS

Price: $15,290 to $21,990

Our Rating:  

It was one of the most surprising cars of 2011 – and a likely award winner if a Most Improved Car of the Year trophy were to exist – and now it has increased its appeal with new variants and a cheaper starting point.

At $15,290 before on-road costs, the three-door hatch introduces a new entry price to the Rio range, while the more upmarket SLS aims to keep changing perceptions about the Kia brand.

The Kia Rio sedan, which is largely targeted at fleet buyers, is styled more conservatively and offers better luggage space and rear-seat room.

The South Korean manufacturer has taken a generational leap forward with the fourth iteration of the Rio, as we found out when we first drove the all-new Rio five-door in September 2011. The three-door and sedan are equally impressive.

Perhaps the biggest surprise of the new Rio is the way it rides over some of Australia’s roughest roads and the confident feel it gives the driver. Kia Australia invested heavily in tuning the new Rio’s ride and handling to suit local conditions, and benchmarked it against two of the most dynamically sound cars in the segment: the Volkswagen Polo and the Ford Fiesta.

While it still lacks the all-round brilliance of the class-leading Polo and the exhilarating handling of the Fiesta, the Rio feels effortlessly composed on both good and bad surfaces. The suspension springs back quickly to iron out undulations and harsher ruts, ensuring a comfortable ride for passengers.

The handling of the three-door Rio S is a little unnerving at times, though. Powered by the smaller 1.4-litre engine and running on 15-inch steel wheels, the steering feel can be unpredictable over bumps at higher speeds and around corners.

The Si sedan and SLS hatch, both powered by the larger 1.6-litre engine and riding on 16- and 17-inch alloy wheels respectively, feel better balanced and more precise.

All variants and tyre sizes direct some road noise into the cabin, especially on rougher roads and highways.

The 1.4-litre petrol engine is relatively quiet and gets on in a gentle, progressive manner. The 79kW/135Nm four-cylinder unit doesn’t feel quick and the 0-100km/h sprint times confirm that. The smooth-shifting six-speed manual hits triple figures in 11.5 seconds, while the optional four-speed auto ($2000) drags its feet at 13.2 seconds.

The better option is the 1.6-litre petrol, which is found in all models above S specification. With 103kW and 167Nm, the four-cylinder direct-injection unit produces 30 per cent more power and 24 per cent more torque. It’s not only faster than the 1.4-litre – 10.2 seconds from 0-100km/h for the manual, 10.3 seconds for the six-speed auto – it’s also more fuel efficient. Manual variants use 5.6 litres per 100km on the combined cycle versus 5.7L/100km for the 1.4-litre, while the automatics measure 6.1L/100km to 6.3L/100km.

The bigger powerplant is the most powerful engine in the light car segment, with the exception of performance models such as the Polo GTI and the Renault Clio RS200. It’s more lively than the 1.4, but lacks the low-down torque and zippy nature of the Polo 77TSI’s turbocharged – and more fuel-efficient – 1.2-litre.

The six-speed automatic is the same versatile gearbox found in the Kia Optima and Kia Sportage. It’s smooth and well calibrated for the smaller Rio, although is forced to drop back when confronted by inclines and overtaking manoeuvres, resulting in higher revs and a louder engine note. The 1.6/manual combination is the sweetest of the bunch, and represents good value with its sub-$20,000 price tag.

Although Kia Australia is pushing head office for it, there’s no high-performance turbocharged engine on the horizon. The local brand is less enthusiastic about a diesel variant, feeling the model’s premium price, marginal fuel savings and manual-only transmission would limit its appeal.

While styling is subjective, the new Rio looks sharp and decidedly more masculine than most light cars. It’s no surprise the Rio was initially designed as a three-door, as the new hatch’s styling is well balanced and exudes a sporty, playful character. The sedan is a triumph, too, eschewing the contrived styling common among light sedans for a cohesive, clean appearance.

The interior has also taken giant steps forward. The layout is functional, the steering wheel and gearsticks have a good look and feel, and the buttons, dials and switches have a classy touch. The quality of the interior plastics and materials rivals most light cars, although the abundant scratchy surfaces lack refinement.

Drivers should find their sweet spot easy enough thanks to a tilt and reach steering wheel and seat height adjustment. Forward visibility is aided by small A-pillar cut-outs. Large C-pillars restrict rear visibility in the three-door; the view from the sedan is significantly better.

The shape of the roof means headroom is more accommodating for rear-seat passengers in the sedan. Legroom is adequate in both body styles for a vehicle in this class. The sedan also benefits from a larger boot (389 litre versus 288 litres), although compared with its rivals, the hatch’s cargo volume is particularly impressive. Both feature flat floors that sit atop full-sized spare wheels.

The entry-level Rio S hatch gets a manual air conditioner, trip computer and a four-speaker audio system with CD player and AUX/USB/iPod/Bluetooth connectivity, including phone and music streaming.

The Si sedan adds front fog lights, folding side mirrors, an upgraded instrument cluster, cruise control, leather-wrapped steering wheel and gear knob, sliding centre console armrest, soft-touch dash plastics and silver trim highlights.

The Rio SLS is arguably Australia’s best value car for under $20,000. Standard on the range-topper are automatic projector headlights, LED daytime running lights and taillights, cornering lamps, dual chrome exhausts, uprated brakes, smart key entry and push-button start, climate control, rain-sensing wipers and leather upholstery.

The Rio is rated five stars for safety, with six airbags, electronic stability control, hill-start assist and seatbelt reminders standard across all models.

Like all new Kia models, the Rio is covered by a five-year/unlimited kilometre warranty.

The Kia Rio three-door hatch and four-door sedan are handy additions to an already convincing light-car line-up. The fact we compared the Rio with the Volkswagen Polo throughout this review is massive compliment in itself, and is evidence of just how far the tiny Korean has come.

2012 Kia Rio manufacturer’s list prices (excluding government and dealer charges):

Three-door hatch:

  • S six-speed manual – $15,290
  • S four-speed automatic – $17,290
  • SLS six-speed manual – $19,990
  • SLS six-speed automatic – $21,990

Four-door sedan:

  • Si six-speed manual – $19,690
  • Si six-speed automatic – $21,690

Five-door hatch:

  • S six-speed manual – $16,290
  • S four-speed automatic – $18,290
  • Si six-speed manual – $18,990
  • Si six-speed automatic – $20,990
  • SLi six-speed manual – $19,990
  • SLi six-speed automatic – $21,990

 

Owner reviews of the KIA RIO Add a New Review

  • Sumpguard

       Have CA tried to scratch that plastic? My Sportage would no doubt contain the same plastics at the top of the doors as the RIO and I had the same concern. My dogs have had their claws on it for the past year yet there isn’t a mark to be seen anywhere!

         Meanwhile KIA now have the best looking sedan rear in the small car market.

  • Lucii Pooky

    As I said in the previous post, if I was in the market for a small 5 Door I would take a Polo or Accent(when GDi is available) over a Rio but if I wanted a 3 Door I would no doubt about it take one of these! The SLS’ interior looks pretty snazzy with the Leather, SmartKey and climate control(Like the Accent and Polo) and it would no doubt be a better drive than a Yaris ZR and the sedan looks much better than the awful Barina shown a couple of days ago. 

    Now maybe a Rio turbo to rival the Polo GTi and DS3?

  • The Salesman

    Absolutely the best looking and best value available in this segment. If you have not got Kia on the shopping list then you are crazy. 

    • Ted

      Is there a 1.2 turbo version on the way ?

      • Anonymous

        lets hope so.

      • Matthew Werner

        Nah, lets get the 2 litre turbo from the LHD Optima :)

    • somebody who knows nothing

      lol not bias are we???

  • http://www.facebook.com/antmindel Anthony Mindel

    Sedan and hatch are both fantastic looking…

  • Philthy

    10.2s 0-100 for a six speed manual light car with 103 kW? Who ate all the pies!!

    • Phil

      Kia lied. Choice magazine should put it on a dyno.

      Funny how the 77KW Polo/78KW Mazda 2/88Kw Fiesta etc are just as fast.

      In actual fact with 103KW and 1179KGs, a Rio 1.6 has a identical power to weight ratio as a Mazda SP25 (122KW and 1400KGs). Yet the Rio lags a full TWO seconds behind 0-100km/h.
      Another comparison is the new BMW 116i…..100KW/1290KGs……it has 3 Kw LESS than a Rio and weighs 120KGs more, yet is 1.5 seconds faster 0-100kmh.

      • Wombat

        Well maybe Kia chose to put economy ahead of acceleration? The Rio 1.6 is  more economical than Fiesta and Mazda2 and BMW116 on the combined cycle and beats them again, plus Polo, on the highway cycles. Seriously,I suspect most people who buy this class of vehicle are more interested in economy than sprint times.

        • Phil

          Your comment makes zero sense.

          What does choosing to put economy ahead of acceleration have to do with anything? They are still claiming 103KW!
          It accelerates like a 80Kw car (and their 79Kw 1.4 accelerates like a 65KW car).

          If it has a better consumption on the combined cycle, it doesn’t “beat” them again on the highway cycle – the combined cycle includes the highway cycle! Small cars don’t do mught highway mileage anyway.
          Besides, they’ve probably lied about the economy figures too.

          Seriously, do you think people who are more interested in economy are going to spend $3700 to save 0.1L100km if they’re not interested in the better sprint times?

          • Wombat

            Its your response that makes zero sense. Firstly you accuse Kia of lying about their power output. Do you really think a major company would be that silly?
            Secondly, you try to justify your silly accusation by saying because the Rio is slower than some then it must have less power. How dumb is that? If the gearing is higher, which encourages economy the car will be slower in acceleration. How the power gets to the wheels is going to be governed by the gearbox. Not exactly rocket science.
            Then you say the Rio doesn’t beat the others in the highway cycle. WRONG AGAIN! Most manufacturers publish the fuel consumption figures for the urban cycle, AND the highway cycle, AND the combined cycle. Guess who wins the highway cycle? I suggest yo do a bit of research before you make any further dumb comments, buddy. .
            Finally you seem to suggest that people who buy this sort of car will be greatly interested in the 0-100 sprint time. I REALLY dont think so. When was the last time you saw a Rio,Polo, Mazda2, Fiesta or anything similar being floored. People who place a high value on sprint times tend to buy Golf GTi’s and Commodore utes.
            Incidentally, at no stage did I suggest people would spend $3700 to save 0.1 L/100km. You might like to read other people’s comments more carefully before writing your own.

          • Phil

            Yes companys lie about figures…..Honda is in trouble at the moment for instance…..also do a google search on Korean company LG who’ve been caught several times providing false figures on their appliances. 

            The 6 speed in the Rio 1.6 has near identical ratios and final drive to the 6 speed in the Polo 77TSI, so it’s not the gearing making it slower….

            I didn’t say Rio didn’t wasnt better in the highway cycle, I pointed out that it’s ridiculous to say it beats them in the conbined cycle and then beats them again in the highway cycle….welll derrrrr…..the combined cycle includes the highway cycle!
            It’s like saying “oh I beat him in the results of my two exams……then I beat him again in the average of my two exams”…..it’s not a second victory….your just repeating one portion of the same victory.

            Whats the point of spending $3700 for the 1.6 over the 1.4 if you’re not interested in the extra acceleration then?

          • Wombat

            For a start the 1.6 model is considerably better equipped. Secondly, the 1.6 has considerably better performance. And performance is more than just acceleration.And thirdly I didn’t say I wasn’t interested in acceleration. I did say that I didn’t think people buying this class of vehicle were GREATLY concerned with the 0-100 sprint time given the fact that you are talking about very small differences here.If the Rio took 20 seconds to get to 100, I would be concerned. There are still plenty of new vehicles for sale which are well off the 10 second mark for that distance and their owners seem to cope.
            With regards to the fuel cycles, it is not ridiculous to separate the results because different people will use their vehicles in different ways. My daily commute is over 200km and is almost entirely at open road speeds. Therefore the fact that the Rio is significantly more economical in that environment is significant to me. If I was stuck in lengthy city queues then the urban figure would be of more interest.The key point I made initially is that for you to accuse KIA of lying about the power output without a shred of evidence to back it up, is unwise. And I remain of that view.

          • Tornadosky

            The above arguments regarding how a Kia Rio’s acceleration times are not as good as the Mazda 3 SP 25′s despite their power-to-weight ratios being the same implies some ignorance into the matter. I’m no mechanical engineer or physicist, but year 12 physics would suggest that these times are a result of power, torque and the engines rpm. Coupled with this are the gearing ratios. A large petrol engine would have more torque at lower rpm (similar to a diesel) and also a flatter torque curve. Power (kW) outputs are more linear in nature, hence in some part, the power figures promoted by car manufacturers can be misleading as the peak power figures are published, and only give some indication to the power output of the engines.

            To accuse Kia of falsifying their power and torque figures is too extreme without any scientific data to back it up. This 1.6L engine is actually an award winning engine, which received the “Ward’s Top 10 Engines for 2012″. This award was just announced late last year. Not many compact class cars actually have award winning technology under their bonnets even though they may have faster 0-100km/hr acceleration times. Implying Kia is a Korean company so they’re more likely to falsify important power figures (how another Korean company such as LG did about its energy consumption figures on their white goods), implies certain negative connotations about Korean companies in general. I would take that with a grain of salt. 

          • Phil

            Whatever you want to say…………The performance of the Rio is appalling for a 103Kw/1179Kg car.

            The gear ratios are about the same as most of the other cars in that segment. Also low torque and flat torque curves, whilst great for day-day driving, count little for brute acceleration.
            If the power/Torque delivery is such that it cannot deliver comparable performance as other cars whilst having a 20-30%% peak power advantage, there is something wrong with that 1.6 engine somewhere…
            It’s either got terrible power/torque delivery or Kia lied about the power output.

          • Wombat

            Wards Top 10 engine for 2012, “Car of the Year” awards. Best car under $20000 awards. Yep. It really must be appalling. Cant imagine why I’ve just ordered one!
            Sorry Phil, I think you’ve been out voted.

          • Phil

            According Wards, the old Holden Bommodore Ecotec engine is the “best engine of the 21st century”. Maybe at some stage you bought one of those too?

          • Sumpguard

               Give it up Phil. Your arguement is silly. Gearing alone can alter accelleration times. It doesn’t really matter. They haven’t lied about the 0-100 times at least which many manufacturers do.

          • K20A

            Cant help myself but to join this silly argument.

            Acceleration figures is not 1+1=2. There’s a lot more to it. Aerodynamics, drivetrain loss, tyre traction, traction control behaviour, etc, etc.

            Why would a company lied about its figure for a Rio-class car?!?! If it was a GT-R or M3, it’s more likely..

            Last time I checked the Rio is not marketed as a hot hatch. Who cares if it’s a couple of secs slower to a hundred kays..

  • Wombat

    I think its a bit misleading to claim the Polo’s 1.2 TSI motor is more fuel efficient than the Rio’s 1.6 GDI. The combined test consumption for the Polo is 5.6 as opposed to the Rio’s 5.7 but as the Rio runs happily on 91 octane whereas the Polo requires 95 or higher, the actual fuel costs should be lower in the Rio. the Rio is also considerably more fuel efficient in the rural test.

    • Lucii Pooky

      Its more efficient because it has more useable torque low down meaning less thrashing of the engine and its also lighter. Also 91 Octane doesn’t exist in most parts of Europe hence the reason why most European cars are 95+.

      • Karl

        That’s true, however Wombat’s point still holds.
        If you tested the RIO on 95 octane, it’s highly likely that it’d use less fuel.

      • wombat

        Well as I live in Australia, and as this review is written for Australians, it doesnt matter in the slightest what fuel is available in Europe. And are you trying to tell me that a small, highly stressed supercharged/turbocharged  engine is going to be less thrashed than a significantly larger one?

        • Jinnzhang

          What makes you think that In real life the 1.4 NA can get close to 5.7L/100km when you have to rev it over 4500 rpm to keep up with the traffic while the 1.2T doesn’t have to because there is plenty of torque at low rev. Do you know what does torque do BTW?

          • Mani

            Wombat was using the 1.6GDI figures not the 1.4 so don’t misquote him Jinnzhang.  By the way, I know what torque is and wombats argument is still a valid one.  Value for dollar, the rio is by far streets ahead of VW – might explain why it’s already winning awards galore.

          • James Cortez

            Then get a bigger displacement turbocharged engine as you can even drive it at lower rpm. Buy a chevy volt if you are after gas mileage

  • Sam

    Nice looking car.  Everytime i look though I think ‘Seat’ and have to remind myself, no its not a Seat its a Kia.

  • Shak

    Wow, that SLS variant is really chocked full of equipment. And you really cant fault either body style on looks. KIA seem to have a big hit on their hands with the Rio.

  • Able

    The 3-door actually looks really good, with almost perfect proportions! They need a 5-door SLS variant though and more than just Si of the saloon would be nice too. Overall, a very good effort from Kia!

  • Anonymous

    I don’t like the location of the rear license plate on the sedan.  Plates down low on the bumper always look cheap.  Much better to have it on the bootlid, like the Accent.

    • Mani

      That’s your opinion.  Might add, when one starts criticising number plate positioning one really is starting to scrape the bottom of the barrel…

      • Anonymous

        Nope, it’s not really just *my* opinion, because almost all expensive/luxury sedans have the plate on the boot lid.  Imagine an S-Class Merc with the plate down on the bumper.  Only inexpensive cars have them on the bumper, and even then, they are in the minority.

  • Anonymous

    I bought my new rio Sli last year in November, now they are bring out an SLS variant, with all the these added features that were suppose to have in the SLI. So disappointed. Really!!! They could have said that they were planning to bring out an SLS variant, with everything i wanted. Now i have to settle with something that isn’t top of the range :( .. Why Kia Why????

    • Anonymous

      So what’s the big deal?  Sell it and then buy an SLS?

    • Phil

      You bought a cheap little Kia Hatch from Korea………………yet your worrying about settling with something that isn’t top of the range:(…Why Wayne Why????

  • BP

    Awww!!! The Kia Rio Sedan rear-end looks sad :’(

    But it annoys me that the only reason Kia’s look so good these days is because of the new designer they got in a couple years. Without him, no-one would be buying a Kia Rio or a Kia car at all.

    • Anonymous

      Kia sold pretty well before the current designer.  The Carnival was not designed by him, and it’s been the best-selling people mover in Australia for something like a decade.  The old Rio also sold very well.

    • wombat

      So which designer was that? Peter Schreyer who designed the Optima, Massimo Fraschella who designed the Rio and Sportage, or perhaps Tom Kearns who seems responsible for the Track”ster, or one of the other members of Kia’s design team?

    • John

      Actually, I reckon the rear end of the sedan looks pretty good – and that is hard to achieve (witness the Mazda 2 sedan, the Fiesta sedan, the Honda City, the Toyota Yaris…).

      I’m still a bit unsure about the pricing of the Rio range, but that aside, I’d happily buy one.

      • Henry Toussaint

        I like the back of the Rio and Accent in Sedan Models!

  • Fdds

    give the Hyundai getz a run for its money.

  • Thomas

    $24990 drive away for a Kia Rio, you can get more from a Euro brand for that money.  Renault, Skoda, VW.  I know which one I would go for.

    • Wombat

      More of what, exactly? More Unreliability? More boring or downright ugly styling? More running costs? More chance of injury in a crash! More ergonomic fails. So many compelling reasons to bu European. NOT!

      • Phil

        Well, Kia Benchmarked their car against two European models………

        As you were…..

        • Wombat

          Yep. they did. And in most areas they equaled or bettered them. Your point?

          • Phil

            ummmm, why don’t you try actually READING this review.

            Specifically parts like this:
            “it lacks the all-round brilliance of the class leading Polo”.

          • Wombat

            Phil,not only have I read this review several times and every other one I could find on the subject, but I have also test driven both the Rio and the Polo a number of times, along with the Fiesta,and Audi A1. Have you?
            There is no question that the Polo is a fine car,and in my assessment it comes a very close second to the Rio. It definitely has the better engine, and marginally better handling but it comes second place in so many other areas that I think, that for me, the Rio is the better car. Clearly the people at Carsguide thought so too when they awarded it Car of the Year.And that is why today, after  6 months of careful research I finally placed an order on Rio SLS. 
            Whether you agree with my choice or not ( and clearly you wont agree) at least I’m prepared to put my money where my mouth is.

          • Kaminari

            Well done Wombat ~ I am also looking to buy a Rio as my second car, after being a happy owner of a Kia Cerato SLI for one year !! Hmm..instead of the VW Golf!

          • Henry Toussaint

            I just think the Normal Polo is Over rated, just like it’s bigger brother Golf. I love the GTI Though…of the polo i hate hate hate the Golf, I only like the Wagon and Convertible!!!!!!!

  • Aussie

    Its still just a KIA in 2 years time it will fall apart like all the other ones! and im sure the resale will be poor as well!!

    • Sumpguard

      Ignorance isn’t aways bliss Aussie. It can make you look stupid too ;)

        My partner has the previous model KIA Rio which has been faultless for 45,000 km’s and 4 years. Your comment is baseless.

    • Martin

      My father still drives his 2000 Kia Shuma to work every week day. So that’s an 11, nearly 12 year old Kia that still runs well, hasn’t ever broken down, doesn’t have bits falling off it and over 160,000 km on the clock. Same deal with my mothers 6 year old Cerato, over 120,000 km on the clock, zero problems, nothing falling apart.

      Your “Aussie” built cars are more likely to have сrap falling of them in two years time than any Kia or Hyundai.

      As Sumpguard said, your comment is baseless.

    • Wombat

      Seems a bit odd that if they’re going to fall to bits in 2 years, Kia seems happy to warrant them for 5 years in Australia, 7 years in Europe, and 10 years in USA! 

      • Anonymous

        Um what?!  Kia’s warranty is 5 years in the USA.  Only the powertrain is covered for 10 years. 

        • Wombat

          My mistake. Still a very good warranty, I think you’d agree? And very unlikely to be offered  if the car was to fall to bits after 2 years as Aussie suggests.

    • brianShuffles8

      hi i own a 2007 kia rio never missed a beat since 1.6 power fuel & econ ex. model 50000ks  still going like new

  • The Salesman

    News on sedan…no manual in Australia yet.

  • drbubo

     Hello guys, are you aware of the pathetic sales figures of this award winning car?
    There are no many people who look at it at all due to the listed price.
    Hyundai/Kia made a big misstake since try to push Kia as the  premium
    class car.  I had driven both the current Rio and the current Swift, Swift is ways better than Rio.
    Why most of people believe if a car looks good the car is good? Good look have significance when it comes to girls and not cars. For cars safety, driveability, refiness,  equipment,  technology,  options, performance an price is important.  All of them look good anyway, except the latest Micra.

    • Mani

      What planet are you living on drbubo?  Kia is smashing all of it’s sales records and is on course to do that again this year.  They plan to sell at least 8000 rio’s this year and would sell more except they can’t get any more supply for Australia.  Demand is that HOT.  I also think your lying about having driven the new RIO.  The new RIO won Australia best cars award for best light car under $20,000.  To quote what the judges said, “The RIO outpointed or equalled all comers in the areas of performance, handling, ride and braking.”  It is such a good little car that the judges are now comparing it to the VW Polo which is a mighty compliment in itself.   Not only does the RIO look great, it’s is very safe (5 star ANCAP), it drives, handles and outperforms anything near it’s price range, it’s level of equipment is unmatched by any of it’s rivals and the price is more then reasonable.  Back it up with a 5 year unlimited km warranty my question to you is, why on earth would you even consider buying the Swift when it is clearly a distant second to the RIO?

    • Grobler F

      U really dont make sense btw……

  • John

    I did some research for a friend of mine looking at the Cerato (he bought one). I used to bag Kia and my next car was going to be a DS3 (yes, I’m a Euro snob). But this 3 door Rio SLS is just such a good buy and I save $10K over the Citroen. I could actually go to Europe with the saving.

  • John

    I noticed in Wheels magazine that they tested the 0-100kmh time for the 5 door, 1.6 manual. They got it down to 8.8secs. Much less that the 10.2 secs Kia states. Looks like Kia did lie…..not about the KW but about how quick the car can go.

    • Grobler F

      What a nice surprise i hope WOMBAT AND PHIL takes note!

  • Aazz

    Thanks CarAdvice. Based on this review my wife dragged me along to a KIA dealership to look at a SLS. I wanted a Polo with Sport Package but I was that impressed that I bought the SLS and saved 8G. Great kit for your money.

  • MJD22

    Thanks for
    the article- saved me from making a big mistake. I wasn’t even aware there was
    a SLS variant available and had placed a deposit on a Signal Red 2012 demo Si
    auto for $20,888 drive away with 100Km on the ODO (in Victoria). Then the night
    before I was due to pick the car up I read this article and learned of the SLS
    and realised it represents far greater value. I even had the bank cheque and
    insurance all sorted. Luckily I was able to transfer my deposit on the Si auto
    to an order for the SLS manual. I negotiated a price of $21,500 drive away on a
    SLS manual in Graphite (my first preference) with Kia floor mats and slimline
    number plates included. So for $612 more I get a feature packed car that ticks
    all my boxes (I realise that I was sacrificing 5 doors for 3 and auto transmission
    for manual but manuals are more fun to drive anyway and I don’t usually have
    more than 1 passenger so no big problem for me there). Incidentally, Kia
    updated their online brochure and specifications PDF to include the SLS the
    very same day I placed my order. I was told I’m looking at 3-4 months for
    delivery with 6 months worst case scenario- have you guys been told anything
    different??

    If you are
    after insurance, Coles came in cheapest for me so get a quote with them online.
    And select market value, not agreed because the premium will be cheaper and if
    you write the car off in the first year they will replace it anyway as per
    their PDS so it doesn’t make a difference. They also have free roadside
    assistance in the first year and every month they send you a 12 cent fuel
    discount.

    Just a quick
    question about the keyless ignition start remote- does that mean that the car
    doors also lock and unlock just based on your proximity to them so that you
    don’t have to press any buttons on the remote as with normal keyless entry? And
    do you get a spare remote or just one? Also, is the glove box lockable? I have
    yet to see a SLS in the flesh. Cheers

  • Kweerkitten

    I drove a new SLS today, it goes well enough but feels a bit heavy and the wheels might perhaps be a bit large, they could make it a better buy with 16inch alloys! Kia offers free roadside assistance and from now on cap priced servicing, the servicing price is not available yet though. I was offered it for $21888 drive away. i wanted a white one and apparently it will only take two weeks :) haven’t decided though and apparently the ‘special’ runs out at the end of the month… or are there always ‘specials’ in this economic climate?

    • Ted

      There are always deals to be had – I have just looked at the SLS in white, buy an auto and was offered 22K drive away in Syd.  This is a good deal and I am yet to make my mind up on one of these or Cerato SLI.

  • Grobler F

    BTW WOMBAT AND PHIL somebody recently posted a video of this 1.6gdi Rio’s sprint time from 0-60 mph and it was 8.9s to 100 not bad for a car with 103kw and it is way faster than the  10.2s claimed somewhere else….go check the video on youtube… 

  • Dlaniger

    Just placed a deposit on an SLS 3dr Auto, $24,300 dap inc floor mats, mudflaps and towbar. Test drove a 5dr version and was impressed. Used normal auto mode and manual mode on test drive. In auto mode the car seemed to hunt around for a gear more than necessary but that could be a driver issue as I have come from using old 3 spd auto boxes. In manual mode it was good fun, nice exhaust note and handled well through some twisty bends, and unlike other cars it didn’t override the gear I chose. Once had a manual N15 Pulsar SSS, the Rio was just as good if not better. Plenty of std kit for the price, 3dr suits as it is only me driving it daily. My requirments were auto(not CVT), fuel economy (91 RON only), cruise control and climate control for under $25k dap. The other options were Mazda2 Genki, Accent, Elantra, Swift, Jazz Vibe-S, Polo or Fabia, Yaris/Corolla.
    Accent, Elantra and Swift didn’t meet all my requirements. Toyota’s overpriced and old tech (read boring). Polo/Fabia use 95 RON and read too many stories about reliability issues – even read that you should trade a VW before warranty expires??
    Genki ticked the boxes but its power and torque just seemed to low, plus I liked the 3dr look but they dropped that model a couple of years ago.
    Jazz Vibe-S currently $22,240 dap was very tempting but it’s old tech smartly dressed, and being a bloke it didn’t feel right driving something with so feminine a name!
    What finally favoured the Kia was the recent announcement of 5yrs capped price servicing. Add to that 5yr unlimited km warranty, new tech 1.6 GDi motor, sports auto 6spd, great value standard kit and every review of a small car i read indicated that the Rio was a better proposition and compared well with the Polo on price, value and economy. And it looks good.
    I plan to keep it for the full 5 years before moving to anything else, so for me it feels like a good deal.

  • Ted

    Hi Dlaniger, I have been looking at buying the RIO 3 door SLS myself in auto form, however as I am in a bigger car I am yet to make a decision.  I live in Syd and have had a drive-away price (no trade-in) for $22000.00 and this inc mats only – any other options would require me to pay for.  However, this is a good price, and was for a white car.  Where do you live, as I feel that you paid a little to much, even although you had a few low cost options.

    • Dlaniger

      If you can get it for that price then go for it. I actually negotiated on buying two cars from the same dealer for a total price – The Rio SLS and a Suzuki Alto GLX , both new, both  autos with mats and mudguards plus a tow bar for the Rio, sum total $38.5k and that’s how they split it on the paperwork. I may have paid a little too much but it fitted my budget and I was happy with the deal – I was quoted elsewhere $25.3 and $14.8 (=$40.1). I could have saved some $ on opting for some demos but if you want new then buy new otherwise it’s just secondhand.
      I’m in VIC.

      • Ted

        Ni Dlaniger, I am completely honest with the price, as the dealer only called me yesterday.  How does the SLS go and do you feel that it has enough power.  I do like the style of the car, but not sure it it would have enough get up and go.

  • Coy1

    I have the new 2012 Kia Rio SLS, nice car, though probs not as economical on the fuel as they make out on the open road.  And although the leather seats are a bonus, the tilt back of drivers seat has bust 5 weeks into owning the car, the second time the latch has been touched,  making it nearly impossible to drive around with out the seat moving all the time. Awaiting Kia to fix it, destroyed the long weekend today going for its first long drive to the sunshine coast. 

  • Very GC

    Interesting to note that around the early 1990s (yes 20yrs ago!) the Pulsar 1.6 (83kw) and the Mazda Astina 1.8 (79kw) both with similar weight to the Rio; Both ran 0-100 around the 10.3second mark.

  • Krio

    Just bought the MY13 RIO SLI 5dr AUTO for $23600 with sensor, mats and full tank of petrol! Great subcompact car in its price range however not so good on acceleration. I might rebuild the engine and put some turbo in it! =D

  • Lobb

    What do you think of the RIO ?  I have just picked up my RIO as well - SLI Auto and it’s a lovely car.  Yes acceleration is not the best because it’s gear for min fuel usage.  However, it is a great car to drive.  I live in Syd and got mats thrown in for drive away $21,800.00.

    • Krio

      I think the RIO is great! A lot of features for its price. One of the reasons that I bought this is because of the warranty and low maintenance/ running cost -and its capped servicing cost! Went Stanwell park last weekend and it struggled on incline. lol

  • Hung Low

    Wow I can’t believe people are paying almost $24k for a Rio! Nothing wrong witH the car but that’s crazy money for a compact class cars these days.

    • Krio

      Really? What other cars can you suggest for its features and price range?