Updated: 2012 Holden Volt makes early debut | Car Advice

Car Advice

Updated: 2012 Holden Volt makes early debut

By Jez Spinks |

The 2012 Holden Volt electric car has made its debut in Australia a year ahead of its showroom launch as the local car maker begins the hype for a vehicle it calls an industry ‘game changer’.

Holden unveiled the Volt to the Australian media in Sydney today, though the vehicles were actually rebadged left-hand-drive Chevrolet versions of the car.

The cars can only be driven legally on Australian roads by Holden employees so media and politicians invited to the launch – the latter comprising Federal Minister for Transport and Infrastructure Anthony Albanese and Lord Mayor of Sydney Clover Moore MP – were restricted to trying the Volt in the confines of a warehouse.

The local car maker is only likely to sell a few hundred units annually, but says the Volt, which will still look similar to the design of the Chevrolet version, is more about changing perceptions of the brand to closer associate Holden with cutting-edge technology.

“The notion of making early-term profits on massive capital investments like Volt … I think GM is on record that isn’t about making near-term or short-term profits,” says Holden boss Mike Devereux. “This is a long-term investment by the company in what we think will become one of the pathways to the future of motoring.

“It’s a precursor to [hydrogen] fuel cells, but that doesn’t’ mean that LPG [liquefied petroleum gas], diesel, ethanol aren’t [alternative fuels] people don’t want to buy because it will be a cost-value equation.”

Devereux says “other launch markets provide a good directional guide to what [the Holden Volt] will cost in Australia”, though it’s expected that the local pricing will be closer to the circa-$58,000 of the Opel version in Europe (called Ampera) rather than the Chevrolet-badged Volt sold in the US for about $40,000, and an expected similar price for the UK market.

General Motors, Holden’s parent company, says the Volt is the world’s first Extended Range Electric Vehicle (EREV).

The Volt differentiates itself from other battery electric vehicles by employing a 1.4-litre petrol engine to power the electric drivetrain once the charge of the lithium-ion battery pack has reached a minimum state of charge.

Holden – and GM – continue to insist the Volt is an electrically driven vehicle, although some quarters in the industry have argued it’s a hybrid because at times it combines up to three motors – a generator, the petrol engine, and a traction motor.

Regardless of which side of the argument people sit, Holden says the Volt can travel between 60 and 80km before the petrol engine will kick in to charge the battery pack and ensure the small car can achieve a total range in excess of 500km.

The car maker says the Volt therefore removes one of the critical barriers to consumer acceptance of electric vehicles: the so-called ‘range anxiety’ where motorists imagine being stranded with no battery power to get them home.

The Holden Volt media event took place at a time when the vehicle is creating controversy in North America where it is already on sale as a Chevrolet.

The vehicle is the subject of a safety probe in North America after a series of Volts caught fire weeks after being subjected to independent crash tests. It’s a matter that has been compounded by accusations that GM was aware of a potential issue some months earlier.

Holden says it not concerned the incidents or safety investigation will affect Australian buyers’ confidence in the Volt.

“I don’t’ think [even] consumers in US are necessarily worried about it,” says Devereux. “The incident that happened in Wisconsin was a purposeful catastrophic intrusion to the battery pack in a side impact crash. That was the purpose of test.

“And then I think having left the car for three weeks in an unattended parking lot with power still on in the battery … you know

“I think what it highlights is that the eco system for first responders, for fire departmernts, for insurance companies, for tow trucks, you have to learn to deal with new technology.

“It isn’t just a GM problem. This is an industry eco system issue that is specific to this lithium-ion [battery] technology that we have to learn and deal with. It affects all [car] companies.”


 
  • Anonymous

    This is what makes me laugh about these hybrid/electric plug in vehicles, the extra resources and energy required to dig up, refine and ship the rare, precious metals to the country that makes the batteries, then ship them to the country that makes the car for the batteries to be installed into.When someone buys the car they then plug it in to charge it with electricity, but where does that electricity come from? Coal fired powerstations.

    Think i’ll just go out and buy 2 Grand Cherokee SRT8′s and save the environment that way. 

    • Anonymous

      And stop putting the Whole article in the RSS feed please CA! You’ve been told this before, why did you change it back?

    • Almart

      A) Manufacturers are rectifying this by building cars in plants powered by clean energy and natural light (Prius), making the car itself out of a high percentage of recycled materials and non-petrochemical plastics (Leaf, Volt and Prius) and making batteries around 98% recyclable at the end of their life (almost everyone).

      B) Everybody knows that an EV charged by coal isn’t hugely more enviro friendly than a standard car. Yet they aren’t necessarily worse than standard cars, an iMiev charged on the ‘average’ Australian grid emmits about 120g/km – about the same as a petrol car its size. The Tesla emmits about 270g/km on our grid, with the exception of the McLaren MP4-12C – no other sports car emits comparable emissions while hitting 0-100 in under 4s.

      C) The kind of people who’d pay a premium for a car like a Volt etc are also smart enough to recognise that they need to be charged off clean energy – hence they’d probably buy solar panels for their house and/or clean energy plans for their provider.

      Soz for the essay, but people clinging onto facts that arent that true/ are heavily over played really bugs me. & no i don’t work for any company with an interest in EVs, i just did a bit of research on them.

      • Anonymous

        But car companies market these vehicles as zero emmissions or environmentally friendly when the fact is they clearly aren’t, and so called intelligent people buy into this crap. For examlpe, driving around in a V8 Range Rover for 15 odd years is less environmentally damaging than buying a Prius.

      • Think

        ……. and the profits from about 70% of crude oil sales are returned to middle eastern countries. Use more fuel = make the Middle East countries richer.

    • Sumpguard

      They have to start somewhere. Eventually the batteries will become lighter, cheaper and store energy more efficiently. Just as petrol cars have done.

          They make breakthroughs with the batteries all the time. Not for me just yet but one day who knows?

    • Dave S

      An amusing and simplistic reply. Tasmania is full of hydro power. The contraversial carbon tax has got people talking more about wind turbines. As more people put panels on their roof, the more solar power is going back into the grid making regular power greener.

      How can people be so negative about something that can be used 99% of the time. How many good reviews and testimonials do people need?

      I saw an article that Jay Leno has a Volt. He uses it as an everyday car and filled up twice in 6 months – sounds good too me.

    • plumplum

      Unlike all those other automotive bits and pieces shipped around the globe as part of “world trade” and the global car?
      You are really scraping the barrel here.

  • Lucii Pooky

    You can still see the Chevy Badge markings under the Holden badge… great re-badging their. 

    • Peopl3mova

      Nice spelling *there*

  • Fred Bear

    Will Holden, assure you that your vehicle won’t catch on FIRE!!! and if it does, will they and GM then confrim that they have a problem?

    • Karl

      ….because a petrol fuelled car has never caught on fire in a crash before.

  • Pingback: 2012 Holden Volt makes early debut: circa-$40,000 price potential | Australian Top News

  • Locky

    @ Almart
    Sorry buddy, all the goodness you spelt out means diddly squat to saving the environment.
    As Falcodore points out, the massive amounts of pollution (container ships spewing out NOX & SOX by burning Bunker Fuel)  created shipping all the components to make the things and THEN to ship the whole vehicle here means the vehicle would need to cover a million miles before there was any benefit to the environment (and any other imported vehicle for that matter).
    please read this report, in a nutshell – 17 of the biggest container ships alone create more pollution than the WHOLE global car fleet put together over a year. Buy locally made and not save the environment but save jobs as well.

    link to the report

    http://electric-vehicles-cars-bikes.blogspot.com/2009/05/big-polluters-one-massive-container.html

    However, I would be 100% for the Holden Volt or even the Nissan Leaf or even the stupid Prius IF they could be built locally and not shipped in, pointless exercise unless they are. 

  • Anonymous

    But car companies are marketing these vehicles as zero emmissions or environmentally friendly, when the fact is they clearly aren’t and so-called intelligent people are buying into this cr@p. Driving a V8 Range Rover around for 15 odd years is less environmentally damaging than buying a Prius and yet these smug people think they’re saving the world simply because of marketing.Heaven help them if they actually had to put the truth in marketing.

    • Anonymous

      That was a reply to Almart, for some reason it didn’t go in the right spot.

      • http://www.autoblog.com/ T4RFFF

        LIGHT CLUTCH>

      • Sam

        What people like yourself seem to forget is that this is the start of a long journey towards the removal of fossil fuels from our primitive brains! Is this car or others like it, the exact answer? No. But it is a start.

        • Anonymous

          Yes, i will agree that this car is a start. At least it’s better than anything Toyota, Nissan or Mitsubishi have come up with.

          And thank you CA for changing back the RSS feed, much better.

  • http://www.autoblog.com/ FrugalOne

    TO EXPENSIVE, HOPELESS ON A LONG TRIP

  • Pingback: 2012 Holden Volt makes early debut: circa-$40,000 price potential | Car and Automotive Trends | AutoFamous.info

  • NICK

    Thank christ that one car company can make an electric car that can travel further than 2 km without running out. The only other electric car is one i will not name (mitsubishi iMiEV)which isthe worst car ever made this car is the way of the future. GO BETTER holden

  • Force-15

    Okay, two things:
    1) Coal-fired electricity: Even though this is how it’s (mostly) made now, it is possible to ‘clean up’ the grid using ‘renewable’ technologies (e.g., geothermal, solar, biomass, etc)
    2) Volt battery problems: GM reportedly almost have a fix for the Volt’s battery pack ready, which will (most likely) involve a recall. The Australian Volts should recieve the improved battery pack.

  • Realitybites

    ill just keep riding my fj1200 which fills for $22 and goes about 450k’s on the open road.

  • Mr Gaspo

    Holden and right about low sales volumes.  For me a price north of $40K for car that can only seat 4 is a deal killer for me.  Having said that, the Volt is genuinely innovative and hope that GM continues to evolve this technology.

  • Frank

    Great technology advance but before I’m won over its cost
    and performance characteristics (speed and range) would have to be much closer
    to current petrol/diesel internal combustion engine powered vehicles.    

  • Pingback: Holden unveils new electric car – Sky News Australia | Australia News

  • Anonymous

    With fuel prices now permanently at the same level they were in 2008 (when oil hit $150) @$40k the Holden Volt will be a winner! 
    Some US owners have clocked up 16,000 km on a single tank of petrol! Once Australians get a hold of $1.50 per 100 km the queue will be around the block to buy these!

  • Anonymous

    PS… I’ll get one!!

  • VW

    Its going to renamed in Australia as the Holden Flame. This is because in the U.S the batteries in these vehicles have been going up in flames!

    • Galverstone

      You didn’t bother to read the article did you? The issue is actually a bit of a non-issue, Over-played by some media outlets. in fact the Volt would appear to be no more combustable than a normal petrol/diesel/hybrid powered vehicle in a collision. Of course there are additional procedures for battery handling and if they’re not followed there may be consequences, like battery fires – but you might be surprised to know that for your watch, phone or car key-fob batteries there’s special handling procedures for the shipping and storage that you, as an end user, never hear about.

      • Mike

        Actually it’s not a non issue car in the states have been catching on fire and GM are giving several customers loan cars to keep it all quiet and trying to trick the public.

        • Cogspin

          Evidence?

    • Dave S

      The flame came from a crashed tested car, 3 months after the test. I doubt very much people will still be sitting in their car 3 months after a severe crash.

      • VW

        Its such non issue that the U.S Government is investigating. Its somewhat arrogant to accept Holden’s response in relation to this matter.What do you expect them to say? We know there is a flaw in something we have invested large sums of money into? The excuse that it occured after crash testing is ignorant. No other vehilces have experienced this. How do we know it isnt an indication of more serious underlying problems? Personally I wouldnt want to have a volatile AA battery in my hands let alone sitting on top of a 3 x 2m block of them! Battery explosions do occur.

  • Gianni.

    I think it’s a reasonable price. Cheaper than an i-Miev, better LOOKING than an i-Miev and overall better than an i-Miev.

    • CRS200

      I heard on the radio yesterday it’s price starts at 60k.

      60k! Seriously? You can get a WRX STI for tat money.

      But if you do intend to buy one of these you better have the firebrigade close by!

      • Robert Ryan

        I agree that is a crazy price. I cannot imagine many being sold in Hybrid resistant Australia.

  • Pingback: Se presenta el Holden Volt en Australia: el trío está completo | Imagenes de Autos de Lujo : Autos Deportivos

  • BP

    Holden stated it would cost at least 60K for the Volt many months ago. At least you know what price to expect roughly to pay when it comes out.

  • Karl

    40k seems optimistic, at least 47k IMO

  • Phil

    Cars that sell for about $40,000 in the USA are all about $60,000-$100,000 in Australia. An example is the Lexus GS300 which is $46,700 over there – here it’s $89,900 (yet its ‘only the Germans’ that rip us off!).

    Why would this particular car buck that trend? Not to mention that it has to be changed over to RHD and shipped from the USA to Australia.

    Nice sensationalist headline CA.

  • A-Train

    This is relatively new technology, people can’t expect that it is going to be perfect right away. What was the fuel efficiency of petrol engines 35 years ago? Petrol engines are now pretty good for efficiency, but it took time. Similarly EV technology will continue to improve. Or do all the “engineers” knocking the car have some better technology that they are hiding from us?

    • Joe

      As far as fuel efficiency 35 years ago, well, my 40 year old daily driving MG Midget, 1275cc, 2 SU Carburettors, gentle driver, gets 40-50mpg. I’d put that down to SU carbies, which are magnificently simple, efficient and effective instruments, and the car having very low frontal area and mass. 40mpg was fairly common, in subcompacts, we had a Datsun sedan when I was little, with essentially the same engine, transmission, and carbies as the midget, and it routinely got 39mpg driving around town. I think probably the biggest reason for bad fuel economy until just recently was that there was absolutely no economic incentive for good fuel economy. In the 1970s, fuel was well under 50 cents a gallon.

    • JooberFPVGT

      Theres always room to improve petrol combustion, one way is to change the
      model of the mechanics, which the OPOC (Opposing Piston Opposing
      Cylinder) design aims to do, at best current engine designs are at
      30% effiecieny at best?
       
       
       
       

  • Jay

    This is the kind of shonky blogging you see on other sites that Jez is familiar with. As Devereux says,it provides a ‘good directional guide’. So the price we pay here for cars that cost $40k in the US gives you a good idea, not the $40k AUS that Jez is advertising and would have you believe you’ll be paying for GM’s Hybrid.

  • Fool

    The Holden brand is starting to feel a bit redundant. It made sense when Holden models were sourced from Opel, Daewoo, and designed locally but in 2016 when the Commodore is replaced by a global FWD sedan all models will be rebadged Chevrolets.  In this age of globalisation and uniform marketing to aid in cost containment the Holden brand must begin feeling like more of a hinderance than anything else.  Half the Commodores you see on the road either carry the Chevy bow-tie or the Pontiac front end, get with it GM. 

    • http://www.facebook.com/people/Peter-Pebbles-Stone/529716977 Peter Pebbles Stone

      I’ll point and laugh in 2016 when your proven wrong….

  • Joe

    The lithium ion battery fire hype is pretty ridiculous, and seems politically motivated. It’s as if the people yelping about it forgot that the majority of car-type vehicles on the road contain several litres of petrol or LPG.

    The pundits’ hyperbole makes it sound like the car will burst into flames in the driveway with the kids playing nearby.

    Not to mention the very selective level of concern regarding several watts of lithium battery technology casually scattered around people’s houses, cars, and pockets/purses.

    And furthermore, that the test in question was specifically to ascertain the behaviour of the batteries after a catastrophic intrusion collision. Any test engineer who’s ever worked with Li Ion or Li Polymer batteries, or most any battery technology, for that matter, and is surprised that they can catch fire if abused, is playing dumb.

    Since they’ve been available, all lithium technology batteries have a clearly worded warning label.

    Crushing several kilowatts of charged batteries and expecting no heat, smoke, or flame output is analogous to lighting petrol and complaining that it burns.

    • JML

      Me thinks thou doth protesteth too much. What’s the longest river in Africa?

  • Brad-kate

    Bring on the electric cars. I personally can’t wait. It’s taking way too long to make this affordable. Whoever gets there first will make ‘Trilliions’. Hey there’s a thought, don’t the US & Europe owe ‘Trillions’?  Kill 2 birds with one stone, and maybe end our reliance on the Oil nations once and for all.
    Forget the carbon tax to solve our environment problems. If we all drive electric then the government will have to invest in more green technology to power the vehicles.

    • The__J__Factor

      Your just trading petrol for coal. Not helping the environment at all. Coal mining would have to expand even more, electrical grids upgraded to take the extra strain of everyone having a electric car. Mining/burning coal has even worse effects then mining/burning petrol.  

      • Ian Knightley

        Yeah but it is infinitely easier to control the pollution from one source than 1 billion smaller sources. The grid has to be upgraded in any case due to the burgeoning population.

  • Modern Man

    Hey look, it’s a fossil fuel eletric vehicle.

    When do we stop blurring the lines between full electric and hybrid.

    Holden wake up and smell the EXHAUST fumes. Electric vehicles let someone ‘potentially’ recharge using green power whereas the Volt is a hybrid due to a petrol engine still being lugged around to power the vehicle.

    If this system is a full electric vehicle then coal mines etc have had full electric dump trucks for years (As the massive diesel engine is not connected to the wheels either) and the Renault Fluence EV being released in canberra soon must be completly beyond reckoning of holden engineers. Oh and the renault will be onsale well before the Volt.

    Please tell the truth that it is a hybrid, just different to a Prius as a prius can only get to around 40km/h then must run a petrol engine whereas the Volt can travel to legal speeds without an engine but can only travel 50-80kms then the petrol ‘generator’ must kick in. Either way it is stil a hybrid.

    • http://www.facebook.com/people/Peter-Pebbles-Stone/529716977 Peter Pebbles Stone

      Sorry your wrong, the setup you talk about in the trucks and also locomotives is diesel electric cause the engine is ALWAYS running, the volt engine only switches on to charge the batteries then back off again.  It’s a great Idea and CAN be driven on electric only and charged at home…. its an EV which can be flexible when emergencies happen where an i-miev will leave you on the side of the road.

      • Modern Man

        As i mentioned in my first response i know the volt can be driven on electric power for 50-80kms total range.

        My questions is why lug around both a 200kg engine and the associated electric equipment totalling 5-600kgs if everyone is saying most people wont know there is an engine there anyway due to short trips. My non engineering guess is 200kg equals more drain on the battery systems. Extra weight seems to slow down normal vehicles and makes then use more fuel.

        A 200kg petrol engine will still need to be started and use fuel no matter what anyone says, as fuel will ‘go off’ in the fuel lines and tank as well as oil will drop to the bottom of the engine. This is my argument for it NOT BEING an EV. The computer within the volt will already have programmed to start the engine at timed intervals to prevent unnecessary seizure of the engine and costly repairs in the future, not to mention the service of the vehicle will be more (a little or a lot im not sure) expensive than the equivalent all petrol or all electric vehicle.

        This was the same as petrol engines with a LPG setup. Two systems to take care of and the need to run petrol through the engine to stop early wear.

        No knocking the VOLT however it is not a FULL EV just like a i-Miev is not a cheap city city runabout.(Personally the i-Miev is a waste of money in Australia due to relativly high cost.)

  • Shak

    Its good to see that Holden are trying to give their Customers a choice of fuel sources. Even if this doesn’t sell in large numbers, which it likely wont due to limited availability and high pricing, its going to do exactly what Holden(especially Holden’s Marketing Department) wants it to do. Its a Halo car people, wake up and smell the roses. All this car needs to do for Holden is get in the hands of maybe 20 influential people, then Holden can ramp up its Behemoth Marketing team and away we go, instant Green Credentials.

    And on top of that, the Volt is by all reports so far actually a really good car. Many in the US have been able to go months on one tank of petrol. It also seems well made, and pretty quick for something weighing this much.

  • Ian Knightley

    Look at the Tesla Model S $49 000 for the base model that can do 160 MILES on one charge that is about 250 KM. There are options of a 230mile (360km) and a 300 mile (480km) battery pack. The packs are quick swap.
    Holden are just selling another piece of junk while trying to apease the yuppies.

  • Ian Knightley

    Any one who believes that Holden cares about anything but the bottom line is a fool

  • Pingback: General Motors to build 60,000 Volts | Car Advice