2011 Subaru Forester Review | Car Advice

Car Advice

2011 Subaru Forester Review

SUBARU FORESTER

Pros: Best all-around compact SUV, new boxer engine, manual gearbox, ride & handling, safety, practicality, bluetooth telephone/audio

Cons: four-speed auto, hard interior plastics, everyone has one

By Alborz Fallah |
Add to shortlist

Price: $24,480 to $39,360

Our Rating:  

Since its introduction in 1997, the Subaru Forester has gone on to become one of the most trustworthy and reputable cars on sale today. The 2011 model year Forester is armed with an all-new naturally-aspirated engine with more torque and better acceleration.

The Forester is the sort of car you buy because you know it will do everything it claims without question. Subaru has built a great deal of its brand reputation on the Forester alone, so it should come as no surprise that it’s the Japanese company’s best selling model. More importantly though, it’s also consistently the best selling compact SUV in Australia.

Last year saw Subaru sell 14,644 Foresters, beating all other 22 contenders to become the best selling compact SUV. Of course, we all know that just because a car is the most popular of its kind doesn’t necessarily mean it’s the best (Toyota Camry being the case in point). However, in the case of the Subaru Forester, it’s the most appealing to the majority of buyers for all the right reasons.

Don’t get me wrong, the Forester doesn’t dominate the Compact SUV market. Toyota’s RAV4 lost to the Forester by only 47 units last year, so the competition is absolutely fierce. So fierce in fact that the Compact SUV segment is now home to 25 contenders from Japan, America, Europe, Korea and even China.

So what makes the Subaru Forester so great? It’s arguably not the best looking car in the segment, so it’s not relying on its looks. It’s also not the best off-road vehicle in its segment (that either goes to the Nissan X-Trail or Suzuki Grand Vitara) and it’s in no way the cheapest (the Chery J11 starts from $19,990).

To give you a short answer to that question, think of the Subaru Forester as the beloved family pet. She may not be the absolute prettiest or the brightest of all her peers but she comes from a very good breeder and scores high across the range, making her a favourite all around. The Forester, then, is arguably the best all around compact SUV based on its overall performance. Its modern styling is pleasant to look at while not being over the top, and it’s packed with Subaru’s proven all-wheel drive technology, safety and bulletproof reliability.

The good news is that everything I’ve said so far has been about the 2010 Forester, which was sporting the older generation 2.5-litre boxer engine based on a design now 21 years old. As part of the updates to the MY11 Forester, the Japanese company has equipped its popular SUV with the third-generation horizontally opposed (FB) 2.5-litre boxer engine that delivers 126kW (at 5800rpm) and 235Nm of torque (at 4100rpm). On paper the difference between new and old is only 6Nm of torque (same power figure), but it’s not until you get behind the wheel that you really notice the difference. The new engine has allowed for the 0-100km/h acceleration to go from 10.4 to 9.3 seconds (even though it feels quicker than that) while fuel economy has remained the same at 9.3L/100km for combined city/highway cycle.

Our test car was the 2011 Subaru Forester X manual, the very base model with absolutely no options. With a starting price of $30,990, the no-frills Forester represents a great entry point into the model line-up, which stretches all the way to $50,990 for the S-Edition.

The new engine delivers power and torque right across the rev range from take-off to highway speeds. Although it’s no match for the turbocharged 2.5-litre found in the XT and S-Edition (which, interestingly, are still using the previous generation engine design), it’s actually fun to drive. I was initially fooled into thinking I was driving a tuned version of the Forester as in-gear acceleration is a lot better than you’d expect from a naturally aspirated 2.5-litre in an SUV that weighs almost 1.5 tonnes.

If you’re going for the base model Forester and can convince the missus to drive a manual, it would be best to stick with the five-speed as the four-speed automatic is not only an additional $2,000 but also not the most advanced in its class.

As far as ride and handling goes, there was some talk among the automotive journalists back at the launch of the S-Edition that the base model actually handled just as well. While I wouldn’t go that far, it’s a testament to the dynamics of the entire range. Like all Subarus, the Forester is sporty at heart. Around Brisbane suburbia the Forester X conquered all the bumps and dreadful roads without hesitation, and on the drive from Brisbane to Warwick the twisty mountain roads of the Cunningham gap proved a breeze for the mighty Subaru. The 2011 models have improved their ride quality thanks to changes in the rear bushes.

The important thing to remember with the Forester is that the whole range is all-wheel drive and there is no cheaper front-wheel drive variant, which is how some of its competitors try and win on price (namely the RAV4). That means even the cheapest Forester is just as capable on- and off-road as the rest of the range. Another point in favour of the Subaru is that it comes with all safety features standard, even the base model. So while you’d have to pay extra for the side and curtain airbags on a base model RAV4 CV, the Forester has them standard.

The main point to take away here is that the Forester is an honest car, it doesn’t try to be the cheapest because it doesn’t need to. It’s not hiding anything in terms of safety or performance, even the very base model is packed with all the must-have features.

Driven back to back with its main rivals there is no denying that the Forester is the more enjoyable car to drive, if you think of driving as more than just getting from A to B (remember, Subaru made its name in the World Rally Championship). I am not saying the RAV4, X-Trail, Sportage and ix35 are not good cars for the right buyer, only that the Forester feels more like a driver’s car.

The Forester manual also offers a dual-range transfer case as standard (which can at times be mistaken for the handbrake) which allows for better off-roading ability. In reality though, unless you really want to wander out into soft sand or other very soft surfaces, it will probably not get too much use.

The interior of the base model is relatively Spartan. It has hard plastics all around and although that may be an issue for some, it offers comfortable seats both front and rear plus a very easy to use and well organised instrument layout.

Rear seats can comfortably fit two McDonald’s-fed adults even for long distance drives or three average sized adults for short to medium journeys.

There is plenty of space in the boot to store the week’s shopping or a couple of suit cases for a long trip. With the rear seats folded down you can fit two road bikes (with their front wheels detached) without too much hassle.

My biggest complaint with the Subaru range has always been lack of multimedia support, but with the MY11 range Subaru has certainly addressed that even on the base model. There is now full Bluetooth support across the range, which means any Forester can connect to your phone wirelessly. Better still, if you have a smartphone (e.g. iPhone) the new Foresters can stream your music wirelessly from your iPod application. You simply pair the phone and pick Forester as the output from your iPhone and you’ll have your entire music library readily available without a single annoying wire. A feature which should be mandatory on all cars!

The Forester X’s four-speaker audio system is not exactly something Mozart would be proud of but it’s more than adequate given the entry price point.

One of the other reasons the Forester is so popular is due to its diverse variant range. Although there are only five grades in the Forester, between them they allow for 13 unique variants. The Forester grades are: X, XS, 2.0 Diesel, XT and S-Edition and each model (except S-Edition) is then broken up into manual and automatic. Additionally the XS, 2.0 Diesel and XT are then subsequently offered in premium grade for both manual and auto.

Apart from the change to the naturally aspirated engines, the 2011 Subaru Forester upgrades also include a new grille, different alloy wheels for XS and XT plus all variants except the X now house indicators integrated in the wing mirrors. The interior also gets the already mentioned Bluetooth support and a reversing camera on all variants except the X and Diesel.

The XT continues to use the same EJ turbocharged engine carried over from before while the S-Edition gets the WRX engine from the Impreza for even more go.

Perhaps the best endorsement I could give a car is to actually say, if I was looking at buying a practical and capable compact SUV, the 2011 Subaru Forester would be my first choice. The model range has a variant to suit nearly everyone and its list of standard features, excellent safety and reliability credentials plus a near 15-year track record of solid engineering is the main reason it’s the most popular compact SUV on the market today.

Read:

Price Range:

  • Forester X manual $30,990
  • Forester X auto $32,990
  • Forester XS manual $34,990
  • Forester XS auto $36,990
  • Forester XS Premium manual $38,490. With SatNav option: $40,490
  • Forester XS Premium auto $40,490. With SatNav option: $42,490
  • Forester 2.0D manual $35,990
  • Forester 2.0D Premium manual $40,490. With SatNav option: $42,490
  • Forester XT manual $39,990
  • Forester XT auto $41,990
  • Forester XT Premium manual $45,490
  • Forester XT Premium auto $47,490
  • Forester S-Edition auto $50,990

Prices exclude dealer delivery and all other government and statutory charges.


 

Reader reviews of the SUBARU FORESTER

<

By: Twainy

Rating:  

I needed a city car with plenty of room in the back. I also wanted constant 4 wheel drive for when I get out of... Read more

Write a review for the SUBARU FORESTER

Do you own this car? Share your opinion and add your own review below.

Add a New Review
>

The competition

  Variant Body Style Price From
SUBARU FORESTER 20D
  • 2.0L DIESEL TURBO F/INJ
  • 6 SP MANUAL
4D WAGON $36,490*
SUBARU FORESTER 20D PREMIUM
  • 2.0L DIESEL TURBO F/INJ
  • 6 SP MANUAL
4D WAGON $40,990*
SUBARU FORESTER S-EDITION
  • 2.5L TURBO MPFI
  • 5 SP AUTO ELEC SPORTSHIFT
  • PREMIUM UNLEADED PETROL
4D WAGON $50,990*
SUBARU FORESTER X
  • 2.5L MULTI POINT F/INJ
  • 5 SP MANUAL
  • UNLEADED PETROL
4D WAGON $30,990*
SUBARU FORESTER X
  • 2.5L MULTI POINT F/INJ
  • 4 SP AUTO ELEC SPORTSHIFT
  • UNLEADED PETROL
4D WAGON $32,990*
SUBARU FORESTER X LIMITED EDITION
  • 2.5L MULTI POINT F/INJ
  • 5 SP MANUAL
  • UNLEADED PETROL
4D WAGON $32,990*
SUBARU FORESTER X LIMITED EDITION
  • 2.5L MULTI POINT F/INJ
  • 4 SP AUTO ELEC SPORTSHIFT
  • UNLEADED PETROL
4D WAGON $34,990*
SUBARU FORESTER XS
  • 2.5L MULTI POINT F/INJ
  • 5 SP MANUAL
  • UNLEADED PETROL
4D WAGON $34,990*
SUBARU FORESTER XS
  • 2.5L MULTI POINT F/INJ
  • 4 SP AUTO ELEC SPORTSHIFT
  • UNLEADED PETROL
4D WAGON $36,990*
SUBARU FORESTER XS PREMIUM
  • 2.5L MULTI POINT F/INJ
  • 5 SP MANUAL
  • UNLEADED PETROL
4D WAGON $38,490*
SUBARU FORESTER XS PREMIUM
  • 2.5L MULTI POINT F/INJ
  • 4 SP AUTO ELEC SPORTSHIFT
  • UNLEADED PETROL
4D WAGON $40,490*
SUBARU FORESTER XT
  • 2.5L TURBO MPFI
  • 5 SP MANUAL
  • PREMIUM UNLEADED PETROL
4D WAGON $39,990*
SUBARU FORESTER XT
  • 2.5L TURBO MPFI
  • 4 SP AUTO ELEC SPORTSHIFT
  • PREMIUM UNLEADED PETROL
4D WAGON $41,990*
SUBARU FORESTER XT PREMIUM
  • 2.5L TURBO MPFI
  • 5 SP MANUAL
  • PREMIUM UNLEADED PETROL
4D WAGON $45,490*
SUBARU FORESTER XT PREMIUM
  • 2.5L TURBO MPFI
  • 4 SP AUTO ELEC SPORTSHIFT
  • PREMIUM UNLEADED PETROL
4D WAGON $47,490*
powered by
  VEHICLE PRICE
2008 SUBARU FORESTER OTHER MY08
  • 127,230 Kms
  • White
  • Wagon
  • Auto
  • Other
  • SA
$19,600*
Enquire Now
2011 SUBARU FORESTER S-EDITIONAWD S3 MY11
  • 3,254 Kms
  • Steel Silver
  • Wagon
  • Auto
  • Petrol
  • NSW
$53,690*
Enquire Now
2008 SUBARU FORESTER XAWD S3 MY09
  • 50,938 Kms
  • White
  • Wagon
  • Auto
  • Petrol
  • SA
$24,850*
Enquire Now
2006 SUBARU FORESTER XAWD 79V MY06
  • 95,334 Kms
  • Silver
  • Wagon
  • Auto
  • Petrol
  • SA
$17,470*
Enquire Now
2012 SUBARU FORESTER XSAWD S3 MY12
  • 1,504 Kms
  • Satin White
  • Wagon
  • Auto
  • Petrol
  • NSW
$36,990*
Enquire Now
2012 SUBARU FORESTER 2.0DAWDPREMIUM S3 MY12
  • 2,132 Kms
  • Satin White Pearl
  • Wagon
  • Manual
  • Diesel
  • NSW
$41,990*
Enquire Now
Showrooms > Subaru > Forester

2011 Subaru Forester Review
Subaru
Forester
If I was looking at buying a practical and capable compact SUV, the 2011 Subaru Forester would be my first choice.
KPI11A
http://www.caradvice.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/2011-Subaru-Forester-Review-05-625x415.jpg

2011 Subaru Forester Review
If I was looking at buying a practical and capable compact SUV, the 2011 Subaru Forester would be my first choice.
3.5 stars
  • nickdl

    It’s the least ugly Subaru but that doesn’t say much. Interior is awful as per usual with Subaru but thankfully it’s pretty good to drive and very roomy. A six-speed auto and an interior revision would do wonders for the Forester as the competitors pictured above are all pretty average (mabye not the X-Trail).

  • Gavo

    Why upgrade the engine and continue to peddle a 4 speed auto? Move on with the times Subaru!

  • TheMan

    Still the best car in its class, so many years on. Can’t beat Subaru for reliability or durability.

  • andronicus

    Good review but I don’t see believe the bluetooth system should be given this big a wrap and included in the Pros section.

    Some of the most basic cars including cheaper ones have this feature as well and I would expect it to be mandatory on Subarus across the range.
    Meanwhile just out of note my new Mazda3 SP25 has this feature and is fantastic but is trumped by the Bluetooth system on my girlfriends 2010 Ford Fiesta in terms of quality and response. The Mazda system is easy to use but sound quality and lag time between using the phone and changes on the system is noticeably poorer and longer than what is in a Ford Fiesta.

    • http://www.caradvice.com.au/ Alborz Fallah

      Andronicus, the reason this is brought up is because, believe it or not, not that many cars still have bluetooth audio streaming, pretty much a great deal of European cars lack this feature. Nearly all of the Forester’s competition also lacks this feature on the base model.

  • crouchy

    I looked at these when buying but my problem was that they just looked rubbish in base model guise! They look great in the higher spec but at that price point, there’s a hell of a lot of competition getting around……

    • Sammo

      Those crappy looking steel wheels don’t do the car any favours. Subaru should offer decent looking alloys as standard, like most other rivals.

      The Forester is a good all-rounder, but I would look elsewhere in the segment.

      • Nasal Explorer

        Out in the bush, you don’t need alloys.

        • Robert

          But the article states that it’s not the best bush basher around, if you’re gonna go off road use the X-trail. people are after different things. If this is a city car for people then the alloys will make a big deal

          • Phil

            No one know knew anything about off road driving would recommend a X-Trail.

          • Bryan

            “off road use the X-trail…” I have a 2005 x trail and I would be very wary about taking it too far off road. There have been a couple of times when I have literally not been able to get it up our drive way! The last time it had been raining a little and the car sat at the bottom of the drive spinning diagonally opposite wheels until they smoked and that was with the 4wd system in “Lock”! After a few unsuccessful attempts, I had to leave the car on the footpath over night and put it away the next morning – much to the amusement of my Landcruiser and Patrol driving neighbours… That said, the x trail is a terrific little car for running around town in which is really why we bought it.

          • Phil

            One thing you use when you go off road is a low range gearbox. The Forester has one. The Xtrail doesn’t.

  • Roger Ramjet

    This and the Rav 4 are the most outdated and overrated models out in the market, especially in base models.
    The sheeple need to look at what the alternatives are offering these days for same or less coin!

  • Devil’s Advocate

    Any car would easily be able to handle “the twisty mountain roads of the Cunningham gap” like a breeze with the 40km/h limit and roadworks that are going on at the moment… ;-)

  • Steven

    The front seats are very flat and don’t support under the thigh properly. Your left leg ends up hanging to the left and with the huge transmission tunnel and off-centre steering, your ankle ends up at a constant angle and this leads to ankle strain.

    Some decent seat cushions (longer seats please) and more contoured cushioning would make it more comfortable. I hope they add some more width to the next gen chassis so you can keep your left leg straight.

  • STP

    Still looking good after all these years.

  • filippo

    I’m not a fan of the current model Forester. The previous models looked like basic but tough station wagons, whereas this current shape looks too much like a try-hard suburban SUV.

  • http://baji192.wordpress.com Baji

    I’d rather have the CX7 over this. It looks so much better inside and out, and its just as good to drive.

  • t39

    I’d rather have a Tiguan 125TSI 6SP manual over this.
    And, in fact, I do already!

  • huh

    Does anyone know the maintenance costs of this vehicle?

    • Anthony

      I own an MY09 Forester XT Premium and the servicing on that is around $270 for a standard service (read oil change) and upward from there. I have always serviced at the dealer I purchased from but it is definitely worth shopping around because costs are different at different dealers.

      • Robert

        all those dealer mechanics would be rubbing their hands together with a huge grin when they service the cars purchased at their dealers. you really should find a trusted mechanic that is knowledgable in the cars you own. it’s amazing how much cheaper they can be

    • John of Perth

      No, but I do know Foresters did suffer from head gasket issues – even out of warranty if there is a known production issue, the factory should help the owner. 80,000kms (four year old) from a regularly maintained vehicle is not good.

  • Ethan

    This “new” engine should be producing at least 150kw and 250Nm and be sipping 8.5L/100km combined cycle. If a 2.5L engine in this day and age can’t do that then it is a worry for a car manufacturer.

  • http://caradvice OSU811

    My pick would be the 2.0D model
    with the torque and fuel efficient turbo diesel
    and the 6sp manual gearbox!
    its also good value over the base model
    with the 6sp, alloys, self levelling susp and better economy over the base 2.5!

  • Energy76

    I have had a first and second gen Forester and they’ve both been perfect. I’ve been waiting for the new engine to come out so that I can upgrade. The four-speed automatic is outdated so ill stick with a manual.

  • save it for the track

    I’d say that the constant AWD system in Forester, puts it ahead of the competition in terms of sure footed handling in all conditions. The rest of the sector have ‘on demand’ systems. To me, grip and handling trump any ‘concerns’ about what sort of plastic the dash may be made of, or if a vehicle has bluetooth connectivity or not. Drive a Forester (with its constant AWD) back to back with any of the other ‘on demand’ type SUV’s on a surface of variable grip (like a hwy or country rd with areas of pooling water), and not only does the Forester keep straight and true, but there is no feeling of slip or pulling as happens with the other SUV’s with their less adequate 4wd systems.
    .
    The load space trumps a Tiguan, but is not up there with an X-Trail or the Santa Fe. It’s a true honest performer, that doesn’t pretend to be the cheapest, or the most frugal to run, because it doesn’t have to be.
    .
    The only questions I have are what exactly are the ‘segments’ that SUV’s are put into. Forester hardly seems ‘compact’, but doesn’t quite measure (size wise) up to what I consider to be medium SUV’s like Santa Fe, yet I’m sure I’ve seen Santa Fe and Sorento (as examples) included as Forester competitors. It would seem that Forester/X-trail and perhaps Rav4(5 door) straddle the compact and medium sectors. Compact to me is rav4 3-door, ix35, Tiguan, sportage, and the like, with medium being cx-7, Santa Fe, Sorento, kluger and similar. On cargo space alone, Tiguan seems like a genuine compact, while others like ix35 and sportage approach their larger sister cars like Santa Fe and Sorento.

    • Phil

      AWD only helps get the engines power down. It doesn’t actually give you better handling.

      If you were driving down those country roads with pools of water, how exactly does AWD keep you straight and true? If you drove it in say a AWD Territory, then drove over it again in a 2WD Territory you would find there was no difference between which version kept you more “straight and true”.

      You’re suffering from Placebo.

      • No

        No Phil, you are suffering from “you don’t know what you are talking about”-itis. Go drive an AWD Subaru. They go where you want them to go. When other cars slip and squirm, especially on loose surfaces or through unsettled puddles. Exactly as previous commenter mentions. It’s remarkable. The only way you can get the rear end to step out (when it would be dancing in another make) is to turn off the traction control and do something silly with the wheel/gas. If you don’t, they Just Work. 

  • Andrew

    Kia Sportage looks better buy than this outdated Forester.

    • Sumpguard

      I have to agree but then I just bought a Sportage last week so I’m a tad biased.

      I have always been a fan of the forester but couldn’t get past the interior quality and after speaking to an owner the other night they stated that the economy is woeful. They did say they love the car though. I like the styling of the Forecter and it is certainly the best looking of the subaru stable at the moment. Infact the guy I spoke to the other night was going to buy a new liberty but said he couldn’t get past the styling. Are you listening Subaru?

      For the record his wife owns Kia Sportage (which is how the convo started) and they both claim it is the better vehicle. Infact their first choice was a second sportage but they were told they’d have to wait 6 months.

      • Sumpguard

        Oh and constant AWD as refered to above by SIFTT is as simple as pushing a button on the dash of the ix35/Sportage and on normal roads and I get the fuel saving benefits when it’s off. Personally I like having the choice and when I had my ix35 it kept me safe on the roads through one of Cairns’ wettest summers on record and there were occassions when I locked it in AWD.

  • Ezzagun

    I echo some comments above, I went on a test drive of the base model with a mate of mine, I was unimpressed with how, ummm, unappealing it is. An interior that Hyundai would have been proud of circa 1998, a 4spd auto (ditto), a stereo that my grandmother’s $17k Mazda2 trumps for sound quality… I don’t get it, I just don’t.

    Sure it may be reliable and sure-footed etc but gimme something else please, something with character. The curent Forester is the Paul’s vanilla ice-cream of the segment, it’ll do the job but there’s more exciting flavours out there.

    • Joker

      Agreed. What a boring, uninspired interior. I can appreciate AWD and the rest of the tech but the wrapping is oh so dull.

    • Alex

      Its called the XT, buy one and you’ll never go back.

      • Devil’s Advocate

        But the Turbo doesn’t fix the “$13,990 drive away” interior plastics though. Sure the fit quality is first class, but it looks and feels like used ice cream containers…

        • Robert

          it’s got interior similar to adelaide’s public transport ha ha

    • http://caradvice OSU811

      maybe in specs and fancy features/looks they lack some things., but the core
      engineering and drive of the subarus’s is the attraction!
      they just steer, corner, grip and drive better than the competition they just do!! Plus are well built and reliable!

  • Wazza

    My goodness, could this car get any more boring? That interior is straight out of the 90s.

  • Mr Gaspo

    I can’t believe this car is popular… the power of the brand and perceived reliability. It looks rubbish, the interior would look at home in a pervious generation Korean car, the 4 speed auto is a joke, the petrol engines give terrible urban cycle fuel consumption, the sheet metal is like tin foil, the diesel is not offered with an auto, the warranty is terrible (squeaks and rattles are not covered after the first 12 months!). Sorry Subaru this is not good enough.

    • MF

      shallow comment. actually drive one before you type.

  • catter29

    that car looks old and out of date. was that the car they had 5 years ago?

  • http://agnoslibertine.blogspot.com/ Tommy

    Not bad. But I prefer the Chevy.

  • Eric

    Forrester looks like a box on wheels. Isn’t Outback much better looking and do all the things a Forrester does ???

    • http://caradvice OSU811

      yes the Outback is the smarter choice as it looks better imo, has more room and a bigger boot, also has the cvt lineartronic auto in the 2.5 compared to the old 4sp!
      the pick would still be the turbo diesel in the Outback though!! or the lovely 3.6 boxer 6, 5sp auto combo!

  • http://caradvice OSU811

    ps. only downside is Outback is more expensive but has more features!

    • craig

      The Outback only has a space saver. The “Outback” is an imposter.

  • Matt

    drove a forester, bought an outlander much better car!

  • PeterG

    The XT still needs better brakes.

  • MS

    We bought the base model Forester last year, having previously owned a Honda CRV. The Forester has more power and handles really well but uses much more fuel than we expected. The Forester also has less space in the front and the middle console arrangement is awkward to get at. Also the heater doesn’t seem to adequately direct the heat downwards, so we end up with cold feet but were told that there was nothing wrong, so that’s another disappointment.

    • Greg

      Must be a very very very old CRV.

  • Ken

    I own a 8 month old LX Captiva V6 after owning a top of the line Subaru Forester (non turbo)for 8 months and I am so impressed with the Captiva. I have had no problems and the car is more comfortable, more responsive and drinks about the same petrol as the Subaru. I found the Subaru cramped and uncomfortable (6 ft tall) and the dash very flimsy and plastic. The Subaru was a manual as I expected it to be underpowered and it still was underpowered.

    The Subaru was a tad quieter and had softer and more comfortable suspension but the excellent features, value for money and surprisingly the great build quality of the Captiva (on par with the Subaru) by far outweighs the Subaru. I am about to order a new car and I have to say that the Series 11 Captiva will be my choice again.

    • Greg

      OMG! From Subaru to Holden. So you really haven’t driven a car yet! LOL. Holden Captiva is about the only car I would consider to be a bigger pile of junk than the Subaru. They are notorioulsy unreliable (like most GM rubbish)

  • engineer

    I bought a manual X in 09. Big mistake. Gearbox is amongst the worst I’ve ever used, the electronic throttle goes from annoying to dangerous and back and teh paint is the most flimsy I’ve ever encountered. Mine’s covered in scratches and look at any in a car park and they are the same. Criminal.

    Subaru’s were once quality cars but now they are just ugly and down near nissan quality levels.

    The car annoys me so much I’m looking at trading it in.

  • Scoobiedood

    Subaru reliability is a myth. I have an 05 Forester X that’s done 130k. At 100k the big end bearings went and at 125k the head gaskets went.

  • Michael

    Subarus are A to B cars if you want more features get a Nissan
    But if you want a safe well engineered long lasting workhorse that
    handles well in real world conditions the forrester is hard to beat
    Agreed some of the opposition look better on paper but there is a lot
    of difference between paper and pavement.

  • Greg

    I found your comments on the automatic transmission interesting. I’ve always driven Toyota and Honda but had my heart set on a Subaru because of the 4×4 ability. Anyway took a new Outback out for a spin. 10 minutes later I resolved to never buy a Subaru again. Here’s why. Very cramped and small inside. My CRV 2010 model is positively huge by comparison front and back. Power and automatic transmission truly are bad in the Subaru. I have not felt lag and incorrect gear down in a car like this since I was kid. Don’t try and play chicken with a truck. The lag is about 2 seconds before the car realises you want to move forward. The power is non existent. The car makes lot of noise when you floor it but doesn’t do much else. You simply cannot compare to the Camry or the Honda. They are space age by comparison. No lag and perfect gear transition in Honda and Toyota. Subaru has a lot of appeal but scratch the surface and you are buying a car with 1980′s technology. Simply unacceptable. The 4×4 part is also meaningless. May have good ground clearance but any 4×4 er knows the most important angle is breakover. Zero breakover angle. The CRV may be a soft roader but I have gone over some terrain the Subaru simply could not handle. Trust me the opposition not only looks better on paper, they are better! I can conclude in one word. Primitive. (I just frigging wish Honda and Toyota wake up and realise we want Diesels!)

  • Katie

    We have a 2005 Turbo model of the Subaru Forester and it has been an absolutely fabulous car. The car has enormous power and we have taken it on some serious dirt road tracks, eg Darling River Run and some pretty rough off-roads in northern Queensland – no problem! We have had it regularly maintained through Tynan’s at Sylvania who, admittedly charge an arm and a leg but do provide good guarantees of parts and labor. I disagree with Greg’s comments above as the engine on our Subaru is as quiet as a mouse and we have not experienced the lag he is referring to; I can only presume there was something wrong with the particular car he drove. We’ve driven this car since it was new and have had a dream run. Its an absolutely brilliant 4×4 for a lady driver – nice and light and not sluggish and heavy like the Nissans and Toyotas. Also, I believe that the Hondas are a lot smaller (and nowhere near as comfortable) inside. I have driven both. However, the only complaint I have about the Subaru is that it does not have a really high clearance (as do the Toyota Hi-Lux) and as it takes Premium Petrol, it can be expensive to run. Also, Premium Petrol can be hard to find in remote areas of the NT and northern Qld. I will, however, be including the Subaru Forester (new model) as one of the models to test drive and compare when seeking a new All Wheel Drive sometime next month.

  • Marie

    I bought a used 2004 Forrester automatic because mine was totaled by a red light runner last month. This one is turbo charged. The turbo Forrester jerks and klunks between 2nd gear and 3rd. It has a smaller jerk and klunk between 1st & 2nd. I took it in to a Subaru-experienced mechanic, and he said the computer system indicated no problems with the transmission. It idled rough and he set it up a bit higher. No help with the jerk-klunk. Do these cars just change gears roughly? I’ve tried to feather onto the accelerator from a stop and that seems to help just a bit. It used to leap into motion when I first started driving it. The transmission did not jerk and klunk during the test drive. Any advice?

  • Photon

    Got to say, am a newbie to the Forester. Drive the base x model. Drivability is good for what the engine offers, though would struggle though to pull a load uphill, with the car fully occupied IMHO. Handles the mild off road stuff well enough. What hasn’t been mentioned is the great turning circle in this car. After years of driving European models, am pleasantly surprised by the drive and the solidness on the road.Obviously, lacks the internal bells and whistles on the base x, but they lose their charm once the euro cars need the service and repair.