Nissan Navara ST-X Review | CarAdvice

Car Advice

Nissan Navara ST-X Review

NISSAN NAVARA

Pros: Great diesel engine, on-road handling, safety, bluetooth

Cons: Really needs parking sensors, bluetooth audio,

By Alborz Fallah
FIND DEALS

Price: $14,850 to $19,470

Our Rating:  

Sometimes, figures speak for themselves and in the case of the Nissan Navara, it’s the second best selling vehicle in the highly-competitive 4×4 Ute segment.

Although the Toyota HiLux 4×4 outsold the Navara 4×4 by about 5,000 vehicles last year, the Nissan Navara is still seen by many as one of the best options on the market today.

More importantly, unlike Toyota Australia, which can arguably be accused of being complacent, Nissan is determined to become Australia’s largest importer of vehicles of the not-too-distant future. A difficult task, but one that is made easier by having a Navara ST-X Dual Cab on your model range.

Last year saw Nissan update the Navara range with the introduction of the Series 4. This meant more power, more torque as well as a whole range of new equipment and safety features.

There are two powerplants available for those considering a Nissan Navara ST-X Dual Cab. A 4.0-litre V6 petrol engine or a 2.5-litre turbodiesel. Frankly, it’s hard to make a strong case for the petrol model. Sure it has more power (198kW compared to 140kW for the diesel) but it has less torque (385Nm at 4000rpm compared to 450Nm at 2000rpm) and uses a truckload more fuel (13.6L/100km compared to 8.5L/100km). It also happens to miss out on vehicle dynamic control (VDC) and an active-brake limited-slip differential (ABLS) – features available on the diesel model. 90 percent of all Navara sales are diesel, so we decided to test the diesel variant instead.

Despite the obvious advantages in buying a diesel, Nissan also happened to upgrade the diesel engine last year with the introduction of a variable nozzle turbo (VNT) with electric control instead of the original hydraulic system. In essence, it now offers 14kW more power and 47Nm more torque whilst reducing fuel economy by 13/14 percent (manual/auto).

From the outside, the new Nissan Navara ST-X has had a minor facelift, growing by 80mm in overall length. Nissan fans will instantly recognise the new bonnet, updated grille and perhaps eventually the harder-to-spot new bumper assembly.

But it’s not just a nip-tuck for a prettier face (if you want to call it that), the changes have also had a minor affect on reducing coefficient of drag (Cd) down by 0.1 to 0.37. This results in less wind noise and also better fuel economy.

Our test vehicle came in Electric Blue, one of the two new colours available to order (the other being Flame Red) and was equipped with a five-speed automatic gearbox. With a price of $53,240* an Electric Blue Navara certainly turns a lot of heads wherever it goes.

It’s good to see Nissan offering some more vibrant colours on its Navara range as God knows we are all sick of white, grey or black coloured utes.

From the outside, first impressions would fool the eye into thinking the Navara is noticeably bigger than the Hilux, but in fact it measures just 41mm longer (5296mm in length compared to 5255mm for the HiLux). Perhaps it’s due to the Navara’s tough exterior appearance highlighted by its chrome grille. Either way, it certainly looks tougher than, say, an SR5 Hilux.

It can also tow more, with towing capacity of 3000kg (compared to 2250kg for the HiLux). In fact, I could probably find a large list of reasons why I’d personally buy this over the Hilux equivalent (did I mention it’s cheaper, more fuel efficient and has 14kW more power and 107Nm more torque?). Alas, this is not meant as a comparison to the Hilux but merely to put the Navara ST-X into perspective against its direct rival.

Like all serious contenders in this segment, the Navara offers genuine 4×4 off-roading ability with the selection for 2WD (rear) for around the city and suburbs, and 4WD High for basic dirt or wet roads and 4WD Low for when it’s time to get serious.

Having previously tested the Navara’s off-roading ability around Mount Cotton’s 4WD course here in Brisbane, I was impressed with the ease by which it could overcome serious obstacles. The problem with comparing off-road ability for a vehicle in this segment is that they all manage most everyday situations quite well.

Sure, the 4WD experts will attempt to climb ridiculous obstacles and find specific things to rate one better than the other but the fact is, the majority of buyers will never do the sorts of things that will differentiate a HiLux from a Navara from a Mitsubishi Triton. They are all great off-road when it comes to everyday use. The main points to look for is the ground clearance (228mm), approach and departure angle (30 and 24 degrees).

On-road ride and handling however, is certainly worth testing as that’s where these vehicles will spend most of their time. The Navara makes use of independent, double wishbone suspension for the front and rigid axle with leaf springs for the rear. As a result, the Navara ST-X can feel a little light on the road (when unladen) but despite that, it offers one of the best on-road handling dynamics in its class (noticeably beaten by the recently released Volkswagen Amarok).

Cornering is simple and any manly passengers will have to try really hard to find a reason to strangle the “holy-sh#t-bars” when the going gets a little rough. The diesel ST-X comes with VDC which helps keep the near two-tonne beast going in the direction you’ve pointed it to.\

With a turning circle of 13.3M (HiLux – 12.4m) the Navara is a little more difficult to turn around than it really needs to be but you’ll get used to it eventually.

Maneuvering around town and parking in tiny spaces will quickly make you realise that the Navara can certainly do with parking sensors as rear-visibility isn’t exactly its strongest point. In fact, I found it near impossible to tell exactly how much room was left when doing a parallel park. Unfortunately, parking sensors are not available as standard but can be fitted as an accessory (as with any car).

The 2.5-litre diesel engine is a good little thing. It delivers power and torque when needed and does so without too many complaints. It’s probably a little noisier than one would hope but if that doesn’t bother you, it’s hard to fault. The five-speed automatic is well suited and changes gears seamlessly.

If you’re used to utes that feel like they’re made out of cheap Chinese toys, the Navara ST-X’s interior will be a pleasantly surprising experience. Nissan has changed the switchgear, door trim and enhanced the Navara with new tougher seat fabric. You can also fit a proper 1L drink bottle in the door pockets.

There is also Bluetooth phone connectivity which I managed to setup with my iPhone in less than 30 seconds. Unfortunately it doesn’t support audio streaming but the six-speaker stereo does allow for auxiliary input (so you can still connect your iPod to it) and it plays MP3 CDs.

The addition of dual-zone climate control is welcomed, but one would have to wonder how often two genuine tradies would argue over if it’s too cold or too hot inside the cabin. If that does actually happen in reality, I’ll eat my hat (please let me know in the comments).

The seats are comfortable and hold you in around corners. They also do a lot to minimise the affects of bumps both on and off-road. Overall the cabin is a nice place to be but it’s certainly no Amarok. Although, it does offer things which its new European rival doesn’t, such as steering wheel controls for audio and cruise control.

Back when it was tested by ANCAP, the Navara received a three-star safety rating. Nonetheless, the ST-X has been upgraded to come standard with driver and front passenger airbags, side airbags and curtain airbags.

Overall, the Nissan Navara ST-X is a package that is hard to beat. It undercuts its equivalent Toyota Hilux on price, safety (ESP, Brake Assist), features (better stereo, 17-inch alloy wheels vs 15, dual zone air-con), and in this reviewers humble opinion, looks, drivability and sheer cool-factor.

If you’re looking at buying a 4×4 ute, test drive this against the Amarok (more expensive), Triton GLX-R and Hilux SR5.

Full specification of Navara range including tray size and all facts and figures see: Nissan Navara Specification.


 

Owner reviews of the NISSAN NAVARA Add a New Review

  • Nelson Muntz

    The Japanese manufactures are really going to have to lift their game, aren’t they? Amarok kills them, and new Ranger will take it higher again!

    Seriously only 3 stars and no reversing camera let alone sensors…? For over $53K? Tell him he’s dreamin’…

    • JEKYL & HYDE

      all utes(except mahindra,stx) are made in thailand.amarok has jumped out of the blocks 30 years too late.a rear camera is what $500.if $53k is too much,buy your ultimate vw or sr5(their dearer).i know a bloke who took on a large backhoe at 100 clicks in his stx.the force of the impact drove a crowbar from the tray,straight through the cabin into the engine bay.he walked away.any other problems…

  • Eric

    The 2012 BT50 looks better.

    Whats better about the VW?

  • Alister

    I like the Navara it looks like a 4WD ute should – tough. TO me in no particular area is it the best, but it is a very good al-round package, but the three star safety rating is a little behind times.

  • Able

    I bought my Triton GLS over this simply because the rear seat in this is absolutely terrible and because of the number of times that it’s been recalled (the dual-cab ute is increasingly aimed at families and the Nissan isn’t family friendly). The initial 1-star safety rating put me off too. I just ordered a white Amarok Ultimate and I can’t wait for it to arrive – it already craps all over most utes, thats for sure. But who knows, maybe I’ll get a Ranger after the Amarok?

    • Crossy

      Can only improve on a Triton. Couldn’t get rid of mine quick enough.

      • Able

        Oh that’s a shame, I really love my Triton !

        • nickdl

          If it’s given you no trouble and you love the Triton then why replace it? I wouldn’t be touching an initial build Amarok with a 10 foot pole.

          • Pork

            Fair comment Nick, and precisely the same reason I’m not interested in a first run car, nor a first run engine from any manufacturer. Not singling out VW (I currently drive one), as when they get it right their really cars are fantastic and build some pretty fierce brand loyalty. I think Nissan are doing the right thing with the Navara… facelifts and power-ups will keep a model thriving for a long time. I’m certainly keen, and will let the dust settle on the Amarok before looking closer at that.

    • JEKYL & HYDE

      triton…good back seat,power down rear window.that about where it stops…

  • Martin

    My favourite of the pickup truck utes. Mainly due to the rugged good looks.

  • Antjuan

    There’s a long box/wheelbase version of the crew cab which would be great if you wanted that cab/box combo but find the ram/gm/ford offerings to large or expensive. Unfortunately it’s only sold in north america. If it were sold here I’d deffinetly by one

  • http://Subaru Sumodog

    One would hope that with engine improvement fuel economy increases ;-)

  • davo

    I work at a combined toyota/nissan dealership spinning spanners and 70% about of all cars that come in on a flatbed truck are D40′s. about 15% of that are other nissans and the other 15% are toyotas. time and time again hear customers say that they are a crap car and that they should of got a hilux. i rate them 1/2 star out of 5. don’t buy one.

    • Crossy

      How many Nissans are sold by your dealership compared to Toyotas?
      Most people buy the Navara because it represents way better value than the Hilux.
      If it breaks down during warranty, sure it’s an inconvenience but at the end of the day, Nissan has to fix it.

      • davo

        sorry i only work on them, i don\’t see the figures of the car sales. i wouls see about a 50/50 split of them to get serviced maybe a few more navaras and when you count the d22 navaras nissan has more utes comming in. we are getting more hilux\’s than normal because of the recall for crossmember.

      • ST

        It’s an inconvenience but if it’s the car that makes you money, the last thing you need is for it to be fixed regardless of who pays for the repairs.

  • nickdl

    As much as I like the Navara, I don’t trust it mechanically. From what I’ve heard of the Spanish-built Nissans, they’re not up to scratch against the Jap ones. I’d be holding out for the new Ranger or just the current one if I needed a ute right away.

  • Rogert

    Shopped around for a twin cab 4×4 ute with all the trimings very happy with my Mazda BT50. Works well and plays well and didn’t cost me a bucket of money.

  • t39

    Best option seems to be to wait till new Ford Ranger / Mazda BT50 comes out. Navara seems very last generation compared to them.

  • http://Subaru Sumodog

    or buy hilux now . New ranger looks like hilux from every angle.

  • Sumpguard

    I had a D22 and the D40 and the D22 was the better car. Far more capable off road, better tied down in the rear on wet roads (the D40 was damn right dangerous) and far more reliable to own. I had countless problems with my D40 and it put me off the brand for good.

    I am sure (or at least hopeful) that Nissan have ironed the bugs out but for me the damage is done. I’d be buying the Ranger over this despite it being a size smaller.

  • Paul

    I know heaps of people who have navara’s and none of them have the issues everyone keeps talking about?
    I myself have just sold my 2006 STX (company car) and am waiting for my new 2011 one to arrive. But with my old one I did not have 1 warranty claim on it and it had 94000kms on it with the original clutch which apparently is a huge problem. I work for a tractor company and towed every bit (and probably more) of the 3T capacity no worries so much so I believe it towed better than the 4.2L turbo intercooled diesel Nissan patrol especially with the 6 speed that the navara had.
    I can’t wait to get my new one which brings me to my only complaint with nissan and that is that I have had my navara on order now for 6 weeks!!! and its still not due to arrive until the end of march!!! You would think that if you have a vehicle that is a very good seller for your company you would have lots available so you can sell them haha!

    P.S I know the Hilux is a good vehicle but is it $10,000 better than the Navara not likely! that is the difference between the SR5 and STX, this also goes for the Amarok especially as the Amarok it is down on power already! we will have to see how it goes in Australia at least all the Jap’s have been here for 20+ years we all know what to sort of expect.In reality they are all about the same all designed to compete with each other just some look better than others thats all.

    • Crossy

      Agree with your comments totally.
      People we know with Navaras only speak of them in good terms. Based on that and the deal we got from Nissan we bought one about two years ago.
      Does everything we want it to do and has been faultless from day one.

  • jeffro bo dingo

    i had a d40 and it spent too much time in the workshop for my liking, i now own a dmax ls-m and had it for 12 months now and it absolutly craps all over the navara,i also have 4 mates that have gone out and got themselves the isuzu as well and not one of us have had a problem. i know the dmax looks a little out dated but i can manage to see through all of that as this beast pulls my 2.5 tonne boat with ease and the fuel ecconomy compared to my navara is chalk and cheese. my mate absolutly puts his dmax through some rough going and it just wants to keep going we have all been well and truely converted and everyone we meet are all starting to see what we are talking about if you really want a work horse get yourselves an isuzu…hands down,from what i hear they will be completely seperate from the colorado late this year and probably have a new model not too long after that i will wait about a year to see how the new model holds up and if the feedback is as good as what ive got now i will without a doubt be buying another one.

  • http://caradvice maersk

    Oh dear,this has to be said folks from personal experience with a 2010 D40 navara diesel purchase,that this was the worst decision that i`ve ever made,at the time i went for this vehicle cos it had more power,torque and a whole lot cheaper than a hilux,boy didn`t i turn out to be a fools FOOL,make no mistake the hilux is superior all round,u get what u pay for…i will not be conned by nissans shiny new offerings from the navara stable ever again,that said i can`t comment on other vihicles in their range..toyota have a tuff fight with the ford ranger/mazda bt50 as my shortlist will include said vehicles…

    • jeffro bo dingo

      put the dmax on your short list as i also believe it kills the toyota with a better chassis with more cross members , thicker axles, bigger brake pads all beit drum on the rear but who cares they work, double brake booster compare that one to the hiluxs… they are just built tough trust me, i used to work for toyota and i honestly believe they are the most over rated and over priced pieces of metal on our roads and thats without their recall issues

      • http://caradvice maersk

        cheers jeffro,i hadn`t thought of including the d-max/colorado…just don`t know to much about those utes,i do like their styling though…

        • jeffro bo dingo

          no worries maersk, as their advertising says Spirit of Truck, that is exactly what they are a small truck the gears dont feel like these other dual cabs on the road that are made by companies that make cars they actually feel a bit rough and ready but once you get your head around that they are an absolute dream to own. with Isuzu trucks they have been number 1 in australia for 21 years straight this is a company that has supplied diesel engines for 75 years so they know what they are doing, apparently the engine in the dmax is the same motor that is out of one of their small trucks and therefor doesnt need to work very hard to do what it needs to. i hope when you are in the market and go and look at one of these you have a good experience as i did and so have my mates who also have them and also get converted. i do not have one regret about buying my ute. plus you will keep anywhere between $10 and $15k in your bank over the toyota.good luck

  • jp

    Own a 08 bt-50. Preferred looks of the ranger – but price was $4k difference for what was effectively same vehicle (twin under skin). Looked at and drove the competitors and couldn’t justify the price difference. Now next model ranger and bt50 will be similar in size too hilux and navara can;t see any reason not to consider them against the larger triton, navara, hilux. The reviewer is right, doesn’t matter what you buy now, they all do the job off road – providing you have a decent set of treads underfoot.

  • http://tsikot mark Tadeo

    Hi I owned a 3.2 triton manual, Its good compare to navarra with lots of problem.

    1. smoke belching
    2. weak aircon
    3. sorts of annoying sounds on the hood.

    on the otherhand triton suffers recalls on steering columns, alarm actuator, uneven height balance of the leafspring, and noise engine.

    triton is faster in accelration even without the VGt turbo that all utes have.

  • Dave

    I regret to say I own a D40 ST-X !!!
    It was a replacement for an earlier model written off when a tree fell on it in a storm and must have been a friday arvo built car.
    Here are my experiences – all before 30,000Km
    Paint on the front and rear driver-side doors are different colour shades (believed to be pre-delivery damage the supplying dealer refused to acknowledge and would not correct)
    Disappointingly dull paint finish when compared to competitors. Paint has lifted on the turret from fruit bat poo!
    Nissan factory car alarm died very early in the piece (my earlier D40 did the same!)
    Black hair embedded in paint at rear of cabin, lol!
    Tub mis-aligned to body and never corrected at services.
    Intercooler crapped out (repaired under warranty)but still blows smoke
    Clutch crapped out (RELUCTANTLY replaced under warranty)
    Blows and trails excessive smoke on take-off from a standstill, especially when under a load eg uphill (told it is normal??? – but am yet to see any Hilux or Triton do it!)
    Fuel consumption has become an issue (related to above?).
    Interior plastics scratch easily.
    I have come to strongly doubt Nissan’s sincerity and when the warranty was due to run out they stalled until it had expired and the only contact I had from the dealer was to come and have a service !!!
    I am in a paradoxical situation – a sort of love hate thing. The ute does what I want and I still believe it is basically good and I can’t afford to bail out of this ute just yet. Nissan are a bunch of morons if they don’t think I am going to stick a stack of vinyl lemon stickers on it and park it outside random dealers on Saturday and Sunday afternoons!
    Think long and hard before you chose a Navara. Nissan are a JOKE!

  • Robyn

    I am happy with my Nissan Navara D40, purchased June 2010. Plenty of power, economical, I like the look of it. Have had no mechanical issues. The only negative is that the ute part leaks in heavy rain.

  • RAY

    I have a D22…. biggest heap of crap ever had. Rattles from day 1, the dash wasn’t bolted on out of the factory. Went through ankle deep water and the fan went through radiator, cost 3k to fix as they blamed my driving. the injector seal was faulty and car ran full noise until I worked out how to stall it, scared the crap out of me & family, did it again 6 weeks later as Nissan would only replace 1 seal….. car rattles like pooh now. done 40k kms now… all that crap happened in first 10k km. biggest heap of crap ever had… never ever buy one I would say.

  • Hazza

    I bought a new D22 STR in 04 and had no trouble, then traded on a new D40 STX (auto) 08 model which still have. Have done 120k kms and still on first set of tyres (Continental)altough are down to the indicators. Fuel consumption not as good as expected but had no trouble what so ever and am looking to trade on a new one 2011 model. Some comments on here make me a touch nervous but hard to change when had such a good run. The new ranger looks good but whats to say that they will not encounter issues as the vehicles start to get some miles under their belts?

  • Matt

    I have just ordered a Navara ST model D40, i,m trading in my 07 SR spacecab 4×4 turbo diesel.i test drove one and it seemed pretty good plus i reckon they look better the old hilux looks dated now
    I have had tonnes of problems with the car it only has 60000 ks on it all the recalls ,the clutch was gone when i got it must of had a corolla clutch or something . i managed to get 40,000 out of it Toyota said they don.t cover the clutch. Also the thrust bearing was replaced under warranty but there is still a loud wherring noise in neutral, stops when clutch is in, the guy at the dealership said it was normal .I had to replace the rear suspension i couldn’t carry more than half a tonne without it struggling. Not to mention the noisy injectors in winter sounds like the engine is gonna blow up .aahh!

  • Chriso

    drove the new ford ranger very rough gear shifting, dash lights and display didnt work on test drive, felt like a piece of shit, my current work ute is a 2010 ranger with 65000 on it and never had a problem except for the rough ride and poor suspension, its full of tools, test drove the d40 navara st,smooth power delivery, power felt the same as rangers even though its rated less, only downfall is the turning circle is shit, purchased one in december 11, its the manual st and getting less than 8L/100km’s with a mix of highway and city driving, does blow some smoke on take off or after back off, but should be able to fix this with tune or change the egr shit around after warranty runs close to an end, 39k how can you beat that, its mostly pure luck these days whether or not you get a lemon car, depending on your own mechanical abilities and knowledge obviously as well, have heard tons of horror stories about all the popular makes of cars out there.

  • Waltersponton

    Having driven a Toyota for several years, I recently purchased the Nissan Navara and find it a much more powerful and comfortable 4×4.  I had many problems with my Toyota and my Nissan has not “skipped a beat” I use it for recreation and work purposes and would not go back to Toyota!  Highly recommend the Nissan Navara as a tradie vehicle.
    Walter

  • Bob darley

    I brought a new stx in 2011, it has been fantastic.  Everyone I know has had buggered diffs, water pumps, alternators and injector problems with their hilux’s.  That’s why I went for the navara, to me it is just good value for money as you get a good looking ute with nice sounds, dual zone climate control, and it is smooth and quiet on the road too.  For the price, the toyota to me is far to plasticy inside and rides like a truck.