Monthly Archives: November 2006

2008 Mitsubishi Lancer GSR

Dear God, its back! After 10 long long years, the Lancer GSR is set to scare the hell out of all WRX owners once again. If you’ve been reading this site long enough, you’d know that I’ve been begging Mitsubishi to bring out a car to fill in the gap between the Lancer VRX and the Lancer EVO IX.

Currently Mitsubishi has nothing to offer those who really can’t afford an EVO IX but don’t want something as uninspiring as a VRX, so they usually opt out for the Subaru Impreza WRX (or a Mazda 3 MPS or Ford Focus XR5) . But alas, someone over at Mitsubishi has been hit with the logic stick and the Lancer GSR is ready for a come back.

Mitsubishi already has a the Subaru Impreza WRX STi equivalent with the Lancer EVO IX and hopes that the new mid range WRX equivalent will attract some new buyers to the brand. Mitsubishi haven’t exactly given it a name yet but I am calling it the Lancer GSR to follow tradition. The new Turbo Charged Lancer is set to arrive in Australia beginning September 2008.

You’ll all be pleased to know that Mitsubishi haven’t done a Mazda and haven’t gone El Cheapo like the Mazda 3 MPS with a front-wheel drive drive-train. Instead Mitsu are sticking with their heritage and the new Lancer will come with all-wheel-drive and is set to carry the Ralliart name.

Its good to see that Mitsubishi have followed Subaru’s approach to bring out an affordable Tubro car, adding to the line up which now includes the likes of the Ralliart Colt which we recently road tested. I posted a few articles of the 2008 Lancer here and here. The base Lancer 08 model is set to come with a boring 2.0-litre four-cylinder engine putting out around 125kW. Whilst Australia will most likely miss out on the 1.5-litre and diesel variants which will be on offer in Europe.

Honestly… I can’t wait for next generation GSR. I just hope Mitsubishi stick with the GSR badge! The photos are all unconfirmed, the actual red car above is a spy shot of what the next Evo (not GSR) might look like. No photos of the GSR are available. Actual shots of the new Lancer are confirmed for release January 2007.

ANCAP November Crash Test Results – Subaru Tribeca Shines

The November Crash Test Results from Australasian New Car Assessment Program (ANCAP) are out and tThe Subaru Tribeca has scored a maximum score of 5 stars. Other results released for vehicles tested in Australia were the Nissan Maxima, Honda Odyssey and Holden Viva with 4 stars and the Mitsubishi Colt with 3 stars (full result table at the end of article).

Vehicles tested by European NCAP and also available in Australia included the Lexus IS250 and Mercedes B Class with 5 stars; and the Land Rover Discovery, Kia Carnival and Mazda3 with 4 stars.

“In addition to good scores in this release of results, it is encouraging that almost all the vehicles here have a full complement of front, side and head protecting curtain airbags,” said ANCAP’s Chair, Mr Lauchlan McIntosh.

“ANCAP has advocated for several years now that all vehicles should have a 6 airbag package and Electronic Stability Control as a minimum safety specification. We are pleased that manufacturers are responding to ANCAP’s call for a full airbag package in new vehicles.”

Mr McIntosh cautioned that curtains are not standard on all variants of the Honda Odyssey, Nissan Maxima, Kia Carnival and Mazda3 although the tested vehicles had them. Curtains are optional for the Mitsubishi Colt and the variant tested was not fitted with them.

Mr McIntosh, said while the airbag availability was pleasing, the installation rate of Electronic Stability Control (ESC) was not as high.

“About 20% of new passenger vehicles sold in Australia have ESC. This is a good start and we would like manufacturers and importers to fit ESC as a standard feature in all Australian vehicles as quickly as possible,” Mr McIntosh continued.

“The Subaru Tribeca, Nissan Maxima, Lexus IS250, Land Rover Discovery and Mercedes B-Class are the only models here to have ESC fitted across all variants.

“ESC is available on all Mazda 3 and Kia Carnival variants and standard on the Ralliart variant of the Mitsubishi Colt. “However, ESC is not available on any variant of the Holden Viva and Honda Odyssey. Stability Control has been shown to reduce the risk of being involved in a crash in the first place, thereby reducing injuries overall.”

Pedestrian tests on the Honda Odyssey, Lexus IS250, Mazda3, Mercedes B class, Holden Viva and Nissan Maxima gave two star results (highest score), with the Land Rover Discovery, Mitsubishi Colt and Kia Carnival producing one star results. ANCAP encourage new vehicle buyers to consider selecting vehicles with a full 6 airbag package and Electronic Stability Control.

The crash test procedures conducted by ANCAP involve a frontal test at 64 km/h where part of the vehicle hits a barrier, and a side impact test at 50 km/h. The vehicles also undergo a test to assess likely injuries caused to pedestrians by a vehicle travelling at 40 km/h.

A pole test is optional, where the vehicle travelling sideways at 29 km/h strikes a round pole lined up with the driver’s head. This measures the effectiveness of head protecting side airbags and can result in extra points being scored.

Pole tests were conducted for the Subaru Tribeca, Holden Viva, Nissan Maxima, Mazda3, Land Rover Discovery, Lexus IS250, Mercedes Benz B-Class and Kia Carnival and confirmed that serious head injury was unlikely. Previous pole tests conducted by ANCAP show that, at this speed, a fatal head injury is almost certain without head-protecting side airbags.

Results are as follows :

  • Lexus IS250 2005 onwards (front, side and head airbags) -
    • ANCAP Score: 5 Pedestrian: 2
  • Mercedes B-Class 2006 on (front, side and head airbags) -
    • ANCAP Score: 5 Pedestrian: 2
  • Subaru Tribeca 2006 on (front, side and head airbags)
    • ANCAP Score: 5 Pedestrian: not tested
  • Mazda3 2006 onwards (front, side and head airbags)
    • ANCAP Score: 4 Pedestrian: 2
  • Land Rover Discovery 2006 onwards (front, side and head airbags)
    • ANCAP Score: 4 Pedestrian: 1
  • Nissan Maxima 2006 on (front, side and head airbags)
    • ANCAP Score: 4 Pedestrian: 2
  • Kia Carnival 2006 onwards (front, side and head airbags)
    • ANCAP Score: 4 Pedestrian: 1
  • Honda Odyssey 2006 on (front, side and head airbags)
    • ANCAP Score: 4 Pedestrian: 2
  • Holden Viva 2005 onwards (front, side and head airbags)
    • ANCAP Score: 4 Pedestrian: 2
  • Mitsubishi Colt 2006 onwards (dual front airbags)
    • ANCAP Score: 4 Pedestrian: 2

2008 Jaguar XF

Ford’s luxury arm, Jaguar today announced a new sports saloon, the Jaguar XF. The new cat which we are still able to find any photos of, will make its public debut next spring (southern hemisphere). Positioned in the luxury mid-size segment, the new Jaguar XF will replace the S-TYPE saloon in the Jaguar model line-up.

The new XF has gone through an extensive design and development phase at Jaguar’s Product Development Centre at Whitley in Coventry, UK whilst the actual production will take place at Jaguar’s Advanced Manufacturing Centre at Castle Bromwich in Birmingham, UK.

Jaguar XF

“The Jaguar XF is a new sports saloon that will challenge people to think again about Jaguar as daring and different,” commented Bibiana Boerio, managing director of Jaguar Cars.

“Our new XK sports car has been very well-received and is enjoying great success. We are now moving on to the next stage of Jaguar’s exciting new design era – and if you like the new XK, just wait until you see the new Jaguar XF!”

The photo above is of the Jaguar XF concept car which came to light in 2003, obviously, I am guessing the new XF will share some characteristics with the concept but no official images yet. Customer deliveries of the new Jaguar XF will commence globally in spring (n/h) 2008, and in Australia later that year.

2007 Mazda BT-50

Mazda isn’t exactly synonymous with utilities but the new 2007 Mazda BT-50 utility is set to bring the Japanese brand to the spotlight in the utility market. BT-50 replaces Mazda’s proven B Series, which Mazda claims has sold more than three million vehicles worldwide.

2007 Mazda BT-50

The Mazda BT-50 is powered by high-performance diesel engines. Mazda designers and engineers built the BT-50 to possess five key values.

  1. Its stylish and athletic design aims to express the individual;
  2. its craftsmanship aims to deliver functional beauty, build quality and customer delight;
  3. driving performance features new powerful yet fuel-efficient diesel engines combined with superb handling;
  4. it adopts unique features with utility for a variety of practical purposes,
  5. it aims to provide safety levels that are top in its class.

The BT-50 comes in three available body types -

  • Single Cab,
  • Freestyle Cab
  • Dual Cab -

The Single Cab body can comfortably seat two or three occupants, and provides a long 2400mm accessory alloy tray providing one of the largest load capacities in its class. At 1410kg the BT-50 Single Cab can haul an additional 30kg over the superseded B Series model.

In two-wheel drive, the Single Cab Chassis is powered by a new MZR-CD 2.5-litre, common-rail, DOHC 16-valve diesel engine that is more refined and fuel efficient than the previous engine, while producing an additional 23 kilowatts of power (now 105kW at 3500rpm) and 59 Newton metres more torque (now 330Nm at 1800rpm).

2007 Mazda BT-50

The 4×2 Single Cab Chassis consumes 8.3L/100km compared with 9.7L/100km (a 14.4 per cent improvement) for the equivalent B Series model according to ADR 81/01 fuel tests. Mated to a new five-speed manual gearbox it can accelerate from 0-100kmh in 10.4 seconds. Towing capacity has also improved with the braked capacity increasing significantly from 1800kg to 2250kg.

All other models in the range – 4×4 Single Cabs, Freestyle and Dual Cabs in both 4×2 and 4×4 specification – are powered by a new 3.0-litre common rail, DOHC 16-valve diesel engine that develops 115kW at 3200rpm (up 33kW) and 380Nm at 1800rpm (up 109Nm) on the superseded 2.5-litre diesel engine.

The use of a variable geometry turbocharger and a large intercooler ensure spirited acceleration, while a Variable Swirl Control Valve (VSCV) combined with an Exhaust Gas Recirculation (EGR) system and a high-efficiency EGR cooler ensures both engines meet Euro Stage IV compliance.

Maximum payload has improved over B Series from 1371kg to 1430kg and braked towing capacity has jumped from 1800kg to 2500kg.

Fuel consumption for all 4x4s has improved with five-speed manual models consuming on average 9.2L/100km, down from 10.1L/100km for the B Series. Range-topping Dual Cab SDX 4×4 models are also offered with a five-speed automatic transmission.

The Dual Cab body provides roomy comfort for five occupants, with two in the front and three in the back, making it just right for family use or for moving small work teams between locations.

Featuring the large door opening and easy access of Mazda’s unique Freestyle Door System, the Freestyle Cab body accommodates two in the front and two in the back, with the back offering plenty of room for carrying precious belongings. The front doors and rear access panels open from the centre in a design that uses no centre pillar to create an unobstructed opening of a wide 1,500mm.

2007 Mazda BT-50

With sedan-like atmosphere, helped by impressively low NVH levels, the Mazda BT-50′s sophisticated interior is enough to make occupants forget they are in a workhorse. With its subdued two-tone colour scheme employing grey as the keynote colour and with silver-finish accents highlighting details, the interior creates a modern, clean ambience that speaks of high quality.

The new instrument panel design features individual highlights common to those used in Mazda passenger cars. Three large meters are each framed by a stylish silver ring that instils a look of greater luxury.

A modular audio unit fits cleanly within the centre stack, and is covered by a silver-faced panel that ties well with the clean look of the cockpit. Both the single disc and six disc systems are MP3 compatible.

A keyless entry system is standard on all models making it easy to lock or unlock the doors (even when both of your hands are encumbered with boxes or bags.)

Safety has also been seriously considered by Mazda in developing the new BT-50. ABS anti-lock brakes with Electronic Brake force Distribution are available on all but the entry Single Cab chassis 4×2 model.

Dual front airbags and front seatbelts with pretensioners and load limiters are standard on all but the farmer focussed Single Cab 4×4 model. In this case the airbags are an option. An airbag compatible bullbar will be offered on all 4×4 models.

Front seatbelt height adjusters are standard on all Dual Cab models.

Two types of 4WD system are available — manual shift or electric shift — with each offering easy operation between 4×2 and 4×4 modes and go-anywhere performance.

While carrying over the double wishbone front design and rear leaf springs proven tough and reliable on previous Mazda utilities, the system is refined to offer a smoother, more comfortable ride. Braking has also been upgraded.

All Mazda’s offer great value and the BT-50 range is no exception. Priced from $20,990 with air conditioning and an alloy tray, the Single Cab 4×2 model also includes alloy wheels, CD player, remote locking, variable intermittent wipers, low fuel warning light, engine immobiliser and dual airbags.

The promotional price for the 3.0-litre powered 4×4 version, complete with overfenders and automatic locking remote free wheel hubs, as well as an alloy tray and air conditioning, is $28,990.

Doug Dickson, Mazda Australia’s managing director, said:

BT-50 offers commercial ute buyers a real Zoom-Zoom alternative. It blends tough workhorse credentials with great style, comfort and naturally driving enjoyment“.

Mazda Australia expects to build on the B Series sales success, which with 6269 sales year-to-date October, is enjoying its best year ever. BT-50 is expected to sell about 700 a month with 4×4 sales taking 50 per cent of the volume (up from 45 per cent now).

BT-50 is protected by a two year, unlimited kilometre or three year/100,000km warranty, whichever comes first.

Chrysler Nassau Concept Jeep Trailhawk Concept Sketches

The Chrysler Group have give us a glimpse of two concepts that will be unveiled in January 2007 at the North American International Auto Show in Detroit

  1. the Chrysler Nassau Concept
  2. the Jeep® Trailhawk Concept.

Chrysler says that the Nassau concept is a four-door, four-passenger luxury coupe with an emphasis on driving dynamics. Chrysler says that the coupes gives a hint of what could be a future sedan in the brand’s line-up.

Chrysler Nassau Concept

The Jeep Trailhawk concept combines the core features of the Jeep Wrangler with the sophistication of the Jeep Grand Cherokee.

Jeep Trailhawk Concept

Derived from the all-new 2007 Wrangler architecture, the design of the car has given rise to its name, with the headlamps, cropped and peering out from beneath a diagonal brow, Chrysler says the design produces the countenance of a bird of prey, and the name “Trailhawk”.

Road Toll Reduction – A New Approach

I was sitting at home last night watching the news about three teenagers that had managed to kill themselves “due to excessive speed” near the Sunshine Coast, and whilst the continuous exposure to road death had left me and countless others completely desensitized to the event, I found it rather surprising what one of the police officers said at the scene of the crash.

I don’t know what else the Police, RACQ and other motoring organizations can do to make teenagers just SLOW DOWN

Having fit the bracket of teenagers not so long ago, and being targeted by QLD police on numerous occasions because of the car I drive and the fact that I am not over 40, I thought that perhaps it was time someone really told QLD police (and other police departments in other states) how to slow down teenagers, plus it really annoys me when I read articles like this.

Queensland Police

The sad thing is, the police never really ask those who count, they have continued to ignore all forms of communication from us here at Car Advice, much the same at QLD transport whom we had written to in protest of the new QLD rules and regulations which had generated such a massive buzz amongst our readers.

Of course, we are just a blog, we have no say in anything. We don’t reflect the public opinion, after all we are not over 40 (well not all of us), and therefore we are either boring Camry drivers or Hoons. Being on the receiving end of countless speeding tickets myself, I have always felt relatively hostile towards our men in blue and I believe this feeling is mutual amongst those my age. Now don’t frown with disgust, let me explain.

There is a massive problem on our roads, people speed all the time, be it teenagers, or older drivers, speeding happens all the time and thats a fact. The problem is that the police seem to continue to deny the reality of the situation. Speeding happens for so many reasons, most of the time it happens unknowingly, and sometimes it happens deliberately.

I can almost guarantee that every time there is a teenager killed in a car crash, the police immediately say “speed may have been a big factor” whilst, I like the fact that they use the word “may”, it is still very much implied that yes, it was the excessive speed that killed the teenager, and practically no other factors. So what happens? We sink more money down the drain to get more speed cameras and more intuitive ways of trying to intimidate people into slowing down. Bigger fines, more points, waiting down a hill behind a tree with a speed gun, whatever you fancy, they have done it all.

Car Accident

And what does that get us? Absolutely nothing. The Australian Bureau of Statistics has some very useful figures when it comes to road crashes, you can find a huge amount of data and facts here. I wont go over all of it, but the evidence is relatively clear, whilst the number of road deaths has dropped considerably over the last 30 years, the deaths have plateaud in the last 5 or so years which means that the introduction of all these somewhat reactionary laws to limit speed and stop younger drivers driving faster cars has failed todo anything.

The main reasons deaths have come down so much and have now plateaud is due to better car safety, with SRS front/side air bags, electronic braking systems and many other modern day safety features, the chances of surviving a crash have improved significantly. NSW has the worse death toll for any state in Australia, and not suprisingly they have some of the toughest road rules, with fixed speed cameras ran by private companies to limits on the type of cars teenagers can drive. The NSW road death-toll for 2001-2004 is below

  • 2001 : 524
  • 2002 : 561
  • 2003 : 539
  • 2004 : 522

Where is the trend? There isn’t one, there is no significant reduction in the death toll at all. QLD transport says that P platers are at a significantly higher risk of having a fatal road accident than open license holders, and they attribute this to speed and inexperience. So based on statistics, this is true, young drivers do tend to get themselves killed more often than their parents. So here is the $1million dollar question. What can they do about it?

Its relatively simple, if you tell a little kid they can’t have the toy/chocolate they want, they will want it more and more and beg for it and cry. Its basic common sense psychology, whilst if you simply give them the toy, they will probably get bored of it and move on (albiet perhaps to bigger toys and the process of appeasement fails). Get the logic? Now can it apply to teenagers on the road? I think so.

In my experience with the police, I have had nothing but a bad attitude and aggressive manners, maybe its cause I am young, maybe its because I drive a turbo charged car, either way, its obvious that the police would rather have me either behind the wheel of a volvo or not driving at all.

Last year in NSW the state government banned P-platers from driving high-powered cars (turbo/supercharged) and from having more than one passenger if they committed a serious driving offence. Did it work? No! 39 people have died in P-plate crashes this year which is more than double the death toll of the same period in 2005. Limits are not the answer.

What makes a teenager drive 150km/hr in a 60 zone at 3am in the morning? Is it testosterone, is it due to his 4 mates in the car cheering him as he is trying to impress them? Is it just sheer stupidity? Or is it because he is street racing? It can be any of these things. But going 150km/hr in a 60 zone doesn’t kill you, its when you lose control and go sideways into a tree/pole/car which kills you. Anyone who has ever lost control of their vehicle would know how scary it is, and once you have found the limit of your vehicle, there are very few occasions where you will be willing to push it that hard.

So here is an idea, whilst the state governments keep pushing new rules to make licensing harder and harder they fail to see the bigger picture. While many young first time drivers can do a reverse parallel park, not many can take a 45′ degree corner at 120km an hour. Now I am not saying we should encourage this sort of behaviour on the road but these are the sorts of things that get people killed. The lack of experience to realize that some things are just impossible in most vehicles is an essential skill, far more important than a reverse parallel park.

Obviously putting all new drivers through an advanced driving course is expensive, I mean you’ll need a proper skid pan, a race circuit, and the willingness of the driver to put their own car (or hire a car) on the track to find its limits. But all these things can be arranged, whats the point of teaching young drivers how to do a reverse park as part of the essential training when they are still unaware of their cars capabilities. Think about it, do you know the exact moment when your car loses traction around a corner?

It always amazes me how many people lose control of their cars in the wet, its as if they don’t realize how much less grip is available in the wet. The government has continued to simply push these ideas away, ignoring them as they are too hard and too expensive to maintain and monitor, it has been shoved into the too hard basket, and so the failures continue while more and more inexperienced drivers die on the road.

Curiosity is a bitch, and finding the limits of your car is a curse on every young male (and some female) drivers – myself included, I have just been one of the lucky ones that has never had to experience the horrible consequences. So I’ve said a lot here, but what it really comes down to isn’t blaming and fining young drivers for their lack of experience, but making sure that they get this experience in a safe environment where they can see and test the limits of their car and realize that once you cross the limits of your car, you put your life and the lives of all those around you in danger.

The entire licensing system needs to be scraped and redesigned. There needs to be some attention paid to the following facts:

  • All drivers must go through an advanced driving course to learn the limits of their vehicle and also to realize the difference between AWD, FWD, RWD cars.
  • Being able to reverse parallel park, do a three point turn and pass your license test doesn’t make you a good driver.
  • Passing your test in a Toyota Echo / Suzuki Swift doesn’t mean you can drive a Toyota Landcruise or other 4WDs.
  • Passing your test in a Toyota Echo / Suzuki Swift doesn’t mean you can drive a Nissan Skyline GTST/GT-R (and any other performance car)
  • Not all cars are the same, the stopping distance for old cars and new cars (specially sports cars) varies significantly, making most speed limits completely useless in most cases (I am taking into account reaction time).
  • Every driver must redo their license every 5 years, there are countless “mature” drivers on the road who have forgotten how to drive.
  • Those who wish to drive a 4WD/High performance car must conduct their licensing test in THAT vehicle.
  • Police need to stop targeting teenagers simply because they are teenagers.

I beg the state transport ministers to please consider these suggestions and realize that there is no short term solution to save young people from their own curiosity and nature – and as with everything, education is the key.

Ajax Engineered Fasteners Closes Down

It was long coming, but today it has been confirmed that Ajax Engineered Fasteners are now going into receivership. Ajax administrator PricewaterhouseCoopers said negotiations between Ajax owners, Allen Capital, and interested receivers had stopped overnight, however a conclusion to the talks was to be finalized by now.

However Unions last night had already named the receiver as KordaMentha. Once a receiver has been appointed, the company’s 180-plus workers will be stood down. Australian Workers Union official Cesar Melhem said staff held a stopwork meeting this morning.

Ajax workers want an upfront agreement guaranteeing them around $12 million in entitlements. It is still unknown whether or not the stand down is permanent or temporary, and much of this uncertainty sits on the shoulders of Holden and Ford and their need for Ajax parts. There is a possibility that another deal could be struck with the car makers to keep the company operating.

Ajax supplies nuts and bolts for use in engine, driveline, vehicle assembly and brake systems to Ford and Holden. It is a division of Global Engineered Fasteners (GEF) and was placed in voluntary administration on August 7 this year. Ford said the situation was not affecting supplies at this stage, but it only had enough stock to last a fortnight.

We’ll wait and see what happens in the meantime,” a Ford spokeswoman said.

Australian Workers Union national secretary Bill Shorten today labeled the car companies as arrogant and also hinted that they may have hindered Ajax’s rescue process.

“Late yesterday it had become clear that the big car companies are making life difficult for this supplier of the bolts, The company will likely be in receivership as we speak right now. The car companies … are dragging their feet, they are not making it easy for a new buyer to buy the company because they won’t guarantee to buy the bolts from this company in the future.” Mr Shorten said.

Mr Shorten called on the major car companies to not take a “short-term view” of Ajax.

Sometimes big car companies do have a responsibility to look after the people who supply them,” he said.

It should be interesting to see what happens once Ford and Holden run out of Ajax parts, Holden has said in the past that it is able to find some of the critical parts from other GM plants worldwide, but I am sure having them made here in Australia insures much better production.

2007 Toyota LandCruiser Prado Turbo-Diesel GX, GXL, VX and Grande

It seems more obvious that ever now that the battle for fuel efficient engines in in full swing. With diesel variants of cars coming out faster than speeding tickets in Victoria, the Diesel uptake in Australia is on the full offensive. Whilst the Landcruiser Prado has been available with a diesel variant for some time, Toyota has improved the engine as well as upping the specifications for the 2007 model release.

2007 Toyota LandCruiser Prado Turbo-Diesel GX, GXL, VX and Grande

I have a great deal of respect for Toyota, sure they build boring, bland and completely uninspiring cars most of the time, but they put a great deal of money into R&D and they are the pioneers of Hybrid vehicle technology. Yet they are also willing to recognise when Hybrid technology is not suitable and have no quarrels going for a Diesel engine.

So the new Toyota LandCruiser Prado has gained a more powerful and fuel-efficient turbo-diesel engine as well as specification upgrades on all models. The new 3.0-litre common-rail Toyota 1KD-FTV direct-injection engine delivers substantially more power and torque, rapid response, smooth acceleration, better fuel economy and lower emissions.

The DOHC four-cylinder intercooled and turbocharged engine produces 32 per cent more power and 19.5 per cent more torque than the similar-capacity engine it replaces. Maximum power is 127kW at 3400rpm (up from 96kW at 3600rpm) while peak torque jumps to 410Nm at 1600-2800rpm (up from 343Nm at 2000rpm).

Transmissions available with the new engine each gain an extra ratio – a six-speed manual and an electronically controlled five-speed automatic with gated shift. Fuel consumption for both turbo-diesel versions has also been lowered to less than 10 litres/100km – an improvement of 19.3 per cent for the manual and 26.2 per cent for the auto.

Turbo-diesel Prado uses 9.2 litres/100km for the manual (down 2.2) and 9.3 litres for the automatic (down 3.3) on the official combined cycle.

The engine complies with new, stricter Euro IV emission levels. David Buttner, Toyota Australia’s senior executive director sales and marketing, said the new engine offered increased power and torque across the rev range.

Prado’s new turbo-diesel engine delivers strong performance from idle and features an extremely flat torque curve,” Mr Buttner said.

“These characteristics make the Prado turbo-diesel ideal for acceleration, towing and off-road driving.”

The manual transmission adopts triple-cone synchromesh on first, second and third gears to make shifts smoother. Diesel fuel is stored under high pressure in a common-rail pump and injected directly into the combustion chamber multiple times per cycle.

This technology optimises the air/fuel mixture in the cylinders, delivering efficient combustion for high torque and excellent fuel economy. Petrol Prado models continue with an all-alloy Quad Cam 4.0-litre V6 engine equipped with variable valve timing (VVT-i).

The petrol engine delivers maximum power of 179kW at 5200rpm and peak torque is 376Nm at 3800rpm. The 4.0-litre V6 petrol engine and new 3.0-litre four-cylinder turbo-diesel engine are available on all four Prado grades – GX, GXL, VX and Grande.

VX and Grande models are fitted with the electronic five-speed automatic transmission. GX and GXL models come with either the six-speed manual or five-speed automatic.

Along with the new turbo-diesel engine, the diesel models gain acoustic windscreen glass and new sound-absorbing material under the instrument panel to reduce noise, vibration and harshness.

Turbo-diesel models have a larger engine cover and twin counter-rotating balance shafts. The Prado Grande receives a new, easier-to-read Optitron instrument cluster and added warning features. Prado GX has been upgraded with wider 17-inch styled steel wheels and wider side steps, overfender flares and mudguards, body-coloured bumpers and door handles, side protection mouldings, and chrome grille and exterior mirrors.

An option pack for Prado GX includes anti-skid brakes (ABS), cruise control, leather steering wheel and leather gearshift knob. Prado GXL models gain privacy glass and roof rails. Additional features for Prado VX include power-operated front seats, leather seat trim and leather/woodgrain door trim.

Lexus Hybrid Batteries Reliable

If you’ve ever thought about buying a hybrid car, you must have thought to yourself, what about the batteries? I mean its one thing to have your car’s battery fail on you as thats easily replaceable, but its another to have the battery which literally powers the engine to die on you.

Lexus/Toyota are well aware of these fears, so they have decided to literally guarantee the technology they use in their hybrid cars. Lexus says that their hybrid vehicles feature world-leading technology, including a high voltage battery designed to last for many more years than a conventional battery.

Lexus Hybrid Batteries Reliable

Lexus has demonstrated its commitment to the concept of hybrid technology with the introduction of the GS450h and the RX400h in 2006. 2007 will see the introduction of the LS600hL, the world’s first upper-luxury petrol-electric hybrid and the world’s first V8 hybrid.

An electric vehicle requires an external electric power source to recharge a spent battery. In a Lexus hybrid vehicle, electricity is generated as the engine moves the vehicle. Therefore, with the simple supply of petrol, an external electric power source is not needed.

Lexus HV hybrid batteries, which are charged as the engine operates, are designed to last for many years and are recharged many thousands of times during normal operation. The batteries are also recyclable.

The batteries in all Lexus hybrid vehicles are under warranty for five years or up to 100,000km, whichever occurs first, for peace of mind. The HV battery should never get completely flat as the car’s computer is designed to constantly monitor the condition of the battery. In normal operation it does not allow a charge load of less than 40 per cent to occur.

When the battery’s charge level is low the engine activates the generator, and the resulting electricity is used to recharge the battery. Additionally, as soon as the brakes are applied the motors begin functioning as generators, also supplying the generated electricity to the battery.

If there is a severe battery failure or critical problems with the battery, the system shuts off automatically. Lexus Manager for Service and Parts, Mr Bob Dawes, believes the hybrid technology is as reliable as a conventional petrol-engined vehicle.

Lexus hybrid vehicles are renowned for their reliability and ease of use. Many people misunderstand the technology associated with hybrid vehicles, but at Lexus we have spent a great deal of time dispelling these myths,” he said.

“We are pleased to report that there have been very few cases of Toyota/Lexus hybrid component failure worldwide. In fact these number less than 0.25% of all the Toyota and Lexus hybrid vehicles in operation,” said Mr Dawes.

“However, should this ever happen, Lexus dealers will be able to replace the battery. And the estimated cost of replacement is only around four thousand dollars; which we believe is minimal given the advanced technology associated with hybrid vehicles.”

By the middle of next year hybrid models could account for almost 10 per cent of total Lexus take-up in Australia. By that time Lexus will have become the first car maker to offer hybrid technology in a luxury car, luxury SUV, all-wheel drive and a V8.

VW Touareg V10 TDI Tows a 747

I remember a while ago I saw some muscle-man towing a 747, but that was simply just odd, and I swear he was very close to self combustion. Nonetheless, it still always amazes me when I see anything towing a 747. Perhaps its simply due to the fact that I don’t understand how much force is required to a move 747. Sure its big and weighs 155 tons, but its on wheels… Anyway, VW wanted to prove a point. Diesel has power.

VW Touareg V10 TDI Tows a 747

Nice photo ha? Reports say that the poor plane didn’t put up much of a fight, and the Touareg towed the massive jumbo jet 150 meters at 8 km/hr before coming to a stop using its own standard brakes – wonder if it needed new brake pads and discs after this little stunt?