<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Toyota planning Celica GT-Four revival?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.caradvice.com.au/9998/toyota-planning-celica-gt-four-revival/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/9998/toyota-planning-celica-gt-four-revival/</link>
	<description>Australian Resource for Car Reviews, News, Advice</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 11:45:39 +1100</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Wheelnut</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/9998/toyota-planning-celica-gt-four-revival/comment-page-1/#comment-126220</link>
		<dc:creator>Wheelnut</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Apr 2009 02:00:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/9998/toyota-planning-celica-gt-four-revival/#comment-126220</guid>
		<description>Casandra - you mean the Car that looks like a Storm troopers helmet that Darth Vader has trodden on?

it&#039;s a concept car that has been around for a couple of years.. its development is currently &quot;On Ice&quot; - as the supra has been for the last 10 years.
Not only that but there are also reports that Toyota are thinking about making it a new Sporty Hybrid [to try and compete witrh the Tesla]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Casandra &#8211; you mean the Car that looks like a Storm troopers helmet that Darth Vader has trodden on?</p>
<p>it&#8217;s a concept car that has been around for a couple of years.. its development is currently &#8220;On Ice&#8221; &#8211; as the supra has been for the last 10 years.<br />
Not only that but there are also reports that Toyota are thinking about making it a new Sporty Hybrid [to try and compete witrh the Tesla]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Casandra</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/9998/toyota-planning-celica-gt-four-revival/comment-page-1/#comment-126211</link>
		<dc:creator>Casandra</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2009 23:55:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/9998/toyota-planning-celica-gt-four-revival/#comment-126211</guid>
		<description>ImportJap there is a new Supra coming ! go to google and put in 2010 Toyota Supra its sick !

&amp; the new Toyota Celica isnt scheduled to be released until late 2012 and it definitely will be a site to see I guarantee it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ImportJap there is a new Supra coming ! go to google and put in 2010 Toyota Supra its sick !</p>
<p>&amp; the new Toyota Celica isnt scheduled to be released until late 2012 and it definitely will be a site to see I guarantee it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bobby Keil</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/9998/toyota-planning-celica-gt-four-revival/comment-page-1/#comment-84575</link>
		<dc:creator>Bobby Keil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 14:01:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/9998/toyota-planning-celica-gt-four-revival/#comment-84575</guid>
		<description>Always had a celica, and have been hanging out for years for a funky new model, with the same space, performance but better economy than the 2000 model. not asking too much am I?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Always had a celica, and have been hanging out for years for a funky new model, with the same space, performance but better economy than the 2000 model. not asking too much am I?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doom</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/9998/toyota-planning-celica-gt-four-revival/comment-page-1/#comment-83395</link>
		<dc:creator>Doom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jul 2008 19:08:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/9998/toyota-planning-celica-gt-four-revival/#comment-83395</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d take a Celica over any of the damned retarded looking Hyundai&#039;s.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d take a Celica over any of the damned retarded looking Hyundai&#8217;s.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: realcars</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/9998/toyota-planning-celica-gt-four-revival/comment-page-1/#comment-52383</link>
		<dc:creator>realcars</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 08:58:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/9998/toyota-planning-celica-gt-four-revival/#comment-52383</guid>
		<description>Yeah I agree,the last Celica as pictured was fugly. I nearly bought a ta22 years ago. That was a classic they have been unable to emulate since. I reckon a new retro version in the same vain as the Mini or latest Stang would be nice if done properly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah I agree,the last Celica as pictured was fugly. I nearly bought a ta22 years ago. That was a classic they have been unable to emulate since. I reckon a new retro version in the same vain as the Mini or latest Stang would be nice if done properly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: realcars</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/9998/toyota-planning-celica-gt-four-revival/comment-page-1/#comment-52380</link>
		<dc:creator>realcars</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 08:52:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/9998/toyota-planning-celica-gt-four-revival/#comment-52380</guid>
		<description>The ta22 sure was sweet ride.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The ta22 sure was sweet ride.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Duck</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/9998/toyota-planning-celica-gt-four-revival/comment-page-1/#comment-52375</link>
		<dc:creator>Duck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 08:44:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/9998/toyota-planning-celica-gt-four-revival/#comment-52375</guid>
		<description>I meant the latest Celica.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I meant the latest Celica.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: realcars</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/9998/toyota-planning-celica-gt-four-revival/comment-page-1/#comment-52365</link>
		<dc:creator>realcars</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 08:16:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/9998/toyota-planning-celica-gt-four-revival/#comment-52365</guid>
		<description>Yes TP, march off the cliff with all the other Toyota loving  Lemmings. 
 
Accept whatever they offer without question.

I have known some Toyota tragics in my time but you take the cake my friend. Can you name the ugliest Toyota model of all time. No I thought not to many to choose from eh including Celica.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes TP, march off the cliff with all the other Toyota loving  Lemmings. </p>
<p>Accept whatever they offer without question.</p>
<p>I have known some Toyota tragics in my time but you take the cake my friend. Can you name the ugliest Toyota model of all time. No I thought not to many to choose from eh including Celica.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TP</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/9998/toyota-planning-celica-gt-four-revival/comment-page-1/#comment-52360</link>
		<dc:creator>TP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 08:02:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/9998/toyota-planning-celica-gt-four-revival/#comment-52360</guid>
		<description>Firstly real cars you twat, there are no pics on here of the new Celica, so your initial comment makes no sense... clearly just here to attack anything Toyota... certainly the AE86 pics which circulated looked very good.

Secondly you are an idiot, you would have to be braindead to think a Tiburon, FWD 140kw trash, would be better then an AWD 150kwish Celica... absolutely braindead. The Tiburon looks alrite now but its still gutless and its still a hyundai.

Lastly, yes Toyota are all bland and offer nothing... yet are the most popular vehicles in the world. You are yet another idiot here who is clueless.

Neeeeeeeeeext...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Firstly real cars you twat, there are no pics on here of the new Celica, so your initial comment makes no sense&#8230; clearly just here to attack anything Toyota&#8230; certainly the AE86 pics which circulated looked very good.</p>
<p>Secondly you are an idiot, you would have to be braindead to think a Tiburon, FWD 140kw trash, would be better then an AWD 150kwish Celica&#8230; absolutely braindead. The Tiburon looks alrite now but its still gutless and its still a hyundai.</p>
<p>Lastly, yes Toyota are all bland and offer nothing&#8230; yet are the most popular vehicles in the world. You are yet another idiot here who is clueless.</p>
<p>Neeeeeeeeeext&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: realcars</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/9998/toyota-planning-celica-gt-four-revival/comment-page-1/#comment-52358</link>
		<dc:creator>realcars</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 07:53:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/9998/toyota-planning-celica-gt-four-revival/#comment-52358</guid>
		<description>Another Fuglier Celica. The only decent Celica was the TA22 and the only classic model Toyota has ever produced i.e worth restoring. Everything else they have made goes straight to the tip.

TP your&#039;ve got your Toyota coloured glasses on again.

Toyota is better than Tiburon in your opinion you sad moron.

Did Daddy give you the keys to the Widebody last weekend.

Soylent green of the automotive world. Half arse offerings  because morons like TP continue to buy whatever bland crap they dish out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another Fuglier Celica. The only decent Celica was the TA22 and the only classic model Toyota has ever produced i.e worth restoring. Everything else they have made goes straight to the tip.</p>
<p>TP your&#8217;ve got your Toyota coloured glasses on again.</p>
<p>Toyota is better than Tiburon in your opinion you sad moron.</p>
<p>Did Daddy give you the keys to the Widebody last weekend.</p>
<p>Soylent green of the automotive world. Half arse offerings  because morons like TP continue to buy whatever bland crap they dish out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anthonii</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/9998/toyota-planning-celica-gt-four-revival/comment-page-1/#comment-52344</link>
		<dc:creator>Anthonii</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 07:16:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/9998/toyota-planning-celica-gt-four-revival/#comment-52344</guid>
		<description>Duck,

I reckon the latest Celica (which is getting on now) looked good, &#039;specially up front.

Highly Unique and simple stylish lines. Previous models that looked like a shortened fat jag were a different story...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Duck,</p>
<p>I reckon the latest Celica (which is getting on now) looked good, &#8217;specially up front.</p>
<p>Highly Unique and simple stylish lines. Previous models that looked like a shortened fat jag were a different story&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Titan</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/9998/toyota-planning-celica-gt-four-revival/comment-page-1/#comment-52315</link>
		<dc:creator>Titan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 05:31:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/9998/toyota-planning-celica-gt-four-revival/#comment-52315</guid>
		<description>^^^ There is no such thing as a current Celica...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>^^^ There is no such thing as a current Celica&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Duck</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/9998/toyota-planning-celica-gt-four-revival/comment-page-1/#comment-52291</link>
		<dc:creator>Duck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 05:11:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/9998/toyota-planning-celica-gt-four-revival/#comment-52291</guid>
		<description>Current Celica looks CRAP!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Current Celica looks CRAP!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anthonii</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/9998/toyota-planning-celica-gt-four-revival/comment-page-1/#comment-52251</link>
		<dc:creator>Anthonii</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 02:32:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/9998/toyota-planning-celica-gt-four-revival/#comment-52251</guid>
		<description>Looks promising...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks promising&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Flying High</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/9998/toyota-planning-celica-gt-four-revival/comment-page-1/#comment-52248</link>
		<dc:creator>Flying High</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 02:20:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/9998/toyota-planning-celica-gt-four-revival/#comment-52248</guid>
		<description>PRAISE BE!!

The perfect combination!    Not a fugly Subaru and Not a piss poor Toyota Motor and Drivetrain

Toyota shell design and Suby under the hood and floorplan = a match made in automative heaven!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PRAISE BE!!</p>
<p>The perfect combination!    Not a fugly Subaru and Not a piss poor Toyota Motor and Drivetrain</p>
<p>Toyota shell design and Suby under the hood and floorplan = a match made in automative heaven!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RoFlmaTiC</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/9998/toyota-planning-celica-gt-four-revival/comment-page-1/#comment-52219</link>
		<dc:creator>RoFlmaTiC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2008 23:28:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/9998/toyota-planning-celica-gt-four-revival/#comment-52219</guid>
		<description>Jason - Perhaps there would be buyers that want Subaru performance without the boy-racer image?

This is where I&#039;d imagine this new car would sit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jason &#8211; Perhaps there would be buyers that want Subaru performance without the boy-racer image?</p>
<p>This is where I&#8217;d imagine this new car would sit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/9998/toyota-planning-celica-gt-four-revival/comment-page-1/#comment-52196</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2008 21:06:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/9998/toyota-planning-celica-gt-four-revival/#comment-52196</guid>
		<description>Van I think you overestimate Toyota&#039;s influence on Subaru. I remember reading a news article a few years back in which GM had asked Subaru for permission to use their AWD technology and boxer engine in a car. Subaru freaked out saying &quot;no&quot; and killed that concept quick smart. 

Just a few years later GM sold their entire stake in Subaru realising they weren&#039;t gonna get a hold of Subaru&#039;s technology. Back then GM owned 20% of Fuji Heavy Industries. Today Toyota owns only 8.7%, hardly a big enough stake to throw your weight around.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Van I think you overestimate Toyota&#8217;s influence on Subaru. I remember reading a news article a few years back in which GM had asked Subaru for permission to use their AWD technology and boxer engine in a car. Subaru freaked out saying &#8220;no&#8221; and killed that concept quick smart. </p>
<p>Just a few years later GM sold their entire stake in Subaru realising they weren&#8217;t gonna get a hold of Subaru&#8217;s technology. Back then GM owned 20% of Fuji Heavy Industries. Today Toyota owns only 8.7%, hardly a big enough stake to throw your weight around.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jamison</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/9998/toyota-planning-celica-gt-four-revival/comment-page-1/#comment-52194</link>
		<dc:creator>jamison</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2008 17:26:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/9998/toyota-planning-celica-gt-four-revival/#comment-52194</guid>
		<description>This is just one of the &quot;shelved&quot; concept I was talking about.

I was a fan of the early 1990s GT4 as well as the AE86.

But just a tid bit, the price of $20,000 USD (under), well thats just for the U.S. The last celica sold here for around 25K US, it sold for almost around 55K in Oz.

Point is, if it does goes to production and it makes Oz (the GT RWD NA engine), roughly 110-120kW. It will cost 35k+. 


And a tid bit on the Hyundai, yes the new Genesis looks good, especially thr RWD format, but a concept spec and a production spec is very different, theres going to be a lot of things not going to make production to keep it a viable sports car under the &quot;Hyndai/genesis&quot; name.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is just one of the &#8220;shelved&#8221; concept I was talking about.</p>
<p>I was a fan of the early 1990s GT4 as well as the AE86.</p>
<p>But just a tid bit, the price of $20,000 USD (under), well thats just for the U.S. The last celica sold here for around 25K US, it sold for almost around 55K in Oz.</p>
<p>Point is, if it does goes to production and it makes Oz (the GT RWD NA engine), roughly 110-120kW. It will cost 35k+. </p>
<p>And a tid bit on the Hyundai, yes the new Genesis looks good, especially thr RWD format, but a concept spec and a production spec is very different, theres going to be a lot of things not going to make production to keep it a viable sports car under the &#8220;Hyndai/genesis&#8221; name.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ImportJap</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/9998/toyota-planning-celica-gt-four-revival/comment-page-1/#comment-52163</link>
		<dc:creator>ImportJap</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2008 12:00:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/9998/toyota-planning-celica-gt-four-revival/#comment-52163</guid>
		<description>I would not underestimate this car until it&#039;s built. Good on Toyota for finally deciding to build a new sports turbo 4, it&#039;s about time. Even if they did have to go to Subaru for the motor (and possibly AWD).

While they&#039;re at it, a new Supra please. And AE86 - or just a turbo RWD Corolla :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would not underestimate this car until it&#8217;s built. Good on Toyota for finally deciding to build a new sports turbo 4, it&#8217;s about time. Even if they did have to go to Subaru for the motor (and possibly AWD).</p>
<p>While they&#8217;re at it, a new Supra please. And AE86 &#8211; or just a turbo RWD Corolla :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Van</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/9998/toyota-planning-celica-gt-four-revival/comment-page-1/#comment-52160</link>
		<dc:creator>Van</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2008 11:45:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/9998/toyota-planning-celica-gt-four-revival/#comment-52160</guid>
		<description>Sorry, I meant to say Golf GTI above.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry, I meant to say Golf GTI above.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
