2008 Mitsubishi Triton review | Car Advice

Car Advice

2008 Mitsubishi Triton review

By Karl Peskett |

2008 Mitsubishi Triton review

t-3-quarter-front.jpg

Model tested: Triton GLX-R diesel automatic

Recommended Retail Price: $46,990

Options fitted: None

plus.jpg Strong engine, smooth auto for a four-speed, roomy, economy

minus.jpg Horrible ride, steering hopelessly undergeared

CarAdvice rating: rating11.gifrating11.gifrating11.gifrating_half.GIF(3.5)

- by Karl Peskett

The amount of handyman businesses around these days is amazing. You just have to look through your local rag to see the “Hire a hubby” services on offer. These guys have a simple approach. Whatever you want done around the house, they’ll do it.

Surely they can’t do every job imaginable, right? Well, there’s a saying. The people who run these businesses are often called “Jack of all trades, Master of none.”

Mitsubishi as an Australian company could be likened to one of these services. When Robert McEniry stepped up to the plate, he quickly realised that MMAL could not be “just the 380 car company.” As a result, he instituted a plan whereby Mitsubishi would get a slice of every market segment to increase its overall market share and therefore its profitability. Jack of all trades, sound familiar?…

But a gaping hole in the lineup was an automatic behind the 3.2-litre common rail diesel in the Triton utility. Surely that’s not a good move, after our experience with that motor previously. Thankfully it has worked. The engine is nothing like its application in the Pajero. Alborz wasn’t impressed with the noise, and after sampling the Paj myself, I must say I can’t blame him. However the Triton uses the same 3.2-litre four cylinder compression ignition motor, but has refinement missing from its larger sibling.

Next page…

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5

t-front-end-only.jpg

From 2000-4000rpm the torque comes on nice and strong, and although the diesel clatter can be heard, it’s never intrusive or bothersome. Couple that with a smooth automatic and you’ve got an ideal drivetrain. Thing is that the auto puts many others to shame.

It’s only a four speed, yet the Triton never seems to be without a ratio for the occasion. It slips from gear to gear with a smoothness that would embarrass many transmissions with more gears. And of course off-road with low range selected the gaps are further reduced.

t-ballajura-3-quarter.jpg

Don’t get me wrong, acceleration isn’t exactly mind-bending, but then it will overtake at highway speeds without making you feel like you’d need a four kilometre run-up. The torque and power overlap when they should, so you’re never left with a big hole, except for the initial lag on take-off like all turbo diesels.

The fact that you get useable power, yet fuel consumption consistently runs at around 9-litres/100km, is pretty good for a work/weekend vehicle. So getting up and going is easy. Braking is another matter.

Unfortunately the brakes are a little weak, so you have to keep your wits about you when approaching intersections. Also the ABS likes to kick in early, which works fine in the wet, but can be a little off-putting in the dry. One thing that the Triton sorely needs is ESP. The torque of the diesel quickly whips the tail out in bend in the wet. And if you go from a wet patch to dry, you’ll be fighting the wheel to keep in straight. And not just because it oversteers.

Next page…

t-skeit-rd-front-view.jpg

 

 

The steering is shockingly undergeared, with 4.3 turns lock to lock. It doesn’t sound like an awful lot, but trust me, it makes for some tiresome driving. Each right angle turn is a marathon, and if you approach a chicane or roundabout, you’ll be sawing at the wheel, and huffing and puffing afterward.

Left, left, left, more left, now quickly, right, right, right and back again, quick, quick… phew glad that’s over. Seriously, it gets a bit like that. Tiring stuff.

t-ballajura-rear.jpg

Now of course, off-road it means you have some leverage so the wheel doesn’t get ripped out of your hands. But slightly more assistance, and less turns would make for a much better drive. Still, the ground clearance is fine, and it does handle the rough stuff well. But that leaf sprung rear end can be a little bouncy on the blacktop.

The front conventional suspension is naturally firmer than most cars, but the rear end bounces off the bumps, rather than covering them. It can carry a load in the tray too, but it gets a bit wearisome without one. The front end goes over a speed bump, and you almost wince as the back launches and wobbles. Unfortunately the ride is definitely bettered by the Triton’s competitors, most notably the Hilux and Navara.

Next page…

t-centre-stack.jpg

Overall the handling is therefore predictable, but not exactly comforting. It rolls a fair bit, and the natural tendency is to understeer, but in practise it’s easy to drive with a little bit of self control. This is no sports car, so it shouldn’t be driven as such.

What it does do extremely well is look after its passengers. The room in the Triton is excellent. The comfort likewise. The front seats are a little boring to look at, and when you first hop in they seem flat and even angled slightly forward. But spend a little bit of time in them and you quickly find that they are extremely comfortable, and have good support.

The rear also has a deceptive amount of room. The foot room and leg room is excellent, as is the headroom. The seats too are a nice place to spend time. So as a dual-cab, it really does that role well. For extra fresh air, the tailgate window is electric, and when wound down, there’s no wind buffetting.

t-blue-glow.jpg

As for the rest of the interior, apart from the dashboards cheap ribbed plastic, its a pretty good blend of funky style, and practicality. Visibility is all good except for rear three quarter vision, where the sweeping curve of the C-pillar blocks a fair bit of the road. At night, the instruments are lit by a blue glow cast from above them. It makes a nice change from the all too common backlit gauges. The HVAC controls are basic, but work well, and the nice LCD screen in the middle, is readable and tasteful.

Next page…

t-ballajura-sunrise.jpg

The GLX-R specification (which we tested) features a rear sports bar, nudge bar, side steps, privacy glass, 16 inch alloy wheels, carpet floor covering and mats with GLX-R logo, Titanium-look and chrome interior accents and Bluetooth hands free phone operation. The Bluetooth is particularly good, and also beats the Pajero for clarity and ease of use.

So inside it’s all good. Outside it’s, well, different. Let’s just say that the exterior styling grows on you. It certainly won’t be mistaken for anything else on the road, that’s for sure. The red of the test car was beautiful in direct sun, where it blazed, showing each metallic fleck. The whole car actually is solidly built, with a decent quality finish. But I have to be honest and say that the styling is polarising.

But as an overall package it’s a curious one. The week started with an apprehensiveness, which gradually turned around until I realised that this was an easy car to live with from day to day. The diesel auto is the pick of the Triton range. It’s more economical than the V6, but it will do everything that the petrol model can, with much less fuss too.

If you want to carry the family around you can. If you want to go off-road you can. If you want to transport some gear, then you can do that too. Like a good cricketer, it’s a decent all rounder – a true jack-of-all-trades kind of car.

2008 Mitsubishi Triton diesel specifications

Engine: 3.2-litre four cylinder
Power: 118kW
Torque:347Nm
Top speed: N/A
Safety: Dual front air bags, – ABS, EBD
0-100km/h: Approx 10 secs
NCAP rating: N/A
Turning circle: 11.8m
Fuel tank: 75 litres
Fuel consumption : 9.1-litres/100km
Fuel type: Diesel


 
  • golfschwein

    Oh well, if I really had to get something like this, I guess it would be one of these. Looks-wise, it’s this or the comically under-tyred/over-bodied Hi Lux, and I’d go for this. Or one of those butch Navara things.

    Anyone wondering why the Commodore Ute drives like a car and carries only 700 kilos needs to read the above test. As always, yer pays yer money and yer takes yer choice.

  • Duck

    Overall what would you have the most guys,a (Put them in order if you could)………

    Toyota Hilux
    Mitsubishi Triton
    Holden Rodeo
    Nissan Navara

  • golfschwein

    Gee Duck, does goats’ piss taste better from a jar or a bottle?

    I’m not necessarily well-informed here, but I’m GUESSING they all steer and brake crappily, I’m GUESSING they ride choppily and I’m GUESSING that they’re all wanting in the primary and secondary safety department. I’m GUESSING it all and suspect that, with one or two exceptions here and there, I’m on the money.

    So, on the basis that their maximum load capacity and 4wd capability are rarely called upon, I’d go a Commodore SSV ute. In Morpheous!

  • Andrew M

    i know some one who has one of these.
    i liked the look of the previous gen triton (also know someone who had one)

    i think the triton is a bit underrated. the front on the new gen has grown on me a bit but the styleside trays still look butt ugly. also i preferred it when the last triton had the bonnet mounted intercooler. it looked a lot tougher and more serious than this new gen.

    im glad you mentioned the rear window opening cause thats one thing i found pretty groovy. ive also been assured that on a hot days driving it actually does make a huge difference to the airflow.
    also as noted in the review the rear space is quite impressive.

  • Andrew M

    Duck,
    dont forget to add the BT50 to your list cause it is afterall the 4X4 ute of the year. oh yeah and then the Ranger ranked well too

    i love the looks of the navara and on looks alone this is my list.

    Navara
    BT50
    Hilux
    Triton (since i dont have to look at the rear anyway)
    Rodeo (just something i dont like about the rodeo lookswise)

    on the vehicles offering overall (including Value)

    BT50/Ranger (sister car but the BT50 is better value)
    Navara
    Hilux
    Triton
    Rodeo
    the only thing that would really change is the navara winning the looks

  • golfschwein

    For the record, Duck, I’d probably go Triton, Navara, Hi-lux then Rodeo out of your proposals. Don’t forget Mazda’s B and Ford’s ranger. They look good in a chunky, no-nonsense yet unagressive way.

  • Duck

    Yeah! I forget about the Ranger/BT-50!
    Can anybody tell me why did ford change the couirer ute the name to the ranger or is it completely a whole diiferent ute!And with Mazda why didnt the just live it as the bravo?

  • Andrew M

    yes golf out of his proposal that would be pretty close to mine.
    and yes dont forget the BT50 and Ranger.

    i used to admire the Triton, Bravo, and Courier for no-nonsence looks(as golf puts it)

    the only one really left to retain the chunky look and not go funky on us is the ranger, although thankfully the BT50 didnt go quite as far as the others. all of them look pretty boring in “Pov pack” colours.

    the hilux looks have grown on me a bit though. in metallic dark grey SR5 guise and kitted up with the bullbar to hide the front a bit it looks a lot better

  • Andrew M

    i think both were trying to hit out with a more marketable name.
    the same reason hyundai for eg is heading with i30 etc.

    the big winner is the BT50. i think they are on a real winner. if only people didnt have the huge “Hilux or nothing” bred into them then the BT50 would be chart topping sales. i cant see any other reason why it shouldnt be.
    i even know guys who have bought the hilux “just because” and then look over at the BT50 and feel they were a bit ripped

  • No Name

    It looks like a truck, handles like a truck, oh my word its a truck. But I wouldn’t mind one at the weekend to drop the boat in the water, and that would be a cheap 2nd hand Navarra

  • Lachlan

    Yeh my dads got the o6 model it drives quite well except for speed humps when the back jumps around but weight over the back makes a huge improvement. and i agree on the steering its a bit bared. but overall the performance imo is pretty good for a 2 tone vehicle, and its a awsome performer off road. and i think that for a work horse the warranty deserves a mention considering the vehicle intended use.

  • Stumpy

    The BT50/Ranger then Navara then a toss up between the Triton and the Hilux, well the Triton did pass the moose test and the Hilux didn’t.

  • http://barina SteveV

    These things look awesome with a set of 24inch rims. A few getting around Brizzi. Would not like to ride in them however or try your luck 4wding in them with the low profile tyres.
    As eluded to in the review, dual cabs are the most versatile vehicle on the market. I have a D21 dual cab Nissan 4wd as a 2nd car and can’t bring myself to part with it. You don’t need a trailer, you can go beach fishing or camping anytime you like, and still drive the kids to school. All of the abovementioned models would keep me happy.

  • Bret

    The name mane change to Ranger brings it inline with the USA, and I think actually a good marketing move, as it may be a more marketable nameplate.
    And yes BT50 and Ranger 1 and 2 in Aust 4×4 Monthly ute of the year.
    3rd ot 6th: Hilux, Triton, Rodeo, Navara.

  • http://impreza dlr1

    Duck…Ford’s decision to rename the courier was more marketing than anything else. The Ranger nameplate has been used in the US for Fords small pickup for a few decades. The couriers name isn’t one that is generally associated with years of quality motoring. Mitsubishi also came to the same conclusion when they dropped the magna name plate.

    The Triton probably is one of the best for value. The similarly specced Hilux SR5 Auto 3.0 is about 5 to 6K more, but it does have a stronger resale than any of the others by a long way, and doesn’t seem to suffer the gearbox problems that the manual Couriers and Tritons do.

    Styling wise its good to see someone come up with something different. The BT-50 and Rangers are so typically bland U.S. slab sided pickups. Its basically an F150/250 mini me.

    As for the ride… well thats the compromise when you have the capacity to carry close to one tonne. Any one who thinks youre better off driving a Commodore ute/crewman has obviously never driven one of those with half a tonne in the back, let alone anything near their official cappacity.

  • Carl

    Just like in the Pajero this motor lets what seems to be a rather good vehicle down. The Navara would be my first choice because of it’s looks and the torquey engine(403Nm)from a much smaller motor than this one. The Hilux is too ugly so the Mazda and ford would have to come 2nd and 3rd.

  • golfschwein

    That’s what I said in the first post, Dlr1. People buy these things to carry a tonne…or do they?

    A jet ski and an esky doesn’t trouble Commodore’s 700-ish payload. A portable cement mixer and half a dozen shovels and associated gear wouldn’t weigh a tonne. Like my 5 seater passenger car has never carried 5 people, these vehicles are seldom used to capacity. That’s why Holden won’t find a shortage of buyers for Commodore utes.

  • Andrew M

    also the small tray on a duel cab ute isnt big enough to fit a tonne’s worth of gear in it to start with.

    you wont see many people even using the 4X4 versions to carry a tonne.
    i doubt many brickies would aspire to shovel sand out of the back of a 4X4 ute either. the trays are pretty damn high on these.
    also forget about these if you want to regularly use the racks once again the height issue tears the practicality out of the 4X4′s
    dont forget there are pro’s and con’s for these 4X4′s as a work ute

  • TP

    Yeah buy a Falcon ute instead Andrew. Yaaaaaaaawn

  • Oz.

    TP. you now agree the Falcon is better now?

  • Andrew M

    OZ
    ha ha ha ha thats how i read it too.
    the funny thing is i never said that so he came up with that all on his own (well done TP ;) )

    TP,
    it is obvious you have never seen a 4X4 duel cab tray for size and height let alone considered how it would be having to work out of one.
    I am saying as a work ute (keeping in mind you may need to “work” out of the back of it) that it is a hell of a lot easier and less straining to work out of a lower 2wd model.

    I know an old concreter (and he can tell a tale or two). he has a Landcruiser ute and an old WB Tonner (253).
    i queried him one time why he doesnt always use his obviously better landcruiser and it was simply because it was too high to lift boxing on top of it.
    yes the landcruiser rode a hell of a lot better than the old tonner but it wasnt a practical work ute due to its height.

  • Tony.S

    You old folk need to get with it Triton makes all others look very tired.I looked,drove&read about all Nonecame close to triton.Some makes have things others don’t,and the others have things thay don’t.But overall i’m more than happy with my Triton 3.2 turbo 4×4 auto.I have owned Toyota,Nissan&Mitsubishi

  • LF

    Spent several months looking at all of the twin cab ute diesel range. We have five of them in our fleet.

    Triton was the clear leader in the class. Good motor, nice to drive, innovative design giving it the best cabin, class leader off road, excellent build quality, leader in safety and a five/ten year warranty.

    Hilux came a close second but its price makes it uncompetitive. The story of higher resale value is rubbish. The slightly higher resale value does not justify the huge upfront hike to be paid just because it has a Toyota badge on it. Toyota’s motto should be pay more and get less.

    Navara is popular amongst tradesman. Price tag is surprising given it is imported from spain – a country normally associated with inexpensive vehicles. Has some nice little gadget like features but they are only fringe benefits – not fundamental features that should drive a purchasing decision. Rates very poorly on safety, rear cabin is worst in the class and quality is behind the Triton and Hilux.

    Larger fleets have pointed to the Triton being the most reliable in the class with the Hilux being, surprisingly for a Toyota, a tad unreliable.

    Holden Rodeo comes a long 4th with an old design that is behind the Triton, Hilux & Navara in every aspect.

    I did not spend much time looking at the BT50 – the poor quality of the panels was enough to stop me going any further. My experience may have been an isolated incident involving early production models.

    A lot of tradesman dont like the new age style of the Triton. It is too innovative for their eyes and they prefer the boxy american style of the Navara. Its simply a choice of style over substance.

    Hilux always sells well. Toyota have the large corporate heavy vehicle fleet market all sewn up. Toyota offer unrivalled fringe benefits to any corporate fleet manager that sticks with Toyota.

    One area the Triton does suffer in the style area is the combo of a twin cab with a alloy tray top. Mitsubishi need to come up with a solution to better integrate its sloped design with a box alloy trap top.

    But most importantly it does not really matter which vehicle you buy. They are all good vehicles and everyone’s circumstances are different.

    The next round of new models will be very interesting as the others attempt to bridge the gap and possibly surpass the Triton’s superior design.

  • http://evo Frugal One

    A new hat is thrown in the ring,

    $24,990 for a “Tradie” a manual only turbo diesel dual cab made by Ssangyong

    Cheers

    F-0

  • Daniel

    I am partial to the Navara but… The new Tritons are growing on me. Being from the country the 10 year new car diamond warranty is a big selling point!

  • pero

    I have a new 2×4 Triton ML single cab ute, all good till 4000kms, now it had developed an oil leak from the rear cam bearing seal. (I thought it was coming from the rear main) has anyone else had any troubles.
    Not good for a new car only 6 weeks old.
    Not Happy.
    The factory fitted tray is very average for an all round tradie, it has a high lip on the sides (not flat like my last one) so you cant sweep or slide your load from the sides. The side and rear gates collect your load (sand gravel etc) when you are unloading then dump it back on the tray when you close them, just another bad design pain in the arse. Also I wanted a 2.4 metre inside length tray but the profile of the gates stuff that up making it hard to carry a 2.4 sheet of plasterboard etc.

  • http://www.caradvice.com.au/9798/2008-mitsubishi-triton-review/ Gary

    I Rolled mine, after having and epeletic convoltion:(

  • http://www.caradvice.com.au/9798/2008-mitsubishi-triton-review/ 650

    I have a Ford F-650, bloody beast, and thirsty, i love big uts, enougth to make other peoples heads turn while driving and crashing after (only kiddn) i tow a mamoth 5th wheeler around thats why i have got it, but i thought ill test drive the Disel Triton, it felt like a Mini to me.
    economy was great, not bad power for its engine size (could of been bigger)but thats about it realy, it was quiet, and smooth, good turning circle, not like my 650, 8 point turn.

    And Gary, i hope your future goes great with your next car, and health.

  • http://www.liftkingaustralia.com.au Retroh

    I recently purchased the GLX-R Triton 3.2 Litre Turbo Diesel and can say that so far I’m very happy with it. The other vehicles in it’s class still look ‘old-school’ in terms of styling – I needed a vehicle that would reflect positively on my business – which it certainly does (looks impressive in black with the flared grey guards and I have matching canopy that also looks excellent on it) – and as far as drive-ability goes I have no complaints – the tester states that it’s tiring to steer, however I haven’t found that – it steers and handles much as I would expect a commercial/cross-over vehicle to steer – it is after all more of a guy’s car – so no major issues there… in fact I find it quite pleasant to drive overall…
    Pity it has no Cruise Control or adjustable seat height – or a more bolstered/sports seat – however the driving position is fine overall…
    One thing I would criticise is the short tub – just not long enough for longer loads – I guess that’s the drawback for dual cabs… so there should be more flexibility there – why not provide a way to fold the rear seats down completely (or remove them easily) and increase the useable length of the tub when required? That would seem like common-sense to me – of course there may be structural/design issues there – but surely that feature would be a BIG plus for owners…
    Apart from that I like the performance overall – and will be installing 2 Hiclones and improved air filter and may get a gas injection/more efficient exhaust system fitted to improve fuel economy…
    I’d happily recommend this vehicle… and hey – check out the Lift King website – you know you all need more garage space!!!
    :)

  • billh

    I bought a new nissan nav in 06,stx td man, i had the vehicle for only 18 months due to the amount of problems i was having with it, without writing a complete list of issues the main points were poor build quality,mechanical issues including complete injector replacement after 6000kms.towing a 1700kg load, the car seemed to struggle, remembering this is only a 2.5lt motor. the car seemed to spend more time have warranty work done that it did in my posession,so, the happiest day i had with the car was when i traded it on a new glx-r triton,i am more than happy with it,build quality is top notch,i have done 22000kms without any issues.

  • Kev.

    I have just gone through the process of looking at all offerings (no I did not test drive the Mahindra – do they make a dual cab chassis?) in the 4 x 4 Dual Cab chassis range. (a visit to the Ford dealers to get prices for the Ranger made me discount the choice as the BT-50 deals were so much better)

    Toyota would have been the choice but I found the drivers seating position and the horrible head banging when getting into the vehicle offputting – on road test did not expose any bad points – everything was what I would expect from the Toyota product – but the price puts it out of reach for my budget.

    Nissan Navara – just too much body – felt like I was driving a 1950′s American tank – overpriced and too much effort to create a false impression.

    Mitsubishi Triton – a big disappointment – the new body shape is UGLY – ridiculous gearing for the steering – I think I counted 12 turns lock to lock??? – same problem with low roof height and head banging to get into drivers seat – the gearshift and transfer lever are a*$e about – obviously a lazy approach by the manufacturer and a “stuff the Assie” by keeping the left hand drive positions for the gear shift and transfer lever – a close look at the underbody shows a poor quality control level from the Thailand factory. Nuts missing from bolts and panels not matching properly do not speak well for trouble free motoring – no wonder they try to push the extended warrantee. Overpriced for what is offered.

    Mazda BT-50 – this was the biggest surprise. Drives extremely well for this style of vehicle – 3.0lt diesel was quiet compared to Triton and Navara but about on par with Hilux – not really intrusive road noise – driving position was good with enough headroom to enter and leave the drivers seat without banging the head on the door sill. Rear seating comments from family were “very good” – finish good – not sign of shoddy workmanship or missing bits on the test vehicle supplied – and the price – that was the real surprise – several thousands of dollars better than any of the others and in the comparison with the Triton $5,000 cheaper for a much better appointed vehicle.

    Not just a matter of the goats piss tasting better from a can or a bottle – for those of us who will be using this sort of vehicle daily in severe off road conditions (and do not want to go to a Land Cruiser) the BT-50 comes out on top when all aspects are considered and examined.

    I bought the BT-50 and will try to give a more in depth review of it in 12 months. I have previously had Land Cruisers, Land Rovers and Suzukis so it will be interesting to see how the Mazda stacks up against their performance over the years

  • Chris

    12 turns lock to lock Kev? You must be an ordinary counter or bad at funny exagerations, try 4 turns. Also, I am 6 foot 2 and never have hit my head getting into my triton.

  • mark

    ***********PROBLEMS TRITON*****************

    father in-law has a 08 triton glx-r model and s many problems and the car has clocked 40,000 km on it

    1. accelerator sensor stuffed up = new sensor + wiring
    2. knock in motor = replaced motor
    3. oil leak X3 gearbox = new gaskets
    4. oil leak gearbox 4th time = new gearbox after making sounds over 80km/h
    5. very little ground clearance 205mm therefor drive shaft some how bent = replaced
    6.turbo shut off motor wont start =still in mitsubishi service

    i will not get a triton iam getting a Isuzu D-MAX LS-M for $38,000 have a look for your self its worth it just type dmax in google

    • Brad

      Our company have purchased two 2.5 09′diesels…they have about 18k-20k on the clock…both now experience slightly fluctuating engine noise & power loss mainly in 2nd & 3rd gear whilst gradually gaining speed.
      Has any one else felt this??…and have any clue what could be causing it?
      Looks like another visit to the service centre as the airbag light remains permanently turned on for the second time also.
      Thanks

  • MRLPD

    Has anybody had problems with bending chassis on new dual cab triton?????

    • Jean

      MRLPD
      Yes we have. we have the 2009 diesel dual cab with a tray fitted & towbar.
      While on holidays with a camper trailer the chassis has bent.
      Would appreciate knowing if this is a fault

      • Paul ROBINSON

        Regarding bent chassis rails, it is not just the Triton. Google “Dual Cabs Bent Chassis Rails”, shift through the threads and sit down and ready yourself for a shock if you believed (like we did after 2 years of research before buying a 2008 BT50 dual cab to go 4WD touring with our camper trailer because the BT50 could supposedly “take a full load on or off road” (Mazda’s website) with up to a 3000kg towing capacity/ 300kg downball and 1150kg payload). Navaras, HiLuxes, Rodeos, BT50 ‘s, Rangers the lot. Decent weight in rear tray (and yes we were under the GVM with everything including the ourselves and the downball weight included) plus towing, plus off road (or rough road) seems to be equaling bent chassis. The car company and insurance will simply say “you were over loaded” even if, like us, you’ve got the weigh bridge certificates to prove otherwise. We had to pay to get it straightened (over two thousand) and now are saving up another $5000 to get the chassis strengthened as we’ve got too many “extras” to simply trade it in. By the way, all our additions were fitted by either ARB or Opposite Lock and are all legal additions that were put on our insurance policy. Now, everyone points the finger to everyone else. If you are doing a remote area trip and you are carrying all the recommended gear (camping, tools, spare parts, fuel, recovery gear, 2nd spare tyre etc.)than you will be overloaded. Be careful.

  • Isabel Storey

    Does maximum gross actually mean that? I have slide-on camper on tray of 2007 2door Triton. Rear springs required additional leaf. Clutch burnt out at 12,107kms and this put down to overloading so not considered under warranty.
    Anyone else had problems carrying a load at maximum?

  • Ben

    have triton and the airbag light remains on?

  • http://www.hotmail.com Ryan

    Hay guys,

    i’ve got myself an 2007 glx-r triton, an i was looking to put a 2 inch suspension lift on it. Would anyone be able to recomend me a good suspenion lift company that are good and reliable?

    Many Thanks
    Ryan

  • http://profile.yahoo.com/5LQQF43YA5GWPFTC56YCT4PQD4 Maria clara Martins de sousa

    Hi, Hello love is triton love…
    Beautiful…