<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Mitsubishi Lancer Prototype S</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.caradvice.com.au/9795/mitsubishi-lancer-prototype-s/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/9795/mitsubishi-lancer-prototype-s/</link>
	<description>Resource for Car Reviews, News, Advice, Road Tests, Green Cars, Hybrids</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 09:30:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: LOVE GTR</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/9795/mitsubishi-lancer-prototype-s/#comment-50845</link>
		<dc:creator>LOVE GTR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2008 07:47:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/9795/mitsubishi-lancer-prototype-s/#comment-50845</guid>
		<description>These are only sketches. I&#039;m sure the real version won&#039;t look as wide or low.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These are only sketches. I&#8217;m sure the real version won&#8217;t look as wide or low.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bubba Ganush</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/9795/mitsubishi-lancer-prototype-s/#comment-50843</link>
		<dc:creator>Bubba Ganush</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2008 07:21:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/9795/mitsubishi-lancer-prototype-s/#comment-50843</guid>
		<description>Looked good....then i saw the rear</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looked good&#8230;.then i saw the rear</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nath</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/9795/mitsubishi-lancer-prototype-s/#comment-50781</link>
		<dc:creator>Nath</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2008 00:12:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/9795/mitsubishi-lancer-prototype-s/#comment-50781</guid>
		<description>It would be great to see a new hatchback, Mitsubishi haven&#039;t have a good hatch since the Mirage. The Colt is just plain horrid. I don&#039;t care how good they say the Colt Ralliart is, it&#039;s still ugly!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It would be great to see a new hatchback, Mitsubishi haven&#8217;t have a good hatch since the Mirage. The Colt is just plain horrid. I don&#8217;t care how good they say the Colt Ralliart is, it&#8217;s still ugly!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: No Name</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/9795/mitsubishi-lancer-prototype-s/#comment-50757</link>
		<dc:creator>No Name</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2008 16:37:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/9795/mitsubishi-lancer-prototype-s/#comment-50757</guid>
		<description>Jamison - first you start saying how fickle previous comentators are for daring to comment on a sketch, then you comment on it a detail yourself AND compare it to a Subaru when its not a direct competitor for the WRX. Uh?

Your obviously a Subaru fan. Nuff said</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jamison &#8211; first you start saying how fickle previous comentators are for daring to comment on a sketch, then you comment on it a detail yourself AND compare it to a Subaru when its not a direct competitor for the WRX. Uh?</p>
<p>Your obviously a Subaru fan. Nuff said</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jamison</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/9795/mitsubishi-lancer-prototype-s/#comment-50755</link>
		<dc:creator>jamison</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2008 15:54:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/9795/mitsubishi-lancer-prototype-s/#comment-50755</guid>
		<description>How fickle are some here....

thats a styling sketch. And it will not look as low or wide as that, Mitsubishi will not produce new body-shell panel dies, which costs up to a million dollar per die.

Engineering wise, thats going to be hampered severely to basically the current EVO X with a hatch style door at the boot.


Now, people who were scolding Subaru for opting for the Hatch for the WRX are applauding this?

The WRX STi looks better... because [1] The front and back side fenders are still wider and apart from the front bumper and head lamps... this is a EVO X... an uglier version. IMO of course.

The sedan EVO X is fine the way it is... what they need to do is release that R-A concept shown at Detroit Motorshow, give it a 4WD platform and call it the new Eclipse... price it the same as a 350Z down under and call it a day.

The EVO X as a sedan and the STi as a Hatch is fine the way it is. And STi Hatch is so much better looking in person people... I got into one and had a better look up close and personal.. and I&#039;ll tell you what its better. The potential for after market enhancement such as bigger wheels and suspensions make it look so much more like a race car too. Check out www.nihoncar.com for more photos.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How fickle are some here&#8230;.</p>
<p>thats a styling sketch. And it will not look as low or wide as that, Mitsubishi will not produce new body-shell panel dies, which costs up to a million dollar per die.</p>
<p>Engineering wise, thats going to be hampered severely to basically the current EVO X with a hatch style door at the boot.</p>
<p>Now, people who were scolding Subaru for opting for the Hatch for the WRX are applauding this?</p>
<p>The WRX STi looks better&#8230; because [1] The front and back side fenders are still wider and apart from the front bumper and head lamps&#8230; this is a EVO X&#8230; an uglier version. IMO of course.</p>
<p>The sedan EVO X is fine the way it is&#8230; what they need to do is release that R-A concept shown at Detroit Motorshow, give it a 4WD platform and call it the new Eclipse&#8230; price it the same as a 350Z down under and call it a day.</p>
<p>The EVO X as a sedan and the STi as a Hatch is fine the way it is. And STi Hatch is so much better looking in person people&#8230; I got into one and had a better look up close and personal.. and I&#8217;ll tell you what its better. The potential for after market enhancement such as bigger wheels and suspensions make it look so much more like a race car too. Check out <a href="http://www.nihoncar.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.nihoncar.com</a> for more photos.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mitchell Oke</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/9795/mitsubishi-lancer-prototype-s/#comment-50488</link>
		<dc:creator>Mitchell Oke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jan 2008 07:24:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/9795/mitsubishi-lancer-prototype-s/#comment-50488</guid>
		<description>That looks awesome!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That looks awesome!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: harry</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/9795/mitsubishi-lancer-prototype-s/#comment-50424</link>
		<dc:creator>harry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jan 2008 02:55:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/9795/mitsubishi-lancer-prototype-s/#comment-50424</guid>
		<description>An admirable concept. Very sharp.  Low, wide, midly aggressive, would become a classic for sure.  Too bad subie designers weren&#039;t as clever. Well done mitso.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An admirable concept. Very sharp.  Low, wide, midly aggressive, would become a classic for sure.  Too bad subie designers weren&#8217;t as clever. Well done mitso.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Flying High</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/9795/mitsubishi-lancer-prototype-s/#comment-50348</link>
		<dc:creator>Flying High</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jan 2008 20:18:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/9795/mitsubishi-lancer-prototype-s/#comment-50348</guid>
		<description>No question - this time around, Mitsu have the goods on Subaru in the looks department</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No question &#8211; this time around, Mitsu have the goods on Subaru in the looks department</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Damon</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/9795/mitsubishi-lancer-prototype-s/#comment-50338</link>
		<dc:creator>Damon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jan 2008 13:19:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/9795/mitsubishi-lancer-prototype-s/#comment-50338</guid>
		<description>Damn a luxury evo wagon.  It could be a competitor for the Audi RS4 wagon.  Good idea imo!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Damn a luxury evo wagon.  It could be a competitor for the Audi RS4 wagon.  Good idea imo!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steven A</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/9795/mitsubishi-lancer-prototype-s/#comment-50334</link>
		<dc:creator>Steven A</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jan 2008 12:36:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/9795/mitsubishi-lancer-prototype-s/#comment-50334</guid>
		<description>I would like to see a wagon version too, now that would be special.....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would like to see a wagon version too, now that would be special&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 2/4 queries in 0.005 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 299/300 objects using memcached

Served from: www.caradvice.com.au @ 2012-02-11 20:56:17 -->
