Diesel Comparison: Ford Focus vs Hyundai i30 vs Mazda3 vs Peugeot 308 | CarAdvice

Car Advice

Diesel Comparison: Ford Focus vs Hyundai i30 vs Mazda3 vs Peugeot 308

PEUGEOT 308
By Tim Beissmann |
Ford Focus TDCi vs Hyundai i30 SLX CRDi vs Mazda3 MZR-CD vs Peugeot 308 1.6 XS HDi

Model overview

 

  • Ford Focus TDCi hatch six-speed sequential – $29,790
  • Hyundai i30 SLX CRDi hatch four-speed automatic – $28,390
  • Mazda3 MZR-CD hatch six-speed manual – $29,230
  • Peugeot 308 1.6 XS HDi EGC hatch six-speed sequential – $29,990

 

As Australian motorists have searched for more fuel-efficient vehicles over the past couple of years, two markets have increased considerably in popularity: small cars, and diesels. Unsurprisingly, combining the two gives you some of the most practical, affordable and environmentally friendly motoring available. Small cars made up 40 percent of the passenger car market in 2010 (excluding SUVs), up more than two percent compared with 2008. Similarly, diesels now account for one in every 13 passenger cars sold, up from around one in every 17 sold in 2008.

This comparison puts the four small diesel hatches available under $30,000 in Australia up against each other. (Keen observers of the market will note the Volkswagen Golf 77TDI is not included. This is because Volkswagen Australia no longer offers the five-speed manual variant as of the 2011 Model Year, meaning the most inexpensive diesel-powered Golf now comes with the seven-speed DSG transmission and a $31,190 pricetag, blowing this comparison’s $30k cap.) Each variant under the spotlight here is the model closest to the price limit, meaning there is just a $1600 difference between the cheapest car (Hyundai i30 SLX CRDi) and the most expensive (Peugeot 308 1.6 XS HDi).

Sales-wise, the Mazda3 is the popular choice, with 39,003 sold in total in 2010 (all models, not just diesel). The i30 is the bolter in the group – with 29,772 units in 2010, its sales and market share have almost tripled since 2008. The 308 sells in much lower numbers than the others, and suffered a further hit last year. Sales dropped more than 500 units to 2827 for the past 12 months. The story is even bleaker for the Focus, which has fallen from the heights of more than 15,000 sales in 2008 to less than 10,000 in 2010.

But sales figures only tell you what other people are buying. To find out which small sub-$30,000 diesel hatch is the one for you, the following comparison will help.

 

Engine and performance

Ford Focus TDCi Hyundai i30 SLX CRDi Mazda3 MZR-CD Peugeot 308 1.6 XS HDi
Engine 2.0-litre four-cylinder turbo diesel 1.6-litre four-cylinder turbo diesel 2.2-litre four-cylinder turbo diesel 1.6-litre four-cylinder turbo diesel
Maximum power 100kW@4000rpm 85kW@4000rpm 110kW@3500rpm 82kW@3600rpm
Maximum torque 320Nm@2000rpm 255Nm@1900rpm 360Nm@1800rpm 270Nm@1750rpm
Transmission Six-speed sequential Four-speed automatic Six-speed manual Six-speed sequential
Acceleration 0-100km/h 9.4 seconds (unofficial) Circa 11 seconds (unofficial) 9.2 seconds (unofficial) 11.4 seconds

If you’re looking for a diesel that doesn’t make sacrifices in performance, the Mazda3 is your best option. It is equipped with the largest engine of the lot, and even has more power than the 2.0-litre petrol unit also offered in the Mazda3 range. At 110kW of power and 360Nm of torque, it is 10kW/40Nm clear of its closest rival, the Focus, and a noticeable 28kW/90Nm beyond the 308. Those looking for a sporting drive will be content with the six-speed manual transmission, although those hoping for a self-shifter continue to be disappointed, with no automatic option available for the Mazda3 MZR-CD. Opting for a manual in the Focus TDCi (six-speed) and the Hyundai SLX CRDi (five-speed) shaves $2000 off the price, while for the manual Peugeot 1.6 XS HDi (six-speed) the saving is $1000.

 

Fuel consumption and emissions

 

Ford Focus TDCi Hyundai i30 SLX CRDi Mazda3 MZR-CD Peugeot 308 1.6 XS HDi
Fuel tank capacity 55 litres 53 litres 55 litres 60 litres
Theoretical range (based on combined cycle fuel consumption) 898km 883km 965km 1333km
Combined cycle fuel consumption 5.9 litres/100km 6.0 litres/100km 5.7 litres/100km 4.5 litres/100km
Urban fuel consumption 7.9 litres/100km 7.9 litres/100km 7.0 litres/100km 5.4 litres/100km
Extra urban fuel consumption 4.8 litres/100km 4.9 litres/100km 5.0 litres/100km 4.0 litres/100km
Carbon dioxide emissions 157g/km 159g/km 150g/km 119g/km

In terms of fuel economy and emissions, it’s impossible to go past the Peugeot. Its combined cycle fuel consumption is 21 precent better than the next best competitor, the Mazda. To put that in perspective: if you drive 15,000km per year at the combined economy levels, the 308 will use 180 litres less fuel than the Mazda3 (675L vs 855L). If we say diesel costs an average of 135 cents/litre, the savings for the Peugeot owner will equal $243 per year. At that rate – given the Peugeot’s $760 price premium – it will take just over three years to make the extra spend worthwhile. (This is a somewhat moot point if the car is financed.) And with its segment-leading 60-litre fuel tank, you could theoretically visit the service station just 13 times per year in the Peugeot and still cover an average 15,000-ish kilometres.

Very little separates the other three, with CO2 emissions all in the 150s and fuel economy between 5.7 and 6.0 litres/100km. However, if your top priority is saving fuel and you don’t mind the idea of manually shifting gears, you should have a serious look at the five-speed version of the i30 SLX CRDi. It is priced at a much sharper $26,390 and has 21 percent improved environmental figures, almost on par with the Peugeot: combined cycle fuel consumption 4.7 litres/100km, CO2 emissions 125g/km. The six-speed manual Focus TDCi is only marginally more frugal than the sequential shifter, with fuel consumption of 5.6 litres/100km and CO2 emissions of 147g/km.

Exterior and dimensions

Ford Focus TDCi Hyundai i30 SLX CRDi Mazda3 MZR-CD Peugeot 308 1.6 XS HDi
Length 4337mm 4245mm 4460mm 4276mm
Width 1839mm 1775mm 1755mm 1821mm
Height 1497mm 1480mm 1470mm 1519mm
Weight 1458kg 1413kg 1457kg 1362kg
Luggage capacity 385 litres 340 litres 340 litres 430 litres

The standout again in terms of dimensions is the 308. Not only is it 50kg lighter than the i30 and almost 100kg lighter than the Focus and Mazda3, is luggage capacity is in a completely different class. Behind the rear seats, it offers 45 litres more space than the Ford and a whopping 90 litres more than both the Hyundai and the Mazda. The only slight trade-off is that the Peugeot is also the tallest of the bunch, being the only one measuring over 1.5m, although aesthetically it does not look out of place. For those looking for a little extra shoulder room, the Focus is the widest of the group, spreading 8.4cm further across than the Mazda3.

All four hatches have front fog lights and body-coloured door handles and side mirrors. The Peugeot is the only one to miss out on 16-inch alloy wheels, and is forced to make do with smaller 15-inch steels instead. It does include a full-size spare wheel, however, a feature matched only by the Hyundai (an important consideration for long-distance drivers and regional owners.) The Ford and the Mazda both have temporary space savers.

The Mazda3 diesel distinguishes itself from the cheaper models in the range and the other vehicles compared here with the addition of sporty side skirts and LED taillights.

 

Interior and equipment

Each vehicle has its own individual comfort and convenience features, but in terms of the best overall package, the Mazda takes the honours, closely followed by the Hyundai.

All four vehicles come standard with cruise control, CD player, 12-volt power supply, tilt and reach adjustable steering wheel and a 60/40 split-fold rear seat.

The Peugeot gets one-touch electric windows, cruise control with speed limiter, air-conditioned glove box, aluminium-finished door handles, charcoal odour filter, pollen filter, and a removable security cover in the boot. Its audio/communications system is the poorest of the lot, coming with only a radio and CD player, and the remote audio controls are mounted on the steering column rather than the steering wheel.

On top of the 308, the other three all feature an AUX audio jack, Bluetooth hands-free and a leather-wrapped steering wheel with mounted audio controls.

The Ford gets one-touch up and down electric windows with anti-trap feature, a USB audio port and eight speakers. It is the only one to offer iPod integration via USB. The Hyundai requires an $11 cable to make this happen, while the Mazda only offers Bluetooth integration.

The Hyundai and the Mazda make do with six speakers, but both add Bluetooth audio streaming, air-conditioned glove box, pollen filter and a leather-wrapped gear knob. The Hyundai gets a USB audio port, one-touch triple turn signal, leather seat inserts, chrome door handles, alloy sports pedals and automatic climate control. In place of those extra features, the Mazda includes satellite navigation, six-disc in-dash CD player and dual-zone automatic climate control, which alone almost justify the $840 price premium over the i30.

 

Safety

 

Long gone are the days of worrying about the safety of small cars. All four vehicles have earned the coveted five-star safety rating under either ANCAP (Australian) or Euro NCAP safety tests.

All four are fitted standard with six airbags (front, side and curtain), as well as electronic stability program, ABS with Electronic Brakeforce Distribution, brake assist, traction control and seatbelt pretensioners for the front seats.

Warranty and servicing

Ford Focus TDCi Hyundai i30 SLX CRDi Mazda3 MZR-CD Peugeot 308 1.6 XS HDi
Vehicle warranty Three-year/100,000km Five-year/Unlimited km Three-year/Unlimited km Three-year/100,000km
Service intervals 12 months/15,000km 12 months/15,000km Six months/10,000km 12 months/20,000km
Estimated resale value (after three years) 57 percent 62 percent 65 percent 59 percent

Conclusion

The 2011 Ford Focus TDCi is the car for you if:

  • You want a convincing all-rounder with European build quality
  • You want a little more interior space than a Mazda3
  • You don’t mind missing out on best-in-class fuel economy
  • You need a maximum power output with three figures rather than two
  • You can never have too many speakers (best audio of the four)
  • You don’t mind swimming against the tide when many other Australians are deserting the Focus

The 2011 Hyundai i30 SLX CRDi is the car for you if:

  • You want the most affordable small diesel hatch you can get your hands on
  • You prefer the security of a five-year/unlimited km warranty
  • You need plenty of audio and interior features, plus the security of a full-size spare alloy wheel
  • You can live with the marginally higher fuel consumption and emissions (at least when equipped with the automatic transmission)
  • You’re not put off by the four-speed automatic transmission or the comparatively small torque figure

The 2011 Mazda3 MZR-CD is the car for you if:

  • You want a cheap small diesel hatch and petrol-rivaling performance
  • You can’t live without satellite navigation or other interior and audio gadgets
  • You want a sportier looking car than the rest
  • You don’t mind the compact packaging and the smaller boot
  • You’re not allergic to changing gears manually

The 2011 Peugeot 308 1.6 XS HDi is the car for you if:

  • You want the most economical and lowest emitting small sub-$30,000 diesel hatch in Australia
  • You are prepared to sacrifice some engine performance
  • You have a lot of luggage to cart around
  • You can live without alloy wheels and 21st century interior and audio technology
  • You have a few extra dollars to spend initially
  • You want to stand out from the crowd

Note: Overseas model Peugeot 308 HDi pictured. 2008 model Hyundai i30 pictured.


 
  • anthony

    Where was the Golf ???

    • http://CarAdvice The Salesman

      As quoted top of page…

      “This comparison puts the four small diesel hatches available under $30,000 in Australia up against each other. (Keen observers of the market will note the Volkswagen Golf 77TDI is not included. This is because Volkswagen Australia no longer offers the five-speed manual variant as of the 2011 Model Year, meaning the most inexpensive diesel-powered Golf now comes with the seven-speed DSG transmission and a $31,190 pricetag, blowing this comparison’s $30k cap”

      Beissmann, T. Car Advice, 10.01.2011. Diesel Comparison.

      • Brodie

        I was suprised to not see the Holden Cruze diesel in this comparison, I would have thought that the Cruze would be the logical choice/competitor to these cars – even more so than the pug.

        • http://CarAdvice Mrs. Kool Cruiser

          FAIL!!!!! ABOVE COMMENT

  • Damian

    It’s funny how the mainstream motoring publications have not done a comparison like this. Thumbs up, CarAdvice.

  • Golfschwein

    The new comparison summaries are good, but you guys are the motoring journos who test and drive the cars, so it would be good to see you nominate a winner also.

    • Bob

      I agree. It ends up being a bit limp-wristed, If we don’t get the testers views. But then again this will keep the car companies happy, if it’s not to critical…….

      • http://www.caradvice.com.au/ Alborz Fallah

        The issue is, there is no such thing as a bad car anymore, so each car works for a certain buyer. We can pick a winner all we like, but even in the office we all have our own favourites for certain reasons. So it’s only fair to list the pros and cons of each car and let the buyer decide.

        • Baddass

          Saying there is no such thing as a bad car anymore so there is no chosen winner is a bit soft. Obviously some cars are better suited to some things than others, but logically, a winner should be chosen from the car that can do the most things the best. This can be done objectively: it doesn’t have to include ‘office favourites’.
          Other motoing publications have been doing it car comparos could be made.

          By the way, who would’ve thought the 308 would have been 50kg lighter than the i30? It looks like a much bigger car.

          • http://www.caradvice.com.au/ Alborz Fallah

            If it makes you feel better Badass,
            My choice is the Peugeot 308 as its the best handling in its class and arguably the best looker.

          • HSRboy

            not to mention the most fuel efficient!

        • Lang Chye

          Agree. Buyers have different needs, as much as cars have different target markets. So, it’s more useful for reviews to specify which horse for which course.

    • Andrew M

      Were the cars even test driven??

      Looks to me like the log books have been pulled out and the stats compared.

      No comments on suspension, drive trains, ergonomics etc etc

      You cant have a winner if they arent even tested

  • delux

    wheres the cruze and where is the winner?

    • Linksy

      again small diesel hatches…

      • delux

        Bogus! You know as well as I do that a person looking for a small diesel wouldnt dismiss the Cruze because it is a sedan.

    • ST

      Why do we need a winner?? The winner is the one that fits your requirements in the categories above.

      I’m so sick of this my car is better than your’s mentality and get into non-biased rating so that the reader can decide which car suits you best.

      • http://CarAdvice The Salesman

        Here, here. Every customer has different buying motives. How could one size fit all?

      • Hooda

        Better abolish car awards then eh? No more “Car of the year”.

        • ST

          Do you really think they mean much at all??

        • http://CarAdvice The Salesman

          COTY awards are based on categories such as, fit and finish, standard specs v price, ride and handling, ect. I’m pretty sure its not based on one persons opinion. A majority vote from a panel of ‘experts’ is required.

  • filippo

    It’s a pity VW have ditched the manual Golf TDi. In my experience, the automatic/DSG hesitates and seems to exaggerate the diesel’s turbo-lag.

  • john

    Very good read but why is everyone “deserting the ford focas?” Are they just waiting on the new model to come out?

    • Yonny

      My guess is that people know the Focus has build quality issues – and Ford, while it has gone some way to improving build quality of the South African built cars, hasn’t gone far enough and are happy to sell average to sub-standard cars to a public that is rapidly becoming used to cars with good to excellent build quality.

      Sure, the Focus is a good drive – but when it comes to paying their own money for a car people are voting with their wallets and giving the Focus a miss. Compare a Focus to a Mazda 3 side by side, and you’ll see why.

      This may change with the new model, to be built in Thailand – but I’d be waiting a good few years (before I bought one) to see if it does change for the better.

  • laurie

    And the BMW 5 Series 520D comes in at 5L/100Km! before I get blasted I know it costs much more, but its the consumption that the big car can do where these cars can just match it why is that?

    • RickyC

      The reason the BMW can do 5.2L is because it has an 8-speed automatic. It’s far more fuel efficient than any of the transmissions of these cars. The previous BMW 520d (with the 6-speed auto) did 6.1L, which is worse than all the cars here.

      • MF

        CVT would be the most efficient.

        • Billionaire Bot

          A CVT wouldn’t get far before exploding in a car the size of a 5 series.

        • Devil’s Advocate

          I am sure with BMW’s “Efficient Dynamics” push they would be using a CVT transmission if it was more efficient at the moment than the best of the conventional torque converter automatics. Plus there is also the issue where most of the CVTs available can only handle a limited amount of torque ie less than what most of the new breed of 2L+ diesels produce.

  • Staggers

    Its true, there is no such thing as a bad car anymore. But there are clearly cars out there that are better then the rest, like the Mazda 3 in this test.

  • MattW

    At least you could have said something along the lines of “my suggestion would be the [insert name here] for [insert reasons here]“. This article indeed sounds like you have some brochures in front of you and no driving of the cars in question has been done.

  • Carmaniac

    Very disappointed with caradvice, my favourite aussie auto site. Where is the drive review of these cars??? Real world handling, fuel economy, etc?? Whats wrong with the team?

    • http://www.caradvice.com.au Tim Beissmann

      Carmaniac and others,

      Perhaps I needed to more clearly state the purpose of the article. This is not a review. It is what we call an on-paper comparison. The idea is to sort through the specifications brochures and cut through all the PR (and trust me, there’s plenty of it) so prospective buyers don’t have to. Then, based on all of the data before you, you can make an informed decision on which vehicles you would like to test drive.

      Of course a drive review is an important part of the process, but that is what the reviews section of our site is for. Comparisons like this give you somewhere to start, and from there you can make your own decisions based on your needs and personal preferences.

      Tim Beissmann

  • Al Juraj

    You forgot to say that the Focus is the car for you if:

    * You want an automatic that isn’t a four-speed.

    I think this car is better than the Hyundai in every way except price. It’s a shame it’s only racked up so many buyers. If only it were not being replaced soon, it would have been on my list. The 9.4-second 0-100 is just about the same as a Lancer 2.0 petrol CVT, but the Ford obviously uses a lot less fuel. Perhaps the upcoming model is worth considering for my next ride (unless I can’t resist the ST bogan-six slayer).

    It’s a wake-up call to Japanese makers who haven’t brought in their oilers, and for those who have, offer a freaking auto or dual clutch option.

  • Save It for the track

    How good is that Peugeot gearbox when it uses a litre less per 100 than it’s manual equivalent? Also, I know a few years ago Ford made some TDCi sedans. Now with 510L of boot space and sub 6.0L per 100 economy those should have sold well. Ford marketing not in action again.
    .
    I’m still interested to know where the prices CarAdvice get come from. Because as an example the Mazda website has the diesel hatch and sedan both starting at $32,856. With the sedan having 430L of boot space, I’d go the Mazda 3 diesel sedan over the others.
    .
    I can’t find these quoted prices anywhere. With most being over $30,000 and I can only find the Hyundai quoted close.

    • Thomas

      I think you will find that CA use the RRP before on-roads.

  • Shak

    CA, i know this was a hatch test, but if given the opportunity would you guys have pitched in the Cruze Sedan as well to see how well it could have fared?

    • http://CarAdvice The Salesman

      Why not test it against a truck as well???? Just to see how well it will have fared…..

  • TonyB

    I’m sorry, but I really do agree with some of the comments here that this “comparison” is rather pointless without some sort of on-the-road drive component. And a fundamental decision that most people are going to make right at the beginning of any such excercise is whether or not they want an auto or manual transmission. As such including the manual-only Mazda is meaningless. Particularly when the writer goes on to say the reason the Golf is not included is that it no longer has a manual option and that the auto (CVT) version is over the nominal $30,000 limit. Well I mean, IF the Mazda did have an auto option wouldn’t it also be over $30,000?

  • Fiz

    This is acually a rather welcome overview of cars in this segment and I for one don’t need someone else to decide for me which is the best as I have my own needs and desires. Thanks.

    Peugeot 308 EGC is actually a 6-speed manual/auto/tiptronic/paddle-shifter so it is an Automatic or Manual to drive as you desire.

    To correct and error in Service Schedule the 308 is 12 months / 20,000km which makes it once a year for most people.

    The Stereo and Cruise/Speed Limiter controls on the steering column makes them safer to use than on the driving surface (wheel) itself and unless you are a stick in the mud you learn them in about 5 mins flat.

    :-)

  • Ovr40

    I reckon CA would be doing the consumer a favour if you threw in a slightly overpriced option in these comparisons that does the job well. Something that makes Joe Punter say hey – what if I did shell out an extra 5 or 10K, then I could have something really good. Comparing cheap stuff with more cheap stuff is never going to reveal the risk in buying cheap stuff.

    • nickdl

      First of all none of the cars are cheap. All of them are well equipped, safe and good quality choices for the money. Secondly that would be very irresponsible advising people to go well over budget and spend money they don’t have – exactly what got America into the GFC.

  • Octavian

    If one can live with a late 20th century interior maybe? Peugeot’s interiors don’t match their far more flamboyant exteriors, and that’s a shame.

  • Peter

    The service intervals for Peugeot’s in Australia is 12 months or 20,000km and timing belt replacement at 10 years or 190,000km.
    Bleutooth is a factory option for under $500.00

  • delux

    CA, do you know if the 2.2 MZR engine has the same issues as the 2.0 MZR from the previous 3? From memory it was something to do with the way the engine dealt with burning off the particulates caught in the filter.

    • http://juicedpixels.com Juiced

      That was just an engine software upgrade that was needed. All modern diesels with particulate filters need to burn off at some stage when there is enough built up.
      I have a 2.0 MZR-CD 2008 Mazda 3 hatch and it hasn’t skipped a beat.

  • Save It for the track

    An interesting addition would be a Skoda Octavia 77TDI, frugal, with dsg, and according to the figures on CA under the $30k mark. It’s also larger than the hatches in this comparo. So, larger car, with more cargo space (560L), just as frugal as some in the comparo, and DSG, for the same or less cash? As long as you didn’t want it to be quick, it’s probably a good choice. The motor certainly wouldn’t overpower the chassis.

    • Lee

      Just checked the pricing on Skoda website:-

      Octavia Wagon 77TDI (5sp manual)
      $34,842.00* estimated driveaway price in NSW.

      Minus on-road costs, about 3grand. I don’t see how it can fall under 30,000 bucks.