<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Maserati GT Convertible rumoured</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.caradvice.com.au/9639/maserati-gt-convertible-rumoured/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/9639/maserati-gt-convertible-rumoured/</link>
	<description>Resource for Car Reviews, News, Advice, Road Tests, Green Cars, Hybrids</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 12:08:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: fordman6</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/9639/maserati-gt-convertible-rumoured/#comment-48957</link>
		<dc:creator>fordman6</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jan 2008 01:42:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/9639/maserati-gt-convertible-rumoured/#comment-48957</guid>
		<description>I think the GT is the hottest Massa in a while... hardtop or not!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the GT is the hottest Massa in a while&#8230; hardtop or not!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elitist</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/9639/maserati-gt-convertible-rumoured/#comment-48836</link>
		<dc:creator>Elitist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2008 19:34:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/9639/maserati-gt-convertible-rumoured/#comment-48836</guid>
		<description>Anthony is right. BUT.. Maserati went this wau cause fiat owns them and now they have become a car range that fits under Ferrari not compete. Same went for Alfa Romeo.
They all used to race in F1.

I do like this new Maserati, I also loved the 2000 model with boomarang breaklights..Why they changed em ill never know.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anthony is right. BUT.. Maserati went this wau cause fiat owns them and now they have become a car range that fits under Ferrari not compete. Same went for Alfa Romeo.<br />
They all used to race in F1.</p>
<p>I do like this new Maserati, I also loved the 2000 model with boomarang breaklights..Why they changed em ill never know.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: No Name</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/9639/maserati-gt-convertible-rumoured/#comment-48826</link>
		<dc:creator>No Name</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2008 15:07:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/9639/maserati-gt-convertible-rumoured/#comment-48826</guid>
		<description>Yep interesting. the 67 Sebring was great there is a mild similarity with the GT above. I&#039;d Still have it over a Ferrai though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yep interesting. the 67 Sebring was great there is a mild similarity with the GT above. I&#8217;d Still have it over a Ferrai though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anthony</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/9639/maserati-gt-convertible-rumoured/#comment-48824</link>
		<dc:creator>Anthony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2008 14:32:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/9639/maserati-gt-convertible-rumoured/#comment-48824</guid>
		<description>&quot;pretty good&quot; is right. That means not great. Google the three cars I have mentioned and tell me what you think compared to the Ferrari&#039;s of the day.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;pretty good&#8221; is right. That means not great. Google the three cars I have mentioned and tell me what you think compared to the Ferrari&#8217;s of the day.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: No Name</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/9639/maserati-gt-convertible-rumoured/#comment-48807</link>
		<dc:creator>No Name</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2008 12:21:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/9639/maserati-gt-convertible-rumoured/#comment-48807</guid>
		<description>no don&#039;t agree Anthony this looks pretty good to me. Typical Maserati and not like ferrari/Lambo cloning. Ok its probably not as good on the road/track but with only 7000 Maserati&#039;s on the road its exclusive.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>no don&#8217;t agree Anthony this looks pretty good to me. Typical Maserati and not like ferrari/Lambo cloning. Ok its probably not as good on the road/track but with only 7000 Maserati&#8217;s on the road its exclusive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anthony</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/9639/maserati-gt-convertible-rumoured/#comment-48748</link>
		<dc:creator>Anthony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2008 05:29:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/9639/maserati-gt-convertible-rumoured/#comment-48748</guid>
		<description>Although Maserati is making some sweet looking cars, the designs fall short of the those earlier, more individual cars like the Sebring, Ghibli and Khamsin which were every bit as good looking as their Ferrari counterparts at the time. Hell, they&#039;re still good looking cars!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Although Maserati is making some sweet looking cars, the designs fall short of the those earlier, more individual cars like the Sebring, Ghibli and Khamsin which were every bit as good looking as their Ferrari counterparts at the time. Hell, they&#8217;re still good looking cars!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 2/4 queries in 0.005 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 255/256 objects using memcached

Served from: www.caradvice.com.au @ 2012-02-11 23:17:55 -->
