blog counter

2008 Audi S8 review

January 12, 2008 by Paul Maric  

The test vehicle was fitted with optional radar cruise control and four-zone climate control. The former works well, but in my opinion is unrefined technology at this present time. It’s impossible to drive with it in dense traffic and it immensely annoys other drivers as it constantly has to activate the brake lights when slowing down. The latter though, a perfect options for this car’s target demographic.

I always get the same feeling when driving an A8. I always feel limited as a driver in terms of the things I can do – gadget wise. The other German competition – BMW and Mercedes – have such advanced onboard computers, they simply put the Audi unit to shame. The Mercedes unit fitted to the S-class – called COMAND –let’s you program everything, even down to the lighting ambience in the cabin. iDrive in the 7-series will allow you to call your best mate without you even taking your hand off the steering wheel. The Audi system is very yesterday and doesn’t feel at all advanced in comparison to its German rivals.

Audi S8 Road Test Audi S8 Road Test

Priced from $259,900, the S8 isn’t all that expensive when you consider the amount of equipment you get, the powertrain you get and how much its competitors cost. Fuel consumption is pretty reasonable too – 13.4-litres/100km. That’s less than Holden’s V8 SS Commodore.

Although it didn’t get as many looks as I had expected, the Audi S8 was thoroughly enjoyable to drive. It didn’t match up to my expectations when pushed harder than normal, but I can understand it’s not entirely built for performance, but more a strike between luxury and performance, which I think it does incredibly well.

Audi S8 Road Test Audi S8 Road Test

It’s also well priced – in comparison to its competition – and looks brilliant. The fuel consumption is very reasonable and the features list endless. There really isn’t much to complain about with the S8. If you’re the discreet type who wants a highway cruiser, which can turn into a ball-tearer at the drop of a hat and don’t mind spending a couple of hundred g’s, the Audi S8 has your name written all over it.

Engine: 5.2-litre
Power: 331kW
Torque: 540Nm
Top speed: 250km/h
Safety: Electronic stability control- front air bags – side airbags – curtain airbags – front seatbelt pre-tensioners and load limiters.
0-100km/h: 5.1-seconds
EuroNCAP rating: 5-star
Turning circle: N/A
Fuel tank: 90 litres
Fuel consumption : 13.4 litres/100km
Fuel type: 98RON premium unleaded

Tags: ,
Related Articles:
  • Spied: Audi RS5- Audi RS5 Revealed. When we reviewed the Audi S5...
  • 2009 Audi A1 Speedster Cabriolet Q1 CGI- The Audi 1 range is expected to be...
  • 2008 Audi A4 Video- Official video of the 2008 Audi A4. ...
  • Audi RS5 spied at ‘Ring- Spotted alongside the TT-RS has been the upcoming...
  • Audi TT-RS spied at ‘Ring- Audi is developing an even hotter version of...
  • Comments

    19 Responses to “2008 Audi S8 review”
    1. Vote -1 Vote +1Lcat
      says:

      good/interseting review – very hard car to define.
      What are the headlights – xenon? any good?

    2. Vote -1 Vote +1Paul Maric
      says:

      The headlights are adaptive bi-xenon.

      Each headlight cluster also has 5 LED lights which operate when the parking lights are on, in combination with the LED brake lights.

    3. Vote -1 Vote +1Nick
      says:

      I have driven one of these on a few occasions. Being black, and with the gaping silver front grille, this one stands out. I agree with Paul entirely. It is a nice place to be, although it just fails to inspire. At 7 10ths, it’s a beautiful GT, but anywhere near the limit, it gets a bit diabolical. The engine is a pearler, and sounds tits, and the brakes are incredible, but thats about where it all ends. Spot on review Paul.

    4. Vote -1 Vote +1Liam
      says:

      I reckon one of these would have made my 2000km+ round trip at Christmas time an absolute doddle!

    5. Vote -1 Vote +1MatthewM
      says:

      “Turning circle: N/A”

      Hmmm… Why have a steering wheel then? :)

    6. Vote -1 Vote +1Minnow
      says:

      I watched a segment on Auto Motor und Sport on Channel 31, on the audis fully sick audio system. The audio blokes actually engineered the speakers to echo sounds perfectly for each passenger, using the same ideas in amphitheaters. And the fuel consumption seems almost unbelievable, V10, 4wd and over 2 ton, how did it even achieve 13.4 . Is there a v10 diesel version of one of these?

    7. Vote -1 Vote +1Lcat
      says:

      ^Could be a v12 diesel in the pipeline now we know it will fit in the R8!

    8. Vote -1 Vote +1Frugal One
      says:

      Sure its a little better quality than a HSV, but for mine rather a TomCat fettled Senator and $150k in my pocket..

      WAY overpriced, no better than say a C63 Benz [M3 eater]

      Impressive stero if nothing else, AND can have:

      “Powered By Lamborgini” on the windscreen! :-)

      Cheers

      F-O

    9. Vote -1 Vote +1Paul Maric
      says:

      lcat:

      There is a W12 diesel available. The flagship model is the Audi A8 W12.

      Frugal One:

      Having driven both the E-series Senator and this vehicle, the quality is not only a “little better”, it’s leaps and bounds better.

      No, the car isn’t overpriced. You must compare this vehicle to its competition, not a vehicle in HSV’s range. When compared to its competition, it’s some $50,000 cheaper than its nearest rival.

      C63…you do understand the C-class is to two model ranges smaller than the A8? The A8’s competition includes the S-class and 7-series.

    10. Vote -1 Vote +1Frugal One
      says:

      Paul, i compared the audi [auto union?] to the Senator for a number of reasons:

      1.They both have over 300kW
      2.Both are the top of the line model for each manufacturer.
      3.Performance is similar
      4.Both are large and luxo.

      I think we should soon see a power boost in the HSV [maybe they can fit the Vette 7L donk] soon as FPV come out with its new range.

      One things for sure, the S8 would drop $100k in the first year, a alarming fall really.

      Yes the audi is in a different class, but they are offereing similar idea, just the audi is aiming for uber-rich upper clients.
      Having said that, i would pay a extra $70k and step up to sister brand Bentley Cont. GT.Now THATS is a impressive beast!

      Agree about the C63, its alleged the best sports sedan from Germany yet!

      Cheers

      F-0

    11. Vote -1 Vote +1Paul Maric
      says:

      Just a correction there lcat, there is NO W12 diesel, it’s a petrol powered W12 motor (essentially two V6 – petrol – engines fused together).

      There is a twin-turbo V8 Diesel available though, which produces some 650Nm of torque.

    12. Vote -1 Vote +1Lcat
      says:

      ^ thanks for info Paul

    13. Vote -1 Vote +1Paul Maric
      says:

      Frugal One:

      As I said, I’ve driven both and the Audi is in a totally different league.

      You mention they’re both “luxo”. The Senator doesn’t even come close to matching the Audi features list. The Senator is also smaller than the A8 – significantly.

      Performance certainly isn’t similar. The 6-speed auto ‘box in the Senator is rubbish compared to the 6-speed used in the S8. The Senator also won’t corner at speed in the wet when compared to the S8.

      Finally, the S8 isn’t the top-of-the-line model in the A8 range, that goes to the A8 L W12.

      Your estimation of the depreciation of the car is also inaccurate. The S8’s depreciation percentage is actually lower than the Senator’s…

      Seriously, the Senator isn’t competition to the S8 and anyone who buys an S8 would laugh at any attempt to compare the two.

    14. Vote -1 Vote +1Troy
      says:

      When will we Australian motor enthusiasts ever come to a consensus on the issue of Aussie built Vs. German engineered?

      From pillar to post Holden has been bragging about its Billion dollar baby, sadly though pouring good money after bad really hasn’t helped the cause. The Holden Commodore and all its offshoots still offer a level of refinement similar to a 2yr old being potty trained. And sadly though [Frugal One] I do not believe looking to the U.S. for a boost will offer much in the way of future stability.

      With both General Motors and Ford trying to stay afloat whilst running with huge deficits I doubt that either will be making headlines with groundbreaking advancements or technology anytime soon.

      Suffice to say I think this argument is one to rival religious debate and the only logical conclusion I can see on the horizon will come about as the Aussie-Americans fall into liquidation.

      Debate aside, the Audi S8 is a powerhouse for the discerning buyer, and hopefully will continue to fly under the radar of the cashed-up Bogan for some years ahead.

    15. Vote -1 Vote +1Duck
      says:

      Wouldnt you think that a reversing camera would be standard on a car like this!

    16. Vote -1 Vote +1Nick
      says:

      I like reading your reviews, but 80%+ (too many) of cars reviewed end up in the same band: Four Stars. Makes it harder to understand your judgement. For example, CRV, Outlander, SantaFe, Lancer, etc. all got Four Stars.

    17. Vote -1 Vote +1Bavarian Missile
      says:

      But isnt 4 stars in their own cattogory!!

      Not a Santa Fe against an Audi for instance!

      Maybe the guys need to indicate what their judging them against to help you!

    18. Vote -1 Vote +1Neo Utopia
      says:

      Those Bang & Olufsen speakers on the dash board’s left and right sides are so so cool! This is the gentleman’s pimp mobile!

    19. Vote -1 Vote +1geh
      says:

      To Troy: Do us all a favour and remove yourself from the gene pool, moron.

    Speak Your Mind

    Tell us what you're thinking...
    and oh, if you want a pic to show with your comment, go get a gravatar!

    *
    To prove you're a person (not a spam script), type the security word shown in the picture. Click on the picture to hear an audio file of the word.
    Click to hear an audio file of the anti-spam word