<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Best rear-visibility study</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.caradvice.com.au/8746/best-rear-visibility-study/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/8746/best-rear-visibility-study/</link>
	<description>Australian Resource for Car Reviews, News, Advice</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 09:01:14 +1100</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: matt</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/8746/best-rear-visibility-study/comment-page-1/#comment-42670</link>
		<dc:creator>matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 03:54:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/8746/best-rear-visibility-study/#comment-42670</guid>
		<description>what about the astra coupe? that has the most godawful rear vision of any car i&#039;ve ever been in. the back window is THAT narrow.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>what about the astra coupe? that has the most godawful rear vision of any car i&#8217;ve ever been in. the back window is THAT narrow.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bret</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/8746/best-rear-visibility-study/comment-page-1/#comment-42597</link>
		<dc:creator>Bret</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2007 23:41:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/8746/best-rear-visibility-study/#comment-42597</guid>
		<description>Tony, why focus on SUV&#039;s?
As a  group they fair OK, because manufacturers have addressed the issue with them.

The big news hers is that VE Commodore, CamAurion and 380 all rate very poorly.
Look at the visability distance not just the star rating.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tony, why focus on SUV&#8217;s?<br />
As a  group they fair OK, because manufacturers have addressed the issue with them.</p>
<p>The big news hers is that VE Commodore, CamAurion and 380 all rate very poorly.<br />
Look at the visability distance not just the star rating.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anthony</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/8746/best-rear-visibility-study/comment-page-1/#comment-42577</link>
		<dc:creator>Anthony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2007 22:28:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/8746/best-rear-visibility-study/#comment-42577</guid>
		<description>Thats not a study, thats a tick box for wether they have a reversing camera or not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thats not a study, thats a tick box for wether they have a reversing camera or not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tony</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/8746/best-rear-visibility-study/comment-page-1/#comment-42476</link>
		<dc:creator>tony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2007 08:51:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/8746/best-rear-visibility-study/#comment-42476</guid>
		<description>Just mandate all SUVs must have a rear camera with audible warning that can&#039;t be switched off when reversing! There will be no more accidents in driveways!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just mandate all SUVs must have a rear camera with audible warning that can&#8217;t be switched off when reversing! There will be no more accidents in driveways!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Grant</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/8746/best-rear-visibility-study/comment-page-1/#comment-42462</link>
		<dc:creator>Grant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2007 08:14:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/8746/best-rear-visibility-study/#comment-42462</guid>
		<description>same old story.. to achieve a five star crash ratings, the c-pillar is made thicker and the cars window-line is moved further upward. its one of the trade-offs; just like curtain airbags = thick a-pillar.

a lot of this has to do with design trends, but if you made a car with excellent rear vision without a camera it wouldn&#039;t achieve a good crash rating.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>same old story.. to achieve a five star crash ratings, the c-pillar is made thicker and the cars window-line is moved further upward. its one of the trade-offs; just like curtain airbags = thick a-pillar.</p>
<p>a lot of this has to do with design trends, but if you made a car with excellent rear vision without a camera it wouldn&#8217;t achieve a good crash rating.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
