Car Advice

2007 Holden Astra Twin Top review

By Karl Peskett |

2007 Holden Astra Twin Top Review

red-side-shot.jpg

CarAdvice Rating:

Recommended Retail Price: $45,490

Options Fitted: Automatic transmission – $2000.

- by Karl Peskett

I don’t get it. Why are these things called hairdresser’s cars, when no hairdresser would drive one?

I mean, if you really cared about your hair, driving with the top down would be the last thing you’d want to do. Chop the roof off your car, and instantly you have a whooshing, swirling, vortex of air that conspires to undo your ‘do as soon as you get above 20km/h.

And depending on which convertible you have, the advection can send an anemometer off the clock. So, you put the windows up. But doesn’t that defeat the purpose? Not in winter. Crank up the heater, whack on the bum-warmers, and away you go, with a hint of cool, just above your noggin.

But in summer, it’s sunburn city. Glasses and hat are mandatory, which takes me back to my first point. Which hairdresser is going to wear a hat? Hence, drop-tops are more a lifestyle choice. A way of getting about with the wind in your hair, admiring the scenery as you go by.

And for the week, we were handed the keys to the Holden Astra Twin Top, so we could experience this way of living. Seeing the Twin Top for the first time in the metal, it’s easy to fall for it.

rear-studio-roof-down.jpg

The proportions are just right, with good looks, roof up, or down. Unlike competitor’s coupe-cabriolets, there’s a good balance between the cab and the boot. It doesn’t look awkward from any angle, like some kind of compromise had to be reached when it was decided the roof had to sink into the back somewhere.

The 17-inch wheels sit nicely at each corner with grippy 225/45 Continental Sport Contact2s ensuring the handling balance stays as neutral as possible, but it will understeer when really pushed. However, let’s put this car into context. We are talking a car built solely for looks. Back off, and just cruise.

22-direct.jpg

Suspension is typically Euro-firm, but not overly so. Rebound damping from the rear could use a little bit of strengthening, as it oscillates a bit more than it should. This serves to unload the rear slightly, especially when braking hard around a corner, but I guess now we’re just being picky.

Criticism could be justifiably levelled at the engine, though. On light throttle applications, it’s reasonably quiet, and seems to match well with the four-speed auto. However as the revs rise, so does the noise and coarseness.

roof-changing.jpg

The gaps in the ratios then become blindingly obvious, as it struggles to accelerate. Kickdown is only achieved by busting your foot through the firewall, and even then it still doesn’t have enough pull.

The 2.2-litre engine makes 110kW and only 210Nm of torque, meaning shifting its 1620kg mass is an exercise in demonstrating patience. But once you get into the groove of cruising, all is good.

However fuel economy could be either be improved, or the 52-litre tank could be increased, so that visits to the servo aren’t as often as you blink your eyes.

Opening the very heavy doors (not ideal for tight parking spots) reveals a nicely built interior, with decent plastics, and robust (read: hard) leather. The seat heaters, and HVAC system work superbly, allowing for comfortable winter driving. Steering is accurate and weighted nicely too.

But the seats project your hips forward a little, meaning the ideal driving position doesn’t quite occur naturally. And if you put the seat back further, you end up cutting of the circulation in the legs of anyone seated rearward.

rear-seats.jpg

Footroom in the back is adequate. Not so knee and legroom. You tend to sit with your legs splayed, but a short cruise along the coast somewhere wouldn’t be too much of a stretch (pun intended).

With the roof up, creaks and groans from the roof-mechanism are audible, as the chassis tries to wobble its way free. To be fair, it’s not the worst convertible for scuttle shake, but the bracing (which adds weight) hasn’t halted vibrations.

front-seats.jpg

The extra weight doesn’t detract from its braking potential either, with firm, confident stops and good pedal feel. The typical Euro “good braking/bad brakedust” syndrome continues, with wheel and sill cleaning necessary every few days. But I guess that’s the price you pay for safety.

Mention must be made of the indicators. Similar to the BMW M5 and M6, the action takes some getting used to. To explain: To turn corners, you push past the springy detent to, let’s say, the left position. Once you’ve done that, and the indicators switch on, the stalk springs back to the home position.

That’s fine when it self-cancels, but when you just want to change lanes and you’ve gone past the left-hand detent, you have to pull it down to the right-hand detent to switch it off. Confused? So am I.

interior.jpg

Apart from that, the IDrive-like menu system is far too complex for daily use, and you end up giving up and just listening to the one CD, or one radio station. Surely there was no need to make it that difficult.

Plus the test car’s glovebox kept opening when going over bumps, and the rear driver’s side window lost its home position.

rear-studio-roof-up.jpg

The problem with the Astra Twin Top is it’s overpriced and underdone. It costs double what the base model Astra does, yet doesn’t give you any surprise-and-delight features that (apart from a chopped-off roof) would make the extra spend worthwhile.

Yes, the roof mechanism is slick. Yes, it looks smart. But, no, it doesn’t do it for me.


 
  • fordman6

    well, the Astra convertible looks better than the Focus convertible, but it doesn’t sound as practical…

  • Scott

    Atras are a bloody brilliant car. Ive driven them all and the only things i could pin on them is that they are relatively underpowered (massively so in the 1.8) and they have a bland interior. In terms of build quality, paint finish, panel fit, solidity and safety they are hard to beat!! Like so many cars though this one has put on massive weight. Most cars are getting heavier through acquiring larger dimensions this one its due to the roof and the extra bracing required for an open top.. which is fair enough.. but 110kw pushing 1610kg gives the sort of power to weight that an 80s model laser has! Not enough! Would be tiring! Nice car nonetheless..

  • Myke

    Astra’s have exceptional build quality and are very solid. Because they feel so heavy they would benefit from say a 2.0l instead of the 1.8l and perhaps a 5 or 6 speeder in the auto.

  • arsenalroc

    paging Going Ford for anti-holden tirade..

    but seriously though… not worth the money

  • http://www.caradvice.com.au Matt

    Yeah, I agree with Arsenalroc, why is it that an Astra, roughly $25K, minus a roof is $20K more? I know there’s more engineering involved but seriously, $20K more? Give me a break! Even the MX-5 isn’t the poor man’s convertible any more.

  • http://www.caradvice.com.au/ alborz

    Well its still better than the Mitsubishi Colt Cabriolet I had a few weeks ago, that car was 38k and nothing compared to this!

  • http://www.caradvice.com.au Karl Peskett

    Exactly Alborz. I’d be giving that thing 1.5, possibly 2 out of 5.

    Hopeless.

  • Bubba Ganush

    i have had a look at this car up close plastic interior no boot space, when you pop the boot there is no covering so you can see all the motors and mechanisms also the boot flexes like buggery.

    I have only one thing to say about this car: COLONARY ABORTION! I cannot believe this vehicle is top in its class for coupe cabriolets

  • Tonyn

    go the eos…. a much sweeter convertable than this!!!

  • Bavarian Missile

    Nice writeup Karl………seems like you have provided some great car advice,stay away from it!

  • http://. Naughtyius Maximus

    The EOS is better in my opinion.

    BM…is Toy. Paul around?

  • wheelnut

    Matt if you don’t like paying $20K extra for a small coupe cabriolet then you’re going to hate the Camaro “convertible” [if it makes it here]
    which doesn’t even have a roof at all not even one that you snap-on.. and will most likely cost about $70K

  • John S

    too bad its just not practical…my retirement car would be a focus cc…but being shy of 30…anything like that for my age is just no practical right now…

  • Bavarian Missile

    Nope haven’t had him back since last week.

  • arsenalroc

    ALBORZ!!!
    would you consider putting up a forum?i know this sounds like a broken record but please please please? :P
    anybody else support me?

  • tuffguy

    Perhaps you should have read the book to see how to operate the indicators. A quick movement of the stalk in the direction you wish to turn (or change lanes) means the indicators will blink 4 times then stop. A long or hard movement of the stalk means the indicators will remain on until you have completed the turn.
    Even my blonde wife worked that one out :)

  • Shane

    The Astra convertible looks very sexy, and this is what most poeple buy convertibles for, to look sexy.

  • VW Fan

    Nice one .. but underpowered.
    I will consider it if there is a 2.0 Turbo

  • Dieselhead

    Karl – the hairdressers bit refers to the fact that a lot of less expensive soft tops cars are driven by hairdressers in the UK, they are cheap posuers cars. It has nothinf to do with wind in the hair mate. Toyota’s MR2 was always their favourite.

    VW’s softy is better styled but mush more expensive. Vx’s has got to be the nicest looking and best value for money.

  • Dieselhead

    Karl – the hairdressers bit refers to the fact that a lot of less expensive soft tops cars are driven by hairdressers in the UK, they are cheap posuers cars. It has nothinf to do with wind in the hair mate. Toyota\’s MR2 was always their favourite.

    VW\’s softy is better styled but mush more expensive. Vx\’s has got to be the nicest looking and best value for money.

  • woz

    Ford Foccus is a much better car than Astra, build quality of the Astra is below par, still under powered, uncomfortable, bland to look at and they are plainly s**t to drive…

  • Myke

    That is exactly what an obsessed Ford-fan would say. The Focus does drive better then the Astra but it is not at all uncomfortable and its build quality isn’t ‘below par’. Looks are subjective but IMO there is nothing wrong with the Astra’s appearance.

  • woz

    Thats right Myke, Astra is crap – Focus is great, you have a problem with that, I’m not obsessed ford fan these are facts based on me driving the latest Astra and Focus models, I could go into detail but it’s easier to be blunt.

  • http://www.caradvice.com.au Karl Peskett

    Tuffguy, thanks. But I’m not sure your blond wife would appreciate that. :)

    It is actually only 3 times that it blinks, and what if the corner has a wide radius, so that it doesn’t self cancel? I stick by my statement and believe there was no need to engineer it like that. But yes, you do get used to it.

    Dieselhead, thanks too. The 2.0TDI Eos though isn’t that much more expensive. It starts at $47,990. I know which I’d rather…

  • Matt2

    The indicators work just like an E90 3 Series BMW that I have driven. Assuming the stalk is on the left hand side as most euro cars are, and you push down to turn left as you say, if you push beyond the detent (or pressure point) it will flash indefinitely until A) it self-cancels by removing steering lock coming out of the left-hander or B) PUSHING DOWN ON THE STALK AGAIN. Most people make the mistake of moving the stalk UP (i.e. right turn) to try and cancel the indicator but this just sets the right blinker going instead, because as you say the stalk returns to the home position. You get used to it after a while but in essence it is counter-intuitive because if anyone has been driving a “normal” car for any period of time they will have become accustomed to moving the stalk opposite to the direction of intended indication, instead of in the SAME DIRECTION, which is how you manually cancel indicators in cars like this.

  • AstraTwintopper

    The Astra Twintop offers a much better ride than the Ford, Renault or Peugeot and its looks by far and away top the Eos.

    The Twintop comes with a powerful 2.2l and it does have a long list of features which are not available in a base model Astra. The extra $20,000 is well worth it, the car looks like a european sports coupe with the top up and a luxury convertible with the top down.

    It also has another model behind it which has a good reputation and has held its resale value well. If youre looking for a fun car and safe buy, go the ASTRA!!

  • http://yahoo.com Stephen Garang Ajith Ajith Dhiel

    Dear Sir/Madam
    I want to buy the car please that is why Iam asking you to sent me the price of it, and type is shown in the website of google. the white car.

  • Simone

    Well i just bought the convertible astra few months ago and i LOVE IT..lets face it if your going to buy a convertible and your a woman you dont care about the ins and outs of how it works or what engine it has blah blah blah…it just has to look good..lol…seriously im really happy…drives well…great on fuel and looks great

  • Shaun

    i was given one of these twin top astras as my 21st present from my parents and i have had NOTHING but trouble with it. The roof is constantly breaking requiring parts to be replaced left right and centre. it has become nothing but a burden and a worry for me. this is a very expensive car to maintain and run. iv had it a yr and already looking at trading to a different car all together. Holden in genral from the begining have given me nothing but trouble and are unwilling to fix the issue. it has gone back to the dealer 9 times in one year…slightly unacceptable. my advise is to avoid all holdens all together now that they are being made in asian countries…..poor car, poor move.