Comments on: Ford to keep Volvo

By: Me.

Me. — Mon, 10 Dec 2007 01:02:58 +0000

Looks like that are over it now

Hard to say if not selling Volvo
is good or bad for Ford…

Cheers

Me.

LOL

By: Iamthestig

Iamthestig — Tue, 13 Nov 2007 03:59:36 +0000

“Length of vehicle means zip, its wheelbase thats the true measure of a vehicles room and market segment.

X3 2795mm
X5 2819mm
XC70 2763mm

Yeap i checked my facts, and as per usual 100% correct

Volvo is a dog brand, but not as bad as Saab [Yet!]”

Dear, dear, you are a dumbo…

Trying to cover up your mistakes with Polliespeak !
Wheelbase is “size” not length – oh well…

For your records – The new XC70 actually has a wheelbase of 2815mm

Are you happy now ? – Mr 100% WRONG !

LOL !!!

By: Frugal One

Frugal One — Sun, 11 Nov 2007 11:04:36 +0000

Iamthestig Says:
November 10th, 2007 at 11:39 pm
\”Yeah……Same price as a almost same size X3

Me and the market have spoken, we know which we prefer:-)

Cheers

F-0\”

Right…

XC70 – 4838mm long
X3 – 4569mm long
X5 – 4854mm long

Check your facts first eh ?

The upcoming XC60 is the X3 competitor.
The X5 sells well, the X3 doesn’t…

Length of vehicle means zip, its wheelbase thats the true measure of a vehicles room and market segment.

X3 2795mm
X5 2819mm
XC70 2763mm

Yeap i checked my facts, and as per usual 100% correct

Volvo is a dog brand, but not as bad as Saab [Yet!]

Ford cannot *dump* it, NOBODY is interested in buying it!

Cheers

F-0

By: Iamthestig

Iamthestig — Sat, 10 Nov 2007 13:39:29 +0000

\”Yeah……Same price as a almost same size X3

Me and the market have spoken, we know which we prefer:-)

Cheers

F-0\”

Right…

XC70 – 4838mm long
X3 – 4569mm long
X5 – 4854mm long

Check your facts first eh ?

The upcoming XC60 is the X3 competitor.
The X5 sells well, the X3 doesn’t…

By: Adam (aka Mada)

Adam (aka Mada) — Fri, 09 Nov 2007 22:08:04 +0000

People are funny…

Volvo made it’s first loss of 100 million this last quarter, otherwise Ford has seen nothing but profits from Volvo, it’s actually the one that help PAG up while the rest were losing money.
Sell Jag/LR and keep Volvo, they intergrate better than the other two.
One quarter of losses does not = a bad purchase.

By: Frugal One

Frugal One — Fri, 09 Nov 2007 22:03:08 +0000

Iamthestig Says:
November 9th, 2007 at 2:56 pm
Well – I am looking forward to seeing the new XC70. It isn’t priced like a BMW.

Diesel will be $60k, somewhat less than a X5 etc.

Yeah……Same price as a almost same size X3

Me and the market have spoken, we know which we prefer:-)

Cheers

F-0

By: Tom

Tom — Fri, 09 Nov 2007 11:28:23 +0000

not really reckless1, GM last quarter lost $39 billion dollars, ford lost $380 million in a quarter. Its still not great, but when analyists were expecting $1b loss from ford, and $380 million is 100 times less than GM, I’d say ford can handle the occasional brand to slip up. GM is the one running out of options, and at least Volvo is worth keeping (they do fairly well in europe), and has the potential to be fixed, unlike saab, who’s on life support and waiting for someone to pull the plug.

By: Reckless1

Reckless1 — Fri, 09 Nov 2007 08:35:23 +0000

Ford is smart keeping Volvo?

Ford has financial woes just like GM, so the loss of $100 Million from Volvo fits well in the Ford psyche – wouldn’t do to have a profit maker in there, hey?

By: woz

woz — Fri, 09 Nov 2007 06:04:37 +0000

Ford is smart keeping Volvo, I’m sure they sell heaps more Volvos than GM trying to sell a SAAB or two, I never see any ads for this brand of car anyway.

Ford has to keep some reputation and not go down GM-Daewoo lost venture, in the end quality is what people want…

By: Iamthestig

Iamthestig — Fri, 09 Nov 2007 04:56:04 +0000

Well – I am looking forward to seeing the new XC70. It isn’t priced like a BMW.

Diesel will be $60k, somewhat less than a X5 etc.

Some of the low end models are overpriced though…