<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Canadians get serious about stability control</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.caradvice.com.au/7792/electronic-stabilicy-control-naming-convention/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/7792/electronic-stabilicy-control-naming-convention/</link>
	<description>Australian Resource for Car Reviews, News, Advice</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 06:17:10 +1100</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: T-Dawg</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/7792/electronic-stabilicy-control-naming-convention/comment-page-1/#comment-35482</link>
		<dc:creator>T-Dawg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2007 01:58:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/7792/electronic-stabilicy-control-naming-convention/#comment-35482</guid>
		<description>sorry ... &#039;visibility&#039;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>sorry &#8230; &#8216;visibility&#8217;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: T-Dawg</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/7792/electronic-stabilicy-control-naming-convention/comment-page-1/#comment-35480</link>
		<dc:creator>T-Dawg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2007 01:57:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/7792/electronic-stabilicy-control-naming-convention/#comment-35480</guid>
		<description>Why Canada &#039;of all places&#039;?  They have had mandatory DRL&#039;s since 1990 - something worth strong consideration down here, particularly given the rise of low visibily colours like silver and black.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why Canada &#8216;of all places&#8217;?  They have had mandatory DRL&#8217;s since 1990 &#8211; something worth strong consideration down here, particularly given the rise of low visibily colours like silver and black.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ImportJap</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/7792/electronic-stabilicy-control-naming-convention/comment-page-1/#comment-35305</link>
		<dc:creator>ImportJap</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2007 06:48:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/7792/electronic-stabilicy-control-naming-convention/#comment-35305</guid>
		<description>Stabilicy?

*Stability*</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stabilicy?</p>
<p>*Stability*</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam J</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/7792/electronic-stabilicy-control-naming-convention/comment-page-1/#comment-35268</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam J</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2007 03:51:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/7792/electronic-stabilicy-control-naming-convention/#comment-35268</guid>
		<description>thats the same with ABS too! There are generational difference, some work better than others, etc etc,
yet it still has the same name

I think the idea should be that as long as the concept is the same, it should be called ESC to limit confusion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thats the same with ABS too! There are generational difference, some work better than others, etc etc,<br />
yet it still has the same name</p>
<p>I think the idea should be that as long as the concept is the same, it should be called ESC to limit confusion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Captain Mainwaring</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/7792/electronic-stabilicy-control-naming-convention/comment-page-1/#comment-35265</link>
		<dc:creator>Captain Mainwaring</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2007 03:20:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/7792/electronic-stabilicy-control-naming-convention/#comment-35265</guid>
		<description>Apart from the problem of what to call it, there is the bigger problem in that not all ESC systems are the same. There are various generations of technology out there - some work superbly, others are over-intrusive and others slow to react. There has to be a common standard before there is a common name.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apart from the problem of what to call it, there is the bigger problem in that not all ESC systems are the same. There are various generations of technology out there &#8211; some work superbly, others are over-intrusive and others slow to react. There has to be a common standard before there is a common name.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
