Comments on: Volvo C30 D5 by MR Sweden Motorsport

By: mark

mark — Sat, 20 Oct 2007 12:08:09 +0000

The front n side are an Audi S3 and the back of it i am glad i have never seen b4 n never want to see again! It looks like a busted arse hole.

By: Tom

Tom — Fri, 19 Oct 2007 21:59:36 +0000

actually, i take that statement back, i really need to get some sleep, these all nighters are killing me.

By: Tom

Tom — Fri, 19 Oct 2007 21:56:22 +0000

toyota paul, what family cars do you drive? Because unless its turbo or V8, I don’t know any family cars that go from 0 – 100 kmh in 7.5s. And turbo or V8 (or supercharged) aren’t exactly average.

Still I’m surprised by the lack of speed. I know its diesel, but with the same power output of the turbo petrol five cylinder but heaps more torque i thought it’d be quicker. Must be the weight of the diesel engine i guess.

By: Toyota Paul

Toyota Paul — Fri, 19 Oct 2007 12:11:15 +0000

I dont share the same views as others on this…

Front : Hot
Rear : Ugly
Rims : Crap
Engine : Loads of torque… but a tuned car, slower then your avg family car? Not good.

By: wheelnut

wheelnut — Fri, 19 Oct 2007 09:40:39 +0000

I like the “Stealth” look. Howeve; It would really look cool with a pair of either Suicide or even Gullwing doors

By: ImportJap

ImportJap — Fri, 19 Oct 2007 07:39:50 +0000

850Nm…to put that in perspective, that’s around the same as the huge silverado.

Looks awesome too, one of the best Volvo’s I’ve seen.

By: George

George — Fri, 19 Oct 2007 07:32:13 +0000

Power may not be that impressive, but remember its a diesel so torque is where its at.

Remember even the mighty R50 V10 diesel makes ‘only’ 258kW but 850Nm.

By: fordman6

fordman6 — Fri, 19 Oct 2007 07:24:09 +0000

Noice! It certainly does look like Volvo has left the cardigan days. Thank the lord! Any way, power is a tad low, but torque is magnafique!