Comments on: 2010 Porsche Panamera Review

By: Tom R

Tom R — Wed, 14 Jul 2010 16:41:44 +0000

I think its sexy as hell, but hardly holds a candle to this car in any way except looks. The 7-series and S-class are totally different cars for different buyers, and a Rapide is going to be a vastly inferior -despite being sexier- car. I would take this anyday, though id also take any on the list anyday…

Would pick a Panamera first =D Would just refrain from having to walk behind it if possible.

By: Jack Docson

Jack Docson — Tue, 13 Jul 2010 10:06:16 +0000

2010 Porsche Panamera 4S’ well done the pics are nice one.Do you have any idea about the similar car like this,,

By: Alborz Fallah

Alborz Fallah — Tue, 13 Jul 2010 02:24:27 +0000

Hey Folks,
The reason for the stock photos is due to a new contributor (Ewan Kennedy) – the car was not photographed.

As always all CarAdvice reviews done by internal staff always come with high resolution exclusive pictures.

By: Shane

Shane — Mon, 12 Jul 2010 23:28:06 +0000

its called technology

By: Martin

Martin — Mon, 12 Jul 2010 15:34:05 +0000

I agree, with it’s Kia Rio rear lights and all…

By: Moey

Moey — Mon, 12 Jul 2010 14:33:31 +0000

The price doesn’t justify it a F6 Typhoon manual is faster for that kind of money I will be looking at the 911 Turbo for a little extra

By: DDH

DDH — Mon, 12 Jul 2010 12:54:38 +0000

People who don’t get the appeal of the Panamera are idiots.

By: MJ

MJ — Mon, 12 Jul 2010 12:38:04 +0000

the front looks fine, they just need to bring the c pillar forward and give it more of a boot line rather than the coupe style back.

By: Damian

Damian — Mon, 12 Jul 2010 10:30:40 +0000

It’s a combination of factors which lead to the Porsche using less fuel. Direct injection, 4-valves per cylinder, PDK…

By: Nobody

Nobody — Mon, 12 Jul 2010 10:01:26 +0000

How come this uses less fuel than a Holden Commodore SSV when both are V8′s with almost same KW and Torque ??