Car Advice

2010 Porsche Panamera Review

PORSCHE PANAMERA

Pros: 

Cons: 

By Ewan Kennedy |
Add to shortlist

Price: $129,420 to $198,360

Our Rating:  

2010 Porsche Panamera 4S Review

The 2010 Porsche Panamera is a stunning example of automotive engineering at the cutting edge of supercar performance. Its 400 horsepower 4.8-litre V8 gives a huge push in the back the moment the driver wants it. While a figure of five seconds to 100 km/h tells the bald story, it’s the way the big Porsche responds to the throttle that guarantees a smile will hit your face. The Panamera seems to have read your mind.

Though automatic transmissions aren’t our favourite pieces of gear in sports machines, the way the Panamera’s seven-speed PDK double-clutch unit works is just brilliant. It not only senses the movement of your right foot, but also gets important information from the V8′s computer to further improve on-road urge. And the engine’s computer talks to the tranny’s computer at the same time, sensational.

The sound of the engine was too muted for our revhead senses until we discovered a handy button on the centre console. It bypasses segments of the mufflers and permits the full roar of the big V8 hits to assault your senses. We immediately took our road test Panamera through one of our favourite tunnels, did a few U-turns, just in case we hadn’t got it right the first time through. Then savoured the exhaust and spent the rest of the trip smiling outrageously.

If there’s a complaint about the Porsche Panamera’s it’s that the tail-end treatment is on the bulky side. However, we soon worked out that the rear wing can be kept raised at all times by pushing another button on the console. This breaks the flow of the lines of the tail and gives a more positive look to the Panamera’s rump.

But you should be aware that a policeperson may know that the wing rises when the Porsche speed reaches 120 km/h and accuse you of travelling at that highly dangerous rate (oh for German speed limits…). In which case you can smile sweetly and point out the wing-raising button.

Porsche sees its Panamera as a GT (Grand Tourer) rather than a full-on sports model. But we beg to disagree, this really is a serious sports sedan. The steering is lightening fast. Feedback through the wheel is excellent and Panamera grips the road at speeds that may feel impossible to those who aren’t used to the characteristics of car likes this. The ability of this two-tonne machine to swerve and recover in emergency situations is simply stunning. Make a big mistake and the electronics simple step in and get the Panamera back on the straight and narrow again.

Porsche Panamera is a big car, bigger than a Commodore or Falcon. It may be low slung but this is a sports saloon not just a coupe with easy access to the back seats. There’s a decent amount of legroom in the two rear bucket seats and the headroom, while not all that generous, certainly won’t cause hassles for most.

Ceramic brakes were one of the options in ‘our’ road test Panamera 4S. These provide enormous amounts of stopping power when used seriously and never showed the slightest sign of fading, even on our seriously steep downhill course. However, the ceramic brakes are aimed at high speed cruising and we found them difficult to modulate at traffic speeds as they grip too suddenly on initial pedal application at gentle speeds.

Ride comfort is good thanks to the ability to dial up different stages of suspension interaction. You probably wouldn’t be a passenger all day in the great Australian bush and come back feeling fresh as a daisy. But the driver is still going to be smiling…

This is a brilliant example of a four-seater sports saloon. One that seems sure of success on the Australian market where we love big machines capable of swallowing up huge distances without breathing hard.

2010 Porsche Panamera 4S 4.8-litre two-door coupe specifications:

ENGINE:
Capacity: 4.806 litres
Configuration: V8
Head Design: DOHC, four valves per cylinder
Compression Ratio: 12.5:1
Bore/Stroke: 89.0 x 96.4 mm
Maximum Power: 294 kW @ 6500 rpm
Maximum Torque: 500 Nm @ 3500 rpm

DRIVELINE:
Driven Wheels: All-wheel drive
Manual Transmission: Not offered
Automatic Transmission: Seven-speed
Final Drive Ratio: NA

DIMENSIONS, WEIGHT AND CAPACITIES:
Length: 4970 mm
Wheelbase: 2920 mm
Width: 1931 mm
Height: 1418 mm
Turning Circle: NA
Kerb Mass: 1860 kg
Fuel Tank Capacity: 100 litres
Towing Ability: Not recommended for towing

SUSPENSION AND BRAKES:
Front Suspension: Double wishbone, gas damper, coil springs, anti-roll bar
Rear Suspension: Independent, multi-link, coil springs, anti-roll bar
Front Brakes: Ventilated Disc
Rear Brakes: Ventilated Disc

PERFORMANCE:
0-100 km/h Acceleration: 5.0 secs

FUEL CONSUMPTION:
Type: Petrol 98RON
Combined Cycle (ADR 81/01): 11.5 L/100km

GREEN VEHICLE GUIDE RATINGS:
Greenhouse Rating: 4.5/10
Air Pollution Rating: 6.5/10

STANDARD WARRANTY:
Two years/unlimited km


 

Reader reviews of the PORSCHE PANAMERA

<

Write a review for the PORSCHE PANAMERA

Do you own this car? Share your opinion and add your own review below.

Add a New Review
>
  • Joe Papez

    Ewan, I’m fairly sure that you must have left your guide dog at home on the day of the road test.

    Please Please Please don’t tell us you would have this over a Rapide, Quatroporte, 7-Series. S-Class, etc. It does not matter how well it drives, not being able to hold your food down every time you went to look at your $300k investment in the driveway would be a tragedy……..

    • Sam

      the quatroporte is ugly as sin

      • Martin

        I agree, with it’s Kia Rio rear lights and all…

        • Tom R

          I think its sexy as hell, but hardly holds a candle to this car in any way except looks. The 7-series and S-class are totally different cars for different buyers, and a Rapide is going to be a vastly inferior -despite being sexier- car. I would take this anyday, though id also take any on the list anyday…

          Would pick a Panamera first =D Would just refrain from having to walk behind it if possible.

  • http://www.facebook.com/sammo.8191 Sam Moss

    I’m not a fan of the styling at all, it just looks wrong.

    • MJ

      the front looks fine, they just need to bring the c pillar forward and give it more of a boot line rather than the coupe style back.

  • TomJ

    A friend of mine who does not follow cars and knows practically nothing about them told me last week “I just saw a Porsche sedan thing on the road! It was the most hideous car ive ever seen!”

    I showed him pictures and surprise surprise, it was the Panamera.

    No doubt its an absolutely jaw dropping brilliant car in every objectively measurable way. But subjectively the styling is just so ungainly i could not drive one.

  • Bezza

    I saw one parked near our local cinema one evening and I thought that, while perhaps a little challenging, it was a very beautiful car. My lady liked it straight up and she often hates anything different.

    :)

  • Jig

    Seeing this car in the flesh does not compare to seeing the car pictures. Many people have said the Maserati QP when it first came out was awful looking with those dopey headlights and lack lustre rear. However, the QP has grown on many of us and the Panamera will be the same.

  • NotTheStig

    Porsche PR must be doing some voting here because, as much i like the concept (4 door sedan/coupe), it is just awkward when you see one in the flesh, out driving around.

    It just doesn’t make you want to be in one, the way a 911 does…

    Sorry, it is ugly and I couldn’t buy one !

  • http://www.chevytruckforsaleinusa.com/ Rose Docson

    I am not much aware and intrested in cars and what the car companies are coming up with,But when i saw Porsche it grabbed my attention and it was awesome.This is very deserving that this company is standing in the top 10 fastest car positions in the world,,

  • Shane

    The panamera is truly a fantastic car.

  • Radbloke

    Not a bad review but it’s a bit disjointed. Almost like it starts half way through the review.

  • Jimmy

    What’s with the stock photos? No budget for a photographer? Disappointing.

  • Jabba the Hut

    I have to go against the masses. I actually like the styling and to me it immediately says Porsche. That is a good thing.

  • AussieCars

    From the front its a car to drool over. Then you see the side and the back and drool turns to vomit…

  • Damian

    Why has CarAdvice made exclusive use of press pictures for a car they’ve allegedly reviewed?

    • http://www.caradvice.com.au/ Alborz Fallah

      Hey Folks,
      The reason for the stock photos is due to a new contributor (Ewan Kennedy) – the car was not photographed.

      As always all CarAdvice reviews done by internal staff always come with high resolution exclusive pictures.

  • Shak

    I think the mass vote goes for Fugly with this cars styling. I can say from a brief stint in one, that it drives like a 911 with four doors, and that is brilliant. But it is pig ugly. Why cant they make it drive good AND look good.

  • Nobody

    How come this uses less fuel than a Holden Commodore SSV when both are V8′s with almost same KW and Torque ??

    • Damian

      It’s a combination of factors which lead to the Porsche using less fuel. Direct injection, 4-valves per cylinder, PDK…

    • Shane

      its called technology

  • DDH

    People who don’t get the appeal of the Panamera are idiots.

  • Moey

    The price doesn’t justify it a F6 Typhoon manual is faster for that kind of money I will be looking at the 911 Turbo for a little extra

  • http://www.besttruckonline.com/ Jack Docson

    2010 Porsche Panamera 4S’ well done the pics are nice one.Do you have any idea about the similar car like this,,