Car Advice

Nissan’s LEAF to cut battery costs

By Chris Anderson-Peters |

The Nissan LEAF, the Japanese company’s first real-world electric car (that goes on sale globally later this year), seeks to slash battery costs by US$9,000 ($10,000) to be more competitive.

In it’s current form the 24-kilowatt lithium battery costs US$472 per kilowatt, making it the most expensive part of the LEAF.

At US $32,780, Nissan is working hard on cutting costs to a target of $370 per kilowatt to make a profit from the LEAF and not price itself out of the market.

Nissan’s potential cost cutting to its 100 percent electric car could work in Australia’s favour as the LEAF may be too expensive to make a real impact. Nissan’s CEO Carlos Ghosn said he expects his company to produce 500,000 electric cars a year by 2012 with the electric cars to make up 10 percent of the entire car market.

General sales of the LEAF will commence in the US this year and Nissan dealers in Australia will have cars on the showroom floor in 2012.

Read more on Nissan LEAF


 

About Chris Anderson-Peters

Christopher Anderson-Peters is a respected Journalist and PR professional who has worked across numerous media companies and organisations such as the Herald-Sun, The Weekly Times, The Age, Austereo Network and sports website Live4Sport. An avid automobile fanatic, Chris is excited to join the CarAdvice team.
  • JEKYL & HYDE

    KUDO’S TO NISSAN…

    current price is about $36aud(not before the gov’t gets stuck into it).new price should be about $2500 cheaper.

    buy 2 of these for 1 mitsubishi miev (just about).and its a bigger car which it least looks like a real car…

  • Shak

    Even with that high price, its still pretty attractive compared to the iMiEV, and would be a nice alternative to the Prius and underpowered Insight. I would consider one if it doesnt blow out past $50K.

    • Andrew M

      So if its capped at 50K you will buy one???
      You are kidding right???

      Based on what sales points would this vehicle be worth 50K??

      • Shak

        The fact that it costs about 36K in the US, and by the time it gets through all our taxes and tariffs it may well be worth 50K

        • Andrew M

          I think you missed my point.

          Im not debating what it may or may not be priced at, rather your mention that 50K would be an acceptable price.

          Would you really spend 50K on this as you mentioned earlier?? and if so I’d be keen to hear why you think 50K would be worth your hard earned coin

  • Steve-Poyza

    Honestly, its not a bad looking car either.

    • Depends

      I agree. Definitely a step in the right direction.

  • Shak

    Because a new technology like this will ost a lot of money in its early stages, and i see my self as an early adopter of new technology. Im also going on the prices of other electric cars such as the Volt and iMiEV. They are very high for not much better cars. I think for the range and technology $50K is acceptable, but not value leading.

    • Andrew M

      Sure, they may be re-couping development costs with initial sales, but for what you get its still not worth 50K.
      Would you really pay a 25-30K premium just to say you have a car running on batteries??
      The technology itself isnt new, just its application to mass vehicles. This tech has been in RC cars and cordless drills for years, not exactlly the WOW I would spend 50K for

      What makes driving a car on batteries so special to warrent you spending more than twice the price for the honours??

  • Gary

    Nissan manage to design quite a few ugly cars now, this is the worst so far. And looks like you can’t park the car rear to kerb when needs charging?