Suzuki Kizashi Review | Car Advice

Car Advice

Suzuki Kizashi Review

SUZUKI KIZASHI

Pros: 

Cons: 

By Alborz Fallah |
Add to shortlist

Price: $22,590 to $36,360

Our Rating:  

2010 Suzuki Kizashi Review

The all-new Suzuki Kizashi represents the best car the Japanese manufacturer has offered to date. A mixture of superb driving dynamics, sexy looks and refined interior comfort justify the Kizashi as a serious contender in the mid-size segment.

There are a few segments in the Australian car market which are heavily contested. These include the light car segment (Suzuki Swift, Toyota Yaris, Hyundai Getz etc), compact SUV (Mitsubishi Outlander, Hyundai ix35, Suzuki Grand Vitara) and of course, the medium car segment.

The Suzuki Kizashi is the Japanese company’s first entry into this segment and goes up against the likes of Mazda6, Honda Accord, Subaru Liberty, Hyundai i45, Toyota Camry and more. So then, why would Suzuki enter a segment so congested?

The answer is rather simple, given how well the Suzuki Swift has done over the last few years, Suzuki needs a car to capture its existing buyers as they grow up. The SX4 started this process by offering a small car (although it hasn’t been as successful as Suzuki may have hoped) and the Kizashi is here to finish up the stable with the best in the range.

Although names like Vitara and Jimny have been synonymous with excellent four-wheel drive capabilities, ask an average joe and he will tell you Suzuki is most famous for motorcycles followed by its compact cars such as the Swift. The Japanese manufacturer has so far struggled to progress past this preconceived image.

Hence the Kizashi has two tasks, to become the best medium-sized car in the segment and also act as a branding exercise for Suzuki as it aims to restructure its image into an everyday manufacturer known for producing cars of all sizes and shapes.



Work on the Suzuki Kizashi project began all the way back in 2004 with the first Kizashi concept seen at the 2007 Frankfurt motorshow. This was followed by two other iterations, Kizashi 2 and Kizashi 3. Although altered heavily from its original concept, the Kizashi still represents one of the better looking cars in its segment.

Looking at the Kizashi from afar it can be quite deceptive in its size. Thanks to its small front and rear overhangs the Suzuki manages to look compact whilst still offering the same levels of interior space as its bulkier-looking rivals.

Frontal design is a showcase for the Suzuki logo embedded in the grille sitting on a rather curvy bonnet. With big headlights and European inspired taut shoulder lines, in some ways it looks rather similar to a Volkswagen Jetta (which shouldn’t be an issue as Volkswagen now own almost 20 percent of Suzuki).

Sitting on a long wheelbase (2,700mm), the Kizashi measures 4,650mm long, 1820mm wide and 1480mm tall. It has a rather large boot (load capacity of 461 litres) and also comes with 60:40-split-folding rear seats.

The highlight of the entire design is the rear which follows the same curvey but symmetrical design ideas from the front with the addition of stainless-steel exhaust covers (paying homage to Suzuki’s motorcycle designs). No matter which way you look at it, it certainly stands out as it drives past you.

Open and close the Kizashi’s doors and you’ll be pleased by that crisp door-closing sound that can tell you a lot about a car’s build quality.

Once inside you might notice the A-pillar (pillar next to the driver’s door) is relatively chunky, this can be a nuisance if you’re driving up twisty roads with tight right handers as they become somewhat hard to see into. However the reason for the over-sized A-pillars is all safety related, the Kizashi wouldn’t have achieved its high five-star American safety rating if it didn’t come equipped with high side-impact protection.

You’ll be glad to know all safety  features are standard across the Kizashi range. All variants come with six airbags and a whole bunch of electronic safety features that will ensure you remain on course at all times.

The Suzuki Kizashi will be offered in Australia in two variants: Kizashi XL and XLS.

Both are powered by the brand’s own 2.4-litre DOHC in-line four cylinder engine (J24B) which is a modification of the one found in the Grand Vitara. Delivering 131 kW at 6500 rpm and 230 Nm of torque at 4000 rpm, the Kizashi engine is mated to either a six-speed manual transmission or a continuously variable transmission (CVT- auto). Both configuration result in fuel economy figures of just 7.9L/100km in the combined highway and city cycle.

For those unfamiliar with CVT transmissions, they differ from an automatic in their inherent engineering design. For the majority of drivers it makes no difference as the gearbox still does all the work for you (although with far more engineering finesse than a standard automatic).

To explain CVT it in one sentence, instead of having set gear ratios (1 to 6), the transmission system has an infinite number of ratios it can pick from as it expands and retracts as requested. This way it can keep the engine in the right rev point when under full acceleration, resulting in quicker 0-100km/h times and better fuel economy overall.

Figures aside, the Suzuki Kizashi is a drivers car in all regards. It’s built to be driven more than just as an A->B car. Of course it can do the boring stuff too (and it can do that rather well) but the Kizashi’s strength is foremost in its driving dynamics and handling ability.

So much so that Suzuki Australia decided to gather the best Australian car journalists and let them drive Kizashis from Gold Coast all the way to Warwick (south west of Brisbane) and spend an afternoon ‘exploring’ the car’s handling abilities at Morgan Park raceway.

Before getting to the track, the twisty mountain drive from Gold Coast to Warwick allowed for some enthusiastic driving. It’s a rather simple drive formula with the front-wheel drive Kizashi, do 80 percent of your braking before a corner, leave the last 20 percent for trail-braking into the corner (this helps keep the car’s front down allowing for much more grip into a corner – if you lift off the brakes right before a corner you will have little grip at the front thanks to the weight transfer to the rear) and once the wheels are pointed in the right direction you simply apply as much power as needed. Torque steer is momentarily present but not much of an issue.

Despite being a front-wheel drive it behaves the same as a Subaru Liberty into corners (although it doesn’t have the out-of-corner finesse that you get with all-wheel drive). The Kizashi may indeed come to Australia as an all-wheel drive V6 in the future, but for now we will have to make do with this setup.

CarAdvice has raced at Morgan Park raceway numerous times in the past and it was with great excitement that Kizashi was track tested. It’s always a good sign when a manufacturer has enough faith in their product to allow journalist to explore it at its limits. The Kizashi, although not really made for the race track, proved to be an efficient car around Warwick’s famous race course.

With 131 kW it was never going to be fast on the straight but it certainly makes up for it in corners. There is something about the car’s stiff chassis which results in next to no body roll around corners whilst still being comfortable enough for Brisbane’s horrid roads. It’s similar in its driving dynamics to the BMW 3 Series (minus the benefits of rear-wheel drive).

In regards to manual or CVT, it’s a personal choice. The CVT is a good option if you can get over it sitting at around 5,500 rpm and staying there as you flatten the accelerator. However the six-speed manual gearbox is a breeze to use and would be my pick.

So that rounds up the looks and driving dynamics, what about the interior? It would all be meaningless if the interior wasn’t up to the rest of the package. Those familiar with Swift and other Suzuki models’ will have a hard time finding any real resemblance once inside.

No doubt the interior still screams Japanese and in some ways lacks the elegant ambience that you find in the more expensive medium-sized European rivals, but the Kizashi starts at just $27,990 and for that price, it’s a damn good interior. Have a look for yourself:

A very clean design to the instrument cluster with standard support for iPhones and iPods through the cars stereo. The steering wheel is fully adjustable and feels great to hold. There is soft plastics used throughout the cabin and lots of other little touches that raise it above most of its rivals. The car’s computer can also report instant fuel usage, average fuel usage, distance to empty and average speed.

Despite having native support for iPod and iPhone, plugging in my iPhone 3GS meant having to use the car’s built in music system to select my desired track. This was practically impossible as it was hard to see a list of songs or select between them with any accuracy. Furthermore the audio system would read even my voice recordings from the iPhone and not just the stored music (a rather interesting issue that I’ve yet to encounter with other cars).

Nonetheless if you do end up going for the XLS variant, it comes with a Rockford Fosgate® audio system which pumps out an impressive 425W through a 10 speaker setup (yes, 10 speakers). A quick test of this at high volume resulted in momentary deafness.

XLS variant for an extra $6,000 and you gain:

  • 18-inch alloy wheels
  • Front fog lamps
  • 10-way power driver’s seat with memory
  • 4-way power passenger seat
  • Rain-sensing wipers
  • Automatic headlamps
  • 10-speaker 425 watt AM/FM/CD Rockford Fosgate® audio system
  • Sunroof
  • Photochromatic rear vision mirror
  • Leather upholstery
  • Self-leveling High Intensity Discharge (HID) headlamps
  • Front and rear parking assist

XLS Worth it? Yes if you can afford it. The 18-inch alloys and foglights give it a far more aggressive look. Meanwhile the upgraded stereo and the addition of a sunroof and leather upholstery create a great interior ambience.

Overall the 2010 Suzuki Kizashi is a surprising little package and certainly worth test driving if you’re in the market for a car this size.

The Japanese manufacturer is so confident in the car’s ability that it wants you to come in to showrooms and test drive a Kizashi, if you end up buying one of its rivals (Mazda6, Honda Accord etc), it will give you $200. Really? What have you got to lose?

Update: Read – Suzuki Kizashi AWD Review


 

Reader reviews of the SUZUKI KIZASHI

<

By: Robert haywood

Rating:  

We have had the AWD Sport for nearly 12 months now. Great looking car, handling is brilliant, not sure about... Read more

Write a review for the SUZUKI KIZASHI

Do you own this car? Share your opinion and add your own review below.

Add a New Review
>

The competition

  Variant Body Style Price From
SUZUKI KIZASHI PRESTIGE
  • 2.4L MULTI POINT F/INJ
  • 6 SP MANUAL
  • UNLEADED PETROL
4D SEDAN $34,990*
SUZUKI KIZASHI PRESTIGE
  • 2.4L MULTI POINT F/INJ
  • CONTINUOUS VARIABLE
  • UNLEADED PETROL
4D SEDAN $36,990*
SUZUKI KIZASHI SPORT AWD
  • 2.4L MULTI POINT F/INJ
  • CONTINUOUS VARIABLE
  • UNLEADED PETROL
4D SEDAN $39,990*
SUZUKI KIZASHI TOURING
  • 2.4L MULTI POINT F/INJ
  • 6 SP MANUAL
  • UNLEADED PETROL
4D SEDAN $28,490*
SUZUKI KIZASHI TOURING
  • 2.4L MULTI POINT F/INJ
  • CONTINUOUS VARIABLE
  • UNLEADED PETROL
4D SEDAN $30,490*
powered by
  VEHICLE PRICE
2011 SUZUKI KIZASHI XLS FR
  • 9,437 Kms
  • Red
  • Sedan
  • Other
  • Petrol
  • QLD
$32,889*
Enquire Now
2012 SUZUKI KIZASHI TOURING FR MY11
  • 10 Kms
  • Snow White
  • Sedan
  • Auto
  • Other
  • QLD
$31,990*
Enquire Now
2012 SUZUKI KIZASHI SPORT AWD FR MY11
  • 10 Kms
  • Snow White
  • Sedan
  • Auto
  • Other
  • QLD
$39,990*
Enquire Now
2012 SUZUKI KIZASHI SPORT AWD FR MY11
  • Snow White
  • Sedan
  • Auto
  • Other
  • QLD
$38,990*
Enquire Now
2012 SUZUKI KIZASHI SPORT AWD FR MY11
  • Fervent Red
  • Sedan
  • Auto
  • Other
  • QLD
$38,990*
Enquire Now
2012 SUZUKI KIZASHI SPORT AWD FR MY11
  • Snow White
  • Sedan
  • Auto
  • Other
  • QLD
$38,990*
Enquire Now
2012 SUZUKI KIZASHI SPORT AWD FR MY11
  • Fervent Red
  • Sedan
  • Auto
  • Other
  • QLD
$38,990*
Enquire Now
Showrooms > Suzuki > Kizashi

Suzuki Kizashi Review
Suzuki
Kizashi
A mixture of superb driving dynamics, sexy looks and refined interior comfort justify the Kizashi as a serious contender in the mid-size segment
KYM10H
http://www.caradvice.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/2010-Suzuki-Kizashi-Review-34-625x416.jpg

Suzuki Kizashi Review
A mixture of superb driving dynamics, sexy looks and refined interior comfort justify the Kizashi as a serious contender in the mid-size segment
3.5 stars
  • Deco

    Hmmm. I would test drive on eof these if I wanted a small car, and by the sounds of it, I’d probably buy it.. Unless I wanted a 3.6GT Liberty xD.

  • Frenchie

    Sounds like Suzuki might have a winner here! Like to see you do a review of this car doing mainly city driving CA.

    • http://www.caradvice.com.au/ Alborz Fallah

      It’s coming. Will soon spend a week with the car.

      • davedogg

        What is the 0-100 time? 8.4 or 7.5 secs? Thanks

        • http://hotmail.com ujjwal

          it means the time taken when drafting the vechile from okm/h to 100 km/h. so 8.4 or 7.5 secs means the vechile take that amount of time to shift from 0 to 100 km/h….

      • Simon

        For a car listed as having good driving dynamics, how does it compare to the 6 or Mondeo?

    • Idiot Driver

      WOW…I still prefer my 1985 Honda City Pro-T

      • boris

        your name says it all

  • Why?

    Nice looking car especially from side and rear. Engine is lacking power and torque though. Fuel economy isn’t that fantastic either given the lack of engine output.

    • http://www.caradvice.com.au/ Alborz Fallah

      The figures don’t sound all the great but when you drive it’s actually zippy. The V6 AWD should answer all power concerns if it ever comes out here.

      • Baddass

        I really want this car, V6 or not.

        • Simon

          Is this the first Badass comment I disagree with? I believe so!
          Just goes to show beauty and beholder and all that.
          Long live differences!

          • pogsy250

            my wife and i purchased a kizashi xls cvt 2 weeks ago
            and we love it. we traded a 2005 swift in on it and still
            have a 2008 sx4 to keep it company in the garage.
            the kizashi xls is a pleasure to drive, we looked at
            mazda’s and all the other cars in the field, but came
            back to suzuki as the others dont give you as much for
            you bucks. that was the same reason wewhy we got the swift and the sx4.

  • Why?

    “425 watts stereo that caused momentary deafness”. Why couldn’t they have cut 200 watts from the stereo and added it to engine kilowatts where it’s needed?

    • Shak

      200 watts are only 0.2 Kw so they would have made nod diference whatsoever as a slightly heavier person or a coffe cup would offset the gains.

      • Why?

        Thanks for the maths lesson. What I was referring to (if you can read beyond the literal sense) was that such a massive power output in the audio system is not necessary. Who listens to the point of deafness anyway? Those that do, this car isn’t for them anyway.

        • Mr Pee Pee

          Some audiophiles might not agree with you.

          • Bezza

            Audiophiles do everything they can to avoid deafness as being deaf kind of defeats their ability to enjoy their greatest passion sound/music

            :-)

    • Frenchie

      Its just the sum of the speakers output. If you have 8 speakers thats just (approx) 55 watts per speaker. Even then the stereo may only pump out 40 watts per speaker. That’s not that loud!

      • Nick

        Im sorry, but you are a stupid idiot

        • Pookie

          I’ll second that Nick

  • Shak

    Pretty well done car, cant really see any major faults with it, except for the lack of an AWD V6 version! Plz Suzuki, us Aussies love our sixes and if its as fuel efficient as this why not?

    • Hjalle

      I am originally from Europe and I have never understood, why do Aussies love their 6′s? You can only drive 100km/h maybe 110 in some areas so whats the need for the big engine? Weve got higher speed limits in Europe and manage with smaller engines why cant Aussies?
      Just to make this clear im not having a go at anyone or anything im just curious.

      • Mr Pee Pee

        Because it’s important to be able to get to 60kmh as quickly as possible when you take off from the lights. Other than that, no, you don’t need a big 6.

        • V8

          Nice one mate! This is so bloody true! LOL

        • Simon

          Doing lots of highway kilometers, I am often overtaking slower traffic. At 100Km/H, while carrying a load, I want to spend as little time as possible in the opposite lane. A torquey engine is just what I need. Most V6s these days have a decent amount of torque which makes overtaking much safer.

        • Ryan

          I have a Forester S edition and its only a 4 cylinder and will eat most “6′s” at the lights so why do I need two more cylinders again????

          The only reason Holden and Ford stuck with building big 6′s and 8′s is because every time they tried to make things smaller, it made them feel smaller as well and we can not have that……..

      • Ricky

        I thought it would be obvious – 6 cylinders have far more low and mid range torque than a 4, and this means quicker acceleration times. Who wouldn’t want that? It really perplexes me, how so few people opt for, for example, the V6 Accord over the 4 cylinder model. What’s wrong with people? To me the V6, when the choice is given, seems like a no brainer.

        • t

          if its only the driver in the car the 4 cyl will do, but Aussies usually carry more than one person in their car, and people are heavy buggers!!

          thats why the 6 sedans have been an idol to us, we need something to lug our heavy asses around in.

          im not fussed on the v6 being based on holdens though, i hope it doesnt suffer the same timing gear issues as the VE version of the motor!

          also, love the kiss assi from the back, the front looks like an sx4 too much!! yuck!

        • Devil’s Advocate

          Or you could have a well sorted turbocharged 4 that can have some quite impressive low down torque figures. Turbos do that, especially when combining one with direct injection. I have a turbo 4 cyl and it has MORE than enough low down torque for climbing hills and quick overtaking of B-Doubles on the highway. This is accomplished with less effort/right toe flex that any non-turbo “big” 6 I have ever driven, even with a load of passengers etc in the car without changing out of 6th gear. For info 100km/h = 2400rpm with approx 360Nm of torque available at those revs. This is more torque than the maximum produced by the 3.6 SIDI engine in the VE Commodore and at lower RPM (max torque of the SIDI 3.6 is 350Nm at 2900rpm)!

          Or using the Golf GTi for example, it has maximum torque available from 1700rpm until only a couple of thousand rpm short of the red line.

          BTW, I am only playing “Devil’s Advocate” and yes, I agree that the “local 6s” are virtually impossible to beat for soaking up the kms on a long distance country drive whilst at the same time providing exceptional fuel economy. I just wanted to highlight that low down torque isn’t only the domain of engines with 6 cyls and above. :-)

      • Shak

        The whole point is because V6 have much more low down torque so you can just cruise while featherfooting it on the pedal. While you may drink a bit more fuel, engines like the new MB V6 prove you can have power and efficiency.

        • Ricky

          Exactly. I thought this would be obvious to someone in Europe as it tends to be more hilly there than flat Australia. Try going up a relatively steep hill in an automatic 4 cylinder – enough said.

          • Hjalle

            In Europe most people dont have automatics, most of the cars are manuals even the vig family estates.

      • pirakavezok

        Well put. Like you, I can’t understand the need for large engines such as those above 3,000 c.c. If the maximum speed limit is only 100kph, wouldn’t a 2,500 cc car do the job adequately. Even if one has to climb steep slopes (which is not often), a 3,000 cc car have plenty of pull.
        A quick take-off at the light will get you nowhere if you are diving in the city.

        • Deco

          We don’t all live in cities. We need to overtake very large trucks in small stretches (50m+ long trucks).

          Lots of us need to tow, which reuqires the torque a V6 n give, but a I4 lacks.

          • Baji

            I totally agree with you Deco.

            Australia is a vast land often with only single lane highways. Overtaking can be really dangerous especially when you’ve got a full load, or on a slight incline. 6 cyl engines provide extra power and torque lower down the rev range so when the need for overtaking arises, the capacity is there.

            Has anyone ever overtaken in a Tarago with a full load (4cyl)? Probably one of the scariest experiences ever. Thank god they’ve decided to put a V6 in.

            Additionally, when on the highway, 6 cyl’s dont’ have to work as hard, meaning they are quieter and more refined.

          • V8

            In Europe and here in Sweden in particular, many small cars such as your corollas, 3s, kias and even mini with a tiny 1.6L have bloody tow-bars! WTF!!!!!

      • Mythfrances

        Comparing the number of ppl buying V6 and the ppl buying V4, more ppl actually still opt for cheaper V4. Its just that in car forum like CA, most ppl are enthusiastic about cars so they love more powerful v6. It doesnt necessarily reflect the overall population’s opinion.

        • Shak

          I’ve never seen a V4 before.

          • V8

            Your are damn right mate! I’d love to test drive a V4! LOL

          • Reckless1

            Then do some reading. V4s were popular some years ago, used in Transit vans and other vehicles too.

          • Baddass

            Well, there is one sitting in your SSV AFM. Also the Ford Transit used one, and this same engine was used as a replacement for the rotary in the NSU RO80.

          • My Cars Called T-Rex

            There was a v4 capri.

      • Frenchie

        To keep up with the kangaroos and emus. If you can’t your driving a 4 cylinder!

        Also haven’t seen too many 4 cylinder cars with bull/roo bars!

      • Hung Low

        I feel sorry for the majority of Europe, dictated to buy cars with tiny engines because of fuel price, congestion and taxes!
        Small cars and small engines are a compromise for family transport in my eyes. If one can afford the larger running cost, they are rewarded with comfort, space and the effortless power/lazy torque that only a larger car can bring. Nothing beats a 6 or V8 for long distance hauling or towing, but times are getting near where we will all need to compromise on that luxury. Thank goodness for the new wave of turbo diesels and LPG!

        • Hjalle

          No, engine size doesnt have anything to do with luxury. In Sweden (where i am originally from) you can spec up a V70 with a 2.4, 4 cylinder to the same spec as a T6. The Mercedes Benz E Class cis another example it omes with 4 cylinder engines, i see that as a perfectly comfortable and luxurious car. Its just that we dont get the smaller egnines in the bigger cars in aus becuase for some reason aussies dont want them so there is no demand for them. So basically becuase you dont have a V6 or V8 doesnt mean you have a small uncomfortable car.

          • My Cars Called T-Rex

            Hjalle why would swedish drivers not prefer a v8?Maybe because big bottom end torque and ice is not a good combination for the average driver.

      • V8

        We Aussies really think V8 are the best.

        • James Cortez

          BS. Face reality, you live in the past. New Generation turbodiesel – be it 4 let lone 6 -out torque pushrod V8 at low rpm and consumes much less fuel.

        • Pookie

          Speak for yourself boofhead…I traded a V8 Commodore for a Turbo 4 with constant AWD and blew the doors off another wanker driving an SS V8 who was being a tosser trying to drag me off at every set of traffic lights…what a pleasure it was to see him fade in my rear vision mirror.Do yourself a favour and take your blinkers off because you are wasting your hard-earned money on your V8 fantasy

      • carzrawsm

        you probably wont read this but the reason we like our 6′s is because it gives us the power and the 4′s cant tow anything and most 4′s are front wheel drive and with a family and a boat or a trailer or anything 6/s are just better cars

        • Pookie

          Another ill-informed wanker…time you read the specs on cars available instead of making such ridiculous assumptions…Suzuki Kizashi towing capacity is 1700kg which outrates alot of other 6′s,8′s & SUV’s on the road…tosser!!!

          • My Cars Called T-Rex

            Have fun towing 1700kg behind a 1470kg car.

  • Valet Dabess

    man these guys are almost on the borderline of cocky. giving us $200… that’s awesoem! interior layout is just perfect. i love spending time in this car. if i was a tuning company i’d get my hands on one and start making a bodykit and stuff for it.

    the only thing i’m no tliking is the rear light layout. reminds me of the holden epica. i wanna test drive one!

    • Valet Dabess

      oh yeah they way the car can play even your voice recording is +. music playing devices should be able to play every type of music file. unlike itunes which can’t even play wma

      • CarrRAH

        yeah its strange how APPLE dont want you to use WindowsMediaAudio files on there apple itunes.

  • Damian

    The Kizashi is a very good looking car, but the 2.4L is lethargic! Those figures just don’t cut it. And what’s with the goose neck boot lid hinges? I thought it was an all new car?

    • matt

      WHYYYYYYYYYYY dont those figures cut it????? more power n better economy then its rivals (camry, mazda6)seems fine to me???? compare it to a lancer VRX even and its still better on fuel and more power, i dont get some of you lol, like thos people who say a 39 990 camry hybrid is overpriced???? i dont think so…

    • Smithy

      Yeah, just imagine moving one of those nice aluminium alloy suitcases too far over and trying to close the boot. A rather dissapointing design flaw for 2010 I think.

      • Baji

        Perhaps suzuki figured that people preferred the boot lid to pop open whenever they hit the button on the keyfob or pulled the lever inside the cabin? Strut type hinges require you to lift the boot lid open.

        Personally i’d prefer the strut hinges, but when those struts go, its a b!tch to open.

  • Jabba the Hut

    It must be good. Suzuki are offering anyone that test drives this car and then goes and buys its competitor a $200 cheque. That’s confidence.

    • Sumodog

      If you are say Mazda 6 buyer go and drive KIAzishi and pick up your $200.
      This might be nice car in isolation but it is not 6 or Accord Euro competitor. BTW headlights are interchangable with VW EOS.

      • Jabba the Hut

        How can you possibly know that without driving one? I am a big fan of the Mazda 6 and the Euro however istant dismissal of this car shows a high degree of ignorance. Personally I think it matched the others in many ways and it actually borders on muscular in its stance.

  • NotTheStig

    If anyone at Suzuki is reading, I would like you to know why I won’t buy one, even though I was quite interested, and this review made that decision more difficult as the car seems quite good…

    My partner wants (and presently has) a white manual sedan with cloth trim so that means a XL. Reasonable price but…

    No leather steering wheel and no cruise control – mmm…
    Pearl white ? – What is it with not offering normal paintwork ?
    Her present Jetta has auto wipers and rear parking sensors so she won’t go backwards there…

    Sad eh ? – just a few details can make all the difference…

    • t

      because pearl white is an extra charge premium colour and standard white is not.

      :)

      • Andrew

        Actually, the Pearl White IS Suzuki’s no cost option

        • Ricky

          You’re wrong. Red is the only non-metallic colour, the rest are $475 extra. So Suzuki offering pearl over flat is just them being greedy. It does look better, though.

          • Nobby

            Just to claify on the pearl white pricing – whilst the red is the only non metallic paint, the peral white is priced as non metallic and does not incur the extra $475 cost.

          • slammin sam

            pearl white is no charge

        • RobY75

          The Pearl White is offered as a no cost paint colour option on the other cars in Suzuki range – not just on the Kizashi.
          I have it on my Suzuki and it looks great.

      • Pookie

        Guys it depends on what dealership you go to…some dealers I have visited are only offering the red as the basic colour and white attracts a premium of $475…guess it just shows we should all shop around before buying and thank god for internet.You want value for money then go for the VW Jetta TSI which has all the options of the XLS at a much lower price…Suzuki,nice car but way overpriced so I’ll wait and watch to see if they drop their price in the coming 6mths before I make a decision to buy from a competitor

    • Shak

      Mate Suzuki can’t tailor its car for everyones needs. Its just doing what will appeal to most people most of the time. It has pretty much seen what equipment seels most of the time in their copetitors cars and put those in.

    • Jabba the Hut

      Cruise control can be fitted aftermarket on the manual version. Around $400 should do it and it can be done quite well. I had it added to my RX navara which you couldn’t get with it at all. Not even the auto. Once they found a pulse in the ECU it was a simple install.

      It seems that there are still a few makers relluctant to fit cruise to manuals and I have no idea why. Mine works a treat and is simply another stalk just down from the wipers.

    • Hung Low

      Leather Steering Wheel and Cruise is standard if you opt for the CVT box on the XL!!

      • Jabba the Hut

        Sorry for the negative vote Hung Low. I clicked the wrong button.

        Someone was carrying on about the price of the CVT. $2,500 is about right for that sort of auto option and with cruise control thrown in it is fairly reasonable.

        • Hung Low

          No worries, I accidently got you back :)

    • nick

      That’s a bit picky, cloth trim but leather steering wheel.

  • Ricky

    The SX4 didn’t “start” the process of Suzuki offering small cars. The Suzuki Esteem (Bolero here) was the first small Suzuki sedan in 1995. Then there was it’s successor, the Liana in 2001.

    • Mr Pee Pee

      Bolero? Do you mean Baleno?

      And before that there was the highly desirable Suzuki Swift and Swift GTi way back in the 80′s & 90′s.

      You must be too young to remember.

      • Ricky

        No I’m not too young to remember. The Swift was, and still is, a light car, not a small car. The Baleno (yes, thanks for the correction), was their very first SMALL car.

        • Hung Low

          Back then, the Swift was a small car. Something like the Alto was a light car!
          Cars have grown out of their respective classes in the last 2 decades.

          • Ricky

            No, even back then the Swift was a light car. C’mon, it had a 1.0L engine back then. Of course it was light. I have the official VFACTS sales data going back to 1991, and even then it was still considered a light car.

  • Ricky

    According to the Suzuki website, the $200 cash back deal is only valid on specific models: Accord Euro, Mazda6, Jetta, Subaru Liberty and Audi A4. That’s a very limited selection – so tough luck if you’re looking at buying the upcoming i45, or even the Camry (obviously left out because it’s bought mainly by fleets).

    • Shak

      No the i45 is now classified as a full sized car, dont know about the camry though, because ADR classification puts it in the mid sized category.

      • Ricky

        The Sonata is now classified as a full size car by the EPA in the USA, which has nothing to do with Australia. When it arrives here, I expect it will still be classed as a mid-size car. Dimensionally, it’s almost the exact same size as the Camry, unlike the full-size Accord which is nearly 5 metres long.

        • Shak

          Look at its measurements and they fall into the Full sized parameters as set out by the ADR’s. Im not going off of the EPA , im going off the cars actual measurements.

          • Ricky

            Well, Shak, you’re wrong there. Take the 2007 Accord, which was classified as a mid-size at the time. It was 4830mm in length. Now look at the Toyota Aurion, which is 4820mm – shorter, but classed as a full-size. In fact, only 10mm separates the Camry & Aurion – they are virtually identical in size, yet occupy different segments.

      • matt

        yet the aurion is a large car even though it is the same as camry with a diff engine

    • Jabba the Hut

      They probably figured that if you’re stupid enough to buy the camry you don’t deserve the money!

      • Baji

        LOL good one!! :-D

    • Sumodog

      Suzuki must be joking to think people will pick this over Accord Euro ,6, Jetta ,Liberty or Audi. Those are all established players and while Suzuki makes some great product (waves to his GSXR :-) ) it has brand perceptions to fight against.
      I think they should of done WRX type assault and produced turbo AWD model to capture original WRX buyers and creat a bit of a cult ,hero car. Then ,few years down the track , suits would consider it…

      • pirakavezok

        It’s no joke at all. Look at the specs- it beats or equals that of its competitors plus it’s price is lower compared to those named by you. True, Kizashi is not ground breaking in any way but it gives a damn good account of itself. In short, it is a serious contender-on an overall package basis.
        People like you need to break the bias about cars not on the usual shopping list. Open your eyes and you will see that the world has gone past you.

        • Sumodog

          It beats competitors ? Accord Euro engine develops 148kW and it has double wishbone suspension front and back – go and drive one. I haven’t driven Kizashi but have driven that engine in Vitara. Does not compare.
          People who shop for Euro ,6 or Jetta ( don’t even mention Audi) won’t even look at Kizashi , hence $200 offer.
          This might compete with Hyundai -Kia and Chinese newcomers.

          • Jabba the Hut

            You lost any remaining credibility when you compared this car to Chinese newcomers. I’d shop for Jetta and Euro and would put this vehicle on that list so that shatters your claim and I am a big fan of the honda and the VW after having driven both.

            This vehicle has pricked my interest. When the Hyundai/Kia stables bring out their new i45/Optima vehicles they will compete with the euro and jetta. Different people have different tastes and while the Euro “may” be the better overall competitor the reality remains that some will buy the i45 for its looks, others for its price point and others because they are upgrading out of a Lantra that has given them trouble free motoring since the day they took it home.

            The feedback I have had from the few owners that I have known to own Suzukis is that they too are trouble free and that will no doubt help this car. The belief that the biggest sellers are the best for reliability was recently undone by toyota.

            You sound a bit like a badge snob to me. Which is ok by me too. When it comes time to buy my next car I will have many options whereas apparently you will have just two due to a bogged down belief that because this car is all new it can’t be any good.

          • pogsy250

            i have worked for most vehicle manufacturers in dealerships, the only brand that i have ever seen everyone in the dealership agree that they would buy and own in suzuki. it was a surprise when you got a warranty claim and rare to see one break down. on the flip side BMW had the highest claims followed by jaguar and landrover.we own a kizashi and sx4, you can keep the bmw’s etc, i am wrapped with suzuki.

  • davo

    Nice car i like suzuki but no bluetooth on either models is a fail

    • matt

      bluetooth is dealer fit option

    • Gan Tan

      If you have a look at the Suzuki website BT is listed as an option

    • Sumodog

      To people who can’t drive a car without bluetooth- go and buy playstation ;-)

    • Valet Dabess

      can’t you drive and use your phone at the same time?

      • Sumodog

        I can drive and do many things but choose not to. In respect to other road users i choose to focus on driving.
        I do notice a lot of drivers talking on the phone (dumbtooth or not)and frankly their lane keeping needs adjustment not to mention awkward cornering lines. So i have to do their work and avoid them. In doing that i do talk (to myself) . I can’t really mention the words said.

  • Philthy

    I saw a line of Kizashi’s driving through Nerang packed full of blokes the other day. This explains it :) . Nice looking car BTW. Turbo AWD version anyone?

  • Ricky

    By the way I just noticed the interior shot is of a LHD model, yet the temperatures are in C meaning it’s not an American spec car. Seems odd.

    • Jabba the Hut

      Europe? There are plenty of markets that drive on the right that still weren’t as arrogant as the yanks when the metric system arrived.

  • Marc

    Rear is similar to the vauxhall insignia, and front looks very close to the vw jetta. Overall nice car but it’s going to have a tough time up against the likes of 6 and accord euro and upcomming i45 and optima

  • Scott

    Suzuki are making some good cars lately and this is by far the best. Everyone has their views on every brand but regardless of what your thoughts have been of Suzuki-This car deserves to take a good chunk of sales from the Mazda 6, Euro, Liberty etc. It’s a genuinely attractive car with plenty of space, good solid Japanese build quality, safety, and a good engine and driving dynamics. Really for the money it’s a hard car to beat. I hope they do well out of this car!

    • matt

      agreed and it is actually Japanese

  • http://www.gold-coast-australia-travel-tips.com Annie from Gold Coast

    When I first looked at this car it reminded me of Honda. I must say I would be interested most in the fuel consumption. That is how I judge cars these days.

    • Spiffy

      Well Annie, for an attractive middle aged woman who knows a lot about the Gold Coast, you seem know very little about what makes a good car. Try test driving a few different types. You will quickly come to appreciate that fuel ecconomy, while important, is far from the sum of a car!

    • boris

      if fuel consumption is what tickles your fancey but an alto …….bris to sydney one tank yeah

  • Gan Tan

    The more I look at the photos the more I’ve come to the conclusion that Kizashi is the spirtual successor to the old body Subaru Liberty in that its sporty looking and not fat and unwieldly like the new Liberty

  • riceboy

    why is there only a $1000 price difference between manual and CVT in XLS trim level? and much bigger price difference on XL trim level? Typo?

    • Ricky

      It’s a typo. The XLS manual is $34,990, and the auto $36,990. So there is $2,000 price difference on XLS, and $2,500 on XL. The strange thing is, I saw this article the minute it went up, and the price read $34,990 for the XLS manual. Odd.

  • Toyota Guru

    Hey CA, how did you go with getting through Cunningham’s Gap (between Beaudesert/Boonah and Warwick)? I hear they’ve been doing major roadworks there and are closing the road for 2 hour intervals (on and off a few times) during the day.

    It’s a fantastic bit of road for driving by the way. Would’ve given a good indication on how the Kizashi handles high speed cornering.

    • http://www.caradvice.com.au/ Alborz Fallah

      Didn’t go that way, we came through Gold Coast so went a very different scenic route, the gap is closed parts of the day so it wouldn’t have been very good to use.

  • t39

    riceboy: looks like the price difference is due to the bundling of cruise control with auto on XL, where is on XLS cruise control is standard, so the extra$ is just for the auto.

  • Victor

    Nice interior! If it will have AWD, I think I might go fot it!

  • Wayne Kerr

    Awesome car – if Suzuki release an AWD performance version I may even forgo my affordable dream car (XR6 Turbo). Suzuki knew what it was up against during the design stage and really made an impact.

  • Leon

    VW JETTA is small car, a sedan version of Golf. Cant be compared to other mid-size car (Accord Euro, Mazda 6, Liberty, Camry and Kizashi).

    • Pookie

      You obviously have not driven the Jetta…I don’t own one but have driven many vehicles recently as I’m looking to buy a reliable,value for money vehicle that can tow 1400kg.Do your self a favour and actually sit in the Jetta before making comment

  • Jabba the Hut

    If Suzuki come in here and read these comments they will be delighted. It’s not too often that the majority of posters in here agree on an all new model. If it’s any indication they are going to do well.

  • Vibe

    “still being comfortable enough for Brisbane’s horrid roads.”

    So very true.

    Just a quick question, in the picture of the boot, it looks as if it has hinges. Are they covered by the boot or do they go down into it as to press on bags or luggage?

    • Smithy

      Nah, 1970′s luggage crushing boot hinges – this would be a deal breaker for me in a car this size, as it dramatically reduces the usable space.

      • Vibe

        Yeah I agree, with so many cars having struts or enclosed hinges it would seem a bit silly.

        Mind you, VT/VX/VY/VZ commodores had them.

  • MazMagic

    VW Polo chances of winning car of the year are gone!

    This car looks really good.

    Just remember, Suzuki makes motorcycles so it should be a cracker to drive.

    This car will be good for Suzuki what Liberty did for Subaru in the late 1980′s.

    And yeah, this is from a Mazda6 fan.

  • ohreally

    Kizashi front = toyota aurion
    kizashi back = bmw 1 series coupe

    and i love it.

    looking forward to the v6 awd if that comes to our shores.

    • RallyWhiz

      I think front looks like the previous Golf GTI and rear like Mercedez Benz C class (tail lamps).

  • Simon

    Not a fan of the looks, maybe they will grow on me but I don’t like that grille or those headlights.

    Ipod, Iphone………….whatever.

    Gimme Sony, HTC, Samsung ect. I’m completely over Apple and their overated products.
    Just wish the other electronic companies would all get in bed and create a universal standard communication protocol for external devices. I’d far rather buy a car that supported such a device than be vendor locked to Apple!

    • Steven

      Good luck in hoping for any kind of universal standard. That is the reason you pay a bit more for Apple products, years of R&D and thought that goes into their products.

      They’re here to stay buddy!

      PS. You can always use the AUX for other products.

      • RallyWhiz

        Universal standard would be good and I totally agree with Simon. Apple is becoming a highly overrated and a belligerent behemoth. Classic example is when Steve Jobs lashed out at Adobe recently on his website about flash. Go read it.. You might be surprised to know that iPod design is not apple’s.. they stole it from an individual. Apple invest their R&D in making their products fit their product ecosystem and to their needs and requirements. The marketing spin they put around the product makes their them so popular. Its actually their marketing team that is a winner and not the Apple ecosystem products. Just look at the iPhone and the iPads.. they are the most overrated and most and under featured devices ever made. Alternatives? Upcoming Windows Phone 7 and the beautiful Zune HD. Unfortunately I use an iPhone and cant wait to get rid of it. Its actually the 4th replacement that I got from the genius bar. Check my blog on iphonesucks.wordpress.com.

        btw, the looks of the Kizashi arent that great. I think the front looks a bit dumb and unexciting.

        • Shak

          If you actually take a look, Apple dont advertise that much, its more word of mouth. And thething with Apple is that they read a confused market and simplified the product and tailored it to meet most consumers’ needs, so of course they deserve to succeed. The thing is the industry had super/smart phones long before the iPhone, its just that Apple made one that most people could use and wanted, and not just a phone suited to executive tastes. And because of this they have become the industry norm.

      • Simon

        Industry is always collaborating to produce new products and standards.
        This is how a lot of technology gets it genesis.
        It’s just time they got together to sort out the “I” craze juggernaught by creating a new standard that is better than Apple’s.
        If they were all together, you can’t tell me car manufacturers would ignore them when they would represent the bulk of their consumer’s interests.

  • ErrNo!

    Gooseneck boot lid hinges, limited head room and visibility, rubbish centre rear seat.FAIL!

    WWWAAAAYYYYYYY over the odd$, should be low low $20k’s, another orphan like skoda

  • Radster

    I love my 2010 Mazda 6, but this news Suzuki looks like a worthy competitior to the other players in the midsize segment. Competition is always most welcome!

    Odd though how mention is made – in passing – of the thick A pillars, yet the VE Commodore is repeatedly condemned for them. Methinks objectivity is a myth and subjectivity is the norm!

  • Steven

    To all those arguing about 4 cylinder vs 6 cylinder, many Europeans just plump for a Turbo Diesel which have superior torque and great in gear acceleration plus amazing fuel consumption.

    Small capacity turbo charged petrols and turbo diesels are the future.

  • oz boy

    Saw it in the flesh today , looks good , this will lure liberty owners , particularly when the awd arrives .

    Subaru drivers will have affinity with the suzuki solidity and reliability , should win over those who cant cope with the awkward liberty style .

    • boris

      i work for a yard that sells both subaru and suzuki and yes this is exactly what happened on saturday our subaru sales rep was showing the liberty and as soon as these clients spotted the kizashi they were all over it in the xls spec , i took them for a drive and i have never heard anyone say how much they loved this car from within seconds of driving it, we got back and yes they did purchase the car. i have worked for suzuki for over 4 yrs and i really think this car is going to be great for the brand.

  • john

    nice car, okay 131kW for a 4cyl … rather ugly looking engine from the outside. Not much torque either 230Nm for a 2.4L instead of 240 or 250Nm to at least beat the 100Nm/L mark.

    at the end of the day you can pick a stock standard BA XT 2002-2005 for around $8000-10000 with a 4L DOHC, better looking, more advanced engine despite the age.

    Still get 380Nm of torque and 182kW of power. Again this is size and power versus money.

    Ultimately after driving this car, i find my old 5 speed AU Falcon a lot more responsive, not to mention my currently new addition a 2005 BF1 Fairmont Ghia 5.4L six speed auto.

    Those who eat this category of cars for breakfast. There is no way you can parallel a 4 cylinder even if it made 150-160kW N/A to a N/A 6 cyl above 3L of capacity.

    My business Aurion AT-X totally eats this 2.4L Suzuki. Tested it and i literally disappeared 5 car lengths away from Kizashi, literally pulling away.

    So yea , go and get yourself a nice 6 cylinder Falcon or Toyota Aurion, perhaps try an AUIII XR8 220kW or a Fairmont Ghia 5.4 BA-BF, they’re as smooth as silk.

    Not to mention 2.7L per engine bank = 5.4L. Where on earth can you buy a 4 cylinder car nowdays with a 2.7L 4 cylinder engine? Citroen? you’d be lookin at $99900.

    So go get yaself something real, Aurion 3.5 or a Falcon 4.0 , both kings of the road!

    • Jabba the Hut

      Drinking the bong water? What a pile of dribble. Already had a drag race with a Kizashi in your Arion? Get off the grass. You “disappeared” 5 car lengths? What the heck does that mean? I doubt you could see through the cloud of gunja smoke in your cabin to see anything. Where do these people come from?

      • Pookie

        Yeah he’s definately tripping…I’ve driven the manual which goes hard unlike the tamed CVT version.Obviously that hadn’t even started up the Kizashi when he had 5 car lengths on him…Tosser!!!

    • Scott

      You are a fool to be directly comparing this car to your collection of Falcons… They are not comparable cars! You’re comparing thirsty large cars to frugal medium segment cars. Neither of your falcons pass the 100NM/L mark so why did you buy them when you don’t think this engine is worth of mention for that reason? This engine also has a far higher specific power than your falcons.

      The engine specs put this car at the pointy end of its class in terms of power and torque, it’s not expected to compete with 6cylinders in other classes of car. But this isn’t the reason most people buy a medium sized family car anyway. You’re ignorant to an intelligent standpoint..

      Bragging of your drag race on a public forum isn’t particularly bright either. You stick to your falcons and aurions mate, you obviously enjoy them…

    • t39

      A Boing 747 is something like 10 times faster than an Aurion or a Falcon. But, is it any fun to commute in?

      Aurion/Falcon are faster in a straight line but that does not make them more enjoyable.

      • http://www.lukehimself.net Luke

        Sure buy the second-hand Falcon, don’t complain to us when the Kizashi drives past while you’re head gasket is getting replaced!

    • http://caradvice OSU811

      John you are a tool!!
      if straight line speed is all thats important to you
      why not but a VL commodore turbo for next to nothing
      and boost the crap out of it, yes it wont brake or handle or be safe in an accident but who cares it will beat most cars from the lights right?????

      • Ben xr6

        Stuff that XR6 turbo if you want straight line speed and it will be miles safer than a VL

  • Patrick

    You Australians want a V6. But We Canadians want a 4 cylinders. Most of the cars on the streets are either V6 or V8+.

    • Simon

      Personally I want a high output 6 cylinder turbo diesel in a large car with awesome driving dynamics.
      Something like BMWs 3.0L I6 Turbo diesel engine from the 330D but in a car of 7 series proportions.
      Unfortunately such a combination of good handling, power, torque, speed, comfort, frugality, size, good looks and safety is a rare combination. Merc and BMW both have something very close but average joe will never find himself in one.
      Here’s hoping that a company like Hyundai will make it happen!

  • http://www.lukehimself.net Luke

    I personally wouldn’t buy this car, but I think it’s a great car and will sell like anything. It’s the gap Suzuki needed to fill, and with the Swift being so popular as a small car, people looking for the bigger family car will jump at this! Plus, it looks great (not sure about those exhaust covers though).

    • pirakavezok

      On the other hand, I’ll buy it if and when I’m in the market for a mid sized sedan. IMHO everything about this car, from its body size to engine power and interior and boot space are all just about right for a car in this category-not too big not too small. The looks is easily likeable and the fuel economy ain’t too bad.

  • nick

    I would love to know the rear-seat legroom compared to an Accord Euro. Both are very similar cars.

    • Michael

      I test drove one on friday, and it really is a well made car, it had heaps of room in the back. I could fault the car if i tried, but im remembering the price, and for what it costs and what it is, it is a really good car.

  • s14aNZ

    Nice! But could have been a bit more nicer if they stuck to the concept: http://www.caradvice.com.au/17381/suzuki-kizashi-3-concept-2008-aims/

    • Fossey

      That’s actually the third-gen concept. The first one was the money – each generation has become increasingly tame. In my opinion the production car shouldn’t be called Kizashi. Many other car companies have learned the trick behind concept cars vs production cars – in this case it’s a branding issue. They’ve almost cheapened the Kizashi name by letting it come to production, rather than letting us all continue to drool over what might one day be, we are left with the sad reality that the beast has been sedated and tamed to the point where it no longer looks exciting at all.

      Hope it’s a different kind of drive though.

      Check the evolution of the concepts here http://cars4fast.blogspot.com/2010/05/suzuki-kizashi-concept-3.html

  • PickUp

    $36,000 for a mid sized car with a 2.4L engine… pleeeeeeeeeeeeeeease. It looks greater, handles great and has decent features, but it is almost insulting that a car which is a new entry into the market is that highly priced.

  • Graham B

    I drove the XLS at Southport yesterday and was impressed by its handling, steering, acceleration, quietness and appointments.

    I got the impression from the salesman that they were willing to significantly discount on its very reasonable $40,400 on road price.

    I’ll drive the Hyundai i45 soon and look at my options – including the Mazda 6 Luxury and Honda Accord.

  • Ricky

    Here’s something that may surprise some: in the US last month, Hyundai’s Sonata (i45) outsold Kizashi 45 to 1. No, that isn’t a typo. Sonata sold 45 cars to every 1 Kizashi. :)

    • Warren

      Doesn’t surprise me at all from a country that didn’t release Swift – clearly the most successful Suzuki that was ever released here.

      With the top 2 Automotive Groups in USA YTD 2010, void of the likes of Toyota, the US is hardly a relative comparison to what goes on here.

      I think Kizashi looks hot & drives the same – simple.

      • Ricky

        US don’t like small hatchbacks, never have never will. I was there last year and I could count on one hand, the number of Toyota Yarises and Honda Jazzs I saw in a period of a month. These cars do have a certain appeal to certain types of people in the US, but they will never become mainstream like they have here. They will always remain a niche there.

  • wayne

    I cannot speak to the likes and dislikes of Australians since I am American. I can state that I own a 2010 Kizashi SLS CVT AWD. I previously drove a 2005 Mercedes C-Class 4matic. Though the Kizashi may not be as refined or well=polished as the C-Class, the Kizashi still was able to handle like a true German sports sedan. The Kizashi isn’t perfect, but it is a great car for the price (at least here in the States). With regard to Hyundais vs Suzukis, Suzuki is not well-respected or that well represented (very few dealerships compared to Hyundai). Suzuki got a horrible reputation from selling rebranded Daewoos here in the States. Suzuki has a long road ahead of itself if it hopes to rehabilitate its image. The next gen Swift is going to be released finally in 2011 here. I am far from a Suzuki fanatic, but some comments about the Kizashi seem a bit harsh. You really need to see the car in person and take it on a test drive. Your perception just might change.

    • http://CarAdviceKizashiReview Wayne

      I agree totally Wayne,
      i am yet to test drive one, but have looked at them and i think thet are just SEX on WHEELS:) in fact i am scared to test drive as i know i will want one if i do. I am so impressed at the European styling of them and the impressive wheel base underneath gives it that horny sporty look that it so has.

  • Reality

    Is that boot size correct? 460 ltrs seems on the small size for a car in the medium size class.

  • Fossey

    What the hell went wrong at Suzuki!!!

    This is NOT the Kizashi! This car may well be a nice, well rounded mid-sized sedan, but the Kizashi was a concept car that was pure cool.

    I’m not saying that this car will be a bad one, I’m just saying that Suzuki need to learn a thing or two about branding. They’ve devalued the Kizashi name by applying it to a mediocre sedan, when it should have been reserved for a flagship sports car, or possibly even stayed as a concept name only.

    Disappointed :(

  • Pete

    Great read. I myself used to be one of those people who wouldn\’t touch a Suzuki or Hyundai and would opt for a Mazda or Toyota.

    The Suzuki of new is a car I would definetly consider.

    Keep up the good work!

  • Heather Phillips

    We have owned a luxury Mazda6 for 7 years & 170000+ kms of interstate driving, but yesterday we test drove and put a deposit on a Kizashi XLS.

    The car had plenty of pick-up – something that I insist on after down sizing from a V6 (before the Mazda), very smooth transmission, steering and handling. The brakes very responsive and the ride was really comfortable. What impressed us as much as the drive however, was how much bang we were getting for our buck. Similar features in the new Mazda 6 would have cost us about $10K more.

  • qwerty

    I too am intrigued by the Suzuki, being a dismayed and disilusioned previous generation Liberty owner, I think many ex Subaru fans will be split between this and the Skoda. However, from what I read the GFC cut into the development budget of this vehicle and it shows in some areas. No factory fitted satnav or bluetooth are the obvious things. But what about the hidden things that only come to light after years of ownership, build quality, reliability of mechanical components and electrical systems, etc…

    Dont get me wrong, I’ll test drive one and I choose cars that handle, go and have a comfortable interior (in that order) so it may well fit the bill. But ther’re always be a shadow of doubt in my mind about reliability and therefore resale…

    • nickdl

      I wouldn’t worry about Suzuki’s reliability at all. They have proven to be tough, reliable vehicles and the Kizashi will continue this tradition. Even if something does go wrong it will cost a lot less to fix in a Suzuki than a Skoda or VW.

      As for the sat-nav and bluetooth, they’re features that are annoying to not even be optional, but aftermarket ones are just as good. A Blueant can be purchased for about $100 and they work fantastic.

      The only advantage of an in-car GPS is that it can’t be stolen. You’re much better off spending $300 on a decent TomTom which will have better maps and cost nothing to update.

      • nickdl

        Hope I didn’t sound like a salesman…

        The Kizashi is nice but those stupid boot hinges are a real turn-off. Ford have had the good ones since the AU Falcon, why can’t Suzuki do the same. I guess that’s the development costs.

  • http://www.suzuki-usj.com Suzuki Dealer Malaysia

    Thanks for the detail write-up. Very Informative and helpful when Suzuki Kizashi is made available in Malaysia.

  • Russel

    I will try a Kizashi as I recommended it as a great contender (not for me, but a family member). Really want to compare with my 2l diesel Laguna 3 which now has some powerful attributes never mentioned. Renault is back in the game (some models eg Megane sport) and with the Nissan partnership have great reliability and reduced costs. Other Euro 4 cylinder diesel / petrol dont seem to add up.
    My old Accord is still very comfy though, and reliable @ almost 300k (apart from ignition switch). My daughter loves it – cost $ 5k not 30k. Seems the brands are moving on for better or worse. My work Yaris is a woeful buzbox but has a good tight turning circle if that counts. Anything about Laguna 3 – PLEASE – its there and undiscovered.

  • Chunky

    I would not normally look at a Suzuki car, but from what I have read about this car, and having seen a few on the road, I may reconsider.

    I drive a WRX at the moment, and, whilst I still love it to death, it’s getting a little long in the tooth.

    If Kizashi was available in a AWD Turbo 4 combo, I would definitely be taking one for a test drive!

  • johny

    i think that the kizashi is the best car in its segment, all the luxury that u get in it, is just unbeleivable, it is value for your money…. at least it is japanese built, not like other cars in the market …

  • http://google doug

    thinking of buy for wife for work mainly
    what do u think

  • dan

    Has anyone else found the headrest too far forward and therefore seating uncomfortable?

  • http://www.creditsmartcanada.com/ Banwanna

     

    I have owned my 2011 Suzuki Kizashi SX for three
    months now and can say it is probably the best kept secret in the car industry.
    Safer than a Volvo, more responsive a BMW or Audi and costs way less. For being
    the bestselling car in Japan I am surprised no one in Canada has ever heard of
    it, likely Because of a non-existent ad campaign. Great Warranty, Fun to drive,
    turns heads everywhere I go. The quality of the build, fit, finish and all the
    little details and gadgets Suzuki included are impressive. This car is
    defiantly worth a test drive even if you’re looking at its more expensive
    European Car!

    My Favorite
    Features for Kizashi are the iAWD, Safety features, Leather interior, moon
    roof, Sports Shift (standard on all Automatic models), performance and
    handling, Aggressive wheels, Exciting styling, Warranty, Low Price.

     

    This car is great! The people at Suzuki walked me
    through everything and answered all of my questions, even the ones that I
    didn’t know I had! I really like the way that the car feels while I’m inside of
    it on the city streets plus it looks like luxury…with me inside it!

    Thanks to Auto Source for arranging my
    loan and Credit Smart Canada
    for fixing all my Credit Issues. Now I have the Car I always dreamed of, my
    Credit is repaired thanks to Credit Smart Canada life is good!