Car Advice

Mercedes-Benz 4.6-litre twin-turbo V8 specifications

By Alborz Fallah |

The Germans have always been regarded as the pioneers of automotive engine development, year after year the likes of Mercedes-Benz, BMW and the Volkswagen Group come out with new engines that provide more power whilst using less fuel. The latest engine that showcases German brilliance is the all-new 4.6-litre twin-turbo V8 engine that puts out 320 kW (435 hp) and 700 Nm of torque. Yes, 700 Nm.

The reason why this engine is worth its own article is its engineering brilliance. To be seen first in the CL-Class, and later in the S-Class from late 2010, the new V8 has gone down 15 percent in capacity whilst going up 12 percent in power. It wouldn’t be much of an improvement if fuel usage hadn’t come down whilst the power had gone up, but it has. In the CL 500, it now uses 9.5-litres per 100km as oppose to 12.3-litres with the previous V8.

CO2 emissions have also come down by 22 percent, from 288 g/km to 224 g/km. Although power figures of 320 kW may not be that high for a V8 these days, the 700 Nm of torque (an increase of 32 percent over previous generation) available from 1800rpm puts the Mercedes V8 in a new league.

Mercedes-Benz says its engineers managed to gain the considerable power and torque figures by using two turbochargers, one for each bank of cylinders. Without the turbos, it would’ve require a naturally aspirated 7-litre engine to produce similar figures, the new V8 delivers 600 Nm of torque between 1600 and 4750 rpm.

The twin-turbo setup means there is no turbo-lag and power and torque is delivered throughout the rev range.

As with its new V6 sibling, the V8 makes use of aluminium crankcases, pistons and cylinder heads.


 
  • Steve-Poyza

    Wow! Those are some great figures! Go Mercedes, they seem to be going down the same path as BMW with the twin turbochargers.

    • Toyota Guru

      +1 What’s really impressive is the fuel economy figures for these new MB engines.

      • Lawrence

        In the past more japanese cars are made with turbo engines… but nowadays german cars are making more turbo engines!

  • Jabba the Hut

    You simply don’t need more than 320 kw when you are pumping 700 eye popping newtons and using less than 10 ltrs per 100k’s in the process. Of course pressing on the ponies will rapidly double that consumption but that’s not the point.

    I must admit to being a little cold on Merc the past few years but this engine deserves praise . Excellent stuff. Without these sorts of breakthroughs V8 engines run the risk of becoming extinct as efficiency demands are increased so it’s implications are massive. No doubt other manufacturers will be queueing up to pull one apart for a looksee.

  • saywhat

    is this going in the next C63?

    • Baddass

      I’m guessing so, and then the twin-turbo 5.5 will go in the range toppers. Great power figures too. Although the capacity number 4.6, will always remind me of the Ford Crown Victoria, with its 4.6l V8 with a meagre 170kw. This doubles that.

      • daan

        Yeah, but its probably 10 times the price and wouldnt do 500,000klm before it needs a rebuild.

        • DDH

          I’m guessing the c63 will keep its engine, at least in this model cycle…its too much of a cult car to lose the big NA

  • Frenchie

    Awesome engine. Engineering at its best!

  • Ryan

    I can’t wait for some crazy English man to put this motor in either a lotus exige or Ariel atom that would be awesome

  • Sick of Muscle Cars

    Can anyone help me fit this engine in a Commodore SS..? Frankly, if this kind of an engine is fitted in Holden Commodore SS series it would have been a much better car!!! Are you listening HOLDEN ????

    • Frenchie

      Dude the CL class in which this motor is going in starts at $350,000- $535,000.
      The motor alone could probably buy 4-6 SS commodores. There is just no comparing these two vehicles let alone putting an expensive piece of engineered motor into a budget shell like a holden SS!

  • Schuss

    Both this article and the one about the 3.5v6 shows us how much other brands have caught up. For eg the ford or FPV engines. Less cylinders, smaller engine but similar output. Or the gm 3.6 in comparison to the merc 3.5. The gap is now small!

  • http://www.v8supergeek.com Luke

    Finally people are starting to realise, it’s all about torque baby :D

    • Hugh Jorgan

      And torque all over the rev range.

  • Valet Dabess

    700 nm! it’s stepping all over hemi’s. and when i read the 600 of torque available at 1600 it put a smile on my face :D

    i thought this engine was suppose to have 400kw +

    • HJP

      400kw plus 5.5L V8 is reserved for AMG models.

      • Valet Dabess

        so the normal model get’s a 4.5 twin turbo an the amg gets 5.5 twin turbo. that’s just insane!

  • Hugh Jorgan

    RIP the naturally aspirated aural heaven that was the 6.3

    Bring on the stupid amounts of torque!

  • Skobee Doo

    Can’t wait for these to come out,I wan’t to line one of these up against my Skoda Superb at the lights its got a piggyback computer a 4 inch exhaust from the rear muffluer back and micky thomsens on the rear.

  • ErrNo!

    …Why you going gaagaa over this?, its a poor output level with not 1 but 2 turbos fitted.

    …Be that as it may, the superior and more advance Italian Engineering manage to get 420kW out of a SMALLER engine and WITHOUT ANY as in no turbos!

    …Well done 458 Italia Ferrari!!

    …Italian engineering all the way!

    • Shak

      Good point, but the hing with Ferrari engine i that they pay no heeed to fuel efficieny and you have to(WANT to) rev the nuts off ‘em to get the torque and power. Not saying its a crappy, donk, far from it. Its just not made for the same purposes as the MB engine, which make them both brilliant engines in their own fields.

    • Hung Lower

      What is the life expectency for that Italian engine?
      You cannot compare a highly strung, high revving engine to this more versatile unit that can be used in heavy luxury saloons as well as a sports coupe thanks to its huge torque and average power!
      You can have your cake and eat it with finesse! Ferrari engines are purpose built and great at that, versatile they are not!
      Too much Italian pride perhaps?

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100001039632084 Shaun Harris

    i simply wish that somehow, somewhere, someone would just post this engines size specifications… in other words, a detailed diagram of the length, height and width of it. it remains hard to design super-cars around the engine, when you dont have measurements for it. i mean what now? where would i place an engine like this? rear, middle or front? it changes the shape and thus, the flow of air over the body might not be as aerodynamic. please. if someone could just help me in my aid to design the greatest car the world has not yet seen, just by getting me an amazing v8′s measurements… i would be greatfull.