blog counter
P-Plater Vehicle Restrictions Under Fire : Car Advice | News Blog

P-Plater Vehicle Restrictions Under Fire

September 26, 2007 by Alborz Fallah  




The recently introduced P-Plater laws which prohibit young drivers from driving supercharged, turbocharged, V8+ or modified vehicles in QLD and Victoria have come under some considerable scrutiny.

Holden VE Commodore SS

In another attempt by the State governments to simply cover-up a much more complicated problem of rising P-Plater accidents, the blanket restrictions have caused a massive headache for the car industry.

So far the NSW, QLD and VIC transport authorities have all failed to produce any sort of evidence linking the blacklisted vehicles to higher accident rates amongst P-platers.

Victoria Police

Not to worry though, frustration is not just limited to P-Platers and car enthusiasts, GoAuto reports the Federal Chamber of Automotive Industries chief executive Andrew McKellar has put his weight behind the move to pressure the Victorian government to reconsider the bans.

To be banning vehicles on the basis that they constitute some sort of safety risk to young drivers when in fact, quite the contrary, we are talking about brands with some of the best safety track records going around, just highlights the ludicrous nature of the regulations,” Mr McKellar told GoAuto.

Just to point out an example before we continue, the new laws have banned all supercharged C-class Mercedes-Benz vehicles, even though most produce minimal power (as low as 105kW!), but provide five-star safety rating for passengers and pedestrians, however cars like the Holden Barina, which manage a dismal two-star safety rating are presented as a safer choice.

Mercedes-Benz C180

The P-plater vehicle restrictions, which have also found their way to Queensland recently, were designed to stop young and inexperienced drivers from getting behind the wheel of performance cars.

The problem, of course, is that not all turbo and supercharged cars are performance cars, in QLD and Victoria the only vehicles that transport authorities have officially excluded from the supercharged/turbocharged blacklist is the entire range of cars from Smart, the Daihatsu Copen and Suzuki’s long forgotten Cappucino.

Suzuki Cappucino

Unfortunately, that leaves the likes of Audi, Volkswagen, Mercedes-Benz and Peugeot, to name a few, in a bad situation.

Peugeot’s 206 CC Turbo (110kW), the new 1.4-litre twin-charged Volkswagen Golf GT (125kW), Audi’s 1.8-litre turbo A4 (120kW) etc, are all banned due to forced induction.

aus2007051691308_alt.jpg

However, in Queensland, cars such as the 3.5-litre Holden VE Commodore (180kW), 4.0-litre Ford Falcon (190kW), Volkswagen’s 3.2-litre AWD performance car, the Golf R32 and any other naturally aspirated vehicle below 200kW is allowed!

2006 Volkswagen Golf R32

In Victoria, the previous laws allowed for a maximum of 125kW of power per ton, and this appeared to be a well thought out plan, however cars such as Subaru’s trouble-making Impreza WRX managed to slip through (~120kW per tonne) and Victorian Police had a hard time working out which cars were banned.

Nonetheless, under the old laws cars such as Honda’s roadrocket, the S2000, was kept at bay, but not any more!

Honda S2000

VicRoads website says the old laws will continue for current P-platers, but all young drivers that have been licensed since July this year will come under the new laws. Meaning a 17-year P1 plater can get behind the wheel of a 176kW Honda S2000, but not a 110kW Peugeot!

Apart from the blanket restrictions on V8+/Turbo/Supercharged/Modified vehicles, the following are also banned for young drivers in Victoria.

Make Model Release Year/s Cylinders
BMW M 1998 6
BMW M3 1994 – 2004 6
BMW M5 1990 6
BMW Z4 2006 onwards 6
Nissan 350Z 2002 onwards V6
Honda NSX 2 Door Coupe 1991 – 2002 V6
Porsche 911 1993 – 2006 6
Porsche Boxster 1999 – 2006 6
Porsche Cayman 2006 onwards 6
Mercedes Benz SLK 350 2004 onwards V6
Mercedes Benz C350 2005 onwards V6
Mercedes Benz C36 1995 6

The list appears very incomplete with many high performance naturally aspirated vehicles, such as the Honda S2000, BMW Z3, Volkswagen Golf R32, Audi Quattro 3.2-litre AWD missing.

Let’s put the argument in some simple hard facts, the 1.8-litre four-cylinder turbo Audi A4 gets from 0-100km/h in 8.6 seconds while its performance orientated brother, the 3.2-litre V6 Quattro AWD (naturally aspirated), does the same run in 7.2 seconds, which one would you ban?

Audi A4

The 1.4-litre twin-charged Volkswagen Golf GT does the dash in 7.9 seconds while the performance prepared Golf R32 beats it by 1.7 seconds!

Surely no one at VicRoads or QLD Transport actually bothered to look this up! Obviously if it’s a turbo or supercharged, it means it goes fast… and somehow leads to late night hooning activities… right?

The question still remains, when will transport authorities start training young drivers and introducing mandatory advanced driving courses instead of simply putting blanket bans on a whole list of cars and installing more and more speed cameras?

Instead, transport authorities have bad-mouthed driver training courses as producing over-confident drivers that are more accident prone, despite all evidence to the contrary.

What really needs to be done, is the introduction of mandatory advanced driver training for all new drivers and a five-year re-licensing scheme to make sure the nation’s drivers are up to scratch with their driving skills.

Yes it’s expensive, but so is the human and financial cost of the nation’s rising road toll. As the new saying goes:

Don’t ban high performance cars, ban low performance drivers!

Think of it this way, when a learner undergoes a current driving test, a simple emergency braking procedure is not performed, so the first time a new driver experiences emergency braking is to avoid an accident, however it is a criteria of the driving test that the leaner perform a parallel or reverse park…

Now how many times have you practised a fire evacuation in your workplace, university or school and have had to actually use your experience to escape a fire? And how many times have you had to slam on the brakes to avoid an accident? They are just as important as each other, yet one is completely neglected.
Make sure you head over to GoAuto and read the rest of their report.

Alborz Fallah

Share this article:
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • MySpace
  • del.icio.us
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Digg



Related Articles:

Car confiscation in new P-plater plan
A new plan will be put to the New South Wales government that will allow police to confiscate cars from

NSW P Plater rules July 2007
The NSW Government has decided to stick with its knee jerk reaction restriction on P platers which will surface from

NSW P-Platers Banned from Mobile Phones (handsfree)
So as the NSW government considers introducing the Zero Tolerance P plater laws, they have already agreed to pass a

Volkswagen Golf VI gets P-plate okay in NSW
When Volkswagen's all new Golf VI hit the showrooms, Australia's illogical blanket ban on turbocharged and supercharged cars for P-platers

Massachusetts Teens Face Massive Speeding Fines
If you thought you were hard done-by the new P plater restrictions, stop worrying, its not only Australia that is

Comments

57 Responses to “P-Plater Vehicle Restrictions Under Fire”
  1. MOE says:

    ive got a holden vl turbo stock as a rock and i am banned to drive it… wats the point.. the new laws are not only wrong but also a waste of time.. i got fined for speeding in my parents camry.. a car accident can happen in anyfing..

  2. Luke says:

    What P plater can afford a Golf Turbo anyway? A VL turbo or Skyline I can understand us P platers being upset about not being able to drive but majority of these cars 99% of P platers cant afford. For instance C class Mercs…

  3. bob says:

    Putting a ban on high performance cars isn’t the smartest thing to do, driver education is a better way, the test to obtain a P1 or P2 is rediculously easy.Personally i really dont think p platers care if too much and still continue to drive high performance cars without their plates displayed.

  4. Luke says:

    hi
    i think these rules are stupid for the obvious reasons.
    the anwser is’nt banning high powered car it is educating young drivers through advanced driving course so they know how to drive there car, it does’nt matter how powerfull.

  5. A burden of one’s choice is not felt

  6. Josh says:

    I was looking at purchasing a subaru wrx, not because it was powerful or because it had a turbo and an intercooler, but because it is a 4WD, stock sports suspension and drives the same in the wet as in the dry. if you are not driving like an idiot – then your far less likely to crash in a car of this nature. your run of the mill sv6 is going to be far more dangerould, or your vs commodore s-pack, which has no traction control and is rwd power. it doesnt make sense

Trackbacks

Check out what others are saying about this post...
  1. Wendy says:

    Wendy…

    I think I read something very similar on the AP just the other day….

  2.  Vote: Add rating 0  Subtract rating 0  


Speak Your Mind

Tell us what you're thinking...
and oh, if you want a pic to show with your comment, go get a gravatar!

*
To prove you're a person (not a spam script), type the security word shown in the picture. Click on the picture to hear an audio file of the word.
Click to hear an audio file of the anti-spam word