Car Advice

Suzuki SX4 Review

SUZUKI SX4

Pros: 

Cons: 

By Paul Maric |
Add to shortlist

Price: $12,960 to $22,080

Our Rating:  

2010 Suzuki SX4 First Steer Review

Bundled in a segment where every man and his dog wants more for less, Suzuki has further refined its niche burrowing SX4 Hatch and SX4 Sedan.

While exterior styling changes will only be spotted by the keen observer, they are limited to a new grille and different alloy wheels. On the other hand, the interior has undergone significant changes, including revision to the climate control cluster, trip computer and audio functions.

The revised SX4 range launches with three models and two drivetrains.

The entry level SX4 Hatch features front-wheel-drive and a six-speed manual gearbox, with pricing starting at $20,490. The entry level SX4 still features the rugged looks of its all-wheel-drive sibling, making it a viable option for punters after a city dwelling vehicle with the advantage of added ground clearance.

At the helm of the SX4, a commanding driving position ensures easy driving with excellent visibility out the front and rear of the vehicle. The high roofline features masses of head room, giving taller passengers ample accommodation.

If the slick shifting, smooth six-speed manual doesn’t tickle your fancy, Suzuki also offers a Continuously Variable Transmission (CVT) for an additional $2,000. Where the manual gearbox needs to be in the right rev band to extract the most out of the SX4, the CVT almost instantaneously jumps into action at the drop of the throttle.

While the engine sounds a bit thrashy at high revs, the CVT is the best thing that could have happened to the SX4. In addition to improved feel behind the wheel, Suzuki has managed to slash fuel consumption figures – being one of the customer’s main complaints with the outgoing model.

The six-speed manual consumes 11 percent less than the outgoing model at 7.3L/100km, while the CVT trumps the outgoing automatic by 16 percent, coming down to 7.6L/100km. In addition to fuel consumption savings, power has increased five percent to 112kW and torque by three percent to 190Nm.

The all-wheel-drive with six-speed manual starts from $23,490, while the front-wheel-drive sedan is only available in S trim, starting at $23,990 for the six-speed manual, with the CVT a $2,000 premium.

In addition to fuel consumption complaints, owners of the previous generation vehicle were also critical of the lack of safety features. Suzuki has addressed concerns by implementing Electronic Stability Control (ESC) and making it standard across the range. In addition to ESC, each model comes with six airbags (except the base front-wheel-drive hatch).

Rear seat leg room is slightly cramped in the hatch, but surprisingly spacious in the sedan. While the sedan may not feature the hatch’s 175mm ground clearance, it does feature a Commodore beating 515 litres luggage capacity.

To demonstrate the all-paw SX4’s ability off-road, Suzuki set up a mild off-road loop that included a muddy hill climb and rutted mogul. The hill climb was tackled in the ‘auto’ mode. The ‘auto’ mode remains in front-wheel-drive mode until the vehicle senses traction loss. From there, the centre differential can send up to 50% of torque to the rear wheels, helping in situations where traction is at a premium.

Surprisingly, the SX4 walked up the muddy hill with relative ease. Although the SX4 is no Landcruiser off-road, it goes to show that it’s as capable as prospective owners would expect it to be.

The rutted mogul went on to show how the added ground clearance of the hatch helped during situations such as grade variations.

The on-road portion of the loop highlighted the tight chassis the SX4 is built on. The weighed steering adds feel through corners and communicates all aspects of the road surface to the driver. Tremendous grip and the ability to grab the car by the scruff of the neck make it a pleasure to drive on easy going roads and tight, twisty stretches of road.

During the press conference, Suzuki was quizzed about the availability of a diesel engine. While there is currently a diesel available in Europe, it isn’t available to Suzuki in Australia. General Manager of Suzuki Australia, Tony Devers, told CarAdvice, “if it comes up, we’ll evaluate it”, and went on to support the idea of a diesel in the SX4.

Suzuki hopes to sell around 500 SX4s, up from the 250-280 averaged during the previous generation’s tenure. Exceptional pricing, impressive ability both on and off-road, along with a raft of safety features will ensure the SX4 sells well in Australia.

If you have been hesitant to sample the Suzuki brand, there is no better time to give it a shot. If the SX4 revision is anything to go by, Suzuki has a long and illustrious future ahead of it.


 

Reader reviews of the SUZUKI SX4

<

Write a review for the SUZUKI SX4

Do you own this car? Share your opinion and add your own review below.

Add a New Review
>
  • The Oracle’s Teacher

    Perhaps one of the most understated brands on the Australian market. I have spoken to a couple of owners of the vitara who had it for a number of years and the response was positive.

    I think Suzuki’s biggest issue with its cars is its marketing? They don’t seem to get the message across that they do a good range of vehicles. Maybe their entrance into the medium large market (kazashi) shortly will help fix that perception? Certainly the manual’s claimed 0-100 in 7.4 secs won’t harm it.

    I very nearly bought an SX4 for my partner but she would have needed two heads to see around the a-pillar.

    Otherwise it was a solid car and well finished.

    • The Oracle’s Teacher

      Excuse the typo. I meant Kizashi. It also appears they have fixed the a-pillar issue in the SX4 .

  • Robin Graves

    Like a lot of other Japanese makes, Suzuki used to make ultra-reliable bulletproof cars until they ran into financial trouble and were taken over by overseas companies. Once these other companies send in the accountants, the legendary engineering and reliability goes out the window.

    • Mitch

      Suzuki have never made a loss, so they cant have been in too much financial trouble.

      • toxic_horse

        I have a SX4 and the only problem I have had is moisture in one of the tail lights which was replaced under warranty, I would say not a major thing.

        What most people don’t realise about the AWD system, is it not only makes for fun driving on gravel, mud and sand. It also makes the car extremley fun on the road and the grip in the wet is increadable. I love it.
        I agree the A pillar annoying but you quickly get used to it.

        • Gan Tan

          One of the great things about the SX4 hatch is the rear view visibility with the glass sweeping around the D pillar

      • Robin Graves

        But the GM beancounters ruined the jap engineers control

        • ptwhite2003

          I think you’re flogging a dead horse, RG. I don’t believe I’ve ever heard that there is anything wrong with Suzuki’s engineering and reliability. Quite often bland, yes; but never much less than bullet-proof.

    • G

      Suzuki still makes bullet proof cars, just ask any Suzuki owner.
      Suzuki was never taken over by any other company, what happened is that for some time GM had a reasonable stake in it, but never got control. A few models sold in North America were very bad indeed, because they were actually GM-Daewoos rebadged as Suzukis (eg the Suzuki Reno, that was sold in Australia as Holden Viva).

  • mr.trith

    I dont get it, FIAT have this exact vehicle and they claim they cannot sell it and compete on price…WTF?

    *MAYBE* Ateco is just a little bit to greedy and has ruined FIAT in Australia?

    Time for a different importer Sergio, maybe Chrysler should run the show?

    • o

      i wouldnt be suprised of chrysler takes over importing fiats.

  • Frenchie

    Seeing more of these on the road. Look like a fun car to drive!

  • vid_ghost

    Its a box on wheels! a very ugly mini suv! just my view!

    • Matthew

      Box on wheels? Are you serious?!?!

    • G

      Maybe you should check your eyes…

      • vid_ghost

        Sure for the price its not a bad buy..But compared to the ix35 its a box.

        • hundi stroker

          At least it has not got a buck toothed grill , IX35 butt ugly front, bogans will love it ,and hundi fan/salesboys .

          SX4 pretty competent car .

  • Sam 300TD

    I would love one!

  • Baddass

    Is the only differences between the SX4 and Liana the name?

    • toxic_horse

      The SX4 Sedan is known as a Liana in Queensland.
      it has no relationship at all with the previous Liana.

      • Baddass

        I know that, but is there any differences, mechanically or cosmetically, from either the SX4 or the SX4 sedan?

        • toxic_horse

          As far as I know the FWD SX4 hatch is mechanically identical to the SX4 Sedan.
          The sedan sits lower on the road and has no roof rails.
          Thats the only difference as far as I know.

  • Michelle

    I Owe a Liana and cant complain at all, great little car, my situation has changed and i need a little 4wd, Because i am so happy with my liana i am going to look at a sx4 as a replacement. Very stylish looking car and some great reviews !

    • http://n/a cletis

      do it the new model handles heaps better and in a manual the gear box is a lot smoother plus the better fuel ecconomy , you wont regret it.

  • CrustyTheClown

    Its no better than anything else at the price.

    Vanilla really

    Lets do $15k and we will talk…….

    • ptwhite2003

      Pfffft. Get real.

    • http://n/a cletis

      crusty you are an idiot

  • Save it for the track

    Not that one would know it from this article with the lack of hard figures at the end, but I hardly think that a vehicle with a best kw/tonne figure of about 93kw/t for the manual sedan (2wd) would do 7.4 secs 0-100. and approx 88kw/t for the manual awd. 7.4 sec 0-100, downhill with a very strong tailwind ? perhaps.
    As for any A-pillar issues, well Holden seem to have soldiered on with the abysmal view (lack thereof) from the A-pillar in the overrated VE series Commodores.

    • Benjie

      What the heck are you talking about? There is absolutely no mention of 0-100km/h times in this article.

      • Save it for the track

        Seems I misread ‘Oracles Teacher’ comment. I thought they were referring to the SX4 manual having a 7.4 sec 0-100. Appear they were referring to upcomig Suzuki Kizashi.

  • Aleks

    I hate it for one simple reason, no center arm rest, any car without one is immediately of my shopping list, because it makes longer journeys painful, having to leave your hand in you lap.

    • Darren

      I hate a car without an arm-rest too. However, if you google after market arm rest, you’ll find it. My new Fiesta didn’t have an arm rest, I ordered one from the UK and put it in myself.

    • G

      The SX4 has a seat mounted center armrest, so that’s not a problem.

      • Aleks

        OK that’s cool than, I couldn’t see one from the pictures.

    • http://n/a cletis

      dry your eyes

    • steve_gee

      Both hands on the wheel mate
      Armrests in centre.
      Arm in lap?
      Next you will want the helper wheel like the yank tanks

  • carl

    anyone knows if the CVT has 6-speed or 4-speed setting?

    • Paul Maric

      It’s has six gear presets.

  • pirakavezok

    I own a Grand Vitara for almost a year. Works perfectly and hasn’t missed a beat. It came with a 5 year warranty. One of the best cars I’ve owned.

  • Valet Dabess

    i read a review on this somewhere before and people didn’t like the fuel consumption or the rear drum brakes

    • Techtragic

      Sorry, but I think your comment is a little misleading… ;-)

      The review is a first drive, and very recent, which is consistent w/ my understanding that this is a 2010 revision. Hence, any review you read “somewhere before” is quite likely to be for previous version.

      Suzuki Australia’s own web site indicates (solid) rear disk brakes (ventilated disks on front) for the 2010 model.

      Regarding the fuel consumption, I’ve done a quick comparison with other new 2 litre engined cars, and while its not amazing, its not awful either (Suzuki Australia quotes 7.6l/100km for the manual, cf manual Hyundai i30 2.0 7.2l/100km ADR81/02; Suzuki’s site doesn’t specify the test protocol used, but I assume its ADR81/02 also.) To put this in context, the sx4 is an AWD vehicle & the i30 is literally an award winner.

      Overall, it looks like Suzuki have listened to what consumers had to say about the deficiencies of the previous version, which were from my point of view when I looked at buying one a year or so back, handling issues, lack of ESC, and poor engine power and fuel economy, and at least attempted to address every single one of them!

      I look forward with anticipation to a full review! :-)

  • suziok

    trust me guys, i have my suzuki liana gs for the last seven years, driven to work almost everyday, had it serviced by suzuki only for the first year and since then been with midas (coz of the entertainment discount voucher), i never had any major problems, replaced tyres once, battery twice, some belt for about $60 bucks, brake rotors (i think) that cost me $500 and that’s about it (havent even replaced any of the lights yet). i’m gonna give it a couple more years then i’ll probably trade it in with another suzuki maybe the 2012 sx4

  • L Coleman

    I have to agree with most reviews but the SX4 has one major problem and that is the propellor shaft or tail shaft.

    My SX4 drives like a stealth bomber,quiet and smooth until one month out of warrenty.

    My wife reported a noise in the transmission at slow speeds on a sealed surface. At first I could not hear it and after further investigation I heard a rotational noise in the rear.

    This noise got louder as time went by so we reported it to the dealers head mechanic.

    I told him it appeared to be a rotational noise in the rear diff, He replied that these cars don’t have a rear diff. As a mechanical engineer myself this rocked my confidence in there service.

    As the vehicle is now out of warrenty I removed the tail shaft to find that the uni joints were rusted due to water penitration.

    But theres more, the uni joints are pressed in and you have to buy the whole shaft ($1590.00) Not greasable.

    So I ripped this useless,poorly designed piece of engineering out of the car and into my machine shop where I cut of both ends and fitted the ends of a Suzuki Searia tailshaft which fit straight into the drive and diff.

    I now have a tailshaft that has heavier bearings and greasable. and replaceable.

  • Nilda

    Dear Readers

    My husbands comments above outlines his disgust in the new money making engineering that car manufacturers are engaged in today with throw away units.

    As a woman with very little knowledge of mechanical things I sat down with my husband and he explained the situation with the drive shaft to the rear wheels.

    You dont have to be a rocket scientist to work out that this design is both impractical engineeringly useless and created to generate dealer income.

    I thougt I bought a real beauty in the SX4 but it turned out to be a very expensive lemon. As a person who relies on a reliable motor vehicle to earn a living I cannot afford to spend $1590.00 to repair a $30.00 bearing.

    As a vehicle with drive on all four wheels one would think that the vehicle would be capable of negotiating wet muddy conditions. I believe that these non replaceable and non greasable bearings should not be installed in any all wheel drive cars.

    I believe this problem is not only associated with Susuki but all new motor vehicles.

    Nilda

  • Headache

    Hi,

    I’m looking around for my 1st car and not sure whether Suzuki SX4 is suitable for less driving experience like me. Buying car causes me a big headache. Can anyone help me…?

    Thanks

  • http://www.cheapoldclassiccars.com/ Classic Old Cars

    Suzuki SX4 is very stylish car have a awesome features. so much passionable.sx4 giving good mileage.
    Good exterior design. great powerfull engine, good luxury and safty devices…Suzuki still makes bullet proof cars, just ask any Suzuki owner.

  • http://forum.carid.com/ Carid

    My friend’s got Suzuki SX4 recently. He has been having a Ford Focus vs SX 4 dilemma, both vehicles are very much alike, but he says the interior design and versatility of SX4 won his heart over.

  • Zoran Simeonov

    Am I the only one that was really scared when driving this thing on twisty roads? When turning right you have better chance predicting the weather patterns then seeing what comes next behind the corner. The pillars are so big, that you can’t even see the truck coming your way occupying both lanes… Russian Roulette.

  • Melanie

    gps keeps dying on me displaying a blank screen. Hate the headrest too high

  • lexi

    i have a Sx4 S hatch. i bought it pre family…. worse thing ever. baby seat just fit, but the front passenger has to sit on the dash. no boot space, can fit pram but thats it. the pillar is horrid! mechanically/fuel etc its great.