2010 Volkswagen Golf Wagon range released

By Tim Beissmann  |  February 12th, 2010
      50 Comments

Hot on the heels of Volkswagen’s unveiling of the new Passat earlier this afternoon comes another all-new model line for Australia – the Volkswagen Golf Wagon.

Standing at 4.63m (around 430mm longer than the hatch), rear storage volume is 505-litres up to the load sill at window height, 690-litres above the sill, and 1495-litres with the rear bench seat folded down.

With the rear bench folded, the continuous flat cargo area from the driver’s backrest measures 1.7m (1.07m with the seat up), while additional storage space can be found beneath the cargo floor and in the side panelling.

Stopping your load from sliding around is a standard cargo partition net which functions with the rear bench up or down, four fold-away tie-down eyes and additional bag hooks in the side panelling.

Another feature unique to the Wagon is the optional panoramic sunroof which spans 1.36m down the length and 0.87m across the width of the ceiling. It consists of two halves, with the front section able to be raised or fully opened, and can be closed completely thanks to the electrically-powered sunshade.

Like the current hatch range, the Golf Wagon is available in both Trendline and Comfortline specifications and comes with two petrol and two diesel power plants with the same three transmission options.

The 77TDI uses 4.7 litres/100km with the five-speed manual (5.2 with the seven-speed DSG), which actually outperforms the hatch in manual form (4.9 litres/100km). CO2 emissions are also lower at 124g/km (manual) and 135 (DSG), compared to 150 and 144 respectively.

The 103TDI loses the manual option of the hatch and is available only with the six-speed DSG. It uses 5.7 litres/100km and emits 149g/km CO2.

The 90TSI base petrol option comes as a six-speed manual or seven-speed DSG. Combined economy is 6.7 litres/100km (manual) and 6.2 (DSG) with CO2 up to 156g/km and 144 respectively.

The 118TSI Comfortline also loses its manual option and burns through 6.3 litres/100km and 148g/km CO2 in seven-speed DSG form.

Safety-wise, the wagon misses out on the driver’s knee airbag of the hatch, but still does well with dual front, side and curtains.

Park assist, which automatically reverse parallel parks the car, and a rear view camera are available as options on the Wagon.

The 2010 Volkswagen Golf Wagon range is now available at the following manufacturer’s list prices:

  • 90TSI Trendline – $26,990 ($29,490 DSG)
  • 77TDI Trendline – $29,490 ($31,990 DSG)
  • 118TSI Comfortline – $33,990
  • 103TDI Comfortline – $36,490

 

Stay tuned for the 2010 Volkswagen Golf Wagon First Steer which will be online soon.

Relations

Similar Articles

Comments

50 Responses to “2010 Volkswagen Golf Wagon range released”
  1. -1 Vote -1 Vote +1sammo
    says:

    What a classy package.
    I’m sure we’ll be seeing many of these on the road soon.

  2. Vote -1 Vote +1jimmy james
    says:

    build a GTi version of this and I will put down my deposit instantly!

  3. +14 Vote -1 Vote +1Baddass
    says:

    I hate the rear lights on this thing: they are so angular and don’t fit with the rest of the car.

  4. +6 Vote -1 Vote +1filippo
    says:

    If you look at the door handles you will see that the wagon’s body is actually the previous model Golf with the latest model’s front attached.

    • +2 Vote -1 Vote +1Golfschwein
      says:

      More specifically, Filippo, it’s the Jetta’s doors that it uses. It’s the Jettas that have the subtle swage line 70mm or thereabouts below the window sill, something the Golfs never had if you look closely. The interior door trims are also Mk V.

      • Vote -1 Vote +1Shak
        says:

        You guys are on the money. This is actually all carry over MkV as per VW’s admissions, the only new portion is the face.

  5. +1 Vote -1 Vote +1Clarence
    says:

    The back looks like a very bad Skoda, or just a normal Skoda really ;-)

  6. +3 Vote -1 Vote +1Golfschwein
    says:

    There’s a certain frumpiness, yes.

  7. +2 Vote -1 Vote +1Andrew M
    says:

    Gee you would want to lather up in sunscreen if you were to be sitting under that massive sun roof on a trip down the coast

    • -4 Vote -1 Vote +1Shak
      says:

      Its obviously got a strong enough tint to bloc out sunlight.

      • +1 Vote -1 Vote +1Andrew M
        says:

        If it had a strong enough tint to block out sunlight, what would be the point??

        Perhaps you mean UV light???
        Although quality tints do make a big difference, you will still get burnt.

        Same goes for that laser light roofing. Its meant to give 99.9% uv reduction etc, but its still bloody hot underneath it, and yes, you will still end up like a lobster from sitting under it longh enough.

        IMO those sort of products seem to reel you into thinking you are totally protected, and let your guard down.
        For eg, how many people think less of sunscreen on cloudy days???

        • +2 Vote -1 Vote +1Golfschwein
          says:

          Andrew M, it has an electrically retractable sun blind beneath the glass, according to the article. If it’s anything like the manually operated Peugeot or Skoda systems I’ve seen, it would be two halves from front and rear that slide on a slim runner and meet in the middle.

          • -12 Vote -1 Vote +1Andrew M
            says:

            (click to show comment)

  8. +9 Vote -1 Vote +1Simon
    says:

    Throw in the lusty Brunette and I’ll take two!

  9. -20 Vote -1 Vote +1Hung Low
    says:

    (click to show comment)

  10. -4 Vote -1 Vote +1o
    says:

    4.6m is huge i would love one of these

  11. -13 Vote -1 Vote +1Tony
    says:

    (click to show comment)

    • -2 Vote -1 Vote +1Will
      says:

      ‘FWD gay’. This is a homophobic comment. Should this idiot have supplemented ‘Jewish’, or ‘Muslim’ for example it would not have appeared on this blog.

      • -15 Vote -1 Vote +1scatman
        says:

        (click to show comment)

      • -3 Vote -1 Vote +1Ghey is BAD
        says:

        Just because it’s legal doesn’t make it compulsory.
        “Not that there’s anything RIGHT with that”.
        If it stinks when you pull it out, something has gone terribly wrong.

        • -2 Vote -1 Vote +1QwkEddie
          says:

          Vw really outdid themselves with this smaller version of the Ssangyong.
          The tyres are the crappy Hancook…VW top quality…yeah not in this case.

  12. +4 Vote -1 Vote +1The Oracle's Teacher
    says:

    I’m a fan of the VW range but not that wagon rear. It looks “droopy”. Perhaps it’s better in the flesh?

  13. +5 Vote -1 Vote +1vid_ghost
    says:

    it looks dated already!

    • -13 Vote -1 Vote +1Will
      says:

      (click to show comment)

      • +3 Vote -1 Vote +1The Oracle's Teacher
        says:

        What’s more sad is that you chose a completely unrelated thread to show your ignorance.

      • -2 Vote -1 Vote +1mmmmm
        says:

        the commodore would be dated if it was based on its previous generation car, like the falcon BF3 or the golf wagon based on golf5 with a golf6 nose tacked onto it.
        by basing it on the old car VW are making it dated before it comes out.
        it may explain the high prices with the golf6 being cheaper and faster to manufacture.

  14. +2 Vote -1 Vote +1omgwot
    says:

    all I can say is NQR

  15. Vote -1 Vote +1Dan
    says:

    As a gay male driver, i am aware that VW is a popular brand of choice in the GLBT community but i find it very very hard to believe that 75% of VW drivers are of homosexual orientation…

    Although it goes without saying, the Golf and Polo GTI’s are the modern gay mans version of say, an XR8 Falcon lol

    Also I know alot of straight guys who are huge VW fans and some drive them even, Golfs mostly. Point is, in this day and age its a bit caveman-like to stereotype a certain driver by there choice of badge. I know plenty of gay guys who drive Monaros, HSV’s ect also…

    all this talk of research about VW’s drivers really is BS if u ask me.

  16. -1 Vote -1 Vote +1Robin Graves
    says:

    That rear end looks kooky, like a ’90s rear end welded on. Baby’s got back!

  17. -4 Vote -1 Vote +1CrustyTheClown
    says:

    BACK seat legroom is still very tight like the Golf

    • +3 Vote -1 Vote +1Golfschwein
      says:

      Golfs are very roomy, actually. Have you ever sat in one? I’m 187 cm tall and can adjust the driver’s seat to requirements and then sit in the rear seat with comfort and without my knees touching the seat in front. There’s a couple of centimetres to spare, but that’s all you need.

      • -7 Vote -1 Vote +1CrustyTheClown
        says:

        (click to show comment)

        • +2 Vote -1 Vote +1The Oracle's Teacher
          says:

          Unless you are 2 mtrs tall you have never sat in the rear of a golf and are simply here to troll. We had the Jetta version for a couple of weeks last year and the rear leg room is more than adequate.

      • +7 Vote -1 Vote +1Peter
        says:

        I don’t know what you guys are talking about – I have mentioned before I am 195cm tall and 120Kg and found there to bo plenty of room in the Golf VI when I tested the other week. However my kids are now teenagers and around 180cm each – still room was adequate (better than any alternatives) but I will probably go for another Passat wagon (I just wish they would bring out a 4Motion with 125KW TDI).

        Anybody who says the back is tight is probably like the journo several years back when he tested the Golf IV – he put the driver’s seat RIGHT back and down then complained there was limited room behind it. The fact he couldn’t reach the bloody pedals meant nothing!

  18. +1 Vote -1 Vote +1Save it for the track
    says:

    As with the Passat range, I see this model putting more pressure on Skoda. The Australian market is not large enough to support all of these VW/Skoda variants, they will cannibalise sales from each other, with Skoda the likely loser in the long run. (despite Skoda overseas scoring higher satisfaction ratings) What’s the bet when that happens that VW pricing creeps up a bit more, and the Skoda standards cost even more as VW extras ?

  19. -2 Vote -1 Vote +1pirakavezok
    says:

    Yummy, I want one !!!! My next new car will defintely be a golfwagen.

Speak Your Mind

Login with Facebook:

*
To prove you're a person (not a spam script), type the security word shown in the picture. Click on the picture to hear an audio file of the word.
Click to hear an audio file of the anti-spam word