Car Advice

Jaguar XKR Review & Road Test

JAGUAR XKR

Pros: Brutal acceleration, exhaust note, handling and drop dead looks

Cons: Steering is over assisted at speed

By Anthony Crawford |
Add to shortlist

Price: $120,240 to $184,320

Our Rating:  

This is how the English do muscle cars, five-star luxury with supercar performance and looks to kill.

Model Tested:

  • 2010 Jaguar XKR; 5.0-litre, V8, supercharged petrol; six-speed automatic; two-door coupe – $255,000*

CarAdvice Rating: rating11.gifrating11.gifrating11.gifrating11.gifrating11.gif

Words by Anthony Crawford Photos by Anthony Crawford, Alborz Fallah & George Skentzos

If the superseded XKR 4.2-litre lacked anything, it was torque during mid-range acceleration. That’s all been fixed, with a new sledgehammer-like 5.0-litre all aluminium quad-cam V8, supercharged of course.

Step on the throttle unmercifully, and you can’t help but light up the massive rear tyres, as all of 625 Newton-metres and 375 Kilowatts attempts to find its way down onto the tarmac.

That’s substantially more than its non-supercharged XK sibling, which develops just 283 kilowatts. That’s courtesy of the highly efficient sixth-generation twin vortex supercharger with twin intercoolers.

My first decent and prolonged prod of the throttle, and I’m muttering to myself, “this thing’s got some serious mumbo. Better still, it’s all on tap from 2500 rpm through to 5500 rpm.

It feels every bit the 4.8 second car it is from 0-100km/h, or if you like, slightly quicker that the considerably more expensive Maserati GranTurismo S.

Some would even argue that the XKR is also considerably more beautiful than the Maserati, with its smooth flowing lines, wide rear track and subtle styling hints from the legendary E-Type Jaguar.

For all its good looks, it has an imposing presence on the road; from the ultra wide rear guards and its low-slung stance, along with four extra large exhaust tips, looking more like a GT racer than a luxury Grand Tourer.

So it’s no surprise then that the stunning new JaguarRSR XKR GT prepared for the 2010 American Le Mans Series (ALMS) uses the standard XKR lightweight aluminium monocoque and their own naturally aspirated 5.0 litre AJV8 engine, which puts out 410kW (550 hp) @ 7000 rpm and will hit 290 km/h (180 MPH) down the straights.

The car also weighs in at a super-light 1245 kilograms. That said should we expect a limited edition XKR RSR production model with some extra kilowatts and a roll cage? I’d love to think so.

Back to the stock XKR and there’s absolutely no throttle hesitation whatsoever (it was the same story with the previous XKR 4.2), you punch it, the rubber bites down hard and you’re gone baby gone!

Credit for the quick off-the-grid starts must go the Active Differential Control, a fully automatic system, which varies the amount of torque sent to each wheel, and the reason why there is so much traction from an all out standing start.

And as brilliant as the Bowers & Wilkins audio system is (and it’s nothing short of sensational) it doesn’t come close on the fun scale to the induction roar when you’re up around 4000 rpm.

I thought I’d miss the supercharger whine (there isn’t any), but the mechanical concerto that ensues simply demands that you lower the driver’s window, and maintain that position until you arrive at your destination.

Launched in 2006, the current shape of the XK and XKR has changed little over those last four years, but it’s the interior in this latest iteration, which has had a complete facelift, XF style.

Gone is the English private club look, and in its place an ultra modern business-like blend of leather, knurled aluminium and authentic dark oak veneer housing the unique JaguarDrive Selector.

It’s all beautifully laid-out and uncluttered, due to most systems being controlled by functions within the easy to use touch screen. It’s also got one of the best in-car satellite navigation systems I’ve ever used.

You can’t fault the top-shelf materials either, Jaguar has employed nothing but the best from plush carpets, which also make their way onto the door trim, to the twin-needle stitched leather covering much of the interior surface.

The super-soft Alcantara headliner is another standout feature inside the XKR, as is the hand stitched three-spoke sports steering wheel embossed with the “R” logo, an absolute treat.

But enough on the luxury kit, I’m keen to know how the big cat handles the thirty-kilometre twist-fest through the Royal National Park to Stanwell Tops.

It’s a good thing that Jaguar chose to up the power stakes in the XKR, because my colleagues will be tailing me in a Bentley Continental Supersports, the only one in Australia I might add, so I won’t be holding back.

And like many roads in NSW, the route is not overly well maintained, but that should tell us a good deal about the suspension set-up in the XKR.

As I pull up to the entrance to park, the attendant asks for the usual fee to enter, but is told in a thoroughly polite manner that “we won’t be stopping luv”, its straight through to Stanwell Tops and the Sea Bridge at Coalcliff.

While its been a rather relaxed drive in the XKR to this point in the standard ‘D’ for drive mode, the tempo is about to get a whole lot quicker, so I’ve pulled off the side of the road to make a few adjustments.

One click to the right with the Drive Selector to engage sport mode, and I’m switching on Dynamic Mode via the small chequered flag button, for a faster throttle response and quicker gearshifts.

But I’ll be using the paddle shifters on this run, which I find more useful on twisty roads such as this.

Five minutes into it, and I’m thinking it’s a better road than I remember, and the Jag is seriously quick out of these corners, but already, I’d like less power assistance in the steering. There’s no issue with accuracy or response though, I’d just like more weight for even greater feel and control on those early Sunday morning drives out of town.

For a large car though, I’m gob smacked at how nimble the XKR feels, you can throw it in and out of bends, as if you were driving an MX-5.

There are a few decent length straight sections out of some very tight corners, and the XKR’s acceleration from point-to-point is downright explosive.

The traction control seems to be having a field day in the hairpins, but thankfully, it’s allowing the back end to step out a little, which Alborz confirms from his position behind me in the Bentley.

Nonetheless you can feel the massive 285/30 series Dunlop SP Sport Maxx rubber bite down with huge grip on a fairly average surface.

But its not all about the tyres with the XKR, equally accountable, is the superbly balanced chassis and Jaguar’s latest generation Adaptive Dynamics, which is partly why the XF is such a good four-door steer.

It’s a complex system of monitoring, which in tern, controls the car’s damping rates through the measurement of vertical movement, roll rate and pitch rate to the tune of 100 times a second.

Hitting some of these corners at speed, the Jag turns in perfectly and there is nil body roll. For a big front engine car, that’s enormously satisfying.

And as planted as the XKR is on all sections of this drive route, at no stage is there any sign of jarring through the body, every pot hole and imperfection (and there are hundreds) is absorbed by the suspension for a comfortable ride.

Again, that’s part of the Adaptive Dynamics, which monitors the wheel position five hundred times a second, to effectively manage the damping rate for control of issues like wheel hop on uneven roads.

You would expect the brakes on the XKR to be good, but not this good. Step on the anchors from seemingly any speed, and you best be prepared for a serious G-force assault on your torso region. There’s no brake fade either, none.

If there’s a smoother, quicker and more robust six-speed gearbox than the ZF unit deployed in this car, then I’ll ride a Honda Postie bike to Timbuktu.

For a mid-week drive just one hour from Sydney, the Royal National Park is hard to beat, and over all too soon.

We probably should turned around and driven it again but we were keen to get a few photos on the well publisised Sea Bridge at Coalcliff before heading back to Sydney up the highway.

While the front seats are supple and more than supportive, I would have expected far more side bolster in an “R” spec car, but not once through the twisty bits, did I cry out for more side support, given that you sink further into the seat than most designs.

As traditional Grand Tourers go, the XKR is a proper 2+2, but if you think for one moment that your mother can get into the rear seat, then you’re horribly mistaken. If you have kids under 7-years old, then they could probably handle short trips to the shops.

But its a different story if you play golf or are into water sports. Open the rear hatch and there’s a tonne of space back there and enough room for several large soft bags and other goods.

If fuel consumption is an issue for you, despite considering the purchase of a performance thoroughbred such as the XKR, don’t stress. After a week of relatively hard charging, my worst reading was 17.2 litres per 100 kilometres, and that’s under the published figure of 18.9 litres/100km for urban usage.

If most of your driving will be to the office each day, then the combined figure of 12.3 litres/100kms would seem entirely reasonable, as would the CO2 emissions of 292 (g/km).

The 2010 Jaguar XKR is intended not as a sports car, but rather as five-star Grand Tourer and with that in mind, it ticks all the boxes and then some.

Ratings:

CarAdvice Overall Rating: rating11.gifrating11.gifrating11.gifrating11.gifrating11.gif
How does it Drive: rating11.gifrating11.gifrating11.gifrating11.gifrating_half.GIF
How does it Look: rating11.gifrating11.gifrating11.gifrating11.gifrating11.gif
How does it Go: rating11.gifrating11.gifrating11.gifrating11.gifrating11.gif


 

Reader reviews of the JAGUAR XKR

<

Write a review for the JAGUAR XKR

Do you own this car? Share your opinion and add your own review below.

Add a New Review
>
  • Peter

    I loved the superseded model and this new one looks even better (initial reservations about the front end treatment appear unfounded). Alas, the back seat is the killer for me for any XK, even ignoring budget. They are certainly a gorgeous car. I’d have one over the aston, but mainly coz Bond gives me the irrits something shocking and I think the XK is not as recognisable. Nice review – I was looking forward to it, and it didnt disappoint. I was interested that you like the sat nav. I like it too, but in the XF forums the yanks whinge about it no end and even the poms seem a little embarrassed by it. And you dont have to stop the car to put it into dynamic mode, do you? The paddles are great, but the box in “sport” will hold the gears far longer (sometimes up to nearly redline) and change down far earlier, maybe 4,000rpm depending on how you are driving, so in the end you only use the paddles when you are excited. Or to change down into first, because the car never does that by itself, even when starting from lights.

  • Fred

    I do not like that front end. :(

  • Andrew

    Great car this. The 5.0L Di engine seems to be exactly what the car needed, no major changes just bigger and with far more oomph. Not being a fan of auto gearboxes myself but I am sure this one would be better than any other. My main reason for this comment however is to mention very well done on your photos Mr. Crawford and any other CarAdvice review for that matter. The photos proved to me alone just how well blended and put together the new Jags seem to be. The photos on any review are excellent quality close-up as well.

  • Devil666

    The whole car looks out of proportion. It is too long, yet there is no room in the back seats. The front has issues with the headlights which are too big, and their teardrop shape gives the car a look of chromosomal issues, as do the tail lights. The centre intake is too small and the lower intake is too big and ultimately the car is my least favourite of all the current Jags. Engine and gearbox aside, I’d take a GranTurismo S anyday.

    Ultimately though, the engine is a little disappointing considering the monumental torque and similar power Mercedes was able to coax from a simple, old school design (3 valves, SOHC, no VVT) 5.5 V8 with a supercharger. That engine has by far one of the most bowel loosening notes of all time. This car should have easily been able to squeeze 700+ nm out with DI and more efficient supercharging. Alas, I’ll go for the heavily depreciated SL55 and save myself $100k, and I’ll enjoy my 4.5 to 100 km/h with a discontinued engine.

    • Joffa

      @@@^^^^

      “I’d take a GranTurismo S”

      Yeap, agree, Maserati EVERY time, AND not related to the Mondeo/X-Type

      • Shak

        but the Maser is related to a Fiat 500, so shouldnt that tell you something?

    • http://www.caradvice.com.au Anthony Crawford

      Devil,

      The XKR is actually has similar proportions to the E-Type, so is that out of proportion too?

      It may just be the lead photo I have used, it’s not the best angle, let me change that for you.

      Personally, I wouldn’t want any more power or speed in the XKR, as there is plenty on tap and the car gets the power down very effectively.

      It’s not always about raw power and torque, ride quality in a GT is equally as important.

      As I mentioned in the review, Jaguar can get 550bhp from a naturally aspirated version of this same engine, but chose not to, as there’s no point in driving around suburbia in an endurance racer!

      Cheers

  • Devil666

    P.S. Any iPhone sync issues, like the rest of the Jag/LR group?

    • http://www.caradvice.com.au Anthony Crawford

      Devil, I plugged in my iPhone to check out the Bowers & Wilkins Audio and next minute my phone answers a call through the speakers, so I was wrapped at how effective it is!

      • Peter

        It is a little difficult to pair the iPhone to the Jag, but after a half a dozen tries I got it (dunno whether it was me or the car at fault) and it has worked perfectly ever since. The standard ipod connector wont charge the iPhone though, or at least that was the case with the 08 model. I’m rapt as well with it.

  • David Jones

    how does it compare to the bentley at approx 1/2 the price?

  • http://www.caradvice.com.au Anthony Crawford

    How they get a 2250kg Bentley to handle like an EVO is beyond my comprehension. An equally brilliant steer, but clearly, if you’re shopping for a Supersports, you are in another financial league.

  • WTF

    Great looking car,although the front looks abit bland. The interior looks awesome. This could be the next Bond car in James Bond goes to Bollywood.

  • Roman

    Pro’s – Great looking car.
    Con’s – Way out of my price league.

  • matt_b

    The rebirth of jaguar has been one of the greatest treats in recent motoring history.

  • Acfsambo

    The RNP is a great drive, though can be dangerous if you are not ready or concentrating as my friend crashed there last Friday night. He had too much speed into a wet corner and tries to slow down but locked up, no injuries though.

    But in relation to the XKR, I WANT.

  • Sund00bie

    Go Tata :D

  • The Realist

    Sorry, there are better cars at ~$255K.

  • Reality Check

    An XFR Jaguar at about $50,000 less looks far better, more modern and has greater operational flexability, (potentially seating up to five people).

    How do Jaguar justify $255,000 for an old shape car ?
    Is 0-100 k.p.h. in 4.8 seconds really brutal as its described ?

    FPV F6′s have been timed at less than 5.0 seconds, come to think of it a G6E Turbo was recently timed at 4.97 seconds but nobody was describing its acceleration as brutal, food for thought ?

    Of course nobody would try and argue these two have the same style and panache, but then again the Jag is about five times the money, its an old shape car and if you’re paying that sort of coin arn’t you entitles to genuine supercar performance, i.e circa 4.0 seconds ?

    Looks like a cheap make-over “cash-in” effort by Tata to me.

  • brent

    I had a bit of a go in one of these today and – WOW!!

    As Anthony indicated the photos don’t do this justice. I’m a fan of sporty GTs and before now the only 2 cars that “did it” for me were the DB9/DBS and the Mserati Granturismo S.

    This Jag beats both of them on most counts for a fraction of the price (although there’s no such thing as a bargain in this country) It really is much more beautiful in person.

    In terms of the 0-100 speed ……no it’s not super car territory (although the equal of the DB9 or Granturismo). Were it smokes the competition is in mid range torque and the time from 60-100kmh – it’s not too far away from supercar standard.

    I really couldn’t fault it:

    - the looks are a match for the competition
    - the interior is of a higher standard and less fiddly with less Fiat/Ford parts bin type stuff
    - the reliability is better from all reports
    - the dealer network is more extensive
    - the dealer service is better (from my brief experience)

    Now to get me one…..

  • http://www.ebettafishcare.com betta fish care

    The exterior looks like a blatant rip off of the MKIV supra to me.