Car Advice

Mazda CX-7 Review & Road Test

MAZDA CX-7

Pros: Styling, diesel engine, space, practicality, quality, all-wheel-drive system

Cons: No automatic option, notchy manual, premium price over petrol models

By Karl Peskett |
Add to shortlist

Price: $21,600 to $35,520

Our Rating:  

Updated, greener, happier and still a winner

Model Tested:

  • 2010 Mazda CX-7 Diesel Sports; 2.2-litre, four cylinder, turbo-diesel; six speed manual; five-door SUV – $43,640*

CarAdvice Rating: rating11.gifrating11.gifrating11.gifrating11.gif

If ever there was a major criticism of Mazda’s extremely popular soft-roader, the CX-7, it was how much fuel it used. Being a turbo-charged 2.3 litre petrol, it had the tendency to gulp down the 95RON. The solution? Whacking in Mazda’s brilliant MZR-CD 2.2-litre turbo-diesel. With an ADR tested fuel consumption of 7.6 litres/100km, it looks to quell any concerns a prospective buyer may have had. We grabbed one for a week to see if it made the CX-7 any better.

The CX-7′s appeal lies largely in its styling. Even with the new “happy Mazda” corporate face, it’s arguably one of the best looking soft-roaders out there. Sure, the basic styling may be a few years old now, but it’s aged well, and doesn’t yet look dated. It’s evidenced by the fact that there were more CX-7s sold last year than the year previous. Angular lines, sharply creased wheel arches and a kinked glasshouse certainly lend visual appeal.

When painted in Stormy Blue, as was the test car, the silver accents which frame the windows and front intake contrast beautifully. The front wheel arches harmonise with the Mazda2, Mazda3 and RX-8. The 2010 model receives new fog lamp surrounds, as well as what Mazda calls its “five point design” – smiley mouth as we know it. The rear also receives a newly designed, larger roof spoiler.

There are also changes to the interior. There’s a newly designed steering wheel, similar to the new Mazda3′s unit. The instruments now have a blue ring around them as well as white needles. The centre stack now has metallic edges (or piano black, dependent on spec), the door trims have been redesigned for more comfort, the dash-top display is reshaped and larger, and on the Diesel Sports, incorporates Satellite Navigation with a reversing camera.

The leather seats are beautifully padded, with good grip and size. There’s plenty of leg room in the back, with generous width, too. The centre rear seat’s backrest is very hard, though it does double as a flip-down cup holder. The rear seat backs are also spring loaded, which means that they’re a sinch to lay flat. The other thing that contributes is the release handles found in the boot. If you want to load something large, there’s no need to open several doors, or climb through the car. Just open the boot, pull on the handle and the rear seats instantly transform to a huge load area.

Child seats are fitted very easily, except for the centre seat which needs the child-seat strap to be fed through the false floor before it can be attached to the hook; a pain if you’re changing your baby seat over quite often. However the boot’s high load height and wide opening make putting a pram in a breeze. The Bose stereo also gives excellent clarity and bass. Really, the CX-7′s interior is not just functional, but also elegant. You can see why it’s the choice of many families.

But if the family budget is constrained due to economic uncertainty, then the diesel version should be at the top of your shopping list. The 2.2-litre engine is not just economical (we almost matched the ADR figure, with 8.2-litres/100km on test), but it’s so quiet and smooth, you’d be forgiven for thinking it wasn’t an oil-burner.

There’s a hint of lag, but the engine is so tractable and torquey you’ll overlook it. Peak torque of 400Nm is made at 2,000rpm, but it will happily pull from 1,500rpm, getting much more urgent by 1,800rpm, with the real push coming from 2,000rpm. It does get a bit breathless above 4,000rpm (power of 127kW peaks at 3,500rpm), so you’ll be rowing the gearbox to keep your momentum up, but this reveals a chink in the armour of the CX-7 Diesel Sport.

The gearbox is not the easiest unit in the world to throw between changes. It’s a bit notchy, and second to third can be missed if you’re trying to change quickly. It may be a solid feeling unit, with a sports-like focus, but given who this car is aimed at, something a bit smoother would be nice. Even better would be a six-speed automatic, sadly, there won’t be one; manual is your only option.

Thankfully the clutch is light and progressive, the brakes are brilliant, handling is very sharp and steering feel is excellent. Dynamically, the CX-7 sets the bar for other compact SUVs. Even the ride on its 18-inch wheels is comfortable and absorbent, despite being on the firm end of the scale.

Its traction in amazing too. So many other SUVs rely on sensors to determine if the front wheels have lost grip, responding by sending some drive rearward. The effect is a front wheel scrabble for a split second, with forward momentum following. However the CX-7s all-wheel-drive system is nothing short of perfect. It doesn’t even for a millisecond chirp the front wheels before the rears kick in to help out. It just grips from the get go, and on loose surfaces, that is very reassuring.

Combine that with a responsive stability control system and the CX-7′s ability is even broader than it makes out. We took it for a brief stint on sand, grass and gravel – none of it proved a challenge.

It’s not hard to see why the CX-7′s appeal is universal. Its virtues stack up well – space, quality, practicality, styling – and that’s before you get to the motor. Adding this excellent diesel to the line-up has been a smart move by Mazda. It’s frugal, torquey and puts out less CO2 than some of its German and Japanese rivals.



The price differential between the diesel and turbocharged petrol models might not be so appealing, though. With some diesels only adding a couple of thousand dollars to a car’s sticker price, Mazda’s ask of $4,650 over its AWD petrol model is perhaps a little high. But if you can live that and with a manual gearbox, then this is a serious contender in the compact SUV market.

Ratings:

CarAdvice Overall Rating: rating11.gifrating11.gifrating11.gifrating11.gif
How does it Drive: rating11.gifrating11.gifrating11.gifrating11.gif
How does it Look: rating11.gifrating11.gifrating11.gifrating11.gifrating_half.GIF
How does it Go: rating11.gifrating11.gifrating11.gifrating_half.GIF



 

Reader reviews of the MAZDA CX-7

<

By: Peter Randall

Rating:  

The Mazda CX-7 Luxury Sports is very well appointed and sensational to drive. My only issue with the car is the... Read more

Write a review for the MAZDA CX-7

Do you own this car? Share your opinion and add your own review below.

Add a New Review

By: Obie D

Rating:  

Ive just bought the New CX7 Luxury Sports edition. Driving this car makes me feel as though I'm in a high class... Read more

>

The competition

  • Mad Max

    Nice car, nice engine. But it will continue to be nothing more than a slow selling novelty here until Mazda extract their digit and build it with an auto. Ford do it with the diesel Mondeo so why can’t Mazda offer this (even if its FWD only) option in the CX-7 and the 6? If they were able to offer an auto, sales would increase very quickly.

  • Reckless1

    $4650 extra for the diesel – that’s insane

    • fishman

      Or just plain greedy.

      I guess they figure that the petrols consumption is so bad that they can jack the price of the economical diesel even further…

      • pb

        pretty much, fishman. If there was too little price difference between the diesel and petrol they figure that no-one will want the petrol. Same reasoning with Toyota when they charge an extra $10K for the diesel in their 200-series LC.

      • The Real Car Fanatic

        Okay firstly the article failed to explain this $4500 is over and above the classic sports petrol model which doesn’t have, Sat Nav, Leather interior, bluetooth connection or the BOSE Premium sound system.

        Secondly, head down to a mazda Dealer and ask how much to have the classic upgraded to those specs, they will recommend you don’t get the leather as an after market product as it may effect the side airbags, but the Sat Nav and BOSE sound system will significantly reduce the $4500 difference. I went in to test drive one last week and brought that little point up.

        Doesn’t sound so expensive now, does it?

    • runnaln

      Would love to hear Mazda, justification for the price diffarential, as it is being compared with a Petrol Turbo.

      • runnaln

        I asked this model is more in line with Luxury sports, which is slightly more expensive, but you get Auto, Sunroof, Chrome handles and 19″ wheels, so diff equates to around $2500, but Petol is a turbo so it is a little steep.

  • Classic

    We’re seriously considering this car for our next one – but am puzzled to see why it doesn’t come offered with a sunroof, even as an option if I understand correctly? It’s called a Diesel Sports for crying out loud! We love the sunroof in our current Mazda 6, so this would be the cherry on top if it was available.

    • Whitbomb07

      Wait for the Hyundai ix35 to come out, I’m thinking (and hoping) that it will give the CX-7 a spanking!

      Regards

      Whitbomb07

  • Toyota Guru

    CA, you forgot to mention that this car needs piss, well actually, synthetic urine or Ad-Blue, to run on as a part of the SCR system. It is apparently injected into the exhaust to help cut emissions. If it runs low, the vehicle’s power and torque is reduced. If you run out, it won’t go, simple. Every 20K service it gets topped-up or replaced.

  • Damian

    Still very cheap considering the amount of car one gets. The CX7 makes the Tiguan look positively ugly and dated.

    • Classic

      I agree, it really is a good buy when compared to similar vehicles. I was considering, wait for it, the Kia Sorrento Platinum until I realised it was over $50K driveaway. Ok, it’s a 7 seater which is great, and the interior seemed to be of a really good quality when I inspected it, much better than I’d expected from Kia. But $50k+ d/away??? No thanks. I’d much rather this from Mazda, the interior of this is really top drawer, and the engine, driving dynamics etc seem to clinch the deal. I don’t care that it’s a manual, just give me a sunroof as an option please Mazda.

    • t39

      Damian: I agree CX7 looks much better, but Tiguan has better handling (specifically CX7 feels much more top-heavy), refinement (tyre noise), interior (soft plastics in Tig), feel of solidity. So, CX-7 is the show and Tiguan is the go.

      • Damian

        T39: We’ll agree to disagree :) I don’t doubt that the Tiguan has a better interior, since the Volkswagen Group is renowned for its quality interiors. But at the end of the day, will you be able to live with a car that looks like it fell off the ugly tree and hit every branch on the way to the bottom?

        The CX-7 also has the Tiguan beat when it comes to value for money. The CX-7 comes with 18 inch wheels (optional on the Tiguan, and may also explain the extra tyre noise on the CX-7), satellite navigation and reverse camera (optional on the Tiguan), electrically adjustable heated leather seats (optional on the Tiguan), and Bose Audio (premium audio on the Tiguan costs extra). If you were to option up the Tiguan to CX-7 Diesel Sports standard, you’d be looking at more than $55k.

        Classic: I am glad you weren’t mad enough to buy a Kia for $50K. You’d have to pay me $50k and allow me to wear a balaclava, to drive a Kia.

        • Jo

          The gearbox and engine in the Kia Sorento blow the Mazda away. Agree that 50k is quite a bit but you guys need to get your heads around the fact that the old Kia is dead and buried. The new Sorento is a classy act.

          • Whitbomb07

            The Sorrento is more an equivalent to the CX-9 not this, as said above wait for the ix35 and watch what happens to the price of this, I think either Mazda will drop the price or lose quite a few customers to Hyundai.

            Regards

            Whitbomb07

          • Fog Badger

            Have tried Cx-7 Luxury Sports, Tiguan, Outback and Santa Fe. Best was Santa Fe. Fantastic new diesel engine; mixes with Cx-7 and Territory et al.

            Cx-7 quality over-stated here, I think. Tiguan too poky and probably not that reliable. Outback cloth seats awful, and radio poor. Crap aircon too.

            Santa fe way to go, but agree that ix35 worth a look when it arrives.

      • Randell

        Have a look at the past review of the tiguan. Damn thing got buried on the beach pretty damn quick. As a SUV damn useless.

        If you are not going to use it off road, then it is just a car with a high ride. That goes for all of these SUV type vehicles.

        Would love to see a review of this on the beach (as per the Tiguan). I have a Mazda Tribute which I use regularly on the beach, so if I was thinking of trading up I would love to see the articles demonstrating off road capability.

        • Justin

          I took mine up the beach for the first time this weekend… a few pretty deep cuttings, uphill with dry, fine sand..
          The CX-7 couldnt care less… just cruised over it all really well… tires were down to 20, but it seemed to have no problems at all!

  • Baddass

    I agree Karl, the looks haven’t dated at all. The smiley front end improves the look, unlike many facelifts for cars. I think I’d probably take the base petrol, as it seems like good value with decent performance. I’d like to see a test on the Classic model please CA, to see if the engine can cope with the weight of the car and what the real world fuel consumption is.

  • Phil

    Nice fuel efficiency, especially compared to the petrol one .. I wonder when Mazda would have diesel for the cx-9.

  • Andrew

    how about the 5 seater ix35 then? I know it is not out yet, but should be soon and this should compete with the CX7.

  • Tony

    i cannot understand the lack of automatic

    if the bloody koreans can manage a six speed auto with their diesel SUVs what is Mazda’s excuse?

    can’t they borrow something from Ford?

    • Baji

      I reckon Mazda are working on one. But they just don’t want to play all their cards at once since they’re only a small company. For example, the CX9. The engine that they used was designed to be able to implement forcded induction and direct injection. But mazda never did any of that. It was originally released as a 3.5L v6, then it was bored out to 3.7L. Pretty soon i reckon they’ll go the same way as ford with the ecoboost v6 in the Flex.

      Mazda also said that a diesel in the CX series was unlikey, but the CX7 has a diesel now.

      My guess is that mazda are working on a twin-clutch auto and if the mazda diesels were to get an auto in future, it would be the twin clutch gearbox paired with the new Sky-D diesel engine.

      • Damian

        Very insightful post, Baji. The CX-9 is in desperate need of a diesel engine. I anticipate that Mazda would sell twice the amount of CX-9s if they came out with a diesel.

  • Gilly

    Try the new Murano if you are in the market for the CX7!

    • Hung Low

      I agree, having driven the CX7 and Murano before, for $46k the Murano ST is a much much better car. It is larger, more comfortable, better interior, more power, better built and the ride is much better than the CX7, the drive train is light years ahead for refinement and response as well. The only thing the CX7 does better slightly is handling.
      An easy choice if it was my money and prospective CX7 buyers in that price range would be stupid if they did not cross shop between the two!

      • GULAG

        .///////????

        WTF, Murano $46k, CX7 $34k

        Matbe you mean CX9>?

        • Hung low

          No, a CX7 with the same equipment levels as the Murano ST is close to $46k, a valid comparison!

          • Gan Tan

            Yes, but can you live with *that* grille?

  • dex

    get a jeep cherokee limited diesel, got all the luxury specs for less than 45k driveaway

    • Devil’s Advocate

      …not to mention with the Jeep you get ‘superior’ American build quality/reliability and if you are really lucky, a free BBQ. Just a shame that the free BBQ is only a one time use…
      ;-)

      • Hung Low

        I would love to see the Mazda compare with the Jeep off-road! In those conditions what would be more reliable and where would real build quality like chassis strength come into play!
        We know the Mazda is better on road but if its designed for a bit of dirt work then a comparison to the Jeep in its better suited environment is fair!

      • jeepok

        i had my jeep cherokee limited 3.7 (top of the range petrol) since november 2008, for $49k driveaway with freedom pack(nudge/sidesteps/tow/roofrack/weathershields), sunroof, rev camera/sensors, rear dvd for kids and havent had any problems with it, got all the features of a luxury car, surprisingly quiet inside, a bit thirsty for the first few months but now settling to 11.5 to 12′s l/100 kms, i’m stil happy with though i might go for a smaller soft-roader next time like ix35 or kuga

    • The Real Car Fanatic

      One in every village then?

  • Callous Aussie

    These are well styled vehicle with a decent sized and specced interior. A six speed auto bolted to the diesel will see it sell in much bigger numbers. Many women won’t consider the manual and as a vehicle that would appeal most to young families as a safe transport to get the kids to school I am baffled by there being no auto.

    • Cinderella

      Have to agree with you there Callous Aussie in that an auto box should be available but don’t tar ALL women as auto drivers, some of us out there want manual cars to drive everyday. :)

      • Callous Aussie

        no I wasn’t trying to tar all women, but that combo would certainly help it sell to the ladies. Many women simply will not drive a manual, so that’s a lot of potential buyers going begging.

    • SteveH

      I know I must be in the minority by actually being happy that this is a manual. Trying to find a manual in many cars is near on impossible nowadays and even if you can find one, its usually a special order and takes months to arrive.

  • Classic

    I also just read over at Drive that these come with a space saver spare wheel? Are they serious? A soft-roader that weighs 2 tonne with a space saver? That is very disappointing.

    • Classic

      I also see it is written on here too, sorry. Still does my head in, spacesaver, sheesh.

    • Cinderella

      What do you want fuel saving or a full size tyre which 95% of drivers would never use in their car’s lifetime!
      A space saver will still enable you to drive to a service repair facility, it not like anyone would take this vehicle off road where they are riping up tyres chasing Land Rovers or Toyotas now is it!

      Hey where is the front bench seat? My old boyfriend’s EH had one so why don’t cars have them any more?

      • Classic

        Good luck getting off Fraser Island with a spacesaver, Cinderella. And don’t tell me these are never taken there, I was up there last week and saw plenty of Subaru Foresters and 1 of these too.

        • The Real Car Fanatic

          You saw one? That must mean all CX-7 owners go there?

    • Devil’s Advocate

      It is not just the CX7 that has a space saver Classic. It would nearly be easier to count all the “SUVs/softroaders” with a normal spare than a space saver.

    • scottwheels

      You saw a CX-7 on Fraser? Thats a bold move. I have the MY07 Luxury, and I’ve taken on a few tracks in Kakadu and never had any problems apart from clearance, but sand tracks must play havoc with the traction control. and even if you turn it of it comes back on automatically over 30km/h.

      The OEM tyre are a disgrace, after 30,000km they are down to the belts. I have done 100,000km and on my third set, the Pirellis are great. I haven’t had to use the space saver myself yet either thankfully, simply the logistics of getting it out of the back of the car if it’s full of gear on a muddy track is fightening. It’s not a space saver like Hondas, it’s a 16″ steel rim with a taller ratio and narrower gauge rubber on it, so it’s not speed limited in any way.

  • Realcars

    Drove a cx9 recently. Reckon Captain Kirk would feel at home!!!

    What a barge. What is the point of this vehicle?

  • Why?

    It amazes me that so many larger family orientated SUV’s as well as wagons do not have rear passenger air ventilation. Even more ridiculous are 7 seat vehicle’s without this in the centre row. Subaru Tribeca comes to mind. Even small hatch’s like VW Golf has this as standard. Volvo 7 seat SUV even has air ventilation for third row. Manufacturers need to show some common sense in car design. Volvo’s 7 seat SUV and VW Golf are examples of well thought out cars inside and out.

    • maximark

      Coundnt agree more

      • Hung Low

        Since when does a Golf have anything to do with a 7 seat SUV?
        The Local Cars have had rear ventilation for decades by the way so no innovation for the Golf there either!

        • Why?

          A CX7 has nothing to do with a 7 seat SUV either! I was merely pointing to the fact that if a small car like a Golf can have rear ventilation (I never stated innovation) then why can’t a big family orientated SUV like CX 7 have it as well?
          The locals may have had rear ventilation for decades but the “innovations” for the Golf are for example DSG, FSI, XDS, ACC. But that’s for another discussion topic. Like yours should have been!

  • Al Juraj

    It’s always Mazda’s blunder not to offer automatics with their diesels. Unless it’s a BMW, you wouldn’t really buy a diesel for performance and fun. People prefer to have convenience in conjunction with economy. They have the upper hand as the other Japs, with the exception of the Mitsubishi Challenger, are stuck with petrol crossovers only, so put the right gearbox and they will sell much better.

  • JarJar

    I was looking at the CX-7 to replace my Mazda 6 wagon later this year and I spoke to a Mazda mechanic who regularly works on the CX range about his thoughts. Strangely enough, he told me to steer clear of the CX-7 because it handled like crap compared to the CX-9 and the higher cost of maintaining a diesel is not worth the fuel savings (especially if I’m only averaging about 15,000 KMs per annum).

    Now I’m somewhat put off by his viewpoint even though I plan on giving it a test drive anyway. Has anyone driven the CX-7 and CX-9 back to back who can attest to this?

    • Speedbird

      My sister currently owns a CX-9, and for its size, it is a very well sorted car that does handle very well. The sound of the 3.7 is rather nice too.

      As for the Cx-7, one of my mates has one and was rather dissapointed by the car. Turbo lag in a WRX/EVO is ok (I don’t mind it) however in a family SUV it shouldn’t really be happening.

      The interiors are on par with each other, however the CX-9 is more family friendly. I also found that the CX-9 was easier on the fuel than the 7.

      IMHO I would take the CX-9

  • Save it for the track

    Hyundai Santa Fe and Kia Sorento both have air con vents in the second AND third rows, and have automatics, and full size spare wheels, and there are several videos online showing Santa Fe and old model Sorento(but expect new Sorento to be on par with Santa Fe) in river crossings, and on 4wd tracks. I would be interested in the CX7 diesel, but as our current search is for my wife an Auto is a must, Tiguans slightly too small and overpriced, Subaru Forester & Mitsubishi Outlander, no diesels. From what I can see so far the Korean pair, even slightly older models are the go. Of course when the Hyundai ix35 and new Kia sportage come out may throw some more ‘cat amongst the pigeons’. 135kW & 392Nm from a 2.0L diesel with six speed auto. Should be interesting. Mazda, pull your fingers out, no auto or DSG equivalent is appalling.

    • Hyundai Lover

      thats right!

      Hyundai’s are currently producing very nice cars leading every class and all the Jap lovers should wake up and smell the roses.

  • http://ozmpsclub OzMPSClub

    Nice unit Mazda and manual would be my first preference as Australians are getting lazy and opting for autos….its all about choice thou.

  • phil

    At the web site below, it talks about a cx7 update next november. Is that 2009 or 2010?? Given that the article was posted december 2009, I am not sure. If it is correct, maybe an auto then??
    http://www.carshowroom.com.au/newcars/news/744/Mazda_CX_7_Crossover_Wagon_Due_In_November#

  • Neo Utopia

    Nice flowing design work from Iwao Koizumi!

  • Booger

    Just test drived a CX-7 Diesel Sports $43,640 and then directly afterwards a Hyundai ix35 Turbo diesel Highlander $37,990. The Highlander was definitely more responsive and punchy with power. However, it did not feel as solid on the road. The Highlander you could feel a slight vibration from the engine when sitting at the lights, the CX-7 was a lot quieter and smooth. The Highlander more bang for your buck, but no bluetooth!!! The CX-7 you would image would have a much better resale value.
    Absolutely confused on what to get. Anyone else driven both?

  • Mal

    Just bought Diesel CX7
    To clear up a few issue.
    Space saver wheel is a normal pneumatic wheel it just a 17″ (which is rate at 100km/h) due to ADR Reg it recomended that you only travel as 80km/h due to diamter difference, but put larger profile tyre on may sole this

    Diesel comes with electric seat, bose stereo, full leather interior, multi fucntion trip cometer, GPS Nav, Blue tooth connection, 6 air bags, the fuel saving is aorund $750 pa at 10k km pa. Price I was able to get $4300 of RRP plus a tow bar and car mats thrown. Resale value of the CX7 in first 3 years very good, especial if can negotiate a good price on the orginally purchase.

  • Baji

    It depends on how you define “MASSIVE”. $160 for a refill every 20,000km doesn’t seem like much to me. But i agree with you that the article should have stated some of the servicing requirements of this diesel engine.

  • Devil’s Advocate

    Even better at $140 every 20k! ;-)